1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning & Community Development Department East Green Street Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting November 4, 2013.
Advertisements

Public Hearing June 4, Case: CDR Project: Winegard Road South PD LUP - Substantial Change Applicant: Hugh M. Lokey, P.E., Hugh M. Lokey.
Small Zone Lot Parking Exemption in all Mixed Use Commercial Zone Districts.
City of Gulf Breeze Land Development Code Update
Land Development Project Land Use Law Spring 2004 Mark Spykerman.
BCC APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE APPLICANT/APPELLANT: FAITH CENTER MINISTRIES, INC. Orange County Zoning Division May 13, 2014 (Continued.
Vineland Commercial Site Address: 7626 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7634 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7630 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N )
El Cajon Courtyard Excel Hotel Group July 1, 2014.
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
January 29, 2008 BCC Called Public Hearing on BZA # SE , 12/6/07 APPLICANT: Ganesh Bansrupan.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 19, 2008.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
BCC APPEAL PUBLIC HEARING ON BZA #SE APPLICANT/APPELLANT: FIRST KOREAN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF ORLANDO Orange County Zoning Division December.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
Community Development Department EUROPEAN VILLAGE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2607.
ZOM Newberry/122 nd St. PD. Applicant Request Applicant is requesting a rezoning from RE-1 (single-family residential) to PD (non-residential planned.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting April 18, 2006 Public Hearing: Zoning Ordinance Amendment: Section Regarding Commercial/Industrial Park.
The “Smith Property” Public Forum March 2, 2011 Photo: Historical Society.
Community Development Department Special Exceptions for: Automotive parts (e.g. accessories and tires) and Automotive, Recreational Vehicle, and Boat Dealers.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
WEST BERKELEY PROJECT Master Use Permits (MUP) May 15, 2012 Response to Concerns & Issues.
A 1,240 Acre Master Development Plan Proposal, West of Willcox, AZ. Cochise County Board of Supervisors August 23, 2011 Docket MDP / Z
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 11, 2011.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
FIRST PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 3, 2014.
1 Presented to the Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations By the City of Fort Worth, Planning and Development Department August 24, 2009 CONSERVATION.
The Three Levels of Development Planning 1 Small Area Plan Zone / CDD DSP / DSUP.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 22, 2010.
Community Development Department Special Exception Vehicle Rental and Leasing St. Joe Plaza.
HOLLYWOOD PLAZA PARKING GARAGE BZA #VA APPLICANT: JOSHUA WALLACK APPELLANT: SCOTT A. GLASS HOLLYWOOD PLAZA PARKING GARAGE BZA #VA
Prepared by: Alex Fisch Planning Services Division.
6 JOSEPHINE STREET APPEAL OF DR/CUP/EA Project Site: Land Use Designation High Density Residential R-3 Zoning District Multiple-Family.
LAND Subdivie a 4.27 acres into 18 lots 17 detached single family homes One duplex Base density allows for unit Affordable housing bonus.
Planning & Community Development Department 3202 East Foothill Boulevard (Mixed Use Project – Space Bank) City Council May 16, 2016 Predevelopment Plan.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Basis of recommendation (cont.) 3.Insufficient green/open space (pgs. 3-4)  Green/open space within the site inadequate to serve estimated population.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus ALBRIGHT OFFICE PARK Planned Development PD Architecture and Site S Environmental.
G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Location Map. G & A Lloyd, LLC ZOM Aerial.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
Applicant: Robert Ganem Addresses: 7304 & 7312 Black Oak Lane Planning Commission Meeting – August 21, 2015.
Community Development Department MADISON GREEN AND TUSCAN RESERVE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2616.
Planning & Community Development Department General Plan Implementation Strategy City Council February 29, 2016.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZ Sevens Residential Memory Care ODP Case Manager: Russell D Clark.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Adjustment Committee Land Use Review LU AD Adjustment.
Planning & Community Development Interim Development Process to Implement the General Plan Land Use Element City Council July 11, 2016.
Major Amendment to Planned Development #65 Mercer Commons Phase IV at E. 14 th Street Neighborhoods Committee April 18, 2016.
Animal Care Facilities
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Special Exception Elite Custom Tattooing Studio Application #3322
File No A request for a Site Plan Review to construct a 1,425 square-foot covered balcony, a 14.5 square-foot balcony and a 5,157 square-foot.
Appeal: Time Extension for Variance # East Walnut Street
Planning and Zoning Board – October 14, 2004
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
115-Unit Mixed-Use Project (711 E
WSUP Madole Construction
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Land Use 101: The Design Process
Presentation transcript:

1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review

2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently adopted MXD3 overlay zoning district provisions contained in Section 3-5(d) of the Zoning Code. The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently adopted MXD3 overlay zoning district provisions contained in Section 3-5(d) of the Zoning Code. The proposed mixed-use project consists of a 10 story building containing ground floor retail, 3 floors of parking and 6 floors of multi-family residential units. The proposed mixed-use project consists of a 10 story building containing ground floor retail, 3 floors of parking and 6 floors of multi-family residential units.

3 Background The property is located one block north of the Village of Merrick Park, and 1 and 2 story commercial buildings occupy the site. The property is located one block north of the Village of Merrick Park, and 1 and 2 story commercial buildings occupy the site. The property has “Industrial” land use and zoning designations, which are the appropriate designations for an MXD3 project. The property has “Industrial” land use and zoning designations, which are the appropriate designations for an MXD3 project. The site is one acre in size, and occupies a majority of the west half of the block. The site is one acre in size, and occupies a majority of the west half of the block. “Village Place”, a 10 story MXD3 mixed-use project has been approved for the east half of the block and has similar size and massing to this proposal. “Village Place”, a 10 story MXD3 mixed-use project has been approved for the east half of the block and has similar size and massing to this proposal.

4 Proposed project 10 story / 100’ high building (125’ high including architectural elements). 10 story / 100’ high building (125’ high including architectural elements). 152,250 sq. ft. in size (3.5 FAR), including 20,478 sq. ft. of ground floor retail. 152,250 sq. ft. in size (3.5 FAR), including 20,478 sq. ft. of ground floor retail. 96 multi-family residential units located on the top 6 floors of the building. 96 multi-family residential units located on the top 6 floors of the building. 268 parking spaces on 3 garage levels (10 spaces more than required by Code). 268 parking spaces on 3 garage levels (10 spaces more than required by Code). Public ROW streetscape improvements, land- scaping and public realm amenities provided. Public ROW streetscape improvements, land- scaping and public realm amenities provided.

5 Review criteria: The Planning Department compared the applicant’s plans with the MXD3 review criteria set out in the Zoning Code, and has determined the following: The Planning Department compared the applicant’s plans with the MXD3 review criteria set out in the Zoning Code, and has determined the following: Proposal is consistent with the purpose and intent of the MXD3 provisions, and provides for public improvements and benefit. Proposal is consistent with the purpose and intent of the MXD3 provisions, and provides for public improvements and benefit. Proposal does not depart significantly from current zoning and subdivision regulations. Proposal does not depart significantly from current zoning and subdivision regulations. Proposal makes adequate provisions for public services and amenities. Proposal makes adequate provisions for public services and amenities.

6 Review criteria (cont.): Project is compatible with surrounding properties and buffered from residential neighborhood to the north by an existing commercial use. Project is compatible with surrounding properties and buffered from residential neighborhood to the north by an existing commercial use. Project has the same building height, setbacks and massing as the approved MXD3 project on west half of this block. Project has the same building height, setbacks and massing as the approved MXD3 project on west half of this block. Project is being developed in conformance with the voluntary MXD3 overlay provisions, as adopted. Project is being developed in conformance with the voluntary MXD3 overlay provisions, as adopted.

7 Review criteria (cont.): Required traffic studies and improvements are intended to provide assurances that public purposes and benefits are realized. Required traffic studies and improvements are intended to provide assurances that public purposes and benefits are realized.

8 Previous reviews: The Development Review Committee reviewed the project on June 24, The Development Review Committee reviewed the project on June 24, The Board of Architects approved the project for Mediterranean architectural style on August 11, The Board of Architects approved the project for Mediterranean architectural style on August 11, The Board of Adjustment granted variances on February 6, 2006 for street level arcade height and building setback above the 3 rd floor. The Board of Adjustment granted variances on February 6, 2006 for street level arcade height and building setback above the 3 rd floor.

9 Finding of fact: Proposed project is consistent with CLUP goals, objectives and polices. Proposed project is consistent with CLUP goals, objectives and polices. Recommended conditions of approval address identified CLUP inconsistencies. Recommended conditions of approval address identified CLUP inconsistencies. Proposal satisfies MXD3 review criteria. Proposal satisfies MXD3 review criteria. A building of approximately the same size and massing could be built on this property as-of- right. A building of approximately the same size and massing could be built on this property as-of- right. The applicant has proffered significant off-site public ROW improvements. The applicant has proffered significant off-site public ROW improvements.

10 Findings of fact (cont.): The applicant is providing public realm improvements on surrounding streets in compliance with MXD3 Master Streetscape Plan. The applicant is providing public realm improvements on surrounding streets in compliance with MXD3 Master Streetscape Plan. This proposal adds a residential component to support commercial uses, and creates a “walk- able” pedestrian environment. This proposal adds a residential component to support commercial uses, and creates a “walk- able” pedestrian environment. The applicant has addressed all comments provided by City Departments. The applicant has addressed all comments provided by City Departments.

11 Staff recommendation: The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed mixed-use site plan with the following conditions: The Planning Department recommends approval of the proposed mixed-use site plan with the following conditions: Conformance with the site plan, landscaping plan and all representations and exhibits prepared and submitted by the applicant. Conformance with the site plan, landscaping plan and all representations and exhibits prepared and submitted by the applicant. All conditions of approval shall be included within a Restrictive Covenant that shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. All conditions of approval shall be included within a Restrictive Covenant that shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney.

12 Conditions: Miami Dade County School Board shall review and determine impacts of project, and any required mitigation. Miami Dade County School Board shall review and determine impacts of project, and any required mitigation. City Commission review and approval of any proposed ROW encroachments. City Commission review and approval of any proposed ROW encroachments. All landscaping and streetscape improve- ments shall be in accordance with the MXD3 Master Streetscape Plan. All landscaping and streetscape improve- ments shall be in accordance with the MXD3 Master Streetscape Plan. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with installation and maintenance of all approved landscaping. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with installation and maintenance of all approved landscaping.

13 Conditions (cont.): Applicant shall reimburse the City for the loss of 8 on-street parking spaces. Applicant shall reimburse the City for the loss of 8 on-street parking spaces. Conduct warrant studies for 3 Altara Avenue intersections and provide required traffic and pedestrian improvements, as warranted. Conduct warrant studies for 3 Altara Avenue intersections and provide required traffic and pedestrian improvements, as warranted. Comply with City’s affordable housing provisions when adopted, retroactive for up to 1 year after issuance of a building permit. Comply with City’s affordable housing provisions when adopted, retroactive for up to 1 year after issuance of a building permit. City resolution of existing citywide concurrency deficit for racquetball courts. City resolution of existing citywide concurrency deficit for racquetball courts.

14 Timeline: MXD3 site plan approval is granted by resolution, requiring only one public hearing before the City Commission. MXD3 site plan approval is granted by resolution, requiring only one public hearing before the City Commission. This application has been tentatively scheduled to be heard by the City Commission on Tuesday, February 28, This application has been tentatively scheduled to be heard by the City Commission on Tuesday, February 28, 2006.