Improving the Prognostic Ozone Parameterization in the NCEP GFS and CFS for Climate Reanalysis and Operational Forecasts Gilbert P. Compo 1,2, Hai-Tien.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Examination of the Radiative Fluxes in Various Reanalyses with an Emphasis on the Global Budget Wesley Ebisuzaki 1, S. K. Yang 1,2, Li Zhang 1,2, Arun.
Advertisements

Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
Requirements for monitoring the global tropopause Bill Randel Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
The influence of the stratosphere on tropospheric circulation and implications for forecasting Nili Harnik Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences,
Atmospheric Reanalyses Update Mike Bosilovich. ReanalysisHoriz.ResDatesVintageStatus NCEP/NCAR R1T present1995ongoing NCEP-DOE R2T present2001ongoing.
Spring Onset in the Northern Hemisphere: A Role for the Stratosphere? Robert X. Black Brent A. McDaniel School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia.
Data assimilation of trace gases in a regional chemical transport model: the impact on model forecasts E. Emili 1, O. Pannekoucke 1,2, E. Jaumouillé 2,
1 Interannual Variability in Stratospheric Ozone Xun Jiang Advisor: Yuk L. Yung Department of Environmental Science and Engineering California Institute.
The first 2 terms on the RHS are nonlinear terms in the bias. The group labeled THF are transient heat advection bias. Q^ is the bias in diabatic heating.
Effect of Stratospheric Water Vapor Change on Ozone Layer and Climate Wenshou Tian Martyn P. Chipperfield 1 Collage of the Atmospheric Science Lanzhou.
Influence of the sun variability and other natural and anthropogenic forcings on the climate with a global climate chemistry model Martin Schraner Polyproject.
© Crown copyright Met Office Climate Projections for West Africa Andrew Hartley, Met Office: PARCC national workshop on climate information and species.
INDIA and INDO-CHINA India and Indo-China are other areas where the theoretical predictability using the interactive soil moisture is superior to the fixed.
Collaborative Research: Toward reanalysis of the Arctic Climate System—sea ice and ocean reconstruction with data assimilation Synthesis of Arctic System.
Analysis of a simulation with prognostic ozone in ARPEGE-Climat Jean-François Royer, Hubert Teysseidre, Hervé Douville, Sophie Tyteca Meteo-France,
A Comparison of the Northern American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) to an Ensemble of Analyses Including CFSR Wesley Ebisuzaki 1, Fedor Mesinger 2, Li Zhang.
Polar Prediction The Scientific Challenges - Antarctica John Turner British Antarctic Survey Cambridge, UK.
Sophie RICCI CALTECH/JPL Post-doc Advisor : Ichiro Fukumori The diabatic errors in the formulation of the data assimilation Kalman Filter/Smoother system.
Objective Data  The outlined square marks the area of the study arranged in most cases in a coarse 24X24 grid.  Data from the NASA Langley Research Center.
Corrective Dynamics for Atmospheric Single Column Models J. Bergman, P. Sardeshmukh, and C. Penland NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center With special.
1 JRA-55 the Japanese 55-year reanalysis project - status and plan - Climate Prediction Division Japan Meteorological Agency.
1 AISC Workshop May 16-18, 2006 Lesson Learned from CCSP 1.1: Temperature Trends in the Atmosphere Lesson Learned from CCSP 1.1 Temperature Trends in the.
The European Heat Wave of 2003: A Modeling Study Using the NSIPP-1 AGCM. Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA/GSFC Philip Pegion (1), Siegfried.
Model evolution of a START08 observed tropospheric intrusion Dalon Stone, Kenneth Bowman, Cameron Homeyer - Texas A&M Laura Pan, Simone Tilmes, Doug Kinnison.
Ocean Surface heat fluxes
The first 2 terms on the RHS are nonlinear terms in the bias. The group labeled THF are transient heat advection bias. Q^ is the bias in diabatic heating.
This study compares the Climate System Forecast Reanalysis (CFSR) tropospheric analyses to two ensembles of analyses. The first ensemble consists of 12.
One-year re-forecast ensembles with CCSM3.0 using initial states for 1 January and 1 July in Model: CCSM3 is a coupled climate model with state-of-the-art.
Of what use is a statistician in climate modeling? Peter Guttorp University of Washington Norwegian Computing Center
Seasonal Anomalies in the Sea Ice Concentration in the Ross Sea and Their Correlation to the Southern Annular Mode Kiley Yeakel 1, Joellen Russell 2, Paul.
Dynamical control of ozone transport and chemistry from satellite observations and coupled chemistry climate models Mark Weber 1, Sandip Dhomse 1, Ingo.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course Mar 2016.
Improving the Prognostic Ozone Parameterization in the NCEP GFS and CFS for Climate Reanalysis and Operational Forecasts Gilbert P. Compo 1,2, Hai-Tien.
Environmental Sciences Course Air Pollution and Climate Change
Coupled Initialization Experiments in the COLA Anomaly Coupled Model
Weather and Climate Weather and Climate are Two Different Things
SCSL SWAP/LYRA workshop
Status and Outlook Evaluating CFSR Air-Sea Heat, Freshwater, and Momentum Fluxes in the context of the Global Energy and Freshwater Budgets PI: Lisan.
Predictability: How can we predict the climate decades into the future when we can’t even predict the weather for next week? Predictability of the first.
Climate Change Climate change scenarios of the
Global Circulation Models
The Atmosphere.
Oliver Elison Timm ATM 306 Fall 2016
Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, NCAR
GOMOS measurements of O3, NO2, and NO3 compared to model simulations
Course Evaluation Now online You should have gotten an with link.
Stratosphere Issues in the CFSR
Impact of Solar and Sulfate Geoengineering on Surface Ozone
Edwin Gerber (New York University)
Why Should We Care About the Stratosphere?
Development and applications of an index for tropical cyclone genesis
seasonal prediction for Myanmar
The Atmosphere: Structure and Temperature
Mark A. Bourassa and Qi Shi
David Salstein, Edward Lorenz, Alan Robock, and John Roads
Nathalie Voisin, Andy W. Wood and Dennis P. Lettenmaier
Course Evaluation Now online You should have gotten an with link.
ATMOSPHERE.
Workshop 1: GFDL (Princeton), June 1-2, 2006
Y. Xue1, C. Wen1, X. Yang2 , D. Behringer1, A. Kumar1,
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
Progress in Seasonal Forecasting at NCEP
Extratropical stratoshere-troposphere exchange in a 20-km-mesh AGCM
ECMWF activities: Seasonal and sub-seasonal time scales
Access and visualization of theTwentieth Century Reanalysis dataset
Surface Fluxes and Model Error An introduction
Strat-trop interaction and Met Office seasonal forecasting
Reanalyses – A sharing of juicy tidbits* and gory details**
Simulations of the transport of idealized short-lived tracers
CURRENT Energy Budget Changes
Presentation transcript:

Improving the Prognostic Ozone Parameterization in the NCEP GFS and CFS for Climate Reanalysis and Operational Forecasts Gilbert P. Compo 1,2, Hai-Tien Lee 3, Sarah Lu 4, Shrinivas Moorthi 4, John P. McCormack 5, Craig Long 3, Prashant D. Sardeshmukh 1,2, Jeffrey S. Whitaker 2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES 2 NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory/Physical Sciences Division 3 NOAA, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Climate Prediction Center 4 NOAA, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Environmental Modeling Center 5 Naval Research Laboratory 1

Stratospheric Ozone A key radiatively active constituent in both solar and infrared radiation Affects temperature of stratosphere, troposphere, and surface Reduces harmful ultraviolet light reaching surface Ozone variations play role in climate variability of Northern and Southern Hemisphere Reanalysis systems, and the weather models on which they rely, must accurately represent the ozone field and its effect on climate variations. Complete ozone photochemistry is too computationally intensive to include in current weather and climate models So, parameterize processes! 2

Naval Research Laboratory CHEM2D Ozone Photochemistry Parameterization (CHEM2D-OPP, McCormack et al. (2006))McCormack et al. (2006) CHEM2D-OPP is based on gas-phase chemistry circa Same approach as used in ECMWF IFS (Cariolle and Deque 1986). Includes ozone depletion from CFCs. Net ozone photochemical tendency: functional form of Production P minus Loss L Approximate as Taylor series linearized about reference state ( denoted by overbar ). prognostic Ozone mixing ratio Temperature column ozone above 3

Reference tendency (P-L) 0 and all partial derivatives are computed from odd oxygen (Ox ≡ O 3 +O) reaction rates in the CHEM2D photochemical transport model. CHEM2D is a global model extending from the surface to ~120 km that solves 280 chemical reactions for 100 different species within a transformed Eulerian mean framework with fully interactive radiative heating and dynamics. The partial CHEM2D-OPP is used in the 20 th Century Reanalysis (20CR) and operational NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) system, and atmosphere of Climate Forecast System (CFS) Reanalysis (CFSR) and operational CFSv2. Partial use of CHEM2D-OPP in the current NCEP Global Forecast System (GFS) atmosphere/land model prognostic Ozone mixing ratio Temperature column ozone above 4

The 20th Century Reanalysis Project version 2 ( ) The reanalyses provide: -First-ever estimates of near-surface to tropopause 6-hourly fields extending back to the beginning of the 20 th century; -Estimates of uncertainties in the basic reanalyses and derived quantities (e.g., storm tracks). Summary: An international project led by NOAA and CIRES to produce 4-dimensional reanalysis datasets for climate applications extending back to the 19th century using an Ensemble Kalman Filter, NCEP GFS, and only surface pressure observations. Examples of uses: Validating climate models. Determining storminess and storm track variations. Understanding historical climate variations (e.g., 1930s Dust Bowl, s Arctic warming). Estimating risks of extreme events Compo et al Weekly-averaged anomaly during July 1936 United States Heat Wave (997 dead during 10-day span) Daily variations compare well with in-situ data. Bismark Stn Reanalysis Daily Near-surface Temperature Anomaly Jul Weekly Near-surface Temperature * ºC Support from US Dept of Energy Office of Science (BER), NOAA Climate Program Office 5

Daily column ozone measurements and 20CR daily ozone at Arosa, Switzerland (46.8N, 9.7E) 6 Anomaly comparison spanning 1924 to 1963 measurements 20CR interpolated to Arosa 20CR (56N, 18E) R=0.60 Despite assimilating only surface pressure observations, 20CR ozone field has large scale fluctuations that reflect ozone highs associated with, e.g., cold air outbreaks (Brönnimann and Compo 2012) (Brönnimann and Compo 2012).

Column ozone from stations compared to 20CR 7 High correlations in Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes where dynamics are an important contributor to ozone variations. Low correlations in Tropics and Poles. Correlations are consistent with measurements taken throughout the record. (Brönnimann and Compo 2012) Period of comparison

Issue: Reference state ozone, temperature, and CHEM2D- OPP parameterization coefficients include the chemistry arising from CFCs throughout the CR record. CFCs invented in 1930s. Project: new CHEM2D-OPP coefficients and an appropriate ozone climatology will be generated for the period before widespread CFC usage. Test effects on 20CR fields by comparing to historical ozone observations and to upper-air temperature observations. 8 But: Inclusion of CFC in early 20 th century is probably not the whole story. Some of the issues seen in 20CR ozone likely relate to an effect seen in operational GFS ozone forecasts.

GFS ozone forecast skill for GFS ozone forecast skill degrades significantly after 5 days due, in part, to unrealistic losses over most of the globe resulting in a global negative bias. Why the loss of ozone? Root Mean Square ErrorBias Long et al

Forecasts of Equatorial Stratospheric O 3 mixing ratios using NOGAPS- ALPHA model with and without CHEM2D-OPP temperature term (June) 10 prognostic Ozone mixing ratio Temperature column ozone Adding temperature term should significantly reduce unrealistic loss in GFS-type implementation Line Contours show O 3 Tendency From initial condition (dashed= Loss) ppmv Forecast Day Without temperature termWith temperature term McCormack et al. 2013

Goal: Improve and reduce the errors in the weather and climate variability of the NOAA GFS model with a particular focus on the stratosphere. Benefit to the NOAA Climate Reanalysis system and NCEP operational forecasts from Improved treatment of stratospheric ozone by fully utilizing all 4 terms of CHEM2D-OPP. Improved treatment of stratospheric ozone by accounting for the effect of the time-variation of CFCs in the parameterization. Improved treatment of stratospheric water vapor by including a realistic climatology. 11

New Parameterization NCEP Operational Compare new ozone implementation to NCEP operational using 2015 NCEP Global Forecast System with daily 5-day forecasts from January 2014 initial conditions New parameterization stops model ozone loss in tropics. Too much ozone in summer pole (true for all seasons).

Average Evolution of 5 day total Ozone forecasts initialized daily for January 2014 Globe Tropics N Hem >60N S Hem <60S New Parameterization NCEP Operational O3 parameterization 1 st try at New Parameterization GFS F00 Analysis Problem with reference ozone climatology

Conclusions 1.Linearized ozone parameterization is sensitive to specified reference climatology. 1 st try including all 4 terms was worse than operational because reference ozone was low. 2.Inclusion of all 4 terms in from CHEM2D-OPP into NCEP GFS maintains global ozone in 5 day forecasts (and 30 day forecasts for all seasons). This is an improvement. 3.Current specified temperature reference is causing excessive ozone in summer pole. Improve reference climatology (combination of analyses and SPARC climatology for high altitudes). 4.Development continues and will include pre-CFC parameterization.

 Implement more advanced O 3 parameterization using the full CHEM2D- OPP and an improved treatment of stratospheric water vapor for use in new versions of the GFS, CFS, and next generation NOAA climate reanalysis systems.  The O 3 parameterization will include the effect of changes in temperature, changes in the vertical distribution of O 3, and the time-variation of CFCs.  The upgraded parameterization and new climatology will be tested in climate reanalyses and weather and climate simulations.  Initially, the parameterization will be tested with two modes, one for times before CFCs and one for times after CFCs began to be released in large quantities.  Also implement a new stratospheric H 2 O climatology as a necessary first step toward future implementation of parameterized H 2 O photochemistry. 15 Project Plans

16 Thank you Funding provided by the NOAA Modeling, Analysis, Predictions, and Projections program is acknowledged.

Ensemble Filter Algorithm (Whitaker and Hamill, 2002) Ensemble meanEnsemble deviations Sample Kalman Gain Sample Modified Kalman Gain 17

Sampling and Model error parameterizations: -Covariance localization (4000 km, 4 scale heights) and -Latitude and time dependent multiplicative covariance inflation (alpha = 1.01 to 1.12) [ Anderson and Anderson, 1999; Houtekamer and Mitchell, 2001; Hamill et al. 2001; Whitaker et al., 2004 ] Algorithm uses an ensemble of GCM runs to produce the weight K that varies with the atmospheric flow and the observation network every 6 hours Using 56 member ensemble, HadISST1.1 prescribed SST and sea ice monthly boundary conditions (Rayner et al. 2003) : T62, 28 level NCEP GFS08ex atmosphere/land model 9 hour forecasts for 6 hour centered analysis window - time-varying CO 2, solar and volcanic radiative forcing - prognostic stratospheric ozone Compo et al. 2011, doi: /qj.776Compo et al th Century Reanalysis implementation of Ensemble Filter Algorithm (Whitaker et al. 2004, Compo et al. 2006, Compo et al. 2011) 18

Zonal mean of annual differences between 20CR, ERA-Interim and NNR ( ) ERA InterimNNR Zonal wind Air Temperature Biases Over Poles and Stratosphere 20CR tropospheric biases are low and tend to be closer to ERA-Interim. They are sometimes of opposite sign. 50SEQ50N50SEQ50N CI:0.5 K CI:0.5 m/s Courtesy of new NOAA-CIRES WRIT tool (C. Smith) Adapted from Compo et al. (2011) m/s K 19

Zonal mean of annual differences between 20CR, ERA-Interim and MERRA ( ) ERA InterimMERRA Zonal wind Air Temperature Biases Over Poles and Stratosphere 20CR stratospheric biases are large and tend to be slightly closer to MERRA. Sign of biases is similar. CI:0.5 K CI:0.5 m/s Courtesy of new NOAA-CIRES WRIT tool (C. Smith) NOAA-CIRES WRIT Adapted from Compo et al. (2011) m/s K 20