PANEL 1 ESI Funds and best practice Romania’s experience

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Joint presentation by respective units in DGs AGRI, EMPL and REGIO IPA Components III, IV and V: Conditions for successful preparation and absorption of.
Advertisements

Cyprus Project Management Society
Towards the Romania of PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania EU projects represent a.
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
Delegation of the European Commission Romania preparing for EU membership European Structural and Cohesion Funds.
HR 08 IB SPP 02 TWINNING PROJECT “ENHANCEMENT OF CAPACITY FOR EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF EU COHESION POLICY FUNDS” 1 The most significant results of Component.
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
Sectoral Operational Programme for Environmental Infrastructure Ministry of Environment and Water Management.
V4 Expert Group V4 Expert Group Partnership Agreement and programmes Czech Republic 16 – 17 June 2014 Budapest.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
1 MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SOCIAL SOLIDARITY AND FAMILY ESF HEAD OF MISSION MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR SECTORAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Territorial Co-operation in Territorial Co-operation in Territorial Co-operation Unit DG Regional Policy West Sussex,
Ministarstvo finansija Vlada Republike Srbije Instrument za pretpristupnu pomoć Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance – IPA
Presentation WG 2 Managing EU Funds on the Regional Level Republic of Albania Ministry of European Integration (MEI) Regional Conference EU Perspectives.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
Forum for Sustainable Mobility and Metropolitan Development Oradea, November 2013 JASPERS Teo Falato, Transport Sector Specialist.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME “DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE BULGARIAN ECONOMY” Republic of Bulgaria Ministry of Economy and Energy April 2006.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion The new architecture for cohesion policy post-2013 High-Level Meeting on the.
European Territorial Cooperation SAWP meeting, 9 July
STEPS FOR FUNDING ELI-NP March 11 st 2011 Dan Cutoiu.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
EU Structural Funds Presentation to Chief Executives 9 May 2006 Hillgrove Hotel Monaghan.
Partnership Agreement of the SR for years
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
1 European Territorial Cooperation in legislative proposals Peter Berkowitz Head of Unit Conception, forward studies, impact assessment, DG Regional Policy.
Regional policy European Commission EN Update on IPA Component III - environment Brussels, 28 November 2008 Erich Unterwurzacher REGIO.I4 – IPA/ISPA.
MOBILISATION OF RESOURCES TO IMPLEMENT THE DANUBE STRATEGY Ruse/Giurgiu, May 2010 T. Sobieski European Commission-Head of Unit C2, DG ELARG.
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR COHESION FUND (REGULATION 1164/94) MANAGEMENT OF PROJECTS, FINANCED BY COHESION.
JASPERS for CEF Stéphane OUAKI Head Of Unit
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
MINISTRY OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION General Directorate for Regional Development Regional Policy and Pogramming Directorate REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
Belgrade, Donor Coordination Meeting Belgrade, 4 th of June 2012.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
THE ROLE OF THE MANAGING AUTHORITY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRUCTURAL AND COHESION FUNDS AND ITS OPERATION ANDREJ ENGELMAN.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
Sectoral Operational Programme “INCREASE OF ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS” October 2005 MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND TRADE.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
Strategic Environmental Assessment for the Operative Programmes Anita Gulam Ana Kovačević Ministry of Environmental and Nature Protection, Republic of.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING AND RESULTS SOCIAL INCLUSION IN EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA TOWARDS MAINSTREAMING.
INTERREG-IIIB CADSES Neighbourhood Program: a general overview
PRE-ACCESSION PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION IN CROATIA
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Ministry of Finance Contribution of the Operational Programmes to the implementation of the NSRF objectives Boriana Pencheva Director Management.
NSRF and National Development Planning in Greece
New opportunities for cooperation
Interreg V-A Romania-Bulgaria Programme
South-East European Space
ESF Committee plenary meeting in Rome
The Instrument for Pre–accession Assistance
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
ESF Technical Working Group Brussels, 10 October 2016
The role of the ECCP (1) The involvement of all relevant stakeholders – public authorities, economic and social partners and civil society bodies – at.
Financial Instruments under the ESF State of Play & Implementation
IPA – European pre-accession funds
Purpose of the CSF and Staff Working Document
EU Cohesion Policy : legislative proposals
Instrument za pretpristupnu pomoć
State of Play Programme level
Ex ante conditionalities in cohesion policy:
The Atlantic Forum Process and outcomes European Commission – DG MARE
Romania-Bulgaria border. Perspectives for
Cohesion Forum Brussels, May 2001
The approved ESPON 2013 Programme
Integrated Development and Increasing Prosperity of Southern Estonia
Presentation transcript:

PANEL 1 ESI Funds 2014-2020 and best practice Romania’s experience

Impact of Cohesion Policy in Romania from the perspective of past decade

The impact on GDP

Household consumption 2010 prices, billion Lei

Total investments 2010 prices, billion Lei

Unemployment rate

Employment

Average monthly salary lei

Transport infrastructure Investments in environment Progress end 2015 (1) Indicators at the level of NSRF priority themes /vs. targets Transport infrastructure Railway infrastructure rehabilitated: 127,05 Km/ vs. 209,185 Km New TEN-T road infrastructure: 312,44 Km/ vs. 372,945 Km TEN-T road infrastructure rehabilitated: 289,29 Km / vs. 302,796 Km County road infrastructure rehabilitated: 1 667,95 Km/ vs. 877 Km City road infrastructure rehabilitated: 198,43 Km/ vs. 325 Km Investments in environment No. of new/ rehabilitated wastewater treatment plants: 107/ vs. 200 No. of projects for renewable energy: 32/ vs. 30 No. of localities with new/ rehabilitated water facilities in regional system: 312/ vs. 430 New integrated system for waste management: 1/ vs. 37 Social infrastructure No. of Medical Units rehabilitated: 58/ vs. 62 No. of Social centers rehabilitated: 172 / vs.223 No. of beneficiaries for social infrastructure rehabilitated: 47 853 / vs. 10 000 No. of beneficiaries for pre- university education infrastructure rehabilitated: 93 399 / vs. 40 000

Progress end 2015 (2) Indicators at the level of NSRF priority themes /vs. targets Teritorial development No. of integrated urban development plans (PIDU) accepted (No.): 94/ vs. 30 No. of urban development projects (No.): 352/ vs. 60 No. of beneficiaries for PIDU projects: 8 203 338/ vs. 400 000 Development of Human Capital New jobs created : 17 232 (ROP) + 7 312 (SOP HRD) + 16970 (SOP C) = 41 514/ vs. 38500 Education staff trained: 256 668 pers. / vs. 75 000 No. of participants at the vulnerable groups programmes: 72 901/ vs. 13 000 No. of long-term unemployed participants in integrated programmes: 122 017/ vs.65 000 Increasing competitiveness No. of microenterprises supported: 1 976/ vs. 1 500 No. of SMEs assisted: 2 729/ vs. 2 000 No. of tourists in the rehabilitated accommodation structures: 989 301/ vs. 400 000 No. of turism projects contracted: 233/ vs. 221

Investments by major fields (based on amounts declared by December 2015 )

Total no of projects/ region Investments in the regions North East 1848 North West 2335 Total no of projects/ region 16 002 Source: SMIS Center 2007 West 1226 South East 1500 South 1618 South-West 1343 Bucharest Ilfov 4125

Experience with preparation of Partnership agreement, operational programmes In 2014-2020 period, there will be financed investments under all 11 Thematic Objectives established through the European regulation in order to support the accomplishment of targets assumed by Romania in line with Europe 2020 Strategy, using ESI Funds. The selection of the thematic objectives was made taking into account their contribution to the development of different sectors to reduce the gaps between regions and between Ro and other Member States: competitiveness people and society infrastructure resources administration and governance

Partnership Agreement 2014-2020 Main steps for approval 1 of April 2014 – the official version of the PA was sent to the COM through SFC 2014 2 of June 2014 – the Romanian authorities received the COM comments on PA 7 July 2014 – the Romanian authorities sent the revised PA version to COM through SFC 2014 6 August 2014 – approval decision (Bx/6.8.2014/C(2014) 5515 final) Romania was the eleventh MS that received the approval of the PA

Operational programmes All operational programmes are approved: Most deprived persons 28 November 2014 Technical Assistance 18 December 2014 Competitiveness 19 December 2014 Human Capital 25 February 2015 Administrative Capacity Rural Development 26 May 2015 Regional 24 June 2015 Large Infrastructure 10 July 2015 Fisheries and Maritime Affairs 25 November 2015

ETC Programmes For the period 2014-2020, Romania participates in the following ETC Programmes:   Interreg V-A Romania Bulgaria Programme Interreg V-A Romania Hungary Programme Joint Operational Programme Romania – Ukraine Joint Operational Programme Romania – Republic of Moldova IPA  Cross-border Cooperation Programme Romania - Serbia Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin Danube Programme Hungary – Slovacia – Romania – Ukraine Programme URBACT III Programme ESPON 2020 Programme INTERREG EUROPE Programme INTERACT III Programme

Institutional architecture Managing Authorities and Operational Programmes 2014- 2020

The first calls The status of launching the calls in 2015 and for 2016-2017 Program Operațional UE allocation 2014-2020 (mil. euro) Applicant guides under public consultation 2015 Open calls Procentage of the launched calls 2015 % N0. of launched calls 2016 Procentage of the allocation to be launched 2016 No. of calls 2017 Large Infrastructure 9.418,52 21 23 98,5 3 Competitiveness 1.329,79 11 8 30,79 17 69,21 Human Capital 4.326,84 6 48 47,17 12 Technical Assistance 212,77 1 NA continuous Regional 6.600,00 33 95,5 Administrative Capacity 553,19 5 2 10 60 Fisheries and maritime affairs 168,42 27 38,48 58 Most deprived persons 441 16 TOTAL 23050,53 50 158 82,72 79

ETC Programmes

Effective implementation and key factors for successful usage of ESIF Management and the overall coordination of the implementation funds through: unitary management decisions on programming and implementation of funds and through a shortened decision making process; synergy - structures that will not be replicated for each management authority; shorter administrative deadlines; unitary approach in terms of implementation according to standardized norms; focus of expertise and a better management of human resources.

Sound implementation of 2014-2020 programming period Starting the sound implementation of 2014-2020 programming period represents one of the main priorities, thus: the framework agreements for attributions delegation are being drafted the description of the management and control systems is being prepared As far as the management system is concerned, simplification and effective coordination are the guiding principles of the new institutional architecture that will manage ESI Funds 2014-2020.

the Ministry of European Funds takes operational measures of a horizontal nature to applying modern management principles, based on performance Thus, the legal provisions impose a semestrial evaluation of the personnel involved in the management of EU funds on a basis of performance indicators a coordination mechanism with structures on three levels (strategic committee, thematic inter- institutional, operational), is set up in order to ensure the coherence of the interventions, complementarities and synergies in the programming and implementation stages.

In order to provide a uniform and equitable rule applying to the FESI implementation for 2014-2020, there were adopted: the national rules on the eligibility of expenditure the financial flow mechanism Regarding the IT system, Romania is currently developing SMIS 2014+ and MySMIS2014 the modules are in various stages of analysis, development and testing, and it will operational gradually this year This system will simplify the procedures as well as diminish the volume of documents submitted by the beneficiaries.