Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Low Complexity Beamtraining for Hybrid MIMO Date: Slide 1 March 2016 Authors: Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE /1186r2 September 2014 Pengfei Xia, Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Comparisons of Simultaneous Downlink Transmissions.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1110r1 September 2013 Submission Beam codebook design scheme for IEEE802.11aj DU GuanglongSlide 1 Date: Presenter:
Doc.: IEEE /0883r1 Submission July 2010 Slide 1 Comment Resolution for “Spatial Reuse” Subgroup Date: Authors: Thomas Derham, Orange.
Doc.: IEEE /0630r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Verification of IEEE ad Channel Model for Enterprise Cubical Environment.
Submission doc.: IEEE / 0431 r0 March 2015 Dmitry Cherniavsky, SiBEAM, Inc.Slide 1 Shared MIMO Architecture for ay. Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0809r0 July 2015 Dmitry Cherniavsky, SiBEAM, Inc.Slide 1 Beamforming to Enable Concurrent Links for ay. Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0808 July 2015 Songnam Hong, EricssonSlide 1 Frequency-independent Digital Precoder for Hybrid MIMO Precoding Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0493r1 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0627r0 May 2015 Hakan Persson, EricssonSlide 1 Beam Selection for Hybrid MIMO Precoding Date: Authors:
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
doc.: IEEE /0496r2 Submission A Flexible Beam Training Protocol for 60GHz mm-Wave Communication (TGad) Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussion on MU-MIMO based on Hybrid Beamforming System in ay
Doc.: IEEE /1011r0 Submission September 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data Date:
Efficient Beam Selection for Hybrid Beamforming
Doc.: IEEE /0553r1 Submission May 2009 Alexander Maltsev, Intel Corp.Slide 1 Path Loss Model Development for TGad Channel Models Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0627r0 May 2012 Ron Murias, InterDigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Preamble Format For 1 MHz Beamforming Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0720r1 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz) July 2013 Francois Chin.
Doc.: IEEE /0493r0 Submission May 2010 Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronicsSlide 1 Beamforming training for IEEE ad Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1145r0 Submission September 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 SU-MIMO Configurations for IEEE ay Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1094 Overview and discussion about the next steps for ay channel modeling Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0133r0 Submission January 2010 Alexander Maltsev, Intel TGad Channel Model Update Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1229r1 Submission November 2009 Alexander Maltsev, IntelSlide 1 Application of 60 GHz Channel Models for Comparison of TGad Proposals.
Doc.: IEEE /0632r0 Submission May 2015 Intel CorporationSlide 1 Experimental Measurements for Short Range LOS SU-MIMO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0720r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz) July 2013 Francois Chin.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0103r0 January 2016 Assaf KasherSlide 1 Beamforming Training proposals Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0806r0 K. Ishihara et al.,(NTT) Slide 1 July 2010 Slide 1 CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for.
11ay MIMO BF Training Enhancements
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Multi-Beamforming in Polarized Channels for 11ay
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
EDMG Header Encoding and Modulation
Beam Tracking for ay Date: Authors: January 2017
Multi-Stage, Multi-Resolution Beamforming Training for ay
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 November 2016
Improvements to enhanced SLS beamforming
GI Overhead/Performance Impact on Open-Loop SU-MIMO
Beamforming for mmWave Distribution Networks
TGad interference modeling for MAC simulations
BRP Transmit Sector Sweep
TGad March 2010 Closing Report
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
Analog and Baseband Beam Tracking in ay
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2009
Asymmetric beamforming training procedure enhancements
Multi-BF Procedure for 11ay
Further Discussion on Beam Tracking for ay
Multi-Beamforming in Polarized Channels for 11ay
Hybrid Beamforming Protocol Design Details
Protocols for Hybrid Beamforming in ay
Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz New Technique Proposal)
Multi-BF Procedure for 11ay
CSI Feedback Scheme using DCT for Explicit Beamforming
Generalized Multi-Beamforming for 11ay
Error Recovery Scheme for Scheduled Ack
MIMO phase in MU-MIMO Beamforming
Discussion on Rank Adaptation
Fixed Inter Frame Spacing for BRP in ay
Channel Modeling with PAA Orientations
Feedback of Short SSW Packet Based Sector Sweep in DTI
Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding
Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Low Complexity Beamtraining for Hybrid MIMO Date: Slide 1 March 2016 Authors: Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Abstract Beam training for Hybrid MIMO in 11ay can be expensive as number of possible beam combinations grows exponentially with number of antenna arrays. This contribution proposes a low complexity beam training method for 11ay. The proposed method can be supported with minimal changes in protocols and frame structures of sector level sweep (SLS) and beam refinement phase (BRP) of 11ad. Results show significant reduction in complexity and negligible losses in resulting MIMO capacity compared to exhaustive search. Slide 2Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University) March 2016

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Introduction Slide 3 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Motivation Slide 4 March 2016  Minimize amount of necessary training phases / channel estimations  Reuse as much as possible 11.ad frame structures and protocols capacity landscape [6] with 90°HPBW Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Two stage approach in 11ad [3] Sector level sweep (SLS) train transmit beamformers by sector sweeps (SSW) vs quasi-omni receive beamformers Beam refinement phase (BRP) improve receive beamformers (optional MID subphase) improve transmit-receive beam combinations (optional BC phase) Slide 5 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Overview of proposed approach Slide 6 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 SLS stage for Hybrid MIMO Slide 7 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Beam refinement methods Slide 8 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Evolutionary beamtraining Slide 9 March 2016 procedure can be used in different stages of beam training procedure within pairwise search (PS) [2] on top of 11ad-like SLS Drawback: Instant feedback needed after each iteration to determine “best combination” Potential benefit in rich scattering environments Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Slide 10 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Simulation parameters Slide 11 March 2016 Conference room scenario [5] Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Complexity and performance comparison Slide 12 March significant reduction in complexity -negligible or no loss in performance Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Protocol and frame structure (K-Best) Slide 13 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Protocol and frame structure (K-Best) Slide 14 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Conclusions Slide 15 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 References 1.C. Cordeiro et al, “Next Generation ad”, doc r0. 2.C. Capar et al, “Efficient Beam Selection for Hybrid Beamforming”, IEEE doc /1131r0. 3.A. Kasher, “Beamforming Training proposals”, doc r0. 4.A. Maltsev et al, “Extension of Legacy IEEE ad Channel Models for MIMO and Channel Bonding”, IEEE doc /1356r1. 5.A. Maltsev et al, “Channel Models for IEEE ay”, IEEE doc /1150r2. 6.F. Fellhauer et al, “Modelling of Spatial Separation in the 11ay Channel Model”, IEEE doc /0073r1. Slide 16 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 APPENDIX March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University) Slide 17

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Slide 18 March 2016 as in slide 12 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)

Submission doc.: IEEE /0316r0 Performance comparison (continued) Slide 19 March 2016 Dana Ciochina (SONY), Felix Fellhauer (Stuttgart University)