Assessing Student Learning Using the Blackboard Discussion Board Assessment Workshop York College CUNY April 7, 2010 Wenying Huang-Stolte, Ph.D. William.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Zehra Akyol & Randy Garrison. Theoretical Background Research Question Methodology Results Discussion Conclusion.
Advertisements

Engaging Students in Online Discussion
“Digital technologies are for education as iron and steel girders, reinforced concrete, plate glass, elevators, central heating and air conditioning.
Strategies to Increase Connectedness in Online Mathematics Courses Sonia Ford Midland College Midland, Texas AMATYC 2013 S001.
Barry Spencer eLearning Barry Spencer eLearning Development Coordinator Bromley College.
Key Ideas and Details Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding, referring to the text as the basis for the answers. Integration of knowledge.
Things We Think About What is it that we want to assess? –What are the benchmarks and standards for my grade level? What a tools are we required to use.
STUDY GROUPS MOVE TEACHING AND LEARNING PLANS FORWARD.
Barry Spencer A Transformation Case Study Barry Spencer.
Instructional Design & Technology Cooperative Learning Effects in Online Instruction Beth Allred Oyarzun.
Jingzi Huang, Ph.D School of Teacher Education, CEBS UNC 2013 Fall GTA Conference Presentation.
ASSESSMENT CERTIFICATE CULMINATING PROJECT: ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Presented by: Shujaat Ahmed and Kaitlin Fitzsimons.
MAINTAINING QUALITY IN BLENDED LEARNING: FROM CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT TO IMPACT EVALUATION PART I: DESIGNING AND EVALUATING LEARNING Suzanne Weinstein, Ph.D.
IMPROVING GRADES, COMPREHENSION and INTEREST in DEVELOPMENTAL MATH COURSES Paola Di Muro - Brandon University NADE 2009.
Critical Reflection. The Learning Cycle  According to David Kolb’s Learning Cycle (the process that participants go through in experiential learning),
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES IN ONLINE ENVIRONMENTS. WELCOME o Facilitator name Position at university Contact info.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
College Reading and Learning Association Conference Richmond, VA 10/29/09.
Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in Online Learning Vonderwell, S., Liang, X., & Alderman, K. (2007). Asynchronous Discussions and Assessment in.
Company LOGO Assessment and Evaluation in an Online Environment Leslie Graham RN MN CNCC.
Nov 9th 2006 Determinants of Engagement in an Online Community of Inquiry Jim Waters College of Information Science and Technology Drexel University Philadelphia.
Developing Critical Thinking Skills through Distance Education Developing Critical Thinking Skills through Distance Education Walden University EDUC-7102.
 Examines the nature of culture and the diverse ways in which societies make meaning and are organized across time and space. Topics include cultural.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Building Trust & Effective Communication Alisa Cooper, EdD Faculty, Assistant Chair/eCourses Coordinator English Department Glendale.
Peer to Peer Interactions Providing opportunities for online students to engage and participate with others in meaningful ways. Susie Bussmann, Ph.D. Sandy.
Company LOGO Assessment and Evaluation in an Online Environment Leslie Graham RN MN CNCC.
HE 520: Higher Education Laws and Regulations Unit One Seminar Pre-Seminar Welcome to HE 520: Higher Education Laws and Regulations, Unit One Seminar Seminar.
“Outcomification”: Development and Use of Student Learning Outcomes Noelle C. Griffin, PhD Director, Assessment and Data Analysis Loyola Marymount University.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
Teams & Blended Learning Interaction & Peer Engagement Alisa Cooper, EdD Faculty, Assistant Chair/eCourses Coordinator English Department.
© 2014 Blackboard Inc. All rights reserved.. Identify the benefits of discussion forums. Create, manage, and grade discussion forums and threads. Develop.
Identifying Assessments
Kerri Lamb Tuesday, January 20, Brain Energizer 2. Using Social Media to Engage Students with Writing 3. Why Students Should Write in EVERY Classroom.
Developing a Metric for Evaluating Discussion Boards Dr. Robin Kay University of Ontario Institute of Technology 2 November 2004.
By Bundhun Amit Varma HMOA  Define Online Discussion  Recognise models of online discussions ◦ Synchronous ◦ Asynchronous  Distinguish three.
Stage 1 Integrated learning Coffee Shop. LEARNING REQUIREMENTS The learning requirements summarise the knowledge, skills, and understanding that students.
LaTonya Ketchup Grade Level: 8 th Subject Area: Social Studies Main Topic: Three Branches of Government CCSD Standard: C14.[6-8].5 Explain the functions.
INTRODUCTION TO THE WIDA FRAMEWORK Presenter Affiliation Date.
Reflections, Discussion Threads and Peer Review for Assessment in Online Learning Kristine Rabberman, Ph.D. Carol A. Muller, Ph.D.
Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry Dr. Norm Vaughan Dr. Marti Cleveland-Innes Dr. Randy Garrison.
Assessment Online. Student Assessment Design learner-centered assessment that include self-reflection Design grading rubrics to assess discussions, assignments,
Encouraging Students’ Social Presence in Online Forums William Ashton BB instructor.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Group Work Evaluation Issue Fairness in Group Work Evaluation Evaluation can be difficult enough when.
Talk about the assignment! April 27th 2015 #TOOC15 Webinar.
Development of the Construct & Questionnaire Randy Garrison & Zehra Akyol April
Creating a Positive Learning Environment
How to Survive Discussion Forums
Online engagement Techniques
Effective classroom discussion and group work
Active Learning: Rethinking Our Teaching to Promote Deeper Learning
How to Succeed in Discussion Forums
Exploratory Factor Analysis Participants, Procedures, & Measures
Joyce Bahhouth Bladen Community College
MUHC Innovation Model.
Chuan Yuan Anderson (Palos Verdes Peninsula High School)
Creating Meaningful Information Literacy Assignments for an Introductory Agriculture Course Marianne Stowell Bracke Purdue University Libraries
Designing for Engagement
How can Blackboard assist in Assessment and Facilitation of Knowledge Exchange? Anne Nortcliffe.
Unpacking Assessment Criteria
Critical Thinking Andy Flaherty
The Effect Of Social Context On The Reflective Practice Of Preservice Science Teachers: Leveraging A Web-Supported Community Of Teachers Jim MaKinster.
Office of Online Education: Tips for Effective Online Teaching
CMC Meina Zhu, Susan C. Herring, and Curtis J. Bonk
Creating a Community of Inquiry
Online Learning Communities: A Vision of the Future of Vanderbilt
Presentation transcript:

Assessing Student Learning Using the Blackboard Discussion Board Assessment Workshop York College CUNY April 7, 2010 Wenying Huang-Stolte, Ph.D. William Divale, Ph.D.

Making a Grading Rubric for Discussions  It is based on the course learning objectives. Bloom’s taxonomy What do you want students to achieve through the discussion?  It should encourage participation.  It can be used to promote durable knowledge construction  It can be used to foster critical thinking and higher-order learning. Cognitive presence 2

Rubric Example 1 This rubric shows that the purpose of the discussion is to examine student’s knowledge and comprehension. CriteriaExcellent - 3Good - 2Needs Work - 1 Timely discussion contributions (20%) Actively participate in the discussion, post multiple threads and responses. Post only one thread and one response. Wait until the deadline to post and only post one thread or one response. Demonstration of knowledge and under-standing to the assigned readings (50%) Show strong evidence that the readings were well understood and provide good examples of the concepts. Show evidence that the readings were well understood and provide examples of the concepts. Not very clear if the readings were understood. Responses to peers and instructors (30%) Interact multiple times with other students and instructor, bring the discussion to a deeper or/and broader level. Interact at least once with other student or instructor, bring the discussion to a deeper or broader level. Do not interact with other people. 3

Rubric Example 2 Criteria5 – Development of ideas (30%) Well-developed ideas; introduce new ideas and stimulate discussion. Show some developed ideas. Poorly developed ideas. Evidence of critical thinking (40%) Show analysis, synthesis, or evaluation of ideas; arguments are well supported; sometimes provide unique insight. Beginning of analysis, synthesis, or evaluation; arguments are supported. Little evidence of analysis, synthesis or evaluation. Clarity (30%) Postings are well articulated and easy to follow. Postings are understandable, but flow could be improved. Postings are difficult to follow. This rubric shows that the purpose of the discussion is to improve student’s critical thinking. 4

Community of Inquiry Model Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer W. (2000). Community of Inquiry. Teaching Presence Social Presence Cognitive Presence Educational Experience Based on Garrison et al, online discussion can provide good educational experience if proper teaching presence, cognitive presence and social presence exist in the discussion. 5

Cognitive Presence  According to Garrison et al: Cognitive presence is the extent to which in any particular configuration of a community of inquiry participants are able to construct meaning through sustained communication. ( )  Garrison et al develop a model to assess the critical discourse. It considers that the discussion can include four phases. 6

The Four Phases of Discussion 1. Triggering event – raise the issue, ask the discussion question. 2. Exploration – explore relevant information, share ideas, brain storming. 3. Integration – construct meaning, make connections. 4. Resolution – draw conclusions, ask new questions. Using this model, you can see where a discussion is and guide it to the later phases. 7

How to Assess Learning from the DB Text 8 Click to go to grading tool

Discussion Topic: An Example of Integrating Two Concepts 9

Theory Behind Discussion Question: Layer Cake Theory of Culture Applied to Urban Slum Dwellers Ideology of a Culture (Includes Beliefs, Religion, Values, Modal Personality, etc.) Social Structure (Includes the customs and institutions by which people in the society Are organized, e.g., Family structure, Kinship groups, Sodalities, Institutions, child-training practices, etc.) Techno-Economic Base (Includes the energetic & economic relations the society has, e.g., How energy is harnessed, processed and distributed to members of the society.) Comments by William Divale, Ph.D. 10 Plate for the Layer Cake (Includes the natural & social environment of the society) This is the part of culture where humans make a living & survive This is the part of culture where humans are organized & taught how to function in the base This part of culture is where the person gets the values, attitudes, and personality traits that allow for functioning in the society A society exists in place & time. Its environment contains physical possibilities & limits, e.g., you can’t grow bananas in NY. Neighboring societies also influence it.

Sample Student Posting from Melissa 11

Lindsey’s Reply to Melissa 12

Assess Learning using Bb DB Tools  Performance Dashboard Provides average post length, minimum and maximum post length. Provides the average post position – an indicator on the number of responses in one thread.  Discussion Board Grading Tool Provides a centralized place to review all postings from one student for a forum and assign a grade. 13

Melisa’s Discussion Performance 14 Click on Total Posts to see all of a student’s posts in a particular forum.

Discussion Board Grading Tool 15

Exercise  Create a discussion forum.  Create a rubric to assess student learning. 16