TU-E1120 SMOTI Lecture 6 HOW OPEN IS INNOVATION? LINUS DAHLANDER, DAVID M. GANN TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

CONCEPTUAL WEB-BASED FRAMEWORK IN AN INTERACTIVE VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT FOR DISTANCE LEARNING Amal Oraifige, Graham Oakes, Anthony Felton, David Heesom, Kevin.
UNIT 1 CONCEPT OF MANAGERIAL ECONOMICS (continue)
Positioning Services in Competitive Markets
Discussion Questions September 11, 2012 POSTECH Strategic Management of Information and Technology Laboratory (POSMIT: Dept.
Project Title (as descriptive as possible) Group Members CPE Computer Engineering Design I Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Strategic Management & Strategic Competitiveness
Jeremy Mekdhansarn 10 May 2010 IEOR 190G Chapter Summary.
Chapter 3 The Internal Environment: Resources, Capabilities, and Core Competencies Hitt, Ireland, and Hoskisson In chapter 3 we take a look at the internal.
1 9 Corporate Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
Strategic Information Systems for Competitive Advantage
9 Corporate Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
Finding and Evaluating Inventions, Prior Art How to Find Inventions, How to Evaluate Inventions, Finding Prior Art.
The Strategic Management Process
Construction Management Practice Implications of the Theory of Construction Management.
Bringing Knowledge to the Market: IPR, Licensing and Collaborative Research Regions for economic change : innovating through EU regional policy Brussels.
International marketing
CHAPTER 3: DEVELOPING LITERATURE REVIEW SKILLS
Understanding Business Strategy
Evaluation of IP for Commercialization Josiah Hernandez.
CriteriaExemplary (4 - 5) Good (2 – 3) Needs Improvement (0 – 1) Identifying Problem and Main Objective Initial QuestionsQuestions are probing and help.
Market Health SOME CONCLUDING REMARKS. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological.
Strategies for Innovation Sourcing 30 August 2007 Paul McGowan Center for Innovative Technology Herndon, VA / Strategies.
Innovation and Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Forest Management Determinants, fostering and impeding factors IP INNO-FOREST, 28 August 2007, Sopron Ewald.
Type author names here © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Operations Management Chapter 10 Developing New Products and Services Jones.
OK. So I’ve Submitted My Proposal
1 Part 2: Analyzing Environments Chapter 4: Analyzing the Firm.
Strategic management Collaboration, Alliances, Mergers and Acquisitions Prof.Dr. E. Vatchkova.
STRATEGY Process, Content, Context
WHY SOME NEW PRODUCTS ARE MORE SUCCESSFUL THAN OTHERS DAVID H. HENARD DAVID M. SZYMANSKI Max Andersson, Nicolas Dolenc, Timo Itävuo, Samuel Makkonen,
Dr Jane Tonge Senior Examiner
Lean Manufacturing Practices In Malaysian SMEs. 1.0Introduction Research Background Why Lean Manufacturing needs to be practiced in SMEs? Problem Statement.
IP4INNO Module 4B: Business Planning with IP The 7Ps Assessment Tool Timing recommendation: 1.5 hours Name of speakerVenue & date.
Open Innovation Co-creation of innovation
Nancy Swisher Lecturer in ESL FLE 402 Fall 2016
Porter’s Competitive Forces
Objective 3.01: Factors Influencing Entrepreneurship
School of Economics Shanghai University
Advanced Higher Modern Languages
International Business 9e
Introduction to Business
Synergies core competencies and network based strategies
An assessment framework for Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
SAMPLE Glimpse Into the Future Using Predictive HR Analytics
General Meeting cern, 10-12/10/2017 CREATIONS Demonstrators
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
Entrepreneurial Strategy: Generating and Exploiting
Week 6 Innovation Process
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Understand that corporate-level strategies include decisions regarding diversification, international expansion, and vertical integration Describe the.
Competing with IT “Using IT as a Strategic Resource and obtaining a competitive advantage.
Chapter 9 Corporate-Level Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
Entrepreneurial Strategy: Generating and Exploiting
Advantage vs. Necessity
EC Strategy, Globalization, and SMEs
Style You need to demonstrate knowledge and understanding beyond undergraduate level and should also reach a level of scope and depth beyond that taught.
Tour VII: Change Management
Competitiveness of the regional market, importance of statistics and innovations THE ROLE OF RESEARCH CENTERS IN PROMOTING OF RESEARCH Sarajevo, 8th.
Entry Strategy and Strategic Alliances
Chapter 9 Corporate-Level Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing.
Lecture 6: How to Read an Academic Paper
Entrepreneurial Strategy: Generating and Exploiting
By the end of this chapter you will be able
9 Chapter 9: Corporate Strategy: Horizontal Integration, Vertical Integration, and Strategic Outsourcing BA 469 Spring Term, 2007 Prof. Dowling.
Solving Workplace Problems
Entrepreneurial Strategy
By the end of this chapter you will be able
Managing People: Essay Guidance 2018/19
Wide Ideas Idea Management Software Idea Management Process
Presentation transcript:

TU-E1120 SMOTI Lecture 6 HOW OPEN IS INNOVATION? LINUS DAHLANDER, DAVID M. GANN TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 1

Agenda 1.General overview of the article 2.Different types of openness 3.Advantages and disadvantages of each type 4.Conclusion and further research TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 2

1.1 The Article How open is innovation? – L. Dahlander, D. M. Gann, Literary overview of use of headwords ’open innovation’ (OI) in scientific database Consists three parts: ◦Results of literary overview ◦New framework ◦Future & further discussion TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 3 ”The author presents a model in which they categorize open innovation into four different categories. Discuss this model in detail! What are the four categories? List advantages and disadvantages within each one of the categories?”

150 - No clear definition Clarification & categorization - 4 categories Framing device 1.2 Findings and results Open innovation is widely used in scientific and technological literature ◦Thomson’s Web of Knowledge (ISI) journals till August 2009 Clarify the definition of ’openness’ used in literature ◦Different definitions and focal points ◦Use of ’openness’ is not coherent Creation of a framing device to compare and evaluate advantages and disadvatages of openness and open innovation ◦Outbound innovation ◦Inbound innovation TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 4

1.3 Goals and group task Framework provides a tool for company managers; ◦Compare advantages and disadvantages of openess and OI ◦Identify own characteristics ◦Round up companies together ◦Not depending on field of operation ◦Ability to compare ◦Future? How did authors do? ◦Describe the framework ◦Discussion about the model TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 5 ”The author presents a model in which they categorize open innovation into four different categories. Discuss this model in detail! What are the four categories? List advantages and disadvantages within each one of the categories?”

2.1 Revealing 6 ●outbound innovation ●non-pecuniary ●revealing internal resources to the external environment TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP

2.2 Selling 7 ●outbound innovation ●pecuniary ●out-licensing or selling products in the market place TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11

2.3 Sourcing ●inbound innovation ●non-pecuniary ●external ideas & knowledge TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 8

2.4 Acquiring ●inbound innovation ●pecuniary ●external inventions & input to innovation process TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 9

3 Overview The Four Categories of Openness TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP REVEALING SELLING SOURCING AQUIRING Inbound Pecuniary Outbound Non-Pecuniary

3.1 Comparison - Outbound  Steady stream of incremental innovations  Collective development of innovative solutions (e.g. open source software)  Escaping “myopia of protectiveness”  Gaining legitimacy from the environment  Difficulties in capturing accruing benefits  Decide which internal resource should be revealed  some can leak to the competitor TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP  firms can more fully leverage their investments in R&D  Profiting by partnering with actors adept by bringing inventions to the market place  Disclosure problem  patents, IPRs  Several obstacles to overcome:  Significant transaction costs  Lack of implementation strategy

3.2 Comparison - Inbound  Access to a broad range of ideas and knowledge  Ability to create synergy between own processes and an external idea  profitable new products  Over-search  difficulties to choose and combine the multiple alternatives  Lost focus  rely to heavily on external sources TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP  Many benefits from in-sourcing external ideas, but that requires expertise  Access to knowledge and resources of the partners  Risk of outsourcing critical dimensions of firm’s business model  Difficulties concerning the essence of input  too similar to existing practices  very hard to come up with new combinations  too distant  difficult to align with existing practice s

4.1 Conclusion TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP Research about open innovation has increased the last decades in a fragmentational way.  Develop a framework about open innovation in order to help the management calculating the advanteges and disadvantages of open innovation  Expansion on the evidence of these arguments will be useful to explain under which circumstances which strategy will be successful No clear definition

4.2 Further Research 1.The influence of new information infrasturctures on open innovation 2. Combinations of the different types 3.Develop a process for maintaining large numbers of relations TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 14

Worth a mention Problem with open innovation When firms use external sources they have to check the relevance of all the data Critique The model and article is very cited and discussed in later research on open innovation ◦Other papers cite the credibility and the extensiveness of literary overview ◦Most of later debate agree with authors’ views about Chesbrough's model (see reference) Additional references H. W. Cherbrough, 2003: Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology Fey, C. F., Birkinshaw, J., External sources of knowledge, governance mode and R&D performance. Journal of Management 31 (4), pp. 597– TU-E1120 SMOTI - GROUP 11 15