CODIF Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Space Science Center UNH Sept 15-17, 2002 Paris, France.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Low x workshop Helsinki 2007 Joël Feltesse 1 Inclusive F 2 at low x and F L measurement at HERA Joël Feltesse Desy/Hamburg/Saclay On behalf of the H1 and.
Advertisements

The Nightglow Spectrum of Jupiter as seen by the Alice UV Spectrograph on New Horizons A. J. Bayless 1, G. R. Gladstone 1, J.-Y. Chaufray 2, K. D. Retherford.
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
1 Recent developments on sensitivity calculations Effect of combined le and me running –Is there a statistical advantage over pure le running? Discrimination.
RBSP-ECT Suite Status: Instrument Status and Instrument Operations Flexibility Harlan E. Spence on behalf of RBSP-ECT Team University of New Hampshire.
2011 HV scan SF6 flow-meter accident 2011 Results comparison RPC HV efficiency scan Pigi Paolucci on behalf of RPC collaboration.
IES Calibration Modeling Phil Valek and Roman Gomez May 29, 2013.
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
CLUSTER Electric Field Measurements in the Magnetotail O. Marghitu (1, 3), M. Hamrin (2), B.Klecker (3), M. André (4), L. Kistler (5), H. Vaith (3), H.
Dependence of the Walén test on the density estimate: A Cluster case study A. Blăgău (1,2), B. Klecker (1), G. Paschmann (1), O. Marghitu (2, 1), M. Scholer.
CODIF Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Space Science Center UNH July 6-8, 2005 Paris, France.
Run 8 Polarization measurements from STAR BBC Andrew Gordon September 12, 2008.
Systematic Errors Studies in the RHIC/AGS Proton-Carbon CNI Polarimeters Andrei Poblaguev Brookhaven National Laboratory The RHIC/AGS Polarimetry Group:
K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.
Page 1 HEND science after 9 years in space. page 2 HEND/2001 Mars Odyssey HEND ( High Energy Neutron Detector ) was developed in Space Research Institute.
Locations of boundaries of outer and inner radiation belts as observed by Cluster and Double Star Natalia Ganushkina (1, 2), Iannis Dandouras (3), Yuri.
Improving Detection Efficiency of a Space-based Ion Mass Spectrum Analyzer Anne Lamontagne, University of New Hampshire; Mark Popecki, UNH; Lynn Kistler,
PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   PHOTON RECONSTRUCTION IN CMS APPLICATION TO H   Elizabeth Locci SPP/DAPNIA, Saclay, France Prague.
Russian Aviation and Space Agency Institute for Space Research NASA 2001 Mars Odyssey page 1 Workshop HEND Procedures of HEND data convolution for.
Mark Dorman UCL/RAL MINOS Collaboration Meeting Fermilab, Oct. 05 Data/MC Comparisons and Estimating the ND Flux with QE Events ● Update on QE event selection.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
1 Recent results on  (3770) production & decays from BES/BEPC Gang RONG (for BES Collaboration) Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing , P.R.
RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics,
Hall D Tagger and Beamline Review, Nov , 2008, Newport News1 Question Question: How can you reliably extract the polarization of the collimated beam.
1 The IBEX-HI SensorVoyagers in the Heliosheath Conference, January 12, 2009 January 12, 2009 Voyagers in the Heliosheath Kauai, Hawaii. The IBEX Hi Sensor:
Preliminary Profile Reconstruction of EA Hybrid Showers Bruce Dawson & Luis Prado Jr thanks to Brian Fick & Paul Sommers and Stefano Argiro & Andrea de.
Electron Spectrometer: Status July 14 Simon Jolly, Lawrence Deacon 1 st July 2014.
1 © A. Kwasinski, 2016 Power vs. energy delivery profile technologies Ragone chart: More information and charts can be found in Holm et. al., “A Comparison.
Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.
15 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 17th – 19th April 2012, UCL, London PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate.
14 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 5th – 7th October 2011, York, UK PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics.
Paper Committee: Moneti(chair?), Danko, Ehrlich, Galik 1 OCT 21, 2006.
CIS Action Items 10 th Cross-Calibration Workshop Observatoire de Paris, Nov
Status of CIS Calibration Work Iannis Dandouras and the CIS Team presented by: Harri Laakso 3 rd CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting MSSL, October 2006.
Recent results on non-DDbar decays of  (3770) at BES HaiLong Ma [For BES Collaboration] The IVIIth Rencontres de Moriond session devoted to QCD AND HIGH.
CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 RAPID/IES Calibration Status J.A. Davies.
CODIF CORSS-CALIBRATIONS C. Mouikis, L. Kistler, K. Genestreti UNH 10th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting L'Observatoire de Paris, Paris, 2-4 November 2009.
26th Oct 2006CAA cross cal meeting, MSSL RAPID Calibration Status RAPID team.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
10 th CAA Cross-calibration meeting, 2nd – 4th November 2009, Paris N. Doss, A. Fazakerley, B. Mihaljčić and I. Rozum UCL Department of Space and Climate.
14 th CAA Cross-calibration Workshop CIS archiving activities York October 5-7, 2011.
Status of CIS Calibration and Archival Activities Iannis Dandouras, Alain Barthe, Lynn Kistler, and the CIS Team 4th CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting LPCE,
CIS Calibration Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Adrian Blagau Iannis Dandouras, Alain Barthe 22 th Cross-Calibration Meeting, Tenerife, November 2015.
CODIF Calibration Status Lynn Kistler Space Science Center UNH Mar 25-27, 2009 Cambridge, UK.
GOES Data Status Mutual Benefits of NASA THEMIS and NOAA GOES
IBD Detection Efficiencies and Uncertainties
PAD SELECTION QUALITY FLAG STATUS
S. Besse, M. A’Hearn and the DIXI team
CIS Data Archival Status
10th CAA Operations Review Annual Report of the CIS Experiment
RAPID/IES Calibration Status Rutherford Appleton Lab
Cross-Calibration Meeting ESTEC, February 2006
Cross-section Measurements of (n,xn) Threshold Reactions
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Physics Scope and Work Plan for the Shielded-Pickup Measurements -- Synchrotron Radiation Photon Distributions Photoelectron Production Parameters.
Preliminary results of the OEMs HDV PN-PEMS validation study
Update on coincidences
UVIS Calibration Update
Karen Meech Institute for Astronomy TOPS 2003
UVIS Calibration Update
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
UVIS Calibration Update
Relating Mars Observations with Earth Observations Odyssey/GOES Energetic Particle Data Comparison ( ) Ron Turner, John Starcher, Matt Rudy.
Energy Calibration with Compton Data
e+ Vertical Beam Size during CESR-c Collisions
LIP Lisbon We would sugest to include in the Statement of Work the following points: The development of an engineering tool to extrapolate measured solar.
ONE DIMENSIONAL MOTION
Studies of the Time over Threshold
Presentation transcript:

CODIF Status Lynn Kistler, Chris Mouikis Space Science Center UNH Sept 15-17, 2002 Paris, France

Outline H+ Efficiencies l Temporal changes l Current status O+ Efficiencies l Temporal Changes l Current Status Comparisons with HIA High rate correction (magnetosheath) Spillover Subtraction Radiation Belt Background subtraction

H+ Efficiencies Temporal Changes. l The temporal changes in the absolute efficiency are determined using the “Monitor Rates” –Start rate (SF) –Stop rate (SR) –Coincidence Rate (SFR) –Single event rate (SEV) l These allow us to monitor the start efficiency (SFR/SR), stop efficiency (SFR/SF) and the fraction of coincidences that also have a single position signal (SEV/SFR). l The product of these values gives the total efficiency. l The stop rate (SR) is not completely reliable, which gives some uncertainty in the final answer.

Temporal Changes To improve the declining efficiencies, we tried the following MCP voltage changes once the spacecraft were out of the SW/Magnetosheath: l June 28: SC1 and SC4 increased two steps. (values SC1/148, SC4/146) –Result - all OK, but not a big increase in efficiency l July 12: SC1 and SC4 increased another two steps (values SC1/150,SC4/148) –Result - increase in efficiency –Some PACC discharges on SC1 l Aug 23: SC1, SC3, SC4 increase two steps (SC1/152, SC3/150,SC4/150) –Result - discharges on all Spacecraft l Set new values to SC1 148 (+2), SC3 148 (+0), SC4 148 (+4)

SC1/FM8 Efficiencies start stop Single event 2000/9/012003/9/01

SC3/FM6 Efficiencies start stop Single event 2000/9/012003/9/01

SC4/FM7 Efficiencies start stop Single event 2000/9/012003/9/01

Efficiencies Temporal Changes (cont). l The changes in SC1(FM8) look realistic- we use these to get an absolute efficiency curve versus time l SC4(FM7) and SC3(FM6) SFR/SR is unreasonable - difficult to use to determine the total change with time. l To determine the changes in time for SC3 and SC4, we used comparisons with SC1(FM8).

SC1/FM8 total Efficiency Change

SC4/FM7 total Efficiency Change

SC3/FM6 total Efficiency Change

Efficiencies l There are some changes from older (April 2003) ABSEFF calibration files in the Nov-Dec 2001 time frame. l The shape of the curves has changed slightly so that the energy dependence matches HIA and agrees better with the measured Efficiency vs. Energy. l There is still an unresolved overall offset from HIA (Chris will show more). l These changes are now included in the Calibration files (ready, but not yet delivered to CESR) - they are good through ~Mar The summer changes have not yet been included.

O+ Efficiencies The O+ efficiencies have been completely redone. Because the monitor rate data, which give us the true efficiency measurement, measure everything coming in the instrument, we need to identify “pure” O+ time periods. To do this, we have used ~all times when O+ beams are observed in the polar cap - these time periods give us a true efficiency measurement for a particular angular pixel. To determine how the particular angular pixel compares with other pixels, we use inner magnetosphere time periods where there is significant O, and a gyrotropic distribution. Assuming gyrotropy, we can get the relative pixel efficiencies. We then take our “true” individual pixel measurements combined with our “relative” measurements to determine the average O+ efficiency as a function of time. Finally, as with H+, we concentrate on using SC1/FM8, and then get the SC3 and SC4 efficiencies by comparing the fluxes between spacecraft.

SC1/FM8 O+ Absolute Eff.

SC3/FM6 O+ Absolute Eff.

SC4/FM7 O+ Absolute Eff.

O+ comments O+ efficiency now decreasing faster at the beginning of the mission than previous assumed. The calibration files are all now available, but not yet submitted to CESR. They are good through Mar