Calibration of single-photon detectors from spontaneous parametric down-conversion Justin Ripley Columbia University, New York, NY Fermi National Accelerator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beyond The Standard Quantum Limit B. W. Barr Institute for Gravitational Research University of Glasgow.
Advertisements

Key CLARITY technologies II – Four-Wave Mixing wavelength conversion National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Department of Informatics and Telecommunications.
Parametric Down-conversion and other single photons sources December 2009 Assaf Halevy Course # 77740, Dr. Hagai Eisenberg 1.
Optical sources Lecture 5.
USE OF GEANT4 FOR LHCB RICH SIMULATION S. Easo, RAL, LHCB AND ITS RICH DETECTORS. TESTBEAM DATA FOR LHCB-RICH. OVERVIEW OF GEANT4 SIMULATION.
Basic Principles of X-ray Source Detection Or Who Stole All Our Photons?.....
Quantum Coherent Control with Non-classical Light Department of Physics of Complex Systems The Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot, Israel Yaron Bromberg,
Beam propagation in anizotropic crystals Optic axis of a crystal is the direction in which a ray of transmitted light suffers no birefringence (double.
G v1Squeezed Light Interferometry1 Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection July 6, 2012 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Entanglement and Bell’s Inequalities
Positronium Rydberg excitation in AEGIS Physics with many positrons International Fermi School July 2009 – Varenna, Italy The experimental work on.
Pump Probe Measurements of Femto-second Pulses By David Baxter.
Tagger Electronics Part 1: tagger focal plane microscope Part 2: tagger fixed array Part 3: trigger and digitization Richard Jones, University of Connecticut.
Quantum Entanglement and Bell’s Inequalities Kristin M. Beck and Jacob E. Mainzer Demonstrating quantum entanglement of photons via the violation of Bell’s.
Single photon sources. Attenuated laser = Coherent state Laser Attenuator Approximate single photon source Mean number of photon per pulse.
Lecture 38 Lasers Final Exam next week. LASER L ight A mplification by S timulated E mission of R adiation.
The Tagger Microscope Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Tagger - Photon Beamline ReviewJan , 2005, Newport News presented by GlueX.
OPT OPT 253 Quantum Optics Laboratory, Final Presentation Wednesday, December 10 th 2008 By Carlin Gettliffe.
Page 1 © J.Paul Robinson, Purdue University BMS 631 – LECTURE007.PPT BMS 602/631 - LECTURE 8 Flow Cytometry: Theory J. Paul Robinson Professor.
4-1 Chap. 7 (Optical Instruments), Chap. 8 (Optical Atomic Spectroscopy) General design of optical instruments Sources of radiation Selection of wavelength.
Ultrafast Experiments Hangwen Guo Solid State II Department of Physics & Astronomy, The University of Tennessee.
1 Waves, Light & Quanta Tim Freegarde Web Gallery of Art; National Gallery, London.
Chapter 8. Second-Harmonic Generation and Parametric Oscillation
Photon detection Visible or near-visible wavelengths
3/26/2003BAE of 10 Application of photodiodes A brief overview.
Single Photon Detectors
Test of Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPM) at Liquid Nitrogen Temperature Yura Efremenko, Vince Cianciolo nEDM CalTech Meeting 02/14/2007.
Characterization of Silicon Photomultipliers for beam loss monitors Lee Liverpool University weekly meeting.
H.-G. Moser Max-Planck-Institut for Physics, Munich CALOR 06 Chicago June 5-9, 2006 Silicon Photomultiplier, a new device for low light level photon detection.
Pure-state, single-photon wave-packet generation by parametric down conversion in a distributed microcavity M. G. Raymer, Jaewoo Noh* Oregon Center for.
Light and Matter Tim Freegarde School of Physics & Astronomy University of Southampton Controlling light with light.
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
Four Channels Data Acquisition System for Silicon Photomultipliers Mateusz Baszczyk, Piotr Dorosz, Sebastian Głąb, Wojciech Kucewicz, Łukasz Mik, Maria.
S. De Santis “Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal Profile in a Storage Ring by Non-Linear Laser Mixing” - BIW 2004 May, 5th Measurement of the Beam Longitudinal.
Light Calibration System (LCS) Temperature & Voltage Dependence Option 2: Optical system Option 2: LED driver Calibration of the Hadronic Calorimeter Prototype.
1 Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1) S.Gomi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, M.Taguchi, (Kyoto University) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura, (KEK) Oct
Quantum Imaging with Undetected Photons
Under the Influence of Spectral Entanglement: Polarization-Entanglement Swapping and Fusion Gates Travis Humble * and Warren Grice, Oak Ridge National.
Optical Amplifiers By: Ryan Galloway.
Photodetectors What is photodetector (PD)? Photodetector properties
1 SiPM studies: Highlighting current equipment and immediate plans Lee BLM Quasar working group.
Optical Receivers Theory and Operation
Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,
Optical and Quantum Communications Group June 9, 2005 Three Themes for Theory Research: Gaussian States, Coherent Laser Radars, and Multi-Photon Detectors.
The VSiPMT: A new Generation of Photons Detectors G. Barbarino 1,2, F. C. T. Barbato 1,2, R. de Asmundis 2, G. De Rosa 1,2, F. Di Capua 1, P. Migliozzi.
Status of NEWCHOD E.Guschin (INR), S.Kholodenko (IHEP), Yu.Kudenko (INR), I.Mannelli (Pisa), O.Mineev (INR), V.Obraztsov (IHEP), V.Semenov(IHEP), V.Sugonyaev.
§8.4 SHG Inside the Laser Resonator
Generation of intense few-cycle pulses from the visible to the mid-IR Josh Nelson 1 Danny Todd 2 Adam Summers 3 Derrek Wilson 3 Dr. Carlos Trallero 3 1.
Development of Multi-Pixel Photon Counters (1)
Activities at SMI/Vienna in testing the performance of SiPMs
Four wave mixing in submicron waveguides
A. F. Yanin, I. M. Dzaparova, E. A. Gorbacheva, A. N. Kurenya, V. B
Performance of LYSO and CeBr3 crystals readout by SiPM
Commissioning of the Crystal evaluation setup
FINAL YEAR PROJECT 4SSCZ
Spontaneous Parametric Down Conversion
Nergis Mavalvala Aspen January 2005
Proof of feasibility of VSiPMT (Vacuum Silicon PhotoMultiplier Tube)
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
BMS 602/631 - LECTURE 7 Flow Cytometry: Theory
Quantum Teleportation
The Pixel Hybrid Photon Detectors of the LHCb RICH
GAJENDRA KUMAR EC 3rd YR. ROLL NO
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
A Generalized Method for Calculating Phase Matching Conditions in Biaxial Crystals Guangwen Huo Xijing University China July.
Optical Receivers 1. Photo Detectors
BMS 602/631 - LECTURE 7 Flow Cytometry: Theory
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
ME instrument and in-orbit performance
LCLS Injector Laser System Paul R. Bolton, SLAC April 24, 2002
Presentation transcript:

Calibration of single-photon detectors from spontaneous parametric down-conversion Justin Ripley Columbia University, New York, NY Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL Mentor: Carlos Escobar August 9, 2012

Overview What is Spontaneous Parametric Down- Conversion (SPDC)? Calibration using SPDC What are Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPMs)? Experimental set up Preliminary Results Current Work Future Work

SPDC: Basics One photon (pump) enters a nonlinear crystal; two photons (signal and idler) emerge Energy and momentum conserved ω p = ω s + ω i k p = k s + k i kpkp kiki ksks θ signal θ idler “Spontaneous”: no final states in initial configuration ( ~ 1 in 10 9 photons down-converted) “Parametric”: crystal does not add/subtract energy/momentum from process (elastic scattering) “Down-Conversion”: frequency of pump photon lowered

SPDC: Nonlinearity and Quantum Components Nonlinear Component Optical susceptibility tensor: P(E) = χ (1) ij E j + χ (2) ij’k’ E j’ E k’ + … Second order term: χ (2) ijk E j E k Three wave mixing Second order term: χ (2) ijk E i E k Take two waves: (E (1) e iω 1 t + c.c. + E (2) e iω 2 t + c.c.) Run through crystal, among final wave states get: ~(E (1) )(E (2) )*e i(ω 1 - ω 2 )t ~(E (2) )(E (1) )*e i(ω 2 – ω 1 )t Quantum Component Send in intense pump beam: E (p) e iω p t + c.c. Spontaneous fluctuations of the vacuum state amplified in nonlinear crystal (Ivano Ruo-Berchera, Advanced Science Letters Vol. 2, 407–429, 2009)

SPDC: Phase Matching Select for specific exit angles for signal beams at specified wavelengths k j = (2 π/c)ν j n j e j ν p n p e p = ν s n s e s + ν i n i e i n j depends on orientation of optical axis (rotation of linear term χ (1) ) Crystal used is Beta-Barium Borate (BBO); is uniaxial (one optical axis) kpkp kiki ksks Θ optical axis Θ idler Θ signal BBO Crystal *B. Boeuf, D. Branning, I. Chaperot, E. Dauler, S. Guérin, G. Jaeger, A. Muller, and A. Migdall, “Calculating characteristics of noncollinear phase matching in uniaxial and biaxial crystals,” Optical Engineering, vol. 39, no. 4, April neeeneee

Calibration using SPDC BBO Crystal Pump Beam Conjugate Detector Efficiency: η c Z Y X Down-Converted Cone of Light Idler 3˚ Trigger Detector Efficiency: η t Signal Assume N down converted (correlated) photon pairs produced and reach Conjugate and Trigger detectors Klyshko Method Photons detected by trigger: N t = Nη t Photons detected by conjugate given a detection by trigger : N c = Nη t η c Efficiency of conjugate detector: η c = N c /N t Absolute calibration Modify for background counts 3˚

Including sources of background in Calibration formula η c = calibrated detector efficiency N c = measured number of coincidence counts during calibration run N t = measured number of single counts for trigger detector during calibration run B c = Estimated background accidental coincidence counts B t = Estimated background single trigger counts Background run – Measure background counting rate (B t ’) for trigger detector with no laser on Accidental coincidences run – Measure coincidence counting rate (B c ’) for detector with laser on with a time delay Calibration run – Measure single counts on trigger, coincidence counts for time period T – B c = B c ’T – B t = B t ’T

What are SiPMs? Pros High gain Single photon resolution Good time resolution Low Bias Voltage Low power consumption Cons High dark pulse rate Cross talk Lots of afterpulsing Matrix of silicon p-n junction diodes Operate in Geiger mode (Pictures courtesy of SensL: )

General Experimental Layout (1) Ga-As laser (405nm) (2) Iris (5) BBO (9) SiPM 1 (10) SiPM 2 (6)Beam Dump (7) 810nm Filter (8) 810nm Filter TOP VIEW (not to scale) 1m 3˚ Readout from detectors went to a FPGA SiPM general readout board (Rubinov and Fitzpatrick) Low bandwidth processing (3) Iris (4) Iris 3˚ BBO crystal optical axis aligned for 3 degree phase matching

Experimental Set Up (as of 8/1/2012)

Preliminary Results (7/27/12) Detection counts per second with alignment SiPMs (~7sec run) Channel 0Channel 1Coincidences Laser Off (± 423) (± 416) (± 399) Laser on, with BBO (± 1 270) (± 1 731) (± 536) Laser on, without BBO (± 1 257) (± 2 045) (± 780) Detectors used for alignment Single pixel SiPMs (100μm) Calibrated detectors will have ~10 3 or more pixels Data processed in ~18.8 ns long bins Channel 0: Trigger detector Channel 1: Conjugate detector

Preliminary Results (7/27/12)

Preliminary Results (8/2/12)

Current Work: Alignment Align detector mounts – “Scanning” alignment detectors and search for global maxima in count rates around calculated down-converted beam location

Current Work: Noise Electronic – Hard to distinguish electronic signals from photons in a short time frame (ΔtΔν ~ 1) Low bandwidth board to cut high frequency noise Measure background rates (should include electronic noise) House FPGA in Faraday cage Background stray photons – Laser fluorescence Weaker laser Mirrors with higher reflectivity in near ultraviolet Dark box with 810nm filters covering beam entrances Dark Pulses, Afterpulsing – Intrinsic to SiPMs – Measure during accidentals and background calibration runs – Possibly cool down detectors

Future Work/Goals Proof of principle with alignment of detectors along one axis Align detector mounts along two axis (x, y) Initially calibrate SiPMs at 810nm Calibrate other photodetectors – Other wavelengths possible via rotation of crystal optical axis or use of shorter wavelength pump laser

Newer Developments (8/6/12 onwards)

Newer Developments (8/7/12)

Newer Developments (8/8/12) Detection counts per second with alignment SiPMs (~7sec run) Channel 0Channel 1Coincidences Laser Off7700 (± 87.7)5361 (± 73.2)1 (± 1.0) Laser on, with BBO7657 (± 87.5)6567 (± 81.0)2 (± 1.4)

Newer Developments (8/9/12)

Detection counts per second with alignment SiPMs (~7sec run) Channel 0Channel 1Coincidences Laser Off 4876 (± 70.0) 1797 (± 42.3) 0.1 (± 0.3) Laser on, with BBO 5063 (± 71.1) 4787 (± 69.1) 1.1 (± 1.0) Laser on, without BBO 4833 (± 69.5) 4754 (± 68.9) 1.6 (± 1.3)

BBO in the Dark

Acknowledgements Carlos Escobar Paul Rubinov Adam Para Donna Kubik Paul Kwiat