U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Executive Order Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds.
Advertisements

Interim Guidance on the Application of Travel and Land Use Forecasting in NEPA Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee October 14, 2010.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
National Environmental Policy Act of Establishes protection of the environment as a national priority Mandates that environmental impacts be considered.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Migratory Bird Treaty Act Bald & Golden Eagle Protection Act EO Bird Conservation on Private Lands.
NORTHWEST REGION STANLEY SPEAKS, REGIONAL DIRECTOR SHERI WILLIAMS, LUMMI TRIBE CYNDI FERGUSON, SENSE INC.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
MISSION: Working with others to conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people.
FY 2011 Northwest Tribal Budget Priorities Tribal Budget Advisory Council NORTHWEST REGION STANLEY SPEAKS, REGIONAL DIRECTOR RICHARD GAY, CONFEDERATED.
Major Federal & State Approvals Environmental Business Council of New England Land-Based Wind Energy May 29, 2008 Ruth H. Silman, Esq.
1 Planning and Environment Linkages: Case Studies Michael Culp and John Humeston FHWA November 2, 2006.
2009 CDBG/CHIP Recipients’ Workshop Welcome to the COMPLIANCE SESSION ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS Afternoon session will cover new CHIP FEDERAL LABOR STANDARDS.
Presented to: Association of California Airports By: Peter F. Ciesla, Environmental Protection Specialist Date: September 21, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Legal Issues Affecting Wind Energy Federal Nexus: Public Lands. On public land, Federal funding, Federal permit, Federal power grid. On public land, Federal.
Presented to: Hershey Aviation Conference By: Ed Gabsewics, Charlie Campbell & Suki Gill Date: March 3, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration Environmental.
ENVE 4505 Surface Water Quality Engineering Dr. Martin T. Auer.
Wetlands Mitigation Policy Sudbury Wetlands Administration Bylaw April 27, 2015.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Assessing Project Related Impacts to Migratory Birds.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.
HABITAT CONSERVATION PLANNING Charles J. Randel, 1 III, Howard O. Clark, Jr., 2 Darren P. Newman, 2 and Thomas P. Dixon 3 1 Randel Wildlife Consulting,
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
West Texas Legislative Summit ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Environmental Regulations Affecting Transportation Carlos Swonke Director, Environmental Affairs Division.
Federal Regulation of Land Use 9/27/11. What is NEPA? NEPA = National Environmental Protection Policy Act – Mandates an environmental assessment of all.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
1 Overview of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)  Objective: Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated Rulemaking Clarify the roles of NEPA and Negotiated.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
1 Environmental Planning and Historic Preservation (EHP) Compliance (p ) EHP Compliance.
CHAPTER 1 FOUNDATION. 1.1 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) “An act to establish a national policy for the environment, to provide for the establishment.
Implementing Conservation Measures to Reduce Impacts to Migratory Birds.
The Intersection of the National Environmental Policy Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act November 4, 2010 Roger Williams.
At the last Steering Team meeting… Goals (Rule-level) EPS (Measurable and Reportable) Natural Resources Human/Cultural Environment Administrative Avoid,
Date Event Global Design Effort 1 CF&S Environmental Timelines & Radiation Impacts Jerry Aarons, PG/CHG (SLAC) Rod Walton, PhD (FNAL)
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Wildlife Agencies Government Organizations that Work for Wildlife.
Fish and Wildlife : Regulatory Framework and Challenges Cherise M. Oram STOEL RIVES LLP Hydrovision 2008 Ocean/Tidal/Stream Power Track 7D “Environmental.
Recreational Trails Program Federal Requirements.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.
Slide 1April 8, 2015, Financial Assistance Council Meeting.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
CORPS OF ENGINEERS REGULATORY PROGRAM PUBLIC INTEREST REVIEW (33 CFR Part 320) August 12, 2005.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Environmental Document Preparation WETLANDS BEST PRACTICES 33 rd Annual Airports Conference Marie.
Defenders of Wildlife Species we are helping to protect.
Environmental Commitments/Tracking. Environmental Commitments Federal Agencies Shall –Use all practicable means consistent with the requirements of.
1 Completing the CEQA Checklist Terry Rivasplata.
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
LBNE Environmental Assessment NEPA Informational Meeting May 23, 2013 Rod Walton, LBNE NEPA Manager.
DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP FIRE MANAGEMENT LEE BANICKI (202)
DOE Environmental Protection Program WORKSHOP MIGRATORY BIRD PROTECTION LEE BANICKI (202)
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Median Estimates of Direct Anthropogenic Bird Mortality (Loss et al. 2014)
Tools to Assist with Assessing the Affected Environment.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act & Birds of Conservation Concern.
What If I Have to Go Beyond an IEE?. EA Training Course 2 Environmental Assessments (EAs) & Programmatic Environmental Assessments (PEAs) How Do I Prepare.
Draft Environmental Assessment Report for Bradley International Airport October 2016
ACA Conference - September 2017
Executive Order – The Basics
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
SEQRA as a Tool to Review Energy Projects
PROCEDURES AND DISPUTE SETTLEMENT
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Migratory Bird Conservation for Federal Partners March 2016, NMFWA

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA NEPA Considerations – Common Questions Common Questions: How do I know I’ve analyzed the correct birds? What if there are a lot of species to consider? What if seasonal habitat restrictions conflict? How do I know I’ve recommended enough mitigation? How do I know I’ve recommended appropriate mitigation? What if I don’t have enough data to recommend specific mitigation?

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds NEPA is a like a puzzle Assembling all the Parts How Why When Who What Where

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Most NEPA coordinators are not bird biologists or wildlife biologists. NEPA coordinators must juggle the full spectrum of resources and how they interact at a project… NEPA Considerations

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds NEPA Considerations Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Umbrella process to coordinate compliance with federal, state and local laws, while protecting resources such as: Wetlands Farmland Historic preservation Air quality Noise Traffic Cultural resources Economic impacts Federal, state, and local laws Endangered species Migratory Birds Civil rights Environmental justice And more…

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds NEPA Considerations – Laws and Regs Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Remember the Executive Order…. Federal Agencies must protect migratory birds Comply with MBTA, the Eagle Act, and EO 13186…under NEPA umbrella Federal agencies may incur civil liability under the MBTA for ongoing or proposed actions that take birds

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds NEPA Considerations – Laws and Regs Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) allows a private party to request that a court enjoin an agency action that does not comply with the MBTA FWS Law Enforcement can use discretion, especially when organizations are willing to work with FWS to avoid or minimize impacts

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds NEPA Considerations – Laws and Regs Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Documentation of the NEPA process A mechanism for federal agencies to document and demonstrate they are meeting their due diligence relative to protecting migratory bird resources.

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds NEPA Considerations – Significance and Implementation Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA Project Description Affected Environment Effects Analysis Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Determine the significance of project’s effects on Migratory Birds.

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds NEPA Considerations – Proposed Action Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA ….THIS DRIVES THE DOCUMENT SO IT MUST BE CLEAR If it is spelled out like an instruction manual, it will help clarify effects pathways and stressors. “I want to be able to follow a drop of water from upstream, through each part of the project, then downstream”

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA NEPA Considerations- Affected Environment

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA The Environmental Effects and Analyses should be cross-walked to the project activities and biological resources in the Affected Environment. Evaluate short-term versus long-term, direct and indirect effects, to local and/or regional populations. NEPA Considerations –Environmental Effects

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA NEPA Considerations – Significance and Implementation Significance Factors: Context Driven Which species would be impacted? BCCs? Culturally important species? Economically important species? State-listed (non-ESA) species?

Migratory Bird Program - Conserving America’s Birds Addressing Migratory Birds in NEPA NEPA Considerations – ROD to Implementation Significance Factors and Recommending Actions Is there a standard mitigation measure commonly used? Precedent For unavoidable impacts, can you modify the proposed action to create a new alternative? MOU recommendations?