The Future of ScholarWorks WHERE WE’RE GOING AND WHERE WE’VE BEEN.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Deconstructing and Reconstructing a Repository – Strategies for Nimble Rebuilding Linda Newman Head of Digital Collections and Repositories University.

Advertisements

Grey Literature, Institutional Repositories and the Organisational Context Simon Lambert, Brian Matthews & Catherine Jones Business & Information Technology.

Suzanne Bell and Nathan Sarr University of Rochester River Campus Libraries Re-engineering the Institutional Repository to Engage Users.

Open Access Niamh Brennan Trinity College Dublin DRIVER Summit, Goettingen, January 17th 2008 Local Integration, National Federation TCD-RSS, TARA, IReL-Open,

Collaborating to Manage Research Data Zheng (John) Wang Rick Johnson Hesburgh Libraries University of Notre Dame 12/10/13.

Tom Lewis Director, Academic & Collaborative Applications University of Washington.

Introduction to Research Data Management Services, January 2013 Research Data Management Infrastructure The Current Context.

IT Task Force Report Item 2.a Significantly expand the Libraries’ emphasis on digital collections, including realigning staffing to emphasize digital areas,

Technical Framework Charl Roberts University of the Witwatersrand Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC)

Administration & Workflow

Trustworthy Repository Criteria, Virtual Organizations, and Infrastructure MacKenzie Smith, MIT Libraries NDIIPP Meeting, July 2010.

Technology Steering Group January 31, 2007 Academic Affairs Technology Steering Group February 13, 2008.

ScholarWorks at WMU Western’s Scholarly Repository Faculty Senate Maira Bundza November 10, 2011.

Perspectives from The Alberta Library Learn, think, CHANGE 2004 Online Learning Symposium November 3, 2004 Zahina Iqbal.

Institutional Repositories Tools for scholarship Mary Westell University of Calgary AMTEC Conference May 26, 2005.

Technology Steering Group January 31, 2007 Academic Affairs Technology Steering Group February 13, 2008.

Shared IR Project Overview Rick Johnson Lead Project Director Shared IR University of Notre Dame Hydra Connect 2014 January 22, 2014Hydra Connect

Variations On Video project update DLF Fall Forum 2010 Jon Dunn, Indiana University Claire Stewart, Northwestern University November 2, 2010.

Introducing New Services with DSpace Open Repositories Conference 2007 Susan Wells Parham Kent Woynowski Julie Griffin.

The DSpace Course Module – An introduction to DSpace.

Hydramata Project Refresh March 10, 2014Hydramata Project Refresh1.

DSpace. TM 2 Agenda  Introduction to DSpace  DSpace community  Institutional Repository  Easy to add/find content in DSpace  Building Online Communities.

The Global Video Grid: DigitalWell Update & Plan For SRB Integration Myke Smith, Manager Streaming Media Technologies University of Washington / ResearchChannel.

U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program eGovernment Working Group Meeting February 11, 2004.

: Strategies for a Successful IR Michael Boock Head of Technical Services Oregon State University Libraries.

Digital Commons & Open Access Repositories Johanna Bristow, Strategic Marketing Manager APBSLG Libraries: September 2006.

This presentation describes the development and implementation of WSU Research Exchange, a permanent digital repository system that is being, adding WSU.

GPO’s Federal Digital System December 10, 2009 U.S. Government Printing Office.

Millman—Nov 04—1 An Update on Digital Libraries David Millman Director of Research & Development Academic Information Systems Columbia University

Information Technology Services Strategic Directions Approach and Proposal “Charting Our Course”

1 Two repositories - different strategies Monica Hammes : University of Pretoria Carnegie Workshop on Institutional Repositories 17 July 2007.

Managing live digital content with DuraSpace services Bill Branan PASIG Spring 2015.

© CGI Group Inc. PrimePortal & #define Annika Maltesson, Project Krister Sundkvist,

William J Nixon Setting up a Repository. Introduction Key Features to consider (and review) Wide Range of Technology Available –Best fit for purpose –Clear.

Just in Time Digital Southern Offers a Suite of Services for the Entire Campus Zach S. Henderson Library.

IR+ A New Repository to Meet User Needs Michael Bell Assistant Dean for Information Technology River Campus Libraries University of Rochester Michael Bell.

Overview of SkillsCommons.org v 1.0 Gerry Hanley, Dave Walker, Rick Lumadue & Marla Gunasegaram California State University MERLOT.

Breeda Herlihy, IR Manager, UCC Library. UCC selected DSpace in 2008 Software selection group Staff from Library IT, Computer Centre, Special Collections,

IT Services Town Hall 7/3/2016 Page 1 S T A N F O R D U N I V E R S I T Y I N F O R M A T I O N T E C H N O L O G Y S E R V I C E S IT Services Town Hall.

It’s All in a Day’s Work: Managing the Institutional Repository Pamela Bluh Thurgood Marshall Law Library October 22, 2010.

Scholarly Communication Services: Repository-based Library Publishing OLA Preconference Feb. 2, 2011 Adrian K. Ho The University of Western Ontario.

Government Gateway Transition and Transformation Brief for Software Developers Oct 2016.

Digital Campus: Foundation Projects

Our Digital Showcase Scholars’ Mine Annual Report from July 2015 – June 2016 Providing global access to the digital, scholarly and cultural resources.

Making Cross-campus, Inter-institutional Collaborations Work

Fedora at UT Libraries Melanie Cofield, Metadata Coordinator

Disaster Recovery Constituent Group

Promoting Faculty Scholarship through the USFSP Digital Archive

SCEC Drupal Website Development Overview and Status

Jennifer Duncan, Head of Collections

Collaborating to Manage Research Data

AWS Solutions Architect Presentation

CLA Digital Content Store

Marilyn Billings Scholarly Communication Librarian

Best Practices for Electronic Theses and Dissertations

Sophia Lafferty-hess | research data manager

Ahmet Fatih Mustacoglu

Strategic Planning Update Group 5

Open Access and Copyright for Theses and Dissertations

Digital Repositories The management of learning objects

Strategic uses of Web Content Management Systems

Selected Digital Repository Projects

CSU ScholarWorks: Current Developments and Future Plans

SSarah The Value of Scholarly Communications Programming: Perspectives from Three Settings Sarah Beaubien • Scholarly Communications.

University of Pittsburgh Library System (ULS)

Michele Kimpton Project Director, DuraCloud NDIPP Partner meeting

The Story of ScholarWorks

Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository

Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository

Presentation transcript:

The Future of ScholarWorks WHERE WE’RE GOING AND WHERE WE’VE BEEN

WELCOME Introductions Agenda

A Brief History 10 years in the making At the beginning of 2013: 16 campuses Various versions of DSpace (from 1.5 – 3.x) A shared server with individual resources Mid-2014: Multitenant Migration Complete Today: 18 Campuses 3 Non-campus projects

Amazing Growth Tripled our storage usage since mid-2014 Growth of 60GB / month on average A lot more data waiting in the wings…

Growth Rate

System Needs Have Taken Off

All grown up! We’ve outgrown DSpace We’ve outgrown our Data center A lot more data waiting in the wings…

Refocused Subcommittee July, Request for participation August, Formation of the “ScholarWorks Planning & Advisory Group” August, 2015 – January, 2016: Draft Vision Focus on the goals of a “System wide Institutional Repository” Establish a plan for the future of ScholarWorks

Report to COLD – February 2016 A proposed ScholarWorks roadmap through 2017 Expand ScholarWorks to offer publishing support Establish an annual ScholarWorks Symposium (WELCOME!!) Utilize confluence to promote the wiki and establish a project site Adopt a campus facing support platform

Roadmap Q – Review systems & describe requirements Q – Data migration development, testing, and planning Q – System selection, development & testing begins Q – Early adopter campus working groups & migration Q – Final ScholarWorks migration planning & deployment Q – Q – Decommissioning of Dspace services

Initial System Review

Benefits of Hydra Community Modular system Less dependence on 3 rd party systems for deployment (i.e. Java, Drupal, etc.) Robust collaboration Extensible metadata structure (through PCDM & LDP)

Data Migration Development & Planning Review of data exported from Dspace Analyze metadata available in export => metadata required for import Dspace Export Strategy Staging to Dropbox Expand AWS resources as necessary Data Movement Strategy Download from Dropbox Unpack Submit items/collections to IR Develop Import Tools

Cloud Deployment - AWS Glacier System Scalability Cost aggregation Seamless (and low cost) disaster recovery structure Security compliance

Migration Strategy Dspace data export: system resource requirements Data transfer timing Import to Development Instance Concurrently Look & Feel Customizations Testing Repeat for Production

Early Adopter Campuses Focusing on feature specific usage for efficient planning San Marcos: Collection/Type specific submissions, Embargoes Northridge: SWORD, Embargoes (via sword) Pomona: Submission workflow Campus sprint planning in progress Development repositories will be updated in parallel with DSpace

Modules & Features to integrate CAS/Shib/LDAP Authentication In use at: Virginia Tech, George Washington, Cleveland Museum of Art Nested Collections DOI/Handles Mediated Deposit (approval workflow) SWORD

Exciting Developments COLD strategic goal STIM subcommittee appointment Hydra-in-a-Box Dspace/Hydra Migration Interest Group Contributing to the community The goal of CSU's shared digital collection is to contribute to research, scholarship, teaching and learning by collaboratively collecting, organizing, preserving, and sharing scholarly and creative works produced by students, faculty, and staff at California State University campuses.

Demos (more to come) (Sufia) (Hydra)

QUESTIONS?

THANK YOU!