A Method of Shower Reconstruction from the Fluorescence Detector M.Giller, G.Wieczorek and the Lodz Auger group GZK-40 Moscow Workshop, May 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
XXXX eme Rencontres de Moriond Pierre COLIN March 2005 Pierre Colin Dmitry Naumov Patrick Nedelec RECONSTRUCTION OF EXTENSIVE AIR SHOWERS FROM SPACE Stand.
Advertisements

AGASA Results Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration at 3 rd Int. Workshop on UHECR, Univ. Leeds.
JNM Dec Annecy, France The High Resolution Fly’s Eye John Matthews University of Utah Department of Physics and High Energy Astrophysics Institute.
Stereo Spectrum of UHECR Showers at the HiRes Detector  The Measurement Technique  Event Reconstruction  Monte Carlo Simulation  Aperture Determination.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Application for Pierre Auger Observatory.
Results from the Telescope Array experiment H. Tokuno Tokyo Tech The Telescope Array Collaboration 1.
The Pierre Auger Observatory Nicolás G. Busca Fermilab-University of Chicago FNAL User’s Meeting, May 2006.
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
AGASA update M. Teshima ICRR, U of CfCP mini workshop Oct
The TA Energy Scale Douglas Bergman Rutgers University Aspen UHECR Workshop April 2007.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
First Analysis of the Auger APF Light Source Eli Visbal (Carnegie Mellon University) Advisor: Stefan Westerhoff.
TAUP 2005: Zaragoza Observations of Ultra-high Energy Cosmic Rays Alan Watson University of Leeds Spokesperson for Pierre Auger Observatory
Systematics in the Pierre Auger Observatory Bruce Dawson University of Adelaide for the Pierre Auger Observatory Collaboration.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
A neural network approach to high energy cosmic rays mass identification at the Pierre Auger Observatory S. Riggi, R. Caruso, A. Insolia, M. Scuderi Department.
First energy estimates of giant air showers with help of the hybrid scheme of simulations L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow,
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
MP BACH MultiPixel Balloon-borne Air CHerenkov Detection of Iron Cosmic Rays Using Direct Cherenkov Radiation Imaged with a High Resolution Camera University.
Modelling of Electron Air Showers and Cherenkov Light A.Mishev J. Stamenov Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
The showers Induced be e with LPM effect included (red stars) look very different from showers without LPM effect (blue stars).The showers are more elongated.
Konstantin Belov. GZK-40, Moscow. Konstantin Belov High Resolution Fly’s Eye (HiRes) Collaboration GZK-40. INR, Moscow. May 17, measurements by fluorescence.
Size and Energy Spectra of incident cosmic radiation obtained by the MAKET - ANI surface array on mountain Aragats. (Final results from MAKET-ANI detector)‏
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov photons Ching-Cheng Hsu, Jan Ching-Cheng Hsu National Taiwan Univ. Dept of physics Feb Shower Simulation.
Cosmic Rays above the Knee Region 3 rd School on Cosmic Rays and Astrophysics Paul Sommers Penn State University Lecture 1 Science issues and open questions.
The measurement of the average shower development profile 高能所:张丙开 导师:曹臻、王焕玉 南京 Apr. 28, 2008.
EAS Reconstruction with Cerenkov Photons Shower Simulation Reconstruction Algorithm Toy MC Study Two Detector Configuration Summary M.Z. Wang and C.C.
Atmospheric shower simulation studies with CORSIKA Physics Department Atreidis George ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI.
Atmospheric Aerosol Measurements at the Pierre Auger Observatory The Pierre Auger Observatory operates an array of monitoring devices to record the atmospheric.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Humberto Salazar (FCFM-BUAP) for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, CTEQ- Fermilab School Lima, Peru, August 2012 Ultrahigh Cosmic Rays: The highest energy.
Paul Sommers Fermilab PAC Nov 12, 2009 Auger Science South and North.
Properties of giant air showers and the problem of energy estimation of initial particles M.I. Pravdin for Yukutsk Collaboration Yu.G. Shafer Institute.
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration
XXXI International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2009 Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009 Time structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO-YBJ experiment.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
1 João Espadanal, Patricia Gonçalves, Mário Pimenta Santiago de Compostela 3 rd IDPASC school Auger LIP Group 3D simulation Of Extensive Air.
“The Cosmic Ray composition in the knee region and the hadronic interaction models” G. Navarra INFN and University, Torino, Italy For the EAS-TOP Collaboration.
Study of high energy cosmic rays by different components of back scattered radiation generated in the lunar regolith N. N. Kalmykov 1, A. A. Konstantinov.
Exploring Laser Light Ruben Conceição. Pierre Auger Observatory Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays Pierre Auger Observatory – Fluorescence Detector Longitudinal.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF SIMULATIONS L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Atmospheric Radio Soundings in Argentina - Effects of Air Density Variations - Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Bianca KeilhauerTokyo,
The Hybrid Scheme of Simulations of the Electron- photon and Electron-hadron Cascades In a Dense Medium at Ultra-high Energies L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov.
What we do know about cosmic rays at energies above eV? A.A.Petrukhin Contents 4 th Round Table, December , Introduction. 2. How these.
Preliminary Profile Reconstruction of EA Hybrid Showers Bruce Dawson & Luis Prado Jr thanks to Brian Fick & Paul Sommers and Stefano Argiro & Andrea de.
Workshop on AstroParticle Physics, WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Darjeeling, December 2009 Extensive Air Showers and Astroparticle Physics Observations and.
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany for AGASA collaboration.
L. CazónHadron-Hadron & Cosmic-Rays interactions at multi-TeV energies. Trento,2-Dez Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory L. Cazon, for the.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
A Measurement of the Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum with the HiRes FADC Detector (HiRes-2) Andreas Zech (for the HiRes Collaboration) Rutgers University.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
Background rejection methods for tens of TeV gamma-ray astronomy applicable to wide angle timing arrays.
Scaling behavior of lateral distribution of electrons in EAS
L.L.Ma for LHAASO collaboration Beijing China
Expectation of Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum with LHAASO
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Atmospheric Aerosol Characterization using
Cosmic Rays at Extreme Energies The Pierre Auger Observatory
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum Measured by HiRes Experiment
Preliminary Profile Reconstruction of EA Hybrid Showers
Litao Zhao Liaoning University&IHEP
Telescope Array Experiment Status and Prospects
Estimation of Sensitivity to Gamma Ray point Sources above 30TeV
The Aperture and Precision of the Auger Observatory
Particles going through matter
Studies and results at Pierre Auger Observatory
Presentation transcript:

A Method of Shower Reconstruction from the Fluorescence Detector M.Giller, G.Wieczorek and the Lodz Auger group GZK-40 Moscow Workshop, May 2006

All large showers are similar when described by the age parameter s s = 3X / (X + 2Xmax) Studying EAS by CORSIKA simulations X – depth in g/cm^2 in the atmosphere Xmax- depth of shower maximum

Shower characteristics at given level s Energy & angle distribution of electrons Lateral distribution function r* is Moliere radius at the level

Energy spectra of electrons x E Each curve -average of 10 proton showers with E 0 =10 19 eV s= shower maximum for different shower ages s

Energy spectra – shower-to-shower fluctuations three showers shower ages s fluctuations are negligible

–Energy spectra - comparison of proton and iron initated showers no differences: electron energy spectrum at a given age s does not depend on primary mass.

Electron energy spectrum at a given shower age s does not depend on primary particle: neither on its mass, nor on its energy! s = 3X/(X+2Xmax) Shower age : Calculate fraction of electrons emitting Cherenkov light as function of s and height in the atmosphere (Ethr(h))

Effective fraction of electrons F(s, h) emitting Cherenkov light as a function of shower age s and height h above Auger level. P 10^20 eV P 10^19 Fe 10^20 Fe 10^19 s

Not to be distinguished from each other Angular distribution of electrons f(  ) age

Are there any fluctuations of f(  ) from shower to shower ? 4 curves for 4 showers Very small !

f(  for various ages s S=

Average  (in °) (in °) eV eV RMS

Angular distribution of electrons at a given age s does not depend on the primary particle, neither on its energy, nor on its mass !

Angular distributions of shower electrons g(  ;E). electron energy

Angular distribution of electrons of a given energy E does not depend on anything else than this energy E. Angular distribution of ALL electrons at a given age s depends on energy because their energy spectrum does.

Angular distributions of shower electron for several values of their energy. Analytical expression fitted

Lateral distributions for different ages

Lateral distribution function when expressed as function of depends on s only ! ( neither on E 0 nor on A)

scattered Cherenkov light fluorescence light isotropic direct Cherenkov light collimated along shower

N(s) = { for s < 1 for s > 1 Application to shower reconstruction, cont. or Gaiser-Hillas gamma function of X

Application to shower reconstruction Number of fluorescence photons n i,fl Number of photons  n i emitted toward the camera ith pixel:

Number of fluorescence photons  N ph (x) emitted by all electrons on shower path  X (in g  cm -2 ) number of photons emitted by one electron where Finally

Average energy deposit per particle = is a function of s only !

Application to shower reconstruction, cont.. Number of Cherenkov photons - n i,Ch Number of direct Cherenkov photons - n i,Ch- d Number of scattered Cherenkov photons n i,Ch- sc

Application to shower reconstruction The procedure to find shower cascade curve N(X(s)) ● Guess initial values of N max and X max for minimizing procedure; ● Having X max, the dependence X(s) can be determined; ● From t correlation “ 1 and X max find initial values for “ 1 ● From correlation  1 and “ 2 find “ 2 ● From the initial parameters, calculate the number of photons emitted ● Compare with those measured; ● Minimizing procedure the parameters of the curve can be found.

Summary Age parameter gives a universal description of electrons in big showers; Having age and N(X(s)) easy to predict both fluxes of light: - fluorescence and - Cherenkov (scattered and direct). No need to use iteration methods applicable only when Cherenkov contribution is small. Work on reconstruction of real events - in progress.....