 The Augustinian theodicy explains the existence of evil and a theist in the world.  The Irenaean theodicy explains the existence of imperfections and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The logical problem of evil
Advertisements

The Problem of Evil and Suffering. The problem?  Qualities that the Christian God is said to possess:-  Omnipotent  Omniscient  Omni benevolent 
Augustine and Irenaeus.  Augustine argues that it was free will that led to the original sin of Adam and Eve  This resulted in their subsequent expulsion.
Romans 8:18–39 “We always have Hope.”.
STARTER: What is the problem of evil and suffering for Christians…?
Divine Truth Fear Of Change. Introduction  We all face a crossroads in life with regard to our painful emotions  Fear  Truth  What is the choice we.
Discuss in pairs and prepare to feedback.
“Man that is born of a woman is of few days, and full of trouble. He cometh forth like a flower, and is cut down: he fleeth also as a shadow, and continueth.
© Michael Lacewing The Problem of Evil Michael Lacewing
PHIL/RS 335 The Problem of Evil Pt. 2. Hick, “Soul-Making Theodicy”  Hick begins by owning up. Unlike Cleanthes, Hick is willing to testify to the vast.
Irenaean Theodicy Irenaeus ( CE) A soul-making solution, earlier than that of Augustine, and less dependent on biblical traditions.
Why did this happen? Chapter 3. journal  Have you ever had a problem reconciling a God who is just with the fact of unjust evil and suffering in the.
The anti-theistic argument from Evil. The Deductive argument from evil If there is a God, then this God would prevent Evil But there is Evil Therefore.
Coping with Suffering Mental suffering Physical suffering Emotional suffering Which one do you think is worst ? Describe any stories you know of people.
Power Prompts Autobiography. My Younger Years Where were you born? I was born.
Why might God allow suffering? On the post stick note in front of you, you need to write one reason that you think God might allow suffering in the world.
Theodicy: The Study of Evil  If God is Benevolent (all-good), Omnipotent (all-powerful) and Omniscient (all-knowing), how could evil exist?  In other.
A THEOLOGY FOR TRAGEDY AND OTHER REALLY DIFFICULT TIMES I. INTRO  Read Jn 16:33.  It is precisely this truth of the expectation of tribulation in this.
What can you see here?. Suffering LO: to enquire into the purpose of suffering.
Defending Skills. What do we mean by defending skills? What are some examples of ways we can defend ourselves?
130 – 202 AD Irenaeus Bishop of Lyons 130 – 202 AD.
GGHS PHILOSOPHY 101 THE ARGUMENT FROM EVIL. FIRST VERSION (1)If God, were to exist then that being would be all-powerful, all knowing, and all loving.
No Pain! No Gain” The Theodicy of St. Irenaeus’ Revd. Gareth Williams Bishop of Llandaff HS.
Irenaeus’ theodicy No pain no gain!. Useful ideas ‘Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.’ (Genesis 1:26) ‘How if we had no knowledge of the.
The problem of evil intro and evil is a necessary part of a balanced universe.
WHEN CHRISTIANS GET IT WRONG When Bad Things Happen.
The Problem of Evil and Suffering
Key Words Theist Atheist Natural Evil Moral Evil Omnipotent Omniscient Omnibenevolent Inconsistent Triad Theodicy Privation Epistemic distance.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
The evidential problem of evil
John Hick’s reformulation of the Irenaean theodicy
Do you have a response to Stephen Fry?
Evil and Suffering and Non-Belief in God – Model Answer
The Problem of Evil.
The logical problem of evil
We Need Suffering in the World
What is the logical ‘problem of evil’ identified by Epicurus? Page 4
Our Future Self Esteem.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 7 The argument from evil
Augustinian Theodicy and Free Will Defence Name the scholar – write a sentence summary Which scholars are missing?
Think, pair, share A: Privation B: The Fall of Man A:Seminally B: Free will.
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SUFFERING.
- Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov
Theology of the Body for Teens
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SUFFERING.
THE PROBLEM OF EVIL AND SUFFERING.
EVIL AND OMNIPOTENCE J.L.MACKIE.
THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENT.
Issues for analysis and evaluation The problem of evil and suffering
The Free Will Defence Discuss: Imagine a parent does everything for a child. - Would the parents be acting responsibly? - What type of adult might the.
Clarify key ideas Evil challenges the qualities of God
5.1c Is It Okay To Feel This Way?
Michael Lacewing The Problem of Evil Michael Lacewing © Michael Lacewing.
EVIL /SIN /SUFFERING.
Think, pair, share A: What is meant by the term soul deciding? B: What is meant by the term soul making? A: Give one criticism of Augustine's theodicy.
Summary Tasks Summarise the theodicy in five points
Power Prompts Autobiography.
2nd March th Sunday in Ordinary Time Year A
Studies in Philippians (6)
The problem of evil makes belief in God irrational
Distance vs. Time Graphs
The Problem of Evil.
By the end of today’s lesson you will:
Problems Christians Face
God and Suffering (2) Dealing with Suffering
Irenaean Theodicy Focus of the lesson…
The Problem of Evil & Suffering
Presentation transcript:

 The Augustinian theodicy explains the existence of evil and a theist in the world.  The Irenaean theodicy explains the existence of imperfections and a theist God in the world

 We are born imperfect and raw like babies and God expects us to grow and face the challenges of evil.  When we are allowed to grow, we can form a close bond to God.  Free will is important to allow children to learn from their mistakes and understand WHY good choices need to be made.

 The Irenaean theodicy can explain this.  Natural disasters allow us to how courage and compassion for one another and creates tribulations for us to work through.  They are reminders of the power of God and our place on earth.

 God must remain hidden if we are to truly learn from our life experiences. Epistemic distance)  If a baby dies and God helps us through this true suffering (or even prevents it from happening) then he is not really putting us through tribulations and we therefore cannot be truly autonomous

 Problems arise when we think about our learning experience. A good teacher tells us the where we are going in life and how best to get there. Our lives to do seem that straight forward. People can be vitreous but still struggle in life. (This life anyway)

 So it makes sense for us to learn and grow but could He not limit the amount of suffering that we have to go through.  There are constant genocides, floods, droughts and misery

 It is our fault that these natural disasters happen. We do not help the poor move into safer regions and we are ruining the world with pollution.  “Nothing can save us from ourselves” Sartre  We need to be more mature and stop looking for excuses and a quick answer.

 Posh phrase for afterlife.  Both theodicies rely on the existence of an afterlife to compensate for the suffering and imperfections in this one.  The design of this world rests on the speculation of an unknown after world. Rationally/empirically unsatisfactory.

 It poses questions like:  What form does the body come back as?  What is a soul?  What part of my life will I remember  Ayer: There is no factual basis for our belief in the afterlife.

 Is this world really so bad after all?

 Is doing evil alright if it achieves good?