AP 4021: Program Discontinuance A Presentation to the Board of Trustees by the Academic Senate Presidents of Moorpark, Oxnard and Ventura Colleges September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W HAT IS M UTUAL AGREEMENT AND P ARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE ? Dr. Eric Oifer Randy Lawson August 26, 2010.
Advertisements

One System…One Mission Are You Considering a New Baccalaureate Degree Program? A Brief Guide 1.
Academic Senate 101 You Make It Happen! Catherine Cox President Mission College Academic Senate August, 2007 Adapted from ASCCC 101, presented at the ASCCC.
Curriculum Concerns in Program Viability and Discontinuance Processes Julie Bruno, Sierra College, Facilitator Chris Hill, Grossmont College Summer 2011.
Update 11/9. Academic Senate University Appointments and Promotions Committee Policies and Procedures (approved ASLC 10/20/10)
AS /AA Clarification of the Formation, Dissolution, Merger or Movement of an Academic Department- Resubmission.
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
Federal Emphasis on Accountability in Higher Education and Regional Accreditation Processes Carla D. Sanderson Commissioner, Southern Association of Colleges.
FLEX Day Presentation August 13, Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM)
AUBURN UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW University Senate July 8, 2008.
Accreditation in a Multi-College District Accreditation Institute Academic Senate for California Community Colleges February 11, 2012, 1:00-2:00pm John.
Bases for Academic Senates: What Are We And What Are Our Roles? Craig Rutan, Area D Representative Cynthia Rico, South Representative.
Accelerated Instructional Program Review Handbook Spring 2007.
College Council Strengthening Shared Governance September 24, 2014.
Proposed Bylaws Revisions Faculty Senate – June 12, 2014.
Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM) Summit August 29, 2014.
Ad hoc Committee on Faculty Bylaws Todd Ellis Michelle Hendley Jimmy Johnston Michael Koch Eileen McClafferty John Relethford Renee B. Walker (Chair)
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
SBVC and CHC Follow–Up Report Joint Presentation to the SBCCD Board of Trustees October 8, 2015 Haragewen Kinde, SBVC ALO Celia Huston, Co-Chair, ASLO.
Faculty Senate Meeting November 19, Agenda I.Call to Order and Roll Call - M. Bruening, Secretary II.Proposed Amendment to the Faculty Bylaws (CRR.
Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM) Workshop November 19, 2015.
2010 Faculty Leadership Institute Local Senates & Curriculum Committees Richard Mahon, Area D Beth Smith, Treasurer.
Baccalaureate Degrees in the California Community College System Jolena Grande, Cypress College James Todd, Modesto Junior College John Stanskas, ASCCC.
Curriculum Development at KCC Prepared by Edward Martin Amanda Kalin ChairDirector College Council Curriculum CommitteeCurriculum Development and Program.
Program Discontinuance Report Marvin Martinez, President Laura Ramirez, Vice President Alex Immerblum, Academic Senate President Jeff Hernandez, Co-Chair.
State Center Community College District Willow International Center Center-to-College Status Naming Process & Timeline.
Proposal Development by Faculty in an Academic Unit College, School, Department, or Program Proposal Preparation Office of Academic Programs, Assessment,
What’s Going on at SCC Presented by: Corinna Evett.
Presented by the Outreach & Training Subcommittee of College Planning Council, as required by Section V.8 of the College Planning Council Handbook College.
CURRICULUM-CHANGE APPROVAL PROCESSES
Faculty Senate Special Meeting June 12, 2014
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Curriculum Development at KCC
Accreditation Update Board of Trustees Meeting January 12, 2016
SUNY Applied Learning Campus Plan Parts V-VII
Strategic Planning Council (SPC)Update
Accreditation Preparation
Curriculum at SCC and Role of the Senate Presented by Craig Rutan and Joyce Wagner SCC Academic Senate Fall 2013 Retreat.
Administrative Review Process
Rebecca Eikey, ASCCC Area C Representative Ginni May, ASCCC Treasurer
College of Alameda Integrated Planning and Budgeting Process
Presented by: Corinna Evett
Curriculum Institute, July 13, 2018, 3:45 – 5:00
Dolores Davison, ASCCC Secretary
Faculty Leadership and the Role of the ASCCC
Substantive Change Full Category I Proposal Workflow
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
Strengthening Processes within Local Senates and Curriculum Committees
New Certificate Program
Erosion of Senate Authority Over Curriculum?
Terminate an Academic Unit
In Preparation to ACCJC team site visit on 10/8-10/11
Reorganize (Merge, Split, Move) an Academic Program or Academic Unit
New Degree (Undergraduate, First Professional, Graduate) Program
Establish a New Academic Unit
Suspend a Degree or Certificate Program
Rename an Academic Program (Degree or Certificate) or Academic Unit
PAc-28 Educational Leave of Absence
Program Discontinuance
Curriculum Committee Orientation
What are the Roles of the cio?
Fort Valley State University
Start with PROGRAM REVIEW
Cheryl Aschenbach, ASCCC Secretary
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
Curriculum Streamlining Training: A Deep Dive
ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2019
Welcome to CAB
Roles and Responsibilities of Administrators in Curricular Processes
Presentation transcript:

AP 4021: Program Discontinuance A Presentation to the Board of Trustees by the Academic Senate Presidents of Moorpark, Oxnard and Ventura Colleges September 11, 2012

 CCR definition of Program* ( § (g) ) : ◦ “Education program” is an organized sequence of courses leading to a defined objective, a degree, a certificate, a diploma, a licenses, or transfer to another institution of high education ◦ If it required BOT action to create, it requires BOT action to eliminate  Discontinuance ◦ Eliminate entire discipline OR ◦ Retain the discipline but eliminate degrees, certificates, awards  “Service discipline”

 Program Plan Review and Evaluation ◦ Evaluation of program effectiveness is required per ACCJC Accreditation Standards* ◦ Process for program review is 10+1** ◦ Separate and distinct process from Program Discontinuance  However, it is referenced as Step I within AP 4021 ◦ AP 4021 stipulates an annual review cycle

 Each college uses its set of agreed upon criteria ◦ Per AP 4021:  The review and evaluation results in one of the four recommendations of action:  No action needed  Strengthen the program  Reduce the program  Review of discontinuance  Programs may be recommended for discontinuance if the Vice Chancellor of Business and Administrative Services projects district reserves to fall below state- required 5%.

 Step I: Annual Program Review and Evaluation Process  Step II: Recommendation Group (RG) Review & Analysis  Option A: Ad Hoc RG: two-thirds faculty as appointed by Academic Senate  Option B: Use an existing committee with majority faculty representation  After analysis using Program metrics/criteria, RG has two options  1) Recommend program continuance with revision  Requires written justification  2 year monitoring period  2) Recommend discontinuance  Requires written justification

 Step III: EVP Review, Analysis & Recommendation ◦ Receives and analyzes RG’s formal written report ◦ Consults with discipline faculty and appropriate constituent groups, as defined by each campus ◦ With a formal written rationale, the EVP informs the following of people of the EVP’s recommendation  Discipline Faculty  Department Chair  Area Dean  Academic Senate President

 Step IV: Academic Senate Review & Recommendation ◦ Receives and reviews recommendation and supporting documentation from the EVP ◦ Academic Senate has two options in response to EVP’s recommendation:  1) Concur with the recommendation  2) Demur with the recommendation  Propose alternate course of action to address issues in EVP’s justification for discontinuance ◦ In response to the EVP’s recommendations and within 2 regularly scheduled meetings, Senate to provide to the College President a formal, written recommendation

 Step V: College President Review & Recommendation ◦ After receiving recommendations from the EVP and the Academic Senate, the President determines the proposed course of action  Required to communicate his/her recommendation to the following:  Discipline Faculty  Department Chair  Area Dean  Academic Senate President ◦ Notifies college of recommendation in writing only after those listed above have received notification ◦ Recommendation is forwarded to the Chancellor for possible BOT action

 Step VI: Board of Trustees Review and Action ◦ Chancellor and BOT are provided  Record of process followed at the campus  Findings and recommendations of  RG, EVP, Academic Senate, College President ◦ Chancellor prepares a written report to the BOT with recommended actions ◦ BOT holds public hearing and takes action

 Step VII: Implementation of Board Actions ◦ If the BOT acts to discontinue  College President develops a plan in consultation with  Discipline Faculty, Department Chair, Area Dean, Academic Senate President  The plan must include the following 1.Timeline and process for curricular and programmatic deletion/discontinuance approval at the local and state level 2.Provision for students currently in the program for completion and/or transfer 3.Provision for displaced faculty and staff, where feasible 4.Provisions for impact on budget and facilities 5.Removal of program from catalog

 The only variables in the process are: ◦ How a program or disciplines gets “on the list”  Program Planning and Evaluation  Should never come as a surprise ◦ The composition of the RG in Step II ◦ Who the EVP consults in Step III

 After Program Review and Evaluation (preceding AP 4021 process) ◦ College President reviews and analyzes Program Evaluation Status ◦ Formally provides Senate with list of areas of concern  AP 4021 process is implemented by the Senate  RG convenes using Option A from Step II  MC’s Senate convenes RG consisting of the following with the Senate VP and a Dean acting as Co-Chairs:  MC’s RG must be 2/3s faculty  Academic Senate Vice President as Co-Chair  1 Dean from an unaffected/least affected as Co-Chair  1 Faculty member from each division who is not associated with the affected discipline (currently 6)  1 Counselor  Faculty are appointed by the Senate  Faculty Curriculum Co-Chair  additional deans adjusted as needed to retain 2/3s majority Faculty  Appointed by the College President  Institutional Researcher (advisory only)

 After recommendations from the RG, EVP and Senate and following the procedures outlined above, the College President produces a list of possible programs for elimination or reduction. ◦ The Senate convenes PBC (the RG) using Option B from Step II with the Academic Senate President and the Vice President of Business Services acting as co-chairs and further membership of:  9 faculty members, no two from the same department  1 AFT representative  2 Managers appointed by the President  3 Classified representatives, including the Institutional Researcher  1 Student representative  EVP of Student Learning (non-voting)

◦ “Executive Team” (College President, EVP and VP of Business Services) reviews and analyzes programs on an annual basis each spring ◦ Exec Team annually and formally provides to the participatory governance group, the College Planning Council (CPC) and to the campus at large each April/May, the “Ventura College Planning Parameters” ◦ Included on the “VC Planning Parameters” are the programs the administration is considering for discontinuance barring any compelling argument presented by a program during the subsequent academic year’s program review process ◦ An updated “VC Planning Parameters” is announced to CPC and campus at large in Aug/Sept ◦ Should a program on the “VC Planning Parameters” still be considered for discontinuance at the conclusion of our program review process, AP 4021 process will be implemented by the Senate ◦ RG would be Option B from Step II

 Riley Dwyer  ◦ Moorpark College Academic Senate President  Linda Kama’ila  ◦ Oxnard College Academic Senate President  Peter H. Sezzi  ◦ Ventura College Academic Senate President