September 2016 Educator Compensation: Context, Status, and Direction Matthew G. Springer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 (c) 2008 The McGraw Hill Companies Redesigning Teacher Salary Structures School Finance: A Policy Perspective, 4e Chapter 12.
Advertisements

Jane V. Wellman COSUAA San Francisco, CA April 29, 2012.
Stephen A. Wandner Senior Economist U.S. Department of Labor Michael Wiseman Research Professor George Washington University.
No Time to Lose The Imperatives to Educate A New Majority: Low Income Students in Georgia “One by one their seats were emptied…Here the circle has been.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.
INTRODUCTION Chapter 1.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Time for a Turnaround: Facing Fiscal Reality in New York State Citizens Budget Commission.
Introduction to Health Economics. Per Capita Total Current Health Care Expenditures, U.S. and Selected Countries, 2007 ^OECD estimate. *Differences in.
Salary Administration East Carolina University Department of Human Resources Classification and Compensation.
Education as a Strategic Investment Conference Prepared by Tony Levitas and Marko Paunovic Belgrade, February 14 th 2009.
Michigan Association of Counties Traverse City, September 19 th, 2011.
DIGEST OF KEY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INDICATORS 2008 Presentation Slides National Science Board.
North Carolina Teacher Salaries State Board of Education March 2013 Alexis Schauss, Director of School Business.
Rebooting finance in public higher education Jane Wellman AASCU Annual Meeting Charleston, SC November 22, 2010.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
1 Improving Teacher Supply and Effectiveness Meeting of OECD Education Ministers Raising the Quality of Learning for All Dublin, March 2004 Phillip.
CHAPTER 1 Introduction Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
South Carolina Teachers Salary Presented by: The SCEA SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON TEACHING NOVEMBER 5, 2015 THE SOUTH CAROLINA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION.
1 Forward by Design : Strategic Initiatives for the Long-Term Master Plan Mark B. Rosenberg Chancellor September 27, 2007.
Financial Institutions and Markets FIN 304 Dr. Andrew L. H. Parkes Day 4 “How do financial markets work?” 卜安吉.
2012 – 2013 COMPENSATION TRENDS WEBINAR HARRINGTON & ASSOCIATES, INC. PRESENTS.
Source: Kaiser Family Foundation analysis of 2013 OECD data: "OECD Health Data: Health status: Health status indicators", OECD Health Statistics (database).
Council for Education Policy, Research and Improvement Council for Education Policy, Research and Improvement Changing Directions Project Lumina Foundation.
Teacher Compensation Michael Podgursky Department of Economics
PROGRESS OF MARKETING Activities of marketing have changed & grown through the years Marketing was first only thought of with distributing a product/service.
MASBO Bi-Monthly February 8, 2017
Taxes, Teacher Wages & School District Resource Allocation in New Jersey Bruce D. Baker.
Chapter 7: Building Market-Competitive Compensation Systems
Making College Work: Pathways to Success for Disadvantaged Students
Topics Wage and Hour Division (WHD) enforcement
PFIN 2 5 USING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND BUDGETS
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
A Framework for Monitoring Economic Development: Datasets of Interest
The current economic situation Swedbank
13th OECD-NBS Workshop on National Accounts
Reorienting education spending  better outcomes
A SHARED OPPORTUNITY AGENDA
Hadley Public Schools Proposed FY14 Budget.
INTRODUCTION Chapter 1.
CHAPTER 11: COMPENSATION
Financing and Governing America’s Schools
DeVELOPMENT KEY ISSUE 1.
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Key Issues Why does development vary among countries? Why does development vary by gender? Why is energy important for development? Why do countries face.
Linking Compensation to Student Growth
EXECUTIVE BENEFITS OVERVIEW
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.
Annual Report on the performance of the Massachusetts health care system September 2014 Chart Book.
INTRODUCTION Chapter 1.
Average spending on health per capita ($US PPP)
Reorienting education spending  better outcomes
“So that the record of history is absolutely crystal clear, that there is no alternative way so far discovered of improving the lot of the ordinary people.
EDUCATION Chapter 7.
Chapter Eleven: Taxes and Tax Policy.
Compensation Plan May 8, 2017.
Paying for Health Care: A General Overview
FIXING THE ILLINOIS SCHOOL FUNDING FORMULA
2019 Economic Report to the Governor
better meet their needs, increase their productivity and incomes, and
INTRODUCTION Chapter 1.
Federal Housing Administration's Home Owners’ Loan Corporation 1934 Red Lining Map.
Exhibit ES-1. Overall Ranking
BY RICHARD KOBIH NKRUMAH
TRENDS IN EDUCATION Guntars Catlaks Senior research co-ordinator
Policy Pub College of Social Sciences and Public Policy
© 2007 Thomson South-Western
Income and wealth Is efficiency, specialisation and trade benefitting everyone? If not who gains who loses?
Presentation transcript:

September 2016 Educator Compensation: Context, Status, and Direction Matthew G. Springer

3 Themes 1.We spend a lot of money on k-12 public education 2.We spend a lot of that money on teachers 3.The way we spend this money is inefficient and the mechanisms we use are rigid

We spend a lot on k-12 public education

How much money did the United States spend on K-12public education during the school year? A.957,823,000 B.127,436,987,000 C.527,166,106,000 D.867,530,900,000 * U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Biennial Survey of Education in the United States, through ; Statistics of State School Systems, and ; Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education, ; and Common Core of Data (CCD), "National Public Education Financial Survey," through Constant dollars based on the Consumer Price Index, prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, adjusted to a school-year basis. NC spent just north of $12.6 billion

How much money did the United States spend on K-12public education over time? * U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Biennial Survey of Education in the United States, through ; Statistics of State School Systems, and ; Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education, ; and Common Core of Data (CCD), "National Public Education Financial Survey," through Constant dollars based on the Consumer Price Index, prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, adjusted to a school-year basis. (This table was prepared September 2016.)

A.$6,224 B.$8,342 C.$9,446 D.$15,435 How much money did the United States spend on K-12public education per pupil during the school year? WRONG!!!! $10,763 * U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Biennial Survey of Education in the United States, through ;Statistics of State School Systems, through ; Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education, through ; and Common Core of Data (CCD), "National Public Education Financial Survey," through (This information was prepared September 2016.) Constant dollars based on the Consumer Price Index, prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, adjusted to a school-year basis.

How much money did the United States spend on K-12public education over time? * U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Biennial Survey of Education in the United States, through ;Statistics of State School Systems, through ; Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education, through ; and Common Core of Data (CCD), "National Public Education Financial Survey," through (This information was prepared September 2016) Constant dollars based on the Consumer Price Index, prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, adjusted to a school-year basis.

Annual expenditures per FTE student for elementary and secondaryeducation in selected OECD countries, by GDP per capita (2010) * Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Education at a Glance, 2008 through (This figure was prepared February 2015.) Includes all expenditures by public education institutions (such as administration, instruction, ancillary services for students and families, and research and development) unless otherwise noted. Data adjusted to U.S. dollars using the purchasing power parity (PPP) index. Constant dollars based on the Consumer Price Index, prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.

Annual expenditures per FTE student for elementary and secondaryeducation in selected OECD countries, by GDP per capita (2010) * Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Education at a Glance, 2008 through (This figure was prepared February 2015.) Includes all expenditures by public education institutions (such as administration, instruction, ancillary services for students and families, and research and development) unless otherwise noted. Data adjusted to U.S. dollars using the purchasing power parity (PPP) index. Constant dollars based on the Consumer Price Index, prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.

Annual expenditures per FTE student for elementary and secondaryeducation in selected OECD countries, by GDP per capita (2010) * Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Education at a Glance, 2008 through (This figure was prepared February 2015.) Includes all expenditures by public education institutions (such as administration, instruction, ancillary services for students and families, and research and development) unless otherwise noted. Data adjusted to U.S. dollars using the purchasing power parity (PPP) index. Constant dollars based on the Consumer Price Index, prepared by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor.

We spend a lot of that money on k-12 public school teachers

* U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), "National Public Education Financial Survey," through This information was prepared September Current expenditure by function

* U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), "National Public Education Financial Survey," through This information was prepared September Current expenditure by function

We need to create less rigid and more efficient compensation practices (current remuneration practices promote equality, resulting in disturbing inequities)

The Single Salary Schedule 15

Salary Schedule Suppresses Pay Differentials by Field Source: Podgursky, M. and Springer, M.G. (2012). Teacher Compensation Systems in the United States K-12 Public School System. National Tax Journal, 64, Elementary EducationMathematics

Incentive approach to compensation 17 Types of reforms can be classified into a handful of categories. Pay for performance / merit pay Knowledge- and skill-based pay Career ladders Hard-to-staff subjects Hard-to-staff schools Recruitment and retention awards Awards based on predetermined tasks /outcomes Market-oriented Source: Springer, M.G. (2009). Performance Incentives: Their Growing Impact on American K-12 Education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Arguments for/against incentive pay Arguments for… o Motivational effect o Selection or compositional effect Arguments against… o Crowding-out of intrinsic rewards o Lack appropriate measures and technical capacity o Empirical evidence is inconclusive

Why do I argue pay practices promote equality, resulting in disturbing inequities?

Problem Highly effective teachers in high priority schools are 5 times more likely to exit Proposed Solution Offer $5,000 retention bonuses for highly effective teacher to stay Finding Retention bonus increases retention by approximately 23 percent This is huge. Let me show you why. Source: Springer, M.G., Rodriguez, L., Swain, W. (2015). Effective Teacher Retention Bonuses: Evidence from Tennessee. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2),

Average TN teacher Average Level 5 teacher in priority school Average teacher hired by priority school 1.7 σ difference Source: Springer, M.G., Rodriguez, L., Swain, W. (2015). Effective Teacher Retention Bonuses: Evidence from Tennessee. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(2),

Compensation practices promote equality, resulting in disturbing inequities ? Taught by teacher at or above 75 th percentile Taught by teacher at or below the 25 th percentile

Current compensation practices are rigid and inefficient. Current compensation practices promote equality, resulting in disturbing inequities. We need to find a better way to (a) respond to labor market realities and (b) reward and recognize our highest performers. Concluding Thoughts

Contact Thank You!