EVALUATION Part 2. Last Class Good, true, knowledge, belief, opinion Acceptability Evaluating claims Types of statements Unconvincing arguments Good premises.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

Formal Criteria for Evaluating Arguments
Last week Change minds; influence people Premises Conclusion
1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength and Cogency Goal: Learn the terms used to evaluate inductive and deductive arguments.
Critical Thinking Introduction. Arguments An argument is a series of statements, one of which is offered as a statement to be supported, and the rest.
 Assertions: unsupported declaration of a belief  Prejudice: a view without evidence for or against  Premises: explicit evidence that lead to a conclusion.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
LESSON 3: PRACTICE WITH VALID/INVALID; MORE ON INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS Logic.
Other Info on Making Arguments
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Philosophy 120 Symbolic Logic I H. Hamner Hill CSTL-CLA.SEMO.EDU/HHILL/PL120.
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Part 2 Module 3 Arguments and deductive reasoning Logic is a formal study of the process of reasoning, or using common sense. Deductive reasoning involves.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
1 Lesson 11: Criteria of a good argument SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
Time 2 hr No choice 1st six week course will be for the paper (including teasers) The 1st six week outlines attached in form of slides.
Deduction, Validity, Soundness Lecture II – 01/25/11.
FALSE PREMISE.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
The construction of a formal argument
Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency Jason Chang Critical Thinking.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
Chapter III Evaluating Arguments. Nondeductive Arguments Most common kinds of arguments Successful arguments are a matter of degree. Deal with likelihood.
Exercise song. A healthy mind needs a healthy body. 健康的精神源于健康的体魄。
Use of Reason and Logic RATIONALISM.  A Rationalist approach to knowledge is based on the belief that we can ascertain truth by thinking and reflection.
Evaluating Deductive Reasoning
Deductive reasoning.
What is Inductive Reasoning?
a valid argument with true premises.
WEEK 3 VALIDITY OF ARGUMENTS Valid argument: A deductive argument is valid if its conclusion is necessarily and logically drawn from the premises. The.
FALSE PREMISE.
What makes a Good Argument?
Relevance Premises are relevant to the conclusion when the truth of the premises provide some evidence that the conclusion is true Premises are irrelevant.
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Gettier and the analysis of knowledge
A Crash Course in Logic : Introduction to Philosophy
10/28/09 BR- What is the most important factor in winning an argument
Today’s Outline Discussion of Exercise VI on page 39.
Evaluating truth tables
Validity and Soundness
Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31
Inductive and Deductive Logic
Distinguish valid from invalid arguments and sound from unsound
Midterm Discussion.
Logic Problems and Questions
Chapter 7: What is Argument?
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Deductive Arguments: Checking for Validity
Validity & Invalidity Valid arguments guarantee true conclusions but only when all of their premises are true Invalid arguments do not guarantee true conclusions.
Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Arguments
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Validity.
Patterns of Informal Non-Deductive Logic (Ch. 6)
Introducing Arguments
Deductive vs Non-Deductive Arguments
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Introducing Natural Deduction
Validity and Soundness, Again
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

EVALUATION Part 2

Last Class Good, true, knowledge, belief, opinion Acceptability Evaluating claims Types of statements Unconvincing arguments Good premises and good reasoning Good premises and bad reasoning Bad premises and good reasoning Bad premises and bad reasoning

Today Two types of reasoning/arguments Deductive Non-Deductive Validity and Soundness Evaluating arguments

Deductive Arguments Premises guarantee the conclusion (100%) Example: All woman are mortal Kate is a woman Therefore, Kate is mortal. A matter of degree? Can be either valid or invalid

Validity An argument is valid if it is impossible for the conclusion to be false if all of the premises are true. Its about the form and structure and the relationship of support among the premises and conclusion. Invalid: T, T, F Example… The heart is in the chest and the chest is a part of the body. So the heart is a part of the body.

Validity Cont’d Question: Does a valid argument require that the premises be all true? Yes or no. Example… All winged animals can fly and pigs have wings, so pigs can fly.

Valid or Invalid: Exercises Recall: Deductive Args, 100% guarantee of Conclusion 1. All of Alex’s students are bored and you’re Alex’s student. So you are bored. 2. Some Athletes use PEDs and Steve is an athlete. So he uses PEDs. 3. Winters in Canada are cold and Montreal is Canada. Montreal has cold winters. 4. If the Red Sox win the AL East, then the Blue Jays won’t make it to the postseason. But the Red Sox didn’t win the AL East. So the Jays won’t make the postseason. 5. Laura is Donna’s daughter, so Donna is Laura’s mother.

Sound / unsound For our purposes as good logicians, an argument is sound if it is has a valid form and all true claims (P and C) Practice exercises… 1. Montreal is in Quebec and Quebec is part of Canada. So Montreal is a part of Canada. 2. Quebec is a francophone province and Quebec is part of Canada. So Canada is composed of at least one francophone province. What about this one The earth is flat. Flat things are biscuits. The earth is a biscuit.

How to check for validity We will learn formal strategies for determining an argument’s validity after the first midterm. Ask yourself? Is it possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false? If yes, then it is invalid. Use your best strategies for evaluation.

Four Possibilities Valid: False premises and a false conclusion Valid: False premises and a true conclusion Valid and Sound: True premises and a true conclusion Invalid: True premises and a false conclusion

False premises and a false conclusion The moon is a made of refined sugar and refined sugar is a healthy food. The moon is a healthy food.

False premises and a true conclusion My dog is a chicken. Chickens don’t lay eggs. So my dog doesn’t lay eggs.

True premises and a true conclusion Pepsi is a soda and sodas are bad for your teeth. So Pepsi is bad for your teeth.

True premises and a false conclusion Sharks are apex predators. Many apex predators live on land. Sharks live on land.

On your own time… Try to come up with your own arguments that fit each of the possibilities we’ve discussed here today: Valid: False premises and a false conclusion Valid: False premises and a true conclusion Valid and Sound: True premises and a true conclusion Invalid: True premises and a false conclusion

Non-deductive Arguments The idea here is to make a convincing case of the likelihood of the conclusion. Probability; Matter of degree > 50% Can be either successful or unsuccessful

Examples For the following: (1) state whether it is successful or unsuccessful and (2) provide a brief explanation for why it is, or is not, successful. Kristina is a student a uOttawa and a recent, random survey of 1000 students on campus revealed that 75% of students think the University needs to build and new, bigger library complex. So Kristina probably thinks the University needs a new library.

Examples For the following: (1) state whether it is successful or unsuccessful and (2) provide a brief explanation for why it is, or is not, successful. 1)I’ve met sixteen major league pitchers and each of them have either had shoulder problems or needed shoulder surgery at least once in their career. Marvin wants to pitch in the majors, so, if he makes it, he’ll likely have troubles with his shoulder. 2) I’ve owned two HP computers, and both broke. I am convinced that all HP computers are garbage.

Examples For the following: (1) state whether it is successful or unsuccessful and (2) provide a brief explanation for why it is, or is not, successful. A recent poll by a national newspaper discovered that more than 65% of Canadians believe that a wall needs to be erected along the Canadian border with the United States. However, only half of those polled who were in favor of building the wall also agreed that the reason was the circus that is the current U.S. Election. Since my friend Emily is a Canadian, she probably thinks Canada needs to build a wall along the border with the U.S. because the current U.S. election is a circus.

Next Class Why the world does not exist! Exam Review Exam is one week from today