Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Water cut matching result of reservoir Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Pressure matching result of reservoir Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Distribution of five horizontal wells and permeability at layer 6. The permeability range of the whole field is between 600 × 10 −3 μm 2 and 6800 × 10 −3 μm 2. There is a high-permeability channels between the Pro3 and Inj wells, and its permeability is eight times the initial permeability. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Distribution of gas saturation around central well at different injection times. The range of gas saturation increases with time (a) t = 4 days, (b) t = 8 days, (c) t = 12 days, (d) t = 16 days, and (e) t = 20 days. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Daily gas rate and cumulative gas production of Pro3 well Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Influence of permeability on daily gas rate of Pro3 well Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Influence of different parameters on gas breakthrough coefficient (a) influence of permeability on GBC, (b) influence of reservoir thickness on GBC, (c) influence of permeability times on GBC, (d) influence of injection strength on GBC, and (e) influence of pressure difference on GBC Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / GBC calibration curves of injection strength and injection production pressure difference Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / GBC calibration curves of injection strength and injection production pressure difference Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Gas breakthrough coefficient of eight wells in China Bohai Oilfield Figure Legend:

Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas Stimulation Technique in an Offshore Heavy Oil Reservoir J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2016;139(3): doi: / Gas saturation distribution of different gas breakthrough degrees after injecting foam. The image from (a) to (h) represent the gas saturation of (a) weak (without foam), (b) weak (foam), (c) moderate (without foam), (d) moderate (foam), (e) strong (without foam), (f) strong (foam), (g) severe (without foam), and (h) severe (foam), respectively. Figure Legend: