Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 IGEC 2 REPORT International Gravitational Events Collaboration ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AURIGA-LIGO Activity F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara for the LIGO-AURIGA JWG 2nd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 24th and 25th, Palma de Mallorca,
Advertisements

GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
GWDAW /12/16 - G Z1 Report on the First Search for BBH Inspiral Signals on the S2 LIGO Data Eirini Messaritaki University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
G.A.Prodi - INFN and Università di Trento, Italy International Gravitational Event Collaboration igec.lnl.infn.it ALLEGRO group:ALLEGRO (LSU)
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-AURIGA Joint Burst Analysis L. Cadonati for the LIGO-AURIGA joint working group LSC meeting – Ann Arbor, June
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Current status of Joint LIGO-TAMA Inspiral Analysis In collaboration with: Patrick Brady, Nobuyuki Kanda, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Daisuke Tatsumi, the LIGO Scientific.
Oct 2006 g.modestino1 Experimental results correlating GW detector data and Gamma Ray Bursts Giuseppina Modestino LNF ROG Collaboration INFN – LN Frascati,
Results from TOBAs Results from TOBAs Cross correlation analysis to search for a Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background University of Tokyo Ayaka Shoda.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Statistical problems in network data analysis: burst searches by narrowband detectors L.Baggio and G.A.Prodi ICRR TokyoUniv.Trento and INFN IGEC time coincidence.
Francesco Salemi - London, October 26th - 27th, VIRGO-bars joint data analysis Francesco Salemi for the VIRGO-bars Collaboration.
STATUS of BAR DETECTORS G.A.Prodi - INFN and University of Trento International Gravitational Event Collaboration - 2 ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 STATUS OF EXPLORER AND NAUTILUS INFN – LN Frascati, LN Gran Sasso, Sez. Roma 1, Roma 2 and Genova Universities “La Sapienza”
Status of stochastic background’s joint data analysis by Virgo and INFN resonant bars G. Cella (INFN Pisa) For Auriga-ROG-Virgo collaborations Prepared.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Upper Limits on the Rate of Gravitational Wave Bursts from the First LIGO Science Run Edward Daw Louisiana.
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Silvia Poggi - GW burst detection strategy in non-homogeneus networks Detection strategies for bursts in networks of non-homogeneus gravitational waves.
Coincidences in gravitational wave experiments Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.
INTERPRETATION of IGEC RESULTS Lucio Baggio, Giovanni Andrea Prodi University of Trento and INFN Italy or unfolding gw source parameters starting point:
First results by IGEC2 6 month of data of AURIGA-EXPLORER-NAUTILUS May 20 - Nov 15, 2005 IGEC2 was the only gw observatory in operation search for transient.
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
Abstract: We completed the tuning of the analysis procedures of the AURIGA-LIGO joint burst search and we are in the process of verifying our results.
ILIAS WP1 – Cascina IGEC – First experience using the data of 5 bar detectors: ALLEGRO, AURIGA, EXPLORER NAUTILUS and NIOBE. – 1460.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
Upper Limits from LIGO and TAMA on Gravitational-Wave Bursts on Gravitational-Wave Bursts Patrick Sutton (LIGO laboratory, Caltech), Masaki Ando (Department.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Compact Binary Coalescences in LIGO and Virgo data Gabriela González For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration APS.
1 An example or real data analysis: the VIRGO-bars search for bursts Andrea Viceré for VIRGO – Auriga - Rog.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
LIGO-G Z Upper Limits from LIGO and TAMA on Gravitational-Wave Bursts Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech for the LIGO and TAMA Collaborations.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
TAUP 2007, Sendai, September 12, 2007 IGEC2 COLLABORATION: A NETWORK OF RESONANT BAR DETECTORS SEARCHING FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES Massimo Visco on behalf.
S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.
Status of the LIGO-AURIGA Joint Burst Analysis F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara on behalf of the AURIGA Collaboration and the LIGO Scientific.
GWDAW11 – Potsdam Results by the IGEC2 collaboration on 2005 data Gabriele Vedovato for the IGEC2 collaboration.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
Status of AURIGA AURIGA Sept 21 st 2005 Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics University of Padova,
Abstract: We completed the tuning of the analysis procedures of the AURIGA-LIGO joint burst search and we are in the process of verifying our results.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
24 th Pacific Coast Gravity Meeting, Santa Barbara LIGO DCC Number: G Z 1 Search for gravitational waves from inspiraling high-mass (non-spinning)
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Search for compact binary systems in LIGO data Thomas Cokelaer On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. LIGO-G Z.
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
SC03 failed results delayed FDS: parameter space searches
A 2 veto for Continuous Wave Searches
Searching for pulsars using the Hough transform
S5 First Epoch BNS & BBH Inspiral Update
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
GW Data Analysis (from an experimentalist’s point of view)
M.-A. Bizouard, F. Cavalier
Maria Principe University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Background estimation in searches for binary inspiral
OK Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Joint bar-IFO observations
Presentation transcript:

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 IGEC 2 REPORT International Gravitational Events Collaboration ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 Introduction to IGEC2 Data analysis methodology Cross validation of data Progress in coincidence analysis OUTLINE OF THE TALK

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 IGEC First experience of extended search of multiple coincidence using data of 5 resonant detectors: ALLEGRO, AURIGA, EXPLORER NAUTILUS and NIOBE. IGEC May  2005 Feb  … A new agreement for a joint search for gravitational waves, now 4 detectors, NOIBE was dismissed. -ALLEGRO, AURIGA and ROG spokespersons unanimously decide actions/agreements. Stronger coordination of joint observations. -The operation are based on a task force, coordinated by G. Prodi, vice-coordinators W.Johnson and M.Visco THE NEW IGEC

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 A DIRECTIONAL 4-ANTENNAE OBSERVATORY The four antennas receive an identical signal, independently from the source

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 NETWORK ANALYSIS following IGEC1on parallel detectors -The IGEC analysis was conceived as a N-fold analysis with adaptive N of parallel detectors. -The analysis is based on lists of candidate events produced selecting with an adaptive threshold data produced by a filter matched to a delta. -The use of amplitude information together with a directional search allows an a-priori control of false alarm and false dismissal -The time window is adapted to SNR -The search parameters are tuned with a blind analysis -The data are cross validated DATA ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 Exchange of one day of raw data to cross validate the filter pipeline - cross validate data and characteristic of the single detector - measure the efficiency of the observatory Exchange of candidate events for one month of data (December 2004)- blind - study of the background - tune of the coincidence analysis pipeline PROGRESS OF IGEC2

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 IGEC IGEC …. FROM IGEC1 TO IGEC2

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 ARRIVAL TIME ESTIMATION For  signals by Monte Carlo injections of software signals (Auriga)  (s) For  signals from cosmic ray (Explorer)  = 2.3 ms The bandwidth improvement of the detectors gives a time resolution larger of about a factor 100 respect to IGEC1

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 To aim a cross validation of data one day of raw data was exchanged The data were filtered with the AURIGA Data Analysis filters The first step completed is the analysis of ROG antennae, analysis of ALLEGRO in progress The first results suggest a good agreement between the different pipelines. CROSS VALIDATION OF DATA

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 PERFORMANCES Spectrograms Continuous performances of all experiments NA AU EX 5000 s

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 DATA QUALITY - SNR OF EVENTS All the detectors show a gaussian behavior NA AU EX

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 DATA QUALITY: DISTRIBUTIONS OF EVENTS Few events with SNR>6 in all the experiments NA AU EX

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 DETECTION EFFICIENCY Injected 1800 signals of SNR=6 within 1h NA AU EX

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 OPERATION TIME - DECEMBER 2004 AURIGA- EXPLORER- NAUTILUS Single 4.63 days Double 16.43days Triple 9.36 days ALAUEXNA AL0 AU EX NA %89 %86 %~90 % from May 2004 DOY N

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 The sensitivity is stationary There is an enhancement of about a factor 3 respect to IGEC 1 EXCHANGE THRESOLD Percentage of time with the adaptive threshold T smaller than H

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 AMPLITUDE OF EXCHANGED EVENTS

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 SELF CORRELOGRAM OF EXCHANGED EVENTS Histograms of the time lags among events of the same detector: much more “Poissonian” than in IGEC-1 AU NA EX 50 seconds AU - now

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF 2-FOLDS COINCIDENCES Statistics of the accidentals are in agreement with the model EXPLORER NAUTILUS Number of accidental coincidences

Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 The analysis must be oriented to the detection as we expect from LIGO after S5 an upper limit far from present resonant detectors sensitivity. Complete the preliminary analysis of cross validation on raw data. Complete the preliminary analysis on one month of data to tune the analysis pipeline. Exchange a larger period of data for the final analysis PROGRAM FOR NEAR FUTURE