TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE & DISSEMINATION: MODEL DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO IMPROVE ADOLESCENT LITERACY FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN GRADES 6 – 12 (84.326M)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FY 2013 Technical Assistance and Capacity Building under the Transformation Initiative OneCPD TA NOFA 1.
Advertisements

FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Alaska Native Education Program (ANEP) Technical Assistance Meeting September 2014 Sylvia E. Lyles Valerie Randall Almita Reed.
Computing Leadership Summit STEM Education Steve Robinson U.S. Department of Education White House Domestic Policy Council February 22, 2010.
TRIBAL COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES PROGRAM (TCUP). Purpose of the Program To assist Tribal Colleges and Universities to: Build, expand, renovate, and equip.
Honolulu, HI August 1,  The requested appropriation for FY 2015 funding for the AANAPISI Part A is $3,062,000.  Planning for at least 10 new awards.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Quality Improvement Capacity for Impact Project (QICIP) Pre-Review Conference Call Competitive Funding Opportunity Announcement: HRSA March 25,
SKILLS FOR SUCCESS PROGRAM COMPETITION OVERVIEW—JUNE 2015 Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official documents published.
CFDA E 2014 Technical Assistance Webinar for Prospective Applicants.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Centers for International Business Education—Technical Assistance.
Find HRSA Funding Opportunities. Grants.gov All discretionary grants offered by the 26 federal grant-making agencies can be found on Grants.gov. You do.
School Leadership Program Pre-Application Slides United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BUREAU OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION Laboratory School and Model Early Childhood Learning Grant
The Early Reading First Program CFDA # A and B Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Program Closing Date: June 24, 2014 At 4:30:00pm Eastern Daylight Time Note: Please mute your telephones.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
Overview of the FY 2010 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey 1.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Professional Development for Arts Educators Program (PDAE) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Improvement.
HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES. Purpose of the Program To assist Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) to expand their role.
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 17, 2011 Webinar and Meeting.
Arts in Education Model Development and Dissemination Grant Program (AEMDD) Pre-Application Webinar U.S. Department of Education Office of Innovation and.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
School Leadership Program Pre Application Meeting March 31, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived Information.
School Leadership Program Pre Application Meeting February 19, 2010 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived.
Request for Applications for Child Welfare Implementation Projects.
ALASKA NATIVE/NATIVE HAWAIIAN INSTITUTIONS ASSISTING COMMUNITIES (AN/NHIAC) PROGRAM.
Predominantly Black Institutions Program CFDA: A FY 2015 PREAPPLICATION WEBINAR Washington, DC July 14, :00 AM. – 12:00 PM, EDT July 14, 2015.
CFDA E 2012 Application Technical Assistance Webinar.
National Center for Information and Technical Support for Postsecondary Students with Disabilities (NCITSPSD) NCITSPSD Technical Assistance Workshop Orientation.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
1. 2 Department of Education Public Charter School Program  PURPOSE: To expand the number of high- quality charter schools by providing financial assistance.
Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Carol M. White Physical Education Program CFDA # F.
Welcome U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs CFDA K Personnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children.
Management Plan Describe the adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed project: On time and within budget Include clearly.
Making Grants.gov Work for You: U.S. Department of Education International Education Program Service Technical Assistance Workshop January 2009 Find. Apply.
Full-Service Community Schools Pre-Application Meeting March 12, 2008 United States Department of Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Archived.
OFFICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ACQUISITION NATIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (NPD) NPD Grant Competition Webinar 2: GPRA & Selection Criteria January.
National Coordinating Center for the Regional Genetic Service Collaboratives ( HRSA – ) Joan A. Scott, MS CGC, Chief, Genetics Services Branch Division.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
84.323A State Personnel Development Grants Program FY 2012 Competition Jennifer Coffey, PhD August 9 th, 2012.
Office of Innovation and Improvement June 9, 2016 Academies for American History and Civics Grant Competition Note: These slides are intended as guidance.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
CPRC: COMMUNITY PARENT RESOURCE CENTERS (84.328C) Understanding the Application and Process ► March 17, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. (E.D.T)
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
Introductions & Logistical Information
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Stepping-Up Technology Implementation
Technical Assistance Webinar: Technical Assistance and Dissemination to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities: Technical.
Technical Assistance Webinar Personnel Development To Improve Services and Results for Children With Disabilities – Early Childhood Personnel.
Briefing: Interdisciplinary Preparation for Personnel Serving Children with Disabilities Who Have High-Intensity Needs CFDA K Office of.
84.323A State Personnel Development Grants Program
American Institutes for Research
Educational Technology, Media and Materials for Individuals with Disabilities Webinar: Research and Development Center on Developing Software.
Skills for Success Program
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Getting Grants for Your Small Business
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Education for Homeless Children and Youth Program Subgrant
Presentation transcript:

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE & DISSEMINATION: MODEL DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO IMPROVE ADOLESCENT LITERACY FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES IN GRADES 6 – 12 (84.326M) Understanding the Application April 16, 2015

Agenda: I. Overview of the Application A. Timelines B. Award Information C. Purpose/Outcomes II. Evaluation Criteria III. Submission Requirements IV. Criteria for Ineligibility V. Tips for Applicants VI. Resources and Assistance VII. Questions 2 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Application Timelines: Application Available March 18, 2015 Pre-Application Teleconference April 16, :00 PM (Washington, DC Time) Deadline for Transmittal of Applications May 4, :30 PM (Washington, DC Time) 3 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Award Information: 4 See page A-14 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M) Type of Award: Cooperative Agreement(s) Estimated Number of Awards: Up to 3 Award(s) Estimated Available Funds: $1.2M. Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of applications. Estimated Average Size: $400,000 Maximum Award: We will reject any application that proposes a budget exceeding $400,000 for a single budget period of 12 months. Project Period: Up to 48 months

Purpose of Program: Promote academic achievement and improve results for children with disabilities by providing technical assistance (TA), in order to: Support model demonstration projects Disseminate useful information Implement activities that are supported by scientifically based research 5 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Purpose of Priority: 6 Funding for up to 3 cooperative agreements to establish and operate model demonstration projects designed to: Improve adolescent literacy for students with disabilities in middle and high school grades 6-12, who: 1. Score below grade level in reading, or 2. Have identified reading goals and objectives on their individualized education program (IEP) Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Definition of Adolescent Literacy For purposes of this priority: Adolescent Literacy refers to the skills needed by individuals with disabilities to locate, read, understand, interpret, evaluate and use written information across multiple content areas 7 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)c

Project Outcomes: Model Demonstration Projects Must Include: 1. Directed efforts at improving adolescent literacy interventions in content areas using effective whole-class and small group instructional approaches for students with disabilities; 2. A professional development component to teach educators how to implement the interventions with fidelity across a variety of content areas; 3. Strategies for replicating interventions used by educators so they are effective when brought to scale across multiple classrooms within participating local education agencies; 8 See page A-8 & A-9 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Project Outcomes (continued): 9 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M) Model Demonstration Projects Must Include: 4. A plan to implement at least one evidence-based adolescent literacy intervention that applies strong theory or evidence of promise across multiple school sites 5. Professional development for all content area teachers at all middle and high school grades targeted to receive the intervention See page A-8 & A-9 in the Application Package.

Eligibility Information State education agencies (SEAs) Local education agencies (LEAs); including public charter schools that are considered LEAs under State law; Institutions of Higher Education (IHEs); Other public agencies; Private nonprofit organizations; Outlying areas; Freely associated States; Indian tribes or tribal organizations; and For-profit organizations. 10 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M) Eligible Applicants Include: See pages A-15 in the Application Package.

Evaluation Criteria: Applications will be evaluated based on the following selection criteria established for these Model Demonstrations: 1. Significance (10 points); 2. Quality of project design(35 points); 3. Adequacy of resources (15 points); 4. Quality of the management plan (20 points); and 5. Quality of project evaluation (20 points). 11 See pages B-11 – B-13 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Significance: In determining the significance of the proposed project the Secretary considers the following: i. The potential contribution of the proposed project to increase knowledge or understanding of problems, issues, or effective strategies in improving results for children with disabilities. ii. The extent to which the proposed project is likely to build local capacity to provide, improve, or expand services that address the needs of the target population iii. The extent to which the proposed project involves the demonstration of promising strategies that build on, or are alternatives to, existing strategies that address the needs of the target population. 12 See page B-11 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Quality of Project Design: In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project the Secretary considers the following : i. The extent to which the goals, objectives and outcomes to be achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable ii. The extent to which a coherent, evidenced-based model and its conceptual framework is clearly articulated iii. The extent to which the design of the proposed project includes a thorough, high-quality review of the relevant literature, a high- quality plan for project implementation, and the use of appropriate methodological tools to ensure successful achievement of project objectives. 13 See pages B11-B12 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

14 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M) Quality of Project Design (continued) : See pages B11-B12 in the Application Package. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed project the Secretary considers the following: iv. The quality of the proposed demonstration design and procedures for documenting project activities, model implementation and results. v. The extent to which the results of the proposed project are to be disseminated in ways that will enable others to use the information or strategies vi. The likelihood that the proposed project will results in system change or improvement through an articulated plan to sustain implementation beyond the end date of the project.

Adequacy of Resources: In determining the adequacy of resources, the Secretary considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for employment from persons who are members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. In addition, the Secretary considers the following: i. The qualifications, including relevant training and experience, of key project personnel (i.e. project director, project staff, and project consultants or subcontractors) ii. The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment, supplies, and other resources, from the applicant organization and key partners. iii. The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the anticipated results and benefits. 15 See pages B12 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Quality of Management Plan: In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following: i. The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives of the proposed model on time and within budget, including clearly defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing project tasks. ii. The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and continuous improvement in the operation of the proposed model. iii. The adequacy of mechanisms for ensuring high-quality products and service from the proposed project. iv. The extent to which the time commitments of the project director, project staff and project consultants or subcontractors are appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed model. 16 See page B-12 & B13 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Quality of the Project Evaluation: In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary considers the following: i. The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the proposed model. ii. The extent to which the methods of evaluation provide for examining the effectiveness of model implementation strategies iii. The extent to which the methods of evaluation will provide performance feedback and permit periodic assessment of progress toward achieving intended child and system outcomes iv. The extent to which the evaluation will provide guidance about effective strategies suitable for replication or testing in other settings. 17 See page B-13 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Submission Requirements: The application narrative is where you, the applicants, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. The application narrative must be limited to the equivalent of no more than 50 pages, using the following standards: A “page” is 8.5” x 11”, on one side only, with 1” margins at top, bottom, and both sides. Double space all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings, footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in charts, tables, figures, graphs. Use a font either 12 point or larger. Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier, Courier New, or Arial. Page limit only applies to the application narrative section. 18 See pages A-16 - A-17 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Submission Requirements (continued): Applications must be submitted electronically using the Grants.gov Apply site ( Applications may not be submitted via . Applications must be submitted no later than 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the application deadline date. Application narrative sections and all other attachments to the application must be uploaded as files in a PDF read-only, non- modifiable format. Note: If you upload a file type other than a.pdf file, or submit a password-protected file, we will not review the material. Applications submitted to Grants.gov will now be posted using Adobe forms. Note: The compatible version of Adobe Reader is required for viewing, editing and submitting a complete grant application package. Applicants should confirm the compatibility of their Adobe Reader version before downloading the application..Grants.gov 19 See pages D-2 – D-4 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Criteria for Ineligibility: Applications received after the deadline (May 4, 2015 at 4:30:00 p.m., Washington, DC time). Applications not addressing the published priority content. Applications exceeding the maximum award size as published in the application package. 20 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Criteria for Ineligibility (continued): Applications exceeding the page limit in the narrative. Narrative sections and all other attachments to the application submitted as file types other than a read-only, non-modifiable PDF (e.g., interactive or fillable PDF, password-protected file) will not be reviewed. Applications submitted in paper format (unless applicant qualifies for exception to electronic submission requirement). 21 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Tips for Applicants: 1. Register early. Grants.gov registration takes several steps and may take five or more business days to complete. Be sure that your registration with is current. 2. Submit early. We strongly recommend that you do not wait until the last day to submit your application. Grants.gov will put a date/time stamp on your application and then process it after it is fully uploaded. 3. Verify submission is ok. Verify that Grants.gov received your submission on time and that it was validated successfully. For successful submission, the time/date received should be earlier than 4:30:00 pm Washington DC time, on the deadline date. 22 See pages A-32 – A-36 in the Application Package. Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)

Resources and Assistance: Applicants are encouraged to contact: Gregory Knollman PH: (202) To obtain the application via the Internet, use the following address: To obtain the application in an accessible format, contact ED’s Grants and Contracts Services Team ( , TDD/TTY ). For problems submitting an application through Grants.gov, contact the Grants.gov Support Desk ( ; obtain a Grants.gov Support Desk Case Number and keep record of it). 23 Model Demonstrations to Improve Adolescent Literacy for Students with Disabilities in Grades 6-12 (84.326M)