ANTARES sensitivity for Diffuse Fluxes and for 1000 d livetime I. Single flavor (  ) II. All flavors (showering events) M. Spurio 19/06/

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on diffuse extraterrestrial neutrino flux search with 2000 AMANDA-II data Jessica Hodges, Gary Hill, Jodi Cooley This version of the presentation.
Advertisements

London Collaboration Meeting September 29, 2005 Search for a Diffuse Flux of Muon Neutrinos using AMANDA-II Data from Jessica Hodges University.
New results from the CHORUS Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Pasquale Migliozzi CERN XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics UBC, Vancouver,
Longitude Latitude A recent analysis of the Fermi-LAT data by M. Su et al. [1] revealed two large spherical structures centered by our Galactic Center.
PROGRESS ON WATER PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION Harold Yepes-Ramirez 17/11/2011.
PROGRESS ON WATER PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION Harold Yepes-Ramirez 09/11/2011.
Sean Grullon For the IceCube Collaboration Searching for High Energy Diffuse Astrophysical Neutrinos with IceCube TeV Particle Astrophysics 2009 Stanford.
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
Recent Charm Results From CLEO Searches for D 0 -D 0 mixing D 0 -> K 0 s  +  - D 0 ->K *+ l - Conclusions Alex Smith University of Minnesota.
Search for B     with SemiExclusive reconstruction C.Cartaro, G. De Nardo, F. Fabozzi, L. Lista Università & INFN - Sezione di Napoli.
Energy Reconstruction Algorithms for the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope J.D. Zornoza 1, A. Romeyer 2, R. Bruijn 3 on Behalf of the ANTARES Collaboration 1.
Radiative Leptonic B Decays Edward Chen, Gregory Dubois-Felsmann, David Hitlin Caltech BaBar DOE Presentation Aug 10, 2005.
Kirsten Münich Dortmund University Diffuse Limit with an unfolding method AMANDA Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 2005.
1 Super-Kamiokande atmospheric neutrinos Results from SK-I atmospheric neutrino analysis including treatment of systematic errors Sensitivity study based.
Search for point sources of cosmic neutrinos with ANTARES J. P. Gómez-González IFIC (CSIC-Universitat de València) The ANTARES.
J. Barrios, S. Schulte, J.P. Gómez-González. Outline Introduction Data selection and processing MC production Data/MC comparison Event selection Detector.
Astrophysics working group - CERN March, 2004 Point source searches, Aart Heijboer 1 Point Source Searches with ANTARES Outline: reconstruction news event.
Neutrino Diffuse Fluxes in KM3NeT Rezo Shanidze, Thomas Seitz ECAP, University of Erlangen (for the KM3NeT consortium) 15 October 2009 Athens, Greece.
SEARCHING FOR A DIFFUSE FLUX OF ULTRA HIGH-ENERGY EXTRATERRESTRIAL NEUTRINOS WITH ICECUBE Henrik Johansson, for the IceCube collaboration LLWI H.
Ronald Bruijn – 10 th APP Symposium Antares results and status Ronald Bruijn.
Дмитрий ВавиловИФВЭ 2005, 19 Декабря1 New results on rare kaon and pion decays from BNL E949 Dmitry Vavilov E949 is an high rate K + decay at rest experiment.
AMANDA Per Olof Hulth The Wierdest wonder Is it good or is it bad?
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
The ANTARES detector: background sources and effects on detector performance S. Escoffier CNRS Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille on behalf.
The AMANDA-II Telescope - Status and First Results - Ralf Wischnewski / DESY-Zeuthen for the AMANDA Collaboration TAUP2001, September.
Status and Results Elisa Bernardini DESY Zeuthen, Germany VLVnT Workshop Amsterdam, Oct (
Higgs self coupling Djamel BOUMEDIENE, Pascal GAY LPC Clermont-Ferrand.
Lecture 8 Source detection NASSP Masters 5003S - Computational Astronomy
Longitude Latitude A recent analysis of the Fermi-LAT data by M. Su et al. [1] revealed two large spherical structures centered by our Galactic Center.
POINT SOURCE ANALYSIS WITH 5-LINE DATA SUMMARY AWG PHONE CALL Juan Pablo Gómez-Gozález 20 th April
Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.
Sebastian Kuch, Rezo Shanidze Preliminary Studies of the KM3NeT Physics Sensitivity KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting Pylos, Greece, April 2007.
2005 Unbinned Point Source Analysis Update Jim Braun IceCube Fall 2006 Collaboration Meeting.
Abstract Several models of elementary particle physics beyond the Standard Model, predict the existence of neutral particles that can decay in jets of.
Results from the ANTARES Neutrino Telescope VLVNT - Roma 14/7/2015 ANTARES Results - M. Spurio 1 Maurizio Spurio VLVnT– Roma 14/09/2015.
Search for diffuse cosmic neutrino fluxes with the ANTARES detector Vladimir Kulikovskiy The ANTARES Collaboration 3-9 August 2014ANTARES diffuse flux.
Andrzej Bożek for Belle Coll. I NSTITUTE OF N UCLEAR P HYSICS, K RAKOW ICHEP Beijing 2004  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 ) at Belle  3 and sin(2  1 +  3 )
Point source analysis with tracks and showers Aart, Javier, Tino 1.
Status report on analysis of BR(K S  p + p - p 0 ) A. Antonelli, M. Moulson, Second KLOE Physics Workshop, Otranto, June 2002.
Search for UHE Neutrinos with AMANDA Stephan Hundertmark University of California, Irvine Methodical Aspects of Underwater/Ice Neutrino Telescopes Hamburg,
AMANDA Per Olof Hulth The Wierdest wonder Is it good or is it bad?
Comparison of reconstruction strategies in IceCube Lake Geneva, April 2007.
EHE Search for EHE neutrinos with the IceCube detector Aya Ishihara Chiba University.
Practice: Given the following Sensitivity Analysis Report
I have 6 events (Nch>=100) on a background of ?
Status of MEG-I physics analysis
Diphoton+MET: Update on Plans and Progress
Proposals for near-future BG determinations from control regions
Search for magnetic monopoles with ANTARES
Sun.
Two Interpretations of What it Means to Normalize the Low Energy Monte Carlo Events to the Low Energy Data Atms MC Atms MC Data Data Signal Signal Apply.
Theoretical Motivation Analysis Procedure Systematics Results
L/E analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data from Super-Kamiokande
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Erik Strahler UW-Madison 4/27/2008
2005 Unbinned Neutrino Point Source Search with AMANDA-II
MUPAGE: A fast muon generator
Rolling Search For a Cascade GRB Signal: 3 Year Results
Rolling Search For a GRB Cascade Signal
Diffuse neutrino flux J. Brunner CPPM ESA/NASA/AVO/Paolo Padovani.
Model Rejection Factor Plots
MC studies of the KM3NeT physics performance Rezo Shanidze
VBF H(->bb)+photon
AMANDA-II Point Source Search Results
2000 Diffuse Analysis Jessica Hodges, Gary Hill, Jodi Cooley
Claudio Bogazzi * - NIKHEF Amsterdam ICRC 2011 – Beijing 13/08/2011
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
P. Sapienza, R. Coniglione and C. Distefano
Presentation transcript:

ANTARES sensitivity for Diffuse Fluxes and for 1000 d livetime I. Single flavor (  ) II. All flavors (showering events) M. Spurio 19/06/2013 1

Sensitivity definition All analyses optimized the sensitivity using the MRF methods from Hill-Rawlins.  90 (n b ) depends on the number of background events. See plot. n s represent the number of signal events. Is the sum of all events in the final step from all neutrino and antineutrino channels The test flux  test represents the sum of the input flux for each and  channel  90 nbnb 2

I-   Analyses 1) Paper PLB 696 (2011) 16–22 2) Jutta Analysis Estimate of the sensitivity  (  ) assuming a reference livetime of 1000 d 3

1) Sensitivity from the PLB paper nbnb  90 nsns MRF=  90 /n s  test GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1  90%(  ) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 Original (334d) (1/2)x2x x d x d (no prompt) x It includes the possible contribution from prompt

2) Sensitivity from the Jutta nbnb  90 nsns MRF=  90 /n s  test GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1  90%(  ) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 Original (838 d) x x d (no prompt) x x It does not include the contribution from prompt

4 different documents analyzed – Giada Carminati PhD thesis – Qader PhD thesis – Lucia Ambrogi Master Thesis – Thomas Folger, in progress (as at the Marseille meeting) Estimate of the sensitivity  ( e +    ) assuming a reference livetime of 1000 d Common problem: simulation of the  int. missing Two scenarios for the  contribution – Pessimistic = 0 events – Optimistic = 70% of the e (for  e, no Glashow resonance) II- Shower analyses (all flavors) 6

1. Giada Carminati thesis Discovered a lot of bugs in the MC Some numbers from wrong MC (Glashow events for upgoing events, NC bugs, etc…) corrected “by hand” The analysis was supposed to be valid for 4  sr (no dedicated cuts to remove down going events) Sensitivity computed for 365 days 7

Sensitivity from Giada nbnb  90 n sh nn n s = n sh +n  MRF=  90 /n s  test GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1  90%(all flavors) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 Original (365d) x10 -7 (single fl.) Pessimis x x10 -7 Optimis * x x * Removed the events in the Glashow resonance

2. Qader PhD (unblinded) 656 d livetime up to 2011 Upward going events only (<2  sr) Unblinded: no survived events (signal =0) Upper limit can be set (better that sensitivity) 9

Sensitivity from Qader (KNN) nbnb  90 n sh nn n s = n sh +n  MRF=  90 /n s  test GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1  90%(all flavors) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 Original (656d) x10 -7 ( e+  ) Pessimis x x10 -7 Optimis x x

3. Lucia Ambrogi Master Based on the reconstruction of Qader Different cuts to include also the downward going events (however mostly rejected at level of MVA) Sensitivity computed for 1000 days Slightly better than Qader 11

Sensitivity from Lucia nbnb  90 n sh nn n s = n sh +n  MRF=  90 /n s  test GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1  90%(all flavors) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 Original (1000 d) x x10 -7 ( e+  ) Pessimis x x10 -7 Optimis x x

Florian Folger (Dusj in progress) See presentation at the last coll. meeting 13

Sensitivity from Florian nbnb  90 n sh nn n s = n sh +n  MRF=  90 /n s  test GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1  90%(all flavors) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 Original (88 days) x4.5x x10 -7 ( e+  ) Pessimis x4.5x x10 -7 Optimis * x4.5x x * I cannot evaluate the contribution of Glashow resonance, if any

Summary for all flavor AnalysisPessimisticOptimisticNote E 2  90%(all flavors) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 Giada1.6x x  Some extrapolations. Glashow resonance contribute 40% to the signal. Florian3.1x x10 -7 Lucia4.0x x10 -7 Qader4.6x x A reasonable value to be quoted seems to be E 2  90%(all flavors) = 3x10 -7 GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 This corresponds to a single flavor: 1/3xE 2  90%(all flavors) = GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1

Summary for all flavor AnalysisPessimisticOptimisticNote E 2  90%(all flavors) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 Giada1.6x x  Some extrapolations. Glashow resonance contribute 40% to the signal. Florian3.1x x10 -7 Lucia4.0x x10 -7 Qader4.6x x AnalysisSensitivityNote E 2  90%(  ) GeVcm -2 s -1 sr -1 PRL paper+Biagi0.37x10 -7 Prompt contribution included Jutta0.33x10 -7 and single flavor from 