- Management of Projects for Phase 2 -. Description of project management processes - Chapter on monitoring Criteria for TRC Chair Description of review.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DNV No. 1 © 2000 Det Norske Veritas D ET N ORSKE V ERITAS THEMES Plans and expected contribution WP VII - Network Management.
Advertisements

Grant Life Cycle TGF/LOG/150804/1.
Preparation of the Self-Study and Documentation
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Summer Internship Program Outline
UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants
Regular process for global reporting and assessment of the state of the marine environment, including socio-economic aspects Taking forward Global Oceans.
1 EFCA - 21th March 2002 Raul Mateus Paula. 2 This presentation underlines: The key objectives of the Relex Reform The division of the responsibilities.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 February 2011 How to apply: Legal Framework – Beneficiaries – Application and Selection Procedure.
PILOT PROJECT: External audit of quality assurance system on HEIs Agency for Science and Higher Education Zagreb, October 2007.
Report of the Special Committee on the Logical Framework, Governance and Funding Shaida Badiee, Development Data Group, World Bank Paris, June 2, 2010.
Reporting during the lifetime of the project Moldova – Research Horizon 30 January 2013 Kristin Kraav.
EPOCA – 11. June EPOCAConsortiumOrganisation.
1 Project Management Framework Revision of the SEEA.
Project Reporting for the EuCARD Integrating Activity Project Based on: - Provisions of the Grant Agreement (GA) and its annexes - FP7 Guide on Project.
South East Europe Transnational Cooperation Programme Bologna, 15° June 2009 Kick-off meeting of project SARMa SEE Joint Technical Secretariat.
Direct Support to Focal Points under CSP  The GEF Country Support Program (CSP) is a capacity building project encompassing an overall comprehensive and.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
IEEE /r3 Submission September 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
SEAN-CC Regional Training Workshop: Building Capacity on Access to Funds for Climate Change Adaptation Initiatives NIE accreditation process Mozaharul.
HiLumi LHC is co-funded by the EU FP7 Capacities Programme, Grant Agreement Svet Stavrev (EU Projects Office, CERN) Administrative Manager 17.
LEONARDO TRANSFER OF INNOVATION PROJECT “MEDIA TECH: The future of media industry using innovative technologies ” No. LLP-LdV-ToI-11-CY Kick-off.
S 1 Annual Meeting 2013 Management and reporting (WP6) Chiara Bearzotti NACLIM project manager.
EuCARD-2 is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement EuCARD-2 Governance.
Negotiation of Proposals Dr. Evangelos Ouzounis Directorate C DG Information Society European Commission.
HNSciCloud Pre-Commercial Procurement Project Procurement Framework and Schedule Dante Gregorio CERN 26 January
Draft model for the Annual and Final implementation report under the Investment for Growth and Jobs goal 12 th meeting of the Expert Group on Delegated.
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Session 2 How to meeting countries needs: What has been done and way forward.
WP3 - Evaluation and proposal selection
Christiane Reinsch Celtic Programme Coordinator
Third PMC meeting University of Priština, Kosovska Mitrovica
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
GUIDELINES Evaluation of National Rural Networks
SOUTH BALTIC CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Gunnar Buckau, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Germany
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
Peter Herrmann Celtic Office Director
Drafting the Guidelines for applicants
Institute of Informatics & Telecommunications
Session II: System authority for ERTMS 4RP Trackside approval
INTERREG VB Danube Transnational Programme
EC-68 DOC 16.3 GOVERNANCE REVIEW
API RP 17A - Discussion Points
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
JRC’s Follow-up work to improve GES assessment
Interested to become an EOQ Member?
Christiane Reinsch Celtic Programme Coordinator
Registration Process for new messages
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
AGDI -Administrative and financial processes
Eurostat Task force on victimisation surveys,
Informal document GRVA nd GRVA, 28 Jan Feb. 2019
ANTICORRP ANTICORRP General Assembly Meeting Administrative update
19th meeting of the WG GES 22/03/2018
Definition of Project and Project Cycle
Overview US Paper C2-7.INF
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
The future grant agreement (contract) and its annexes
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
2nd Coordination Meeting 24-26th May, Greece
WP 1 Management and Coordination
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
Energy Statistics Compilers Manual
Invasive Alien Species
Working Party on Noise (GRB) General information and WP.29 highlights
Presentation transcript:

- Management of Projects for Phase 2 -

Description of project management processes - Chapter on monitoring Criteria for TRC Chair Description of review processes - Chapter on Deliverables Criteria for WAIG Chair Work Arrangements for WAIG Criteria for Project Leader Description of tasks of Project Leaders and Members Criteria for TRC member Criteria for WAIG members Template for Projects Criteria for Projects Description of project management processes - Chapter on Implementation Module IV: Review process of completed deliverables Indicators presented in the template for projects and in Annexes of Strat Doc (see Logical Framework) Processes for the development of projects within the UNEP/SETAC Life Cycle Initiative Module III: Monitoring & Fulfilment of LC Ini Indicators LC INI-013 LC INI-014 Description of project management processes - Chapter on submission LC INI-016 Description of the review process Chapter on New Projects LC INI-TRC LC INI-016 Criteria for TRC Chair LC INI-TRC Description of ExCom’s tasks LC INI-016 Approved? Yes No End Project 1Project N… Modules I: Project generation, review and approval Modules II: Project implementation Project generation Project review Project approval LC INI T-01 Description of ExCom’s tasks LC INI-016

Template for Projects Project submitted to ExCom Project evaluated by ExCom Criteria for Projects Does it fulfil the criteria? The project goes back to the applicant No Commissioned Projects Group Projects Endorsed Projects Co-governed Projects Yes Are there enough funds? No Yes ExCom submits the project to the TRC Chair for concurrence with the recommendation Will it provide the agreed funds to the LC Ini? Yes (it becomes a full ILCP member) No Restricted membership Project generated by Leaders of Work Areas Project generated by Work Area Interest Group Project generated by Open Forum I. Project generation, review & approval module II Implemen- tation of the project Agreement? Yes A A No ExCom submits the project to the ILCP for approval Approved? Yes No The project goes back to the applicant End Project generation Project review Project approval Description of ExCom’s tasks LC INI-016 Description of review processes - Chapter on New Projects LC INI-TRC

Group project conformed Project followed-up by the WAIG Chair Project Leader confirmed II. Implemen- tation project module IV. Review Process of completed deliverables Description of tasks of Project Leaders and Members III. Follow-up of fulfilment of LC Ini INDICATORS B C Original partners of the project in the Project Document Expressions of interest from Work Area Interest Group members Expressions of interest from Open Forum members Expressions of interest positively evaluated by the Project Leader? Interested persons communicated on the decision by the Secretariat Yes No End LC INI-014 LC INI T-01 LC INI T- 02 End WAIG Chair proposes the Project Leader new project members Description of Project Management processes - Chapter on implementation LC INI-016

Mid term reports (Twice a year) prepared on fulfilment of indicators by the Project leaders III. Module on monitoring & Fulfilment of LC Ini indicators Is the performance of the project aligned to the expectations? Indicators developed by the Initiative (in Logical Framework) Continue as planned Project leader implements corrective actions B Yes No Has the project concluded? yesNo C WAIG monitors fulfilment of goals/targets/indicators Indicators presented in the template for progress reports final reports prepared on fulfilment of indicators by the Project leaders ExCom monitors the implementation of corrective actions D D Deliverables of the project submitted for review Description of Project Management processes - Chapter on monitoring LC INI-016 LC INI T-07 Bi-annually reports are prepared by the WAIG Chair and submitted to the ExCom and the ILCP

IV. Review process of completed deliverables Reviewers identified by the authors Identified by the Chair of the Technical Review Com. Reviewers identified by ExeCom Potential reviewers invited by the Secretariat A restricted web area for the review is set up by the Secr. Is the next version acceptable? The project goes back to the authors for improvement No Yes Criteria for the review Reviewers that accepted invitation receive the reports Feedback received by the TR Chair Next version prepared by authors The Chair checks the next version and the incorporation of feedback received The project is sent to the ILCP by the ExCom for advise/approval before the dissemination Is the deliverable approved? Yes Worldwide disse- mination of the work Criteria for Reviewers TRC Chair integrates the review received TRC Chair sends the review to the author(s) LC INI-TRC Description of review processes - Chapter on Deliverables LC INI-TRC The Chair shares the report on the review process with the ExCom looking for concurrence Concurrence With the ExCom? 1-page statement With comments prepared by the ExCom will join the report No End Description of ExCom’s tasks LC INI-016