Introduction Sara Ahmadian, & Delroy L. Paulhus University of British Columbia Predicting Success among Republican Candidates: Personality and Verbal Style.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Warm-up: Answer the following question on your warm-up page. How many times have your parents voted for the president?
Advertisements

V v You CAN Trust a Pretty Face: Perceived Physical Attractiveness and the Use of Credibility Related Linguistic Markers Katy L. Krieger 1, Jill A. Brown.
Chapter Nine Nominations, Elections, and Campaigns.
Published August 5, 2015 National Journal Presentation Credits
What Determines Elections? Linkage Institutions #4.
National Conventions. National party conventions They meet for 4 days during late Summer of the presidential election year This is the only time the Democrat.
Results A majority of respondents (67.4%) reported using Facebook daily to several times a day. Respondents that had never used Facebook were omitted from.
CHRISTINE B. WILLIAMS BENTLEY COLLEGE WALTHAM, MASSACHUSETTS THE HARVARD NETWORKS IN POLITICAL SCIENCE CONFERENCE JUNE 13-14, 2008 The Internet as a Grassroots.
Release Date September 29, 2015 The GOP Debates Begin Late Summer 2015 Michael Cornfield Associate Professor Lara Brown Associate Professor Jamie P. Chandler.
Voting. Electoral College- Votes per State are given based on each State’s total Reps and Senators.
Prediction of Influencers from Word Use Chan Shing Hei.
The Constitution The constitution would not have passed had the Federalists not protected individual liberties (The Bill of Rights) Bill of Limits.
EMMY AWARDS. It was a great night for HBO. After five seasons HBO's epic "Game of Thrones" won its first best-drama award Sunday night at the 67th Primetime.
When Do We Elect the President of the United States? The people of the United States of American choose a President every four years. An election takes.
DO WEALTHY CANDIDATES WIN ELECTIONS?. PLAN The influence of money in campaigns Global trends Why is money so essential? The limits of money’s impact.
Selecting a President 2016: Primaries & Caucuses elections/videos/primaries-caucuses-and-conventions.
Empirical support—U.S. Wisconsin For example, Hedlund and Watts (1986) find that, in the open primaries of Wisconsin from 1968 to 1984, around 30% to 40%
Republicans hold debates for 17 candidates who want to be president Power Point by: Jenna Sullivan Source: Newsela Date: December 8 th, 2015.
CandidateRepresentativesSenatorsGovernorsTota l Marco Rubio Ted Cruz John Kasich Donald Trump Ben Carson 1 1 Hillary.
DayIn-classHomework 1Overview: Primaries and General ElectionWatch Election Primaries and Caucuses/Electoral CollegeCoverage 2Choose groups/ResearchResearch.
Campaign Strategy & Voter Turnout March How are campaigns run? Candidate Researchers Campaign Manager - Our Brand is Crisis Our Brand is Crisis.
The Executive Branch Of the U.S. Government. CNN Student News Florida`s governor declared a ___________ in two counties to speed up government help to.
The Campaign Process Chapter 14. The Campaign Process ✦ We will cover ✦ The Structure of a Campaign ✦ The Candidate for the Campaign ✦ Which do we vote.
CandidateRepresentativesSenatorsGovernorsTota l Marco Rubio Jeb Bush Ted Cruz John Kasich Ben Carson 1 1 Donald Trump 0000.
Concentrated interest vs dispersed interest Interest groups, PACS, and Iron Triangles Campaign Finance- dark money Propaganda Political Parties.
The New Shape of the Republican Race Insights based on the work of Ronald Brownstein February 26, 2016 First Published: February 26, 2016 Producer: Alexander.
2016 Election Central: How someone becomes Nominated for President By: Mr. Parsons.
The Electoral College GOAL: Evaluate the Electoral College system.
Choosing Someone You Like What things do you look for in someone running for a certain job or position?
Forms of Political Participation
One Book One Northwestern Book Group Discussion
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION and METHODS
Attachment style and condom use across and within dating relationships
[ 10.3 ] Voting Trends.
Chapter 10: The Nuts and Bolts of correlational studies.
Power Point #4 Presidential Campaigns
Selecting a President 2016:
Exploratory Factor Analysis Participants, Procedures, & Measures
Strategic Voting in Open Primaries
Differentiating Psychopathic and Alexithymic Emotional Traits With Thin Slices of Verbal Behaviour K. Kaseweter, M.Sc. Candidate, University of Northern.
Influence detection of famous personalities using Politeness and Likeability Navita Jain.
US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Participants and Procedures
Selecting a President:
5def Rising Campaign Cost
Krystle Lange & Regan A. R. Gurung University of Wisconsin, Green Bay
Donald Trump DYC Debate.
Conservative Media Factor Median of Factor Difference
Past and Present: Verb Tenses Across Blog Topics
Measuring Personal Religious Experience
The Dynamics of Political Communication Chapter 3 The Study of political communication © 2018 Taylor & Francis.
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Do wealthy candidates win elections?
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
The Political Process SSCG 15 & 16.
Project PResentations
The Fall Campaign October 31, 2017
Figure 1. Candidates’ News Coverage, Week by Week
Approval Voting.
Language and taboo Why is a certain audience shocked by the use of certain language? What do taboos say about cultural values and shared beliefs? How is.
CMC Meina Zhu, Susan C. Herring, and Curtis J. Bonk
How should a president get elected?
Presidential Elections
Warm-up What do the following four men all have in common?
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Warm Up – March 4 Answer the following questions on a post it:
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Conclusions and Future Implications
The Electoral College Political Science Module Developed by PQE
Presentation transcript:

Introduction Sara Ahmadian, & Delroy L. Paulhus University of British Columbia Predicting Success among Republican Candidates: Personality and Verbal Style Method We analyzed speeches of nine Republican presidential candidates: Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, John Kasich, Ben Carson, Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Rick Perry, Lindsey Graham & Mike Huckabee. Each candidate’s announcement speech and 2 other random speeches were chosen and transcribed leading to a total of 27 speeches. Three variables were of outmost importance to us: Media Presence, Narcissism and Formality. Formality: The speeches were run through LIWC [Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count] (Tausczik & Pennebaker, 2010).to look for linguistic markers of Formal Speech: They included informality, analytical thinking, words per sentence and words less than 6 letters. Narcissism: Speeches were coded by a blind coder on two criteria: derogation and boasting. In addition, we extracted the LIWC total of person pronouns (FPP). Media Presence: Each candidate’s twitter page was coded for ratio of followers/following, total number of tweets before announcement, total number of tweets after announcement, and number of tweets per year on Twitter. As outcome variables, we collected information on the number of primary contest won by each candidate to see if there was a relationship between media presence and contests won. Figure 1: As expected, t- test between Trump (M = -6.51, SD= 1.64) and other Republican candidates (M =.81, SD= 2.46) indicated that Trump’s speech incorporated a lower rate of formal linguistic attributes, t(25) = -4.99, p <.001. Figure 2: Trump (M = 5.24, SD=.25) used a higher rate of personal pronouns compared to other republican candidates (M = 2.7, SD= 1.53), t(25) = 2.83, p =.004. Figure 3: Trump (M =.72, SD=.59) scored significantly higher on narcissism compared to other republican candidates (M = -. 09, SD=.64), t(25) = 2.09, p =.02. Table 1: Correlations of media presence, narcissism and informality with number of states and territories won by each candidate. * p <.05 Candidate success (# states won) was predicted by narcissistic, informal speech, and social media presence. The fact that Donald Trump’s campaign style led in all 3 qualities may explain his popularity as a Republican candidate. His informal style of speaking may lead him to come across as more relatable to the public (Hirsh & Peterson, 2009). Supporting previous research on campaign speeches (Watts et al., 2013), Trump’s grandiose style may explain winning the popular vote among Republicans. Finally, our research confirmed Trump’s strong presence on social media. This advantage supports Lee & Shin (2012) in showing a positive link between politicians’ twitter activity and people’s intention to vote for them. Trump’s success may not be a puzzle after all. It appears that unlimited self- promotion is a winning style – at least among Republican voters. Watts, A. L., Lilienfeld, S. O., Smith, S. F., Miller, J. D., Campbell, W. K., Waldman, I. D.. Faschingbauer, T. J. (2013). The double-edged sword of grandiose narcissism: Implications for successful and unsuccessful leadership among U.S. presidents. Psychological Science, 24, Lee, E., & Shin, S. Y. (2012). Are they talking to me? cognitive and affective effects of interactivity in politicians' twitter communication. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Personality and language use in self-narratives. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, Discussion Result References The success or failure of political candidates is determined by a small amount of information – often superficial - transmitted by media, primarily television Based on previous research, we considered three themes in analyzing the 2016 Republican candidates: 1. Narcissism: evidence suggests that narcissists make a good first impression 2. Informality: more casual candidates fare better than more formal ones 3. Social media presence: recent candidates have fared better if they make active use of social media. We hypothesized that all three variables would contribute to success in the Republican race The remarkable success of Donald Trump has baffled most political pundits We suspected his success can be traced to the three key factors noted above. We predict that he will surpass all candidates on these three variables. States & Territories Won Tweets over 4 month after announcement r =.70* Follower/following ratio on Twitter r =.88* Narcissism ratings from speeches r =.45 Boasting r =.59* Derogation r =.18 Informality r =.72*