CODIF Calibration Status Lynn Kistler Space Science Center UNH Mar 25-27, 2009 Cambridge, UK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Detectors / Particle Detectors
Advertisements

STAFF Report. 1.Status of data delivery 2.Delivery Plan 3.Status of data pipeline 4.STAFF/FGM cross calibration 5.Conclusions 2 15th Cross-Calibration.
Near-Earth Magnetotail Reconnection and Plasmoid Formation in Connection With a Substorm Onset on 27 August 2001 S. Eriksson 1, M. Oieroset 2, D. N. Baker.
Five Spacecraft Observations of Oppositely Directed Exhaust Jets from a Magnetic Reconnection X-line Extending > 4.3 x 10 6 km in the Solar Wind Gosling.
The Nightglow Spectrum of Jupiter as seen by the Alice UV Spectrograph on New Horizons A. J. Bayless 1, G. R. Gladstone 1, J.-Y. Chaufray 2, K. D. Retherford.
The Origins of X-Rays. The X-Ray Spectrum The X-Ray Spectrum (Changes in Voltage) The characteristic lines are a result of electrons ejecting orbital.
The Properties of Stars Masses. Using Newton’s Law of Gravity to Determine the Mass of a Celestial Body Newton’s law of gravity, combined with his laws.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
What DMSP Data Tell us About the Thermosphere Response to Solar Wind Forcing Delores Knipp CU Aerospace Engineering Sciences and NCAR HAO With Assistance.
IES Calibration Modeling Phil Valek and Roman Gomez May 29, 2013.
Concentrated Generator Regions in the Auroral Magnetosphere as Derived from Conjugated Cluster and FAST Data M. Hamrin (1),O. Marghitu (2, 3), B.Klecker.
Fundamental Physics II PETROVIETNAM UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF FUNDAMENTAL SCIENCES Vungtau, 2013 Pham Hong Quang
Plastic Software Status and Data Access March 27, 2007 Lynn Kistler & Lorna Ellis.
Conservation of Angular Momentum 8.01 W11D2 Fall 2006.
CODIF Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Space Science Center UNH July 6-8, 2005 Paris, France.
The dayside magnetopause in the spring of 2004: A case study and a statistical report A. Blăgău (1, 2), B. Klecker (1), G. Paschmann (1), M. Scholer (1),
Ivan Smiljanić Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, Belgrade, Serbia Energy resolution and scale requirements for luminosity measurement.
5. Walen Test analysis The Walen Test results for Cluster 3 are as expected for a reconnection event. The test over the leading edge shows a positive correlation.
Improving Detection Efficiency of a Space-based Ion Mass Spectrum Analyzer Anne Lamontagne, University of New Hampshire; Mark Popecki, UNH; Lynn Kistler,
Authors: S. Beyene1, C. J. Owen1, A. P. Walsh1, A. N. Fazakerley1, E
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
Van Allen Probe Data Pathways SWG, September 23, 2014 D. G. Sibeck NASA/GSFC.
17th Cluster workshop Uppsala, Sweden , May 12-15, 2009
IBEX-lo 2015 Ops and ISN Overview D. Heirtzler et al, UNH/SSC IBEX SWTM August D. Heirtzler, A. Galli, K. Fairchild, H. Kucharek, T. Leonard, E.
CAMMICE Science Report March 31, 2006 There will be two sections to the report: 1.A discussion on the inter-comparison of the responses of the MICS, Hydra,
Quantum Mechanical Model. Quantum Numbers (n, l, m l, m s ) n = ____________ Quantum Number It has whole number values (1, 2, 3, …) An n increases, the.
18 Sep 2008Paul Dauncey 1 DECAL: Motivation Hence, number of charged particles is an intrinsically better measure than the energy deposited Clearest with.
1 CAA 2009 Peer Review, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March CAA Peer Review: Selected Recommendations.
1 Chapter No. 17 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Measurement of Timing Properties.
DAA PEACE Status A. Fazakerley, B. Mihaljčić, I. Rozum, A. Lahiff, G. Watson, D. Kataria UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics Mullard Space Science.
9 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March /17 CAA Graphics: Pre-generated/On-demand Panels and Cross-Calibration.
Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February Comparison of the EDI and FGM Measurements of the Magnetic Field Magnitude Plot shown.
Reconstructing the spacecraft potential of Cluster when in active control and other issues Maria Andriopoulou Klaus Torkar Rumi Nakamura Space Research.
15th CAA Cross-calibration workshop CIS archiving activities report University College of London 2012, April
15 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 17th – 19th April 2012, UCL, London PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate.
14 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 5th – 7th October 2011, York, UK PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics.
MSSL * I. Rozum, A.N. Fazakerley, A.D. Lahiff, H. Bacai and C. Anekallu PEACE Calibration Status 8 th Cross Calibration Workshop, Kinsale, Ireland, 28.
Cluster Active Archive Science User Working Group (CAASUWG) - update Matt Taylor on behalf of CAASUWG.
CIS Action Items 10 th Cross-Calibration Workshop Observatoire de Paris, Nov
8th Cross-calibration Workshop CIS data delivery report Kinsale – October 2008.
Status of CIS Calibration Work Iannis Dandouras and the CIS Team presented by: Harri Laakso 3 rd CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting MSSL, October 2006.
Mullard Space Science Laboratory CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting ESTEC 16 th May 2006 H. Khan, A. D. Lahiff, A.N. Fazakerley, I. Rozum, R. J Wilson MSSL-UCL.
CODIF CORSS-CALIBRATIONS C. Mouikis, L. Kistler, K. Genestreti UNH 10th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting L'Observatoire de Paris, Paris, 2-4 November 2009.
26th Oct 2006CAA cross cal meeting, MSSL RAPID Calibration Status RAPID team.
20 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop MPS, Göttingen, Germany Oct Ways of Measuring DC Electric Field: Who Does it Correctly?
14 th CAA Cross-calibration Workshop CIS archiving activities York October 5-7, 2011.
Status of CIS Calibration and Archival Activities Iannis Dandouras, Alain Barthe, Lynn Kistler, and the CIS Team 4th CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting LPCE,
CIS Calibration Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Adrian Blagau Iannis Dandouras, Alain Barthe 22 th Cross-Calibration Meeting, Tenerife, November 2015.
CODIF Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Space Science Center UNH Sept 15-17, 2002 Paris, France.
WHISPER Cross-caibration activities
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Data-Model Comparisons
CIS Data Archival Status
CIS Data Archival Status
10th CAA Operations Review Annual Report of the CIS Experiment
SWIA Front End Peer Review
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
RAPID/IES Calibration Status Rutherford Appleton Lab
H. Rème, I.Dandouras and A. Barthe IRAP, Toulouse, France
Cross-Calibration Meeting ESTEC, February 2006
M. Yamauchi1, I. Dandouras2, H. Reme2,
Time Series Analysis of Particles and Fields data
Field quality to achieve the required lifetime goals (single beam)
Anisotropy of Primary Cosmic Rays
Forbush Decreases and Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections at Earth and Mars Mark Lester1, Beatriz Sanchez-Cano1, Emma Thomas1, Adam Langeveld1, Jingnan.
The Physics of the Collisionless Diffusion Region
UVIS Calibration Update
Chandra Calibration Status
Relating Mars Observations with Earth Observations Odyssey/GOES Energetic Particle Data Comparison ( ) Ron Turner, John Starcher, Matt Rudy.
T2K Run8 MUMON Summary.
Presentation transcript:

CODIF Calibration Status Lynn Kistler Space Science Center UNH Mar 25-27, 2009 Cambridge, UK

CODIF Efficiencies Overall Change in H+ Efficiency Changes. l For SC4 (FM7) use “monitor rate” data to track the start efficiency (SFR/SR), stop efficiency (SFR/SF) and the fraction of coincidences that also have a single position signal (SEV/SFR). The product of these values gives the total efficiency. l For SC3 (FM6) (for which the Stop rate, SR, does not work well) use comparison spectra with FM7 for time periods when the two spacecraft are close. Overall Change in O+ l We used to use times when the count rate was dominated by O+ (mainly times with O+ “beams” in the lobe). l Because these do not now give a sufficiently high count rate, we instead use comparison O+ spectra between SC3 and SC4, and assume that SC3 is constant Relative efficiency change at different positions for SC 3 and SC4, H+ and O+ l Use pitch angle spectra during gyrotropic time periods to normalize the different positions within each instrument. This is done separately for H+ and O+

Temporal Changes There have been no MCP increases since July-Oct 2004

SC4/FM7 Efficiencies start stop Single event 1-yearWhole mission 2007/1/1 2008/5/12001/1/12008/1/1

Total H+ Efficiency for SC4 SC4-linear scaleSC4-log scale

Total H+ Efficiency for SC3 SC3-linear scaleSC3-log scale

Total O+ Efficiency for SC4 SC4-linear scaleSC4-log scale

SC4 H+ Anode Efficiencies

SC3 H+ Anode Efficiencies

Calibration Files New Calibration files have been made that cover 2006 and This includes l updates to HS H+ total and position efficiencies l updates to HS O+ total and position efficiencies We have done the following checks l Comparison of moments in plasma sheet - spot checks and statistical averages (average velocities, densities) l Checks on LS at times when instrument switches from LS to HS l Absolute Calibration Tests –Comparisons with Whisper (not for recent data) –Pressure balance tests in the plasma sheet

Density comparison over 3 orbits (SC3: Blue - SC4-Black)

Checks on H+ Calibrations GSE - Whole instrument Main point is that the average SC4 Vz is zero, as would be expected. This shows that the anodes are well calibrated for this period. SC3 cannot measure Vz one half of the “high side” does not work. [So ignore SC3 in these plots]

Checks on H+ Calibrations GSE - Whole instrument Main point is that the average SC4 Vz is zero, as would be expected. This shows that the anodes are well calibrated for this period. SC3 cannot measure Vz one half of the “high side” does not work. [So ignore SC3 in these plots]

Checks on H+ Calibrations Instr. Coord. - Half instrument Using the half- instrument from SC3 and SC4, densities and all components of the velocity agree well. Note Vx and Vy (spin plane) average to zero, but Vz is anomalously high because only 1/2 the anodes are used.

Checks on H+ Calibrations Instr. Coord. - Half instrument

LS Calibration Checks at LS/HS transition

LS Calibration Checks at LS/HS transition

Absolute Calibration Comparisons with Whisper (for high density times) Pressure Balance across the plasma sheet

SC4 Low Side in the magnetosheathCODIF/Whisper Comparisons

SC1 High Side in the cusp CODIF/Whisper Comparisons

SC4 High Side in the cusp CODIF/Whisper Comparisons

Masson et al., 2008 SC4 High Side in dense plasma sheetCODIF/Whisper Comparisons

SC1 High Side in more normal plasma sheet CODIF/Whisper Comparisons 30-jul-2002

2002 Plasma sheet Pressure Balance Tests Black - SC4 CODIF, Blue+Red SC1/3 HIA Particle Magnetic Total P

Plasma sheet Pressure Balance Tests Black - SC4 CODIF, Blue+Red SC1/3 HIA Particle Magnetic Total P

Plasma sheet Pressure Balance Tests Black - SC4 CODIF, Blue+Red SC1/3 HIA Particle Magnetic Total P

Plasma sheet Pressure Balance Tests Black - SC4 CODIF, Blue+Red SC1/3 HIA Particle Magnetic Total P 2007

Efficiency Summary Efficiencies have been checked through Jan SC4 shows a significant decline at the end of We need to increase MCP voltage. Calibrated data in CAA (goes through 2005) is good, both in relative and absolute efficiency (from both Whisper comparisons and pressure tests) For l Anode efficiencies are good (Vz looks nominal) l HS/LS comparison looks good l SC3/SC4 comparisons look good. l The Absolute efficiency still looks too high (pressure coming out too low). This needs to be adjusted before release.

The End