CATERING FOR DIVERSITY THROUGH WRITING NZLA CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PACT Feedback Rubric Pilot Results with UC Davis English Cohort.
Advertisements

Successful Learning Conference 2013 Making adjustments for students with special education needs, K–6 24 June 2013.
ENGLISH IMMERSION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS OF ENGLISH WELCOME!!
Dafne González Universidad Simón Bolívar - TISLID'10 -
Copyright © Tulsa Public Schools 2011 © 2012, Tulsa Public Schools Teacher and Leader Effectiveness (TLE) Observation and Evaluation System / Process.
Te Kotahitanga Phase 5 The Genesis of Te Kotahitanga.
Key Principles for Growing e-Learning Teacher Capability in NZ schools A Pilot Project With a focus on meeting the needs of Māori students
What We Say & Do Matters Presented by: Diana Vincent
Communicative Language Teaching
Dr. Amy Barnhill. Implementing effective, responsive instruction and assessment Competency 7: The teacher understands and applies principles and strategies.
The Genesis of Te Kotahitanga. 2001: The Scoping Exercise Research initiated by Professor Russell Bishop and Dr Mere Berryman with support from kuia and.
ENGLISH IMMERSION FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS OF ENGLISH.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
MASTERING READING INSTRUCTION A PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FOR FIRST GRADE PROFESSIONALS.
Introduction to coaching conversations Ann Telesz May 2015.
 Dr. Jennifer Sanders & Dr. Rebecca Damron Oklahoma State University.
Previously Implemented Instructional Approaches  DEAR time (Drop Everything and Read)  Whole Group Instruction  Literacy Centers  Work Stations  Guided.
Teacher(s): Time: The Course Organizer Student: Course Dates: This Course: Pre-K/ Kindergarten Language Arts Course Questions: is about Course Measures.
How to teach writing Why teach writing?
Indian Community Languages Schools Parents and Teachers Conference July 2017.
Catering for diversity through writing
At Park Mead Primary.
Spelling and beyond – Curriculum
Fitting It All In Incorporating phonics and other word study work into reading instruction Michelle Fitzsimmons.
Gearing Up for Academic Conversations
The Interpersonal Mode
Learning-focused relationships
Developing students’ language
2015 Leadership Conference “All In: Achieving Results Together”
Common Core Basics Students in grades K-8 are given individual specific standards. While those in 9-10 and are grouped together. The emphasis throughout.
Mentors and Protégés October 1, 2015 Session Two.
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners
Learning and Teaching –
Why bother – is this not the English Department’s job?
Reading Between the Lines
Literacy through Exploration
ELT 213 APPROACHES TO ELT I Communicative Language Teaching Week 11
Goal Setting Homework Day 2.
Previously Implemented Instructional Approaches
NAEYC Early Childhood Standards
Spelling and beyond Literacy Toolkit HGIOS
Redelivery Presentation, prepared by Janet Junco
“He said, she said…” The What, Why, and How of Dialogue Journaling
M.A.T.C.H. Professional Series: Module 11
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Literacy Across Learning
Developing Thinking Thinking Skills for 21st century learners Literacy
Rounds Model of Professional Development
Group Talk Feedback – A focus on the individual
ACTFL's Core Practices for Effective Chinese Learning
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
Improvement 101 Learning Series
Product training: Academic Skills Builder : Apply (2 hours)
Group Talk Feedback – A focus on the individual
Building Leadership Capacity Difficult Discussions
Building Leadership Capacity Difficult Discussions
Introducing English.
Miss Ford, Mrs Bowater, Mr Pearce & Mr Taylor
How to be an effective Learning Helper in the classroom
Unit 5 – English-Language Development
FEEDBACK Dr. Mohammed Moizuddin Khan Associate Professor.
Steph Kirkham, Development Consultant, sparqs
Gail E. Tompkins California State University, Fresno
Wrt 105: practices of academic writing
AO1 Read, understand and respond to texts. Maintain a critical style and develop an informed personal response. Use textual references, including quotations,
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Encouraging Good Learning Behaviours for Vulnerable pupils
Mathematics Leaders’ Video Conference
Using LitKit Materials
Presentation transcript:

CATERING FOR DIVERSITY THROUGH WRITING NZLA CONFERENCE SEPTEMBER 2016

WHAT IS RESPONSIVE WRITTEN FEEDBACK? THE PROCEDURE PROVIDES A FRAMEWORK THAT FACILITIES SOCIAL INTERACTION, THROUGH A WRITING EXCHANGE OR WRITING RELATIONSHIP, BETWEEN A (LESS COMPETENT) WRITER AND A RESPONDER (WHO IS MORE SKILLED AT WRITING THAN THE WRITER). THE WRITER INITIATES THE WRITING EXCHANGE AND CAN DETERMINE WHAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO COMMUNICATE AND SHARE WITH THEIR RESPONDER. THE RESPONDER READS THE PIECE OF WRITING AND THEN PROVIDES WRITTEN FEEDBACK TO THE WRITER. THE INTENTION OF THE FEEDBACK IS TO RESPOND TO THE MESSAGES CONVEYED WITHIN THE PIECE OF WRITING IN ORDER TO DEVELOP A NON-DOMINATING WRITING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE WRITER AND THE RESPONDER.

WHAT IS RESPONSIVE WRITTEN FEEDBACK? IF WE CONSIDER WHAT THIS SOCIAL INTERACTION MIGHT LOOK LIKE IN TERMS OF A RESPECTFUL FACE-TO-FACE CONVERSATION BETWEEN TWO PEOPLE, THE PERSON WHO IS MORE COMPETENT IN THEIR ORAL LANGUAGE DELIVERY IS UNLIKELY TO FOCUS ON CORRECTING OR EVALUATING THE ORAL LANGUAGE DELIVERY OF THE PERSON WHO IS LESS COMPETENT. THE SAME PRINCIPLE OR SOCIALLY APPROPRIATE CONVENTIONS APPLY TO THIS WRITING EXCHANGE SO THAT THE RESPONDER SHOWS SUPPORT FOR THE WRITER BY RESPONDING TO WHAT THEY UNDERSTAND THE WRITER IS ATTEMPTING TO COMMUNICATE, RATHER THAN COMMENTING ON OR TRYING TO CORRECT THE WRITER’S ERRORS. THIS DOES NOT MEAN HOWEVER THAT RESPONSIVE WRITTEN FEEDBACK DOES NOT SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCURATE SPELLING, GRAMMAR AND CORRECT STRUCTURE.

WHAT IS RESPONSIVE WRITTEN FEEDBACK? RESPONSIVE WRITTEN FEEDBACK WAS USED IN RESEARCH UNDERTAKEN BY GLYNN, JERRAM AND TUCK IN AN ENGLISH LANGUAGE CONTEXT IN 1986 AND THIS PROCEDURE WAS THEN FURTHER TRIALLED IN A M Ā ORI LANGUAGE SETTING (GLYNN, BERRYMAN, O’BRIEN AND BISHOP, 2000), IN THE CONTEXT OF IMMERSION STUDENTS TRANSITIONING INTO THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND IN THE CONTEXT OF EMERGENT WRITERS IN BOTH ENGLISH AND M Ā ORI (GLYNN, BERRYMAN & GLYNN, 2000). MORE RECENTLY THE RESPONSIVE WRITTEN FEEDBACK HAS BEEN USED IN TE KOTAHITANGA IN A MAINSTREAM SECONDARY SCHOOL TO ACCELERATE THE WRITING ACHIEVEMENT OF YEAR 9 STUDENTS. IN THESE STUDIES BOTH ADULTS AND TU Ā KANA (OLDER STUDENTS) HAVE BEEN USED AS RESPONDERS. THE RESULTS SHOWED THAT ALL STUDENTS (INCLUDING TU Ā KANA), WHO PARTICIPATED, LEARNED THE PROCEDURES EASILY, WROTE LONGER AND MORE INTERESTING PIECES OF WRITING AND IMPROVED THEIR WRITING FLUENCY ACROSS A RANGE OF DIFFERENT MEASURES. AN ADDITIONAL PASTORAL BENEFIT THAT ONE TEACHER OBSERVED IN THE TE KOTAHITANGA STUDY REINFORCES HOW POWERFUL THIS PROCEDURE CAN BE WITH REGARD TO PROVIDING A CONTEXT FOR LEARNING WHEREBY STUDENTS THROUGH THEIR ENGAGEMENT IN THIS SUSTAINED SOCIAL INTERACTION COULD COME TO BETTER UNDERSTAND AND PARTICIPATE IN THEIR WORLD.

WHAT IS RESPONSIVE WRITTEN FEEDBACK? VIDEO OF DR MERE BERRYMAN AND THERESE FORD DISCUSSING WRITTEN RESPONSIVE FEEDBACK.

HOW IT WORKS THE INTERVENTION RUNS FOR 10 WEEKS THE STUDENTS WRITE ONCE A WEEK TO A SET TIME FRAME-5 MINUTES PLANNING, 10 MINUTES WRITING AND 5 MINUTES PROOF READING AND EDITING THE STUDENTS SELECT WHAT THEY WANT TO WRITE, TEACHER CAN GIVE SUGGESTIONS IF REQUIRED. THE STUDENTS BOOKS ARE SENT TO THE RESPONDER (WHO IS A SECRET) WHEN THE 10 WEEKS ARE FINISHED THE RESPONDERS ARE INVITED TO A REVEAL CELEBRATION

MY JOURNEY FIRST WAS INTRODUCED TO WRITTEN RESPONSIVE FEEDBACK BY THERESE FORD WHEN SHE WANTED TO TRIAL THE INTERVENTION IN THE SCHOOL WHERE I WAS LITERACY LEADER SMALL GROUPS-WITHDRAWAL INTRODUCED INTO 2 YEAR 5/6 CLASSES FOLLOWING YEAR 4 YEAR 5/6 CLASSES INVOLVED-ONE WAS A BILINGUAL CLASS THIS WAS RESEARCHED AND DATA COLLECTED

IMPLEMENTING INTO SCHOOL IN 2014 I MOVED TO MOUNT MAUNGANUI INTERMEDIATE AND THE INTERVENTION WAS INTRODUCED AND 11 CLASSES PARTICIPATED FACILITATED PLD FOR STAFF AND THE FOLLOWING YEARS FOR NEW STAFF IN 2015 & 2016 ALL CLASSES PARTICIPATED IN THE INTERVENTION (23 CLASSES) EXERCISE BOOKS FOR THE INTERVENTION FINDING RESPONDERS-CAN HAVE AN OVERWHELMING RESPONSE RESPONDER’S MEETING

HOST ONE MEETING FOR THE SCHOOL PRESENT KEY IDEAS AND CLARIFY THE RESPONDERS ROLE HAND-OUT FOR RESPONDERS TO TAKE AWAY AND REFER TO

EXAMPLES AND RESOURCES WEBSITE- FOR-WRITINGHTTP://KEP.ORG.NZ/MODULE-7B/4-CREATING-RESPONSIVE-SOCIAL-CONTEXTS- FOR-WRITING KIA PUÀWAI AI TE REO-STRATEGIES AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP STUDENTS WRITE IN MÀORI AND ENGLISH RELATIONAL AND RESPONSIVE INCLUSION-CONTEXTS FOR BECOMING AND BELONGING (MERE BERRYMAN, ANN NEVIN, SUZANNE SOOHOO, THERESE FORD) STUDENT BOOKS-SOME ACTUAL EXAMPLES TO SHARE AND LOOK AT

RESULTS

MAKING CONNECTIONS IN 2015 MY YEAR 8 CLASS WERE RESPONDERS FOR A YEAR 4/5 CLASS. THE STUDENTS WERE EXCITED TO SWAP ROLES AND THE REVEAL CELEBRATION WAS A HIGHLIGHT FOR THESE STUDENTS. THIS WAS ANOTHER WAY WE MADE CONNECTIONS WITH OUR COMMUNITY.

QUESTIONS????? ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS?