Training for staff members responsible for writing self-evaluation reports of study programmes, May 2011 University of Tuzla Prof. Dr Emina Nakaš-Ićindić.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Karl Donert, National Teaching Fellow HERODOT Project coordinator HERODOT: Benchmarking Geography.
Advertisements

Prof. V.J. Papazoglou on behalf of the Hellenic Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (HQAA) ENQA Seminar on Current Trends in the European Quality.
Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki June 2005
Educational Teams: Variation at McGill Teaching in a different way Lynn McAlpine McGill University Canada
The role of national standards for quality assurance of training programs in higher educational institutions of the Republic of Tajikistan Samadov Safarboy,
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
Welcome.
UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID CENTRO DE AMPLIACIÓN DE ESTUDIOS CRITERIA AND GUIDELINES FOR THE ACCREDITATION OF MASTER’S DEGREES IN SPAIN 1.
Quality Assurance at the University St. Kliment Ohridski Elizabeta Bahtovska National Bologna promoter TEMPUS SCM C-032B06 West Balkan Bologna Promoters.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS AGENCY
The Bologna Declaration and its implementation at Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (Belgium) JEP UM Zagreb, 28 October 2004 An Huts International.
TEMPUS UM_JEP Development of Quality Assurance System in Higher Education - QUASYS Promotion of Quality Assurance System at the University of.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Institutional Evaluation of medical faculties Prof. A. Сheminat Arkhangelsk 2012.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
GUIDELINES ON CRITERIA AND STANDARDS FOR PROGRAM ACCREDITATION (AREA 1, 2, 3 AND 8)
INTITUTIONAL AUDIT & (SELF)-ACCREDITATION Ton Vroeijenstijn.
Quality in mobility: how to measure and assess it Maria Sticchi Damiani.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
AMU DoQuP FINAL REPORT MD, PhD, Associate Professor G.Ahmadov Azerbaijan Medical University Bishkek, April 22, 2015.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ESTONIA ACCREDITATION OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES AND INSTITUTIONS TIIT LAASBERG.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 I.2 Relevant Documents
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department.
29 November 2005 Educational quality at the K.U.Leuven Quality assurance and enhancement at the K.U.Leuven Veerle Hulpiau.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
1, avenue Léon-Journault Sèvres - France Centre international d’études pédagogiques.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
The Bologna Process at the University of Helsinki University of Helsinki
AHPGS ON SITE VISIT NOVEMBER 2015 Vice -Deanship for Development and Quality November 2015.
Organizational Process The activities conducted by an educational institution or school is called organizational process Which consist of series of steps.
University of Warsaw. The quality of education assurance and enhancement system at the University of Warsaw.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
AIUA STRATEGI PLAN GUIDELINES : Quality Assurance Prepared by Kolej Universiti Islam Sultan Azlan Shah (KUISAS), Perak, Malaysia.
Self-evaluation report of study-programs Prof dr André Govaert ANDRE
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 13-14, 2009 III.1 The accreditation report:
P ROPOSAL C RITERIA AND INDICATORS FOR EVALUATION OF STUDY PROGRAMS ON BH U NIVERSITIES IN ESABIH PROJECT D. Bokonjic D. Mujkic.
Accreditation of study programs at the Faculty of information technologies Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
School practice Dragica Trivic. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM TEMPUS MASTS CONFERENCE in Novi Sad Practice should be seen as an integral part of the.
Preparation of self evaluation reports in KaHo Sint-Lieven 09 October 2010 Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
TEMPUS IV MASTS Master curriculum design workshop in Nis Subject Teacher Education Master Programme at University of Belgrade.
1 The faculty and SOMA welcome all master students to a seminar Monday at – How to get a PhD?
Role of Regulatory Bodies in Improving Quality Education By Rashmi Farkiya.
Preparation of self evaluation reports in KaHo Sint-Lieven 09 October 2010 Tempus SMGR BE ESABIH EU standards for accreditation of study.
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
New Curriculum of Nursing Education
TRAINERS AND TRAINING PROCESSES
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Erasmus+ ( ): 3 Key Actions
Curriculum in Statistics at the University of Oviedo
EUR-ACE Engineering Programme Accreditations
Assessment feedback of Hospitality students by industry stakeholders during Work-integrated learning. Beverley Seager Cape Town Hotel School Cape Peninsula.
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Recognising and Rewarding Successful Teaching
Introduction to the training
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Recognition Tools and Practices – Criteria and Procedure
Evaluation of Teaching Process and Students Experience
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Istanbul University, Department of Economics BEYAZIT-FATIH ISTANBUL
Internal and External Quality Assurance Systems for Cycle 3 (Doctoral) programmes "PROMOTING INTERNATIONALIZATION OF RESEARCH THROUGH ESTABLISHMENT AND.
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics (KhNUE)
The Perspective of a Professional Body (HPCSA) on National Standards & Reviews. the SAAIR CONFERENCE at UJ Prof K Mfenyana 03 July 2019.
Program Modification “Academic Year 2019” Assumption University
Entrepreneurship prof. dr. Jo Seldeslachts
Presentation transcript:

Training for staff members responsible for writing self-evaluation reports of study programmes, May 2011 University of Tuzla Prof. Dr Emina Nakaš-Ićindić

 2.1 Correspondence between objectives and the content of the programme  Translation of the objectives in the curriculum;  Level  Presence of inter-disciplinary elements;  International dimension in the study programme/internationalisation of the curriculum (policy, participation rate, cooperation forms, international contacts, etc);  Degree to which recent advancements in education at home and abroad have found expression in the curriculum;  Procedures for curriculum revision and innovation;  Participation of relevant stakeholders in curriculum development, revision and innovation.

 Content of the study programme is in line with the objectives of the education  There are functional linkages of the content of scientific disciplines in realization of multidisciplinary courses/ subjects  Clearly defined objectives and outcomes of education aimed at gaining appropriate competencies within the each course/subject syllabi  Objectives of the education are translated into competencies, i.e. expected knowledge, skills and attitudes students have to attain  Regular revision and introduction of innovations in the study curriculum  Study content is designed in line with the recent advancements in specific scientific fields

 Insufficient internationalization of the study programme  Standard operating procedures for curriculum revision and innovation are not developed and adopted  Relevant stakeholders are not sufficiently involved in the curriculum development, revision, and innovation

 The Office for Quality Assurance and Accreditation should be responsible for developing the standard operating procedures for curriculum revision and innovation and the Scientific and Academic Council for their adoption.  Relevant stakeholders should be actively involved in the development, revision, and innovation of the curriculum and should provide financial support for realization of education and scientific research.

 Attention in the curriculum for knowledge development;  Attention in the curriculum for skills that support professional functioning;  Attention in the curriculum for experience in the field: interaction with professional practice, attitude, content, level and guidance of practical training final projects, etc;  Alignment with recent (international) developments in the field/discipline and professional practice (among other things, as researcher);  Research alignment of the study programme: among other things, feedback of (own) research to the study programme, active involvement of students in research within the study programme;  Attention in the curriculum for development of research skills – conveying the research attitude – research skills. Interaction between study programme and social/academic services.

 Sequential structure and coherence of the curriculum in terms of the standard process;  Harmony of the curriculum in the cooperation with other university departments and institutions;  Relation between the curriculum and flexible learning process.

 The study programme fulfils the formal requirements with regard to the size of the curriculum for Bachelor and Master:  It is possible to follow the programme because factors that hinder the learning process are being eliminated as much as possible;  Study time measurements and follow up;  Agreement between estimated and actual study time;  Spread of the study time in the study programme;  Presence of factors obstructing or promoting study and any steps.

 The didactic concept is in line with the objectives;  The work forms are aligned with the didactic concept. Work forms used (lectures, working groups, project work, practical work, self- study, workshops, etc);  Alignment of the didactic work forms with the objectives, the didactic concept and the characteristics of the student intake;  Attention for recent educational developments at home and abroad in the didactic concept and its elaboration;  Variation of educational forms;  Educational resources used and quality (syllabi, guides, courses, teaching and learning aids, etc): Alignment of the learning resources with the didactic concept, the objectives (at study programme level and study programme component level) and the characteristics of the student intake;

 Indicator 4.1 Assessment and testing (learning assessment)  Student guidance during assessment;  Organisation of tests and examinations;  Various assessment standards with regard to the objectives of the study programme components and the study programme as a whole: concept, orientation of the evaluation to the (integrated) tests of knowledge, insight, skills and attitudes, degree of difficulty;  Criteria and method of the assessment by the evaluators;  Criteria and method of the assessment by the examination committee;  Transparency of the assessment: Familiarity of students with the requirements connected to the evaluation;  Familiarity of students and staff with the assessment procedures;  Quality Assurance of examination matters

 Place/relative weight of the practical training/thesis in the study programme;  Contents and concept of the practical training;  Preparation for the practical training;  Guidance in the practical training;  Assessment of the practical training.

 Proportion of the practical training in comparison to theoretical is increased  Clearly defined objectives of the practical training  Experienced academic staff for realization of the practical training  Application of modern methods and equipment  Precisely defined assessment methods of the practical training

 Great number of students does not always allow to follow standard and norms in reference to the size of groups at the practical training  Inadeqate facilities for some kind of practical training  Insufficient number of assistants to organize work in small groups  Inadeqate qantity and allocation of didactic equipment, phantom dolls for the clinical and preclinical practical training  Information and communication technologies in the process of education are not sufficentely used  Unequal distribution of material resources for realization of the practical training at some cathedras

Years Number of academic staff Number of students Number of graduates Student/staff members Graduates/staff members I ,20- II ,92- III2990-3,10- IV5938-0,14- *There are no graduate students because the new study program started 4 years ago and the first graduate student will complete education at least in two years.

 Proposed measures  To hire new assitants. Number of assistants employed at the Faculty is limited. The Faculty does not have influence or autonomy to make decisions on number of the academic staff.  To improve conditions for realization of the practical training. Number of students and way of financing, limited material resources

 Internal procedures for admission of students;  Characteristics of the student intake and related policy;  The curriculum is in line with the preliminary training;  Specific activities with regard to the alignment between the preliminary training and the study programme;

 Handling the results of enquires;  Influence of students on curriculum;  Participation of students in different decision making bodies and influence on managerial structures.

 Existence of bilateral and multilateral agreement in the country and abroad;  Existence of student exchange programs  Acceptance of credits gain during exchange programs  Existence of ECTS or other credit systems

 Existence of coaching system and regular consultations;  Way of coaching students;

 Way of handling of complains from students;  Measures for student support;  Information and advice during the study programme by study programme/central services;  Communication of educational objectives, and education and examination regulations;  Organisation and guidance of international student exchange (including guidance and integration of foreign students).