MA-PAL TASK 1 LEADERSHIP THROUGH A VISION FOR HIGH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
District Accreditation
Advertisements

WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
School Improvement Through Capacity Building The PLC Process.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Illinois Principal Preparation Program Internship Assessment Rubric
The edTPA trademarks are owned by The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Use of the edTPA trademarks is permitted only pursuant.
Task 3 Assessing Student Learning
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
TPAC - Task 2 By Dora L. Bailey, An analysis of the effects of teaching on students’ learning (the “so what”) Video Tape should : 2.
1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE Strategic Planning Steering Committee Session V September 7, 2012.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment 1.2 Discuss approaches to auditing the capabilities and capacity of an college in or der to evaluate its readiness.
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT for LEADERS M A S S A C H U S E T T S PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT for LEADERS M A S S A C H U S E T T S Massachusetts Performance Assessment.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION GRAVES COUNTY SCHOOLS © 2010 AdvancED.
Annual Planning Task Force (APTF) Recommendations NOVEMBER 18, 2014.
HRM 498 ASSIST Teaching Effectiverly/hrm498assist.com FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
Nevada Department of Education Office of Educational Opportunity Nevada Comprehensive Curriculum Audit Tool for Schools NCCAT-S August
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Strategic planning A Tool to Promote Organizational Effectiveness
PG-26765: Culture and People
What it means for New Teachers
Breakthrough School Improvement
LEADERSHIP THROUGH A VISION FOR HIGH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
Presented by Deborah Eldridge, CAEP Consultant
HRM 498 ASSIST Experience Tradition/hrm498assist.com
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Organizational Consulting
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
ESL 504 Innovative Education-- snaptutorial.com
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Strategic Planning Setting Direction Retreat
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
GIFT and IBP Pilot PROJECT on PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Campus Improvement Plans
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Massachusetts Performance Assessment for Leaders: Leadership Preparation Programs Webinar September 30, 2015.
AET/515 Instructional Plan Template (Shirmen McDonald)
EdTPA - Where do I begin? Jenn Hatch Knight NBCT, M.Ed. edTPA Student Support Coordinator.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

MA-PAL TASK 1 LEADERSHIP THROUGH A VISION FOR HIGH STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT

WHAT DO YOU NEED TO DO TO COMPLETE THIS TASK?  Access, collect and analyze three to five years of quantitative and qualitative data on school culture, student learning, and overall school context information  Identify a priority academic area where improved student performance is needed, with attention to federally-designated priority student groups Example: Students with disabilities, ELL, African American, Hispanic, Native American students, low-income students, and students performing below state proficiency levels Documents/Sources:EDU 5601 Data Collection EDU 5602 Data Collection, Action Plan (see MA-Pal Rubric 1a)

 WHAT DO YOU NEED TO DO TO COMPLETE THIS TASK? – CONTINUED …  Collect additional quantitative and qualitative data on the selected student group’s performance issues  Identify and document existing school programs, services, and practices relevant to the student group’s performance/identify the gaps in effectiveness and opportunities for improvement  Solicit input from stakeholders about student learning needs and proposed improvement strategies EDU 5602 Data Collection, Action Plan EDU 5612 Adaptive Change Project (see MA-Pal Rubric 1a)

Qu  WHAT DO YOU NEED TO DO TO COMPLETE THIS TASK? – CONTINUED….  Develop a vision, set of action strategies, and a proposed plan to improve the group’s learning  Solicit feedback about the proposed plan  Evaluate the feedback and make revisions  Examine the leadership skills and practices that you used or developed in completing this task (see MA-PAL Rubric 1a)

Questions to Consider  What school and district data currently exist?  Which individuals at the school/district level can best advise you on the priority academic area?  What information can be obtained from observations/interviews with stakeholders?  What sources of evidence make an argument compelling?

Components  Investigate - Review, collect, and analyze data  Prepare – Evaluate gaps and opportunities for improvement  Act – Design and present a plan; solicit input and guidance  Assess – Evaluate your leadership skills and practices used in the task Documents/Sources: EDU 5601 Data Collection; EDU 5602 Data Collection, Action Plan EDU 5612 Adaptive Change Project, Leadership Style Paper EDU 6755 Financial and Asset Management Project (see MA-Pal Rubric 1a; 1b; 1c)

Submission: Artifacts, Documents, and Commentary  Three artifacts  Documents that support your artifacts  Your commentary in narrative form, in response to a series of prompts, about the development of your leadership skills while completing this task.

Artifact # 1 – Priority Area  Memo to superintendent/principal (three single-spaced pages, up to 1,500 words) which includes:  Description of a priority academic area where improved student performance is needed  Compelling rationale based on the data collected and analyzed  Analysis of multiple quantitative/qualitative data  Description of the school and community context and cultural factors  Summary of gaps in relation to the priority area  How input was solicited (see MA-PAL Rubric 1a)

Artifact #2 - Plan for Action Strategies  Memo to superintendent/principal (four single-spaced pages, up to 2,000 words which includes:  Vision statement describing how the plan will support and sustain improvement in the priority academic area for the student group  Compelling evidence-based justification explaining how the plan responds to the school context and student culture, and addresses the needs of student groups to improve student learning  Goals and measurable objectives  Action strategies  Theory of action; How will these strategies effectively work together to positively impact student performance (see MA-PAL Rubric 1b)

Artifact #2 - Plan for Action Strategies continued  Existing resources used and new resources required  Changes in the school organization or structure  Roles and lines of responsibility for implementation  Steps to engage staff and garner support for proposed strategies  Timeline, proposed evaluation and feedback processes (see MA-PAL Rubric 1b)

Artifact #3 - Findings, Feedback, Recommendations  In a report of up to three single-spaced pages, up to 1,500 words describe how you collected, synthesized, and interpreted feedback on your plan from stakeholders including the following information:  Identification by role of individuals from the leadership team, staff and other stakeholders  Synthesis and interpretation of the feedback regarding relevance and comprehensiveness of the plan  Explanation of how the final plan was revised to incorporate feedback (see MA-PAL Rubric 1c)

Documents  Category #1:Student demographic and other relevant school context and student performance information  Category #2:The school’s existing vision, mission, and school improvement plan  Category #3:School and district priorities  Category #4:Data collection forms (e.g. surveys, interview guides) used to gather additional information  Category #5:Forms(surveys or interview questions) used to collect feedback from the leadership team and other stakeholders about the proposed plan

Commentary  In a personal analysis of up to two single-spaced pages, up to 1,000 words  Evaluate the leadership skills you used in developing the plan for Task 1  Refer to the guiding questions on pages 29 and 30 of the Candidate Assessment Handbook (see MA-PAL Rubric 1c)

INQUIRY AND PLANNING PROCESS  Select an initial learning priority area  Determine which student group has the most challenges or needs  Determine the programs and services that already exist to support student learning

INQUIRY AND PLANNING PROCESS  Investigate the student learning experience in the priority area quantitatively and qualitatively  Develop a plan to improve student learning for one group in the priority academic area  Solicit feedback and revise plan

Assessment of Evidence  Scorers will be reviewing your submission to determine if you have complied with the following requirements:  A. Has the submission been appropriately blinded with all candidate, school, staff and student information?  B. Is the submission addressing an academic priority area for the school?  C. Does the submission address a federally-designated priority student group? ( Students with disabilities, ELL, African American, Hispanic, Students with disabilities, ELL, African American, Hispanic, Native American students, low- income students, and students performing below state proficiency levels)  D. Is the submission complete in that it contains all supporting documents in each category?