1 DCD Gain and Pedestal Spread

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kailua-Kona, Marcel Trimpl, Bonn University Readout Concept for Future Pixel Detectors based on Current Mode Signal Processing Marcel Trimpl.
Advertisements

Analysis of chip with 100 events, July 2001 Variation in pixel to pixel average ADC values (fixed pattern noise) Pixel ADC value event to event repeatability.
18/05/2015 Calice meeting Prague Status Report on ADC LPC ILC Group.
Preshower 15/03/2005 P.Kokkas Preshower September Run Data Analysis P. Kokkas.
29 June 2004Paul Dauncey1 ECAL Readout Tests Paul Dauncey For the CALICE-UK electronics group A. Baird, D. Bowerman, P. Dauncey, C. Fry, R. Halsall, M.
Checking the Acd hardware veto setting The hardware veto is generated in the front-end electronics Discriminator with coarse and fine settings Both are.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
Status of Oxford Setup Matthew Chalk, Erik Devetak, Johan Fopma, Brian Hawes, Ben Jeffery, Nikhil Kundu, Andrei Nomerotski University of Oxford ( 18 August.
ECAL electronics Guido Haefeli, Lausanne PEBS meeting 10.Jan
Understanding ADC Specifications September Definition of Terms 000 Analogue Input Voltage Digital Output Code FS1/2.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
DEPFET Electronics Ivan Peric, Mannheim University.
Pierpaolo Valerio.  CLICpix is a hybrid pixel detector to be used as the CLIC vertex detector  Main features: ◦ small pixel pitch (25 μm), ◦ Simultaneous.
2. Super KEKB Meeting, DEPFET Electronics DEPFET Readout and Control Electronics Ivan Peric, Peter Fischer, Christian Kreidl Heidelberg University.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
Montpellier, November 15, 2003 J. Cvach, TileHCAL and APD readout1 TileHCAL- fibre readout by APD APDs and preamplifiers Energy scan with DESY beam –Energy.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK)
ECE 353 Introduction to Microprocessor Systems Michael G. Morrow, P.E. Module #7 Assessment Quiz.
Why Data Conversion? Real world is analog Mostly, communication and computation is digital Need a component to convert analog signals to digital (ADC)
LCFI meeting 19 th August 2008 TESTING OF CPR2A Mirek Havranek, Peter Murray, Konstantin Stefanov, Stephen Thomas.
HAPPEX DAQ / ADC Tests Luis Mercado UMASS 4/17/09.
Summary of FPIX tests Tom Zimmerman Fermilab May 16, 2007.
F Don Lincoln, Fermilab f Fermilab/Boeing Test Results for HiSTE-VI Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.
1 Oct 2009Paul Dauncey1 Status of 2D efficiency study Paul Dauncey.
Predicting the In-System Performance of the CMS Tracker Analog Readout Optical Links Stefanos Dris CERN & Imperial College, London.
SuperKEKB 3nd open meeting July 7-9, 2009 Hans-Günther Moser MPI für Physik Sensor and ASIC R&D Sensor Prototype Production: running, ASICs: Switcher,
1 Updates of EMCM Testing Jakob Haidl, Christian Koffmane, Felix Müller, Martin Ritter, Manfred Valentan o Hardware DHE (v3.2) Setups o Software o Measurements.
1 EMCM Measurements Florian Lütticke, Martin Ritter, Felix Müller.
1 Updates of EMCM Testing J. Haidl, C. Koffmane, F. Müller, M. Valentan 8th Belle II VXD Workshop September University of Trieste.
KIT – Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales Forschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Status of ASICs.
Robert Kohrs –Universität Bonn Laser studies on PXD-5 (Kristof Schmieden)
1 Test Beam with Hybrid 6 Florian Lütticke for the Testbeam Crew Bonn University 7th Belle II VXD Workshop and 18th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors.
PXD ASIC review, October 2014 ASIC Review 1 H-.G. Moser, 18 th B2GM, June 2014 Date and Location MPP, October 27, 10:00 – October 28, 16:00, Room 313 Reviewers:
NOISE MEASUREMENTS ON CLICPIX AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Pierpaolo Valerio.
Laser Measurements (as comparison to test beam data) Florian Lütticke University of Bonn 9 th VXD Belle 2 Workshop Valencia,
H. Krüger, , DEPFET Workshop, Heidelberg1 System and DHP Development Module overview Data rates DHP function blocks Module layout Ideas & open questions.
Development of Multi-pixel photon counters(2) M.Taguchi, T.Nakaya, M.Yokoyama, S.Gomi(kyoto) T.Nakadaira, K.Yoshimura(KEK) for KEKDTP photon sensor group.
H.-G. Moser, 6 th PXD/SVD workshop, Pisa, Oct PXD Summary 1 DEPFET Sensors production yield inter-metal insulation EMCM electronic tests ASICs Schedule.
M.Taguchi and T.Nobuhara(Kyoto) HPK MPPC(Multi Pixel Photon Counter) status T2K280m meeting.
ASIC Review DCD. ASIC Review DCD is implemented in UMC 0.18 um CMOS technology 3.2mm x 5mm DCD-B uses bump bonding on the UMC technology.
TILC08, Sendai, March DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors for the ILC Marcel Vos for the DEPFET Collaboration (
Clear Performance and Demonstration of a novel Clear Concept for DEPFET Active Pixel Sensors Stefan Rummel Max-Planck-Institut für Physik – Halbleiterlabor.
Ysterious apping ess Florian Lütticke On behalf of the test beam crew 20th International Workshop on DEPFET Detectors and.
Front End. Charge pre-amp and detector Voltage regulator. TOP side. Detector linear voltage regulator BOTTOM side. Charge pre-amp.
1 First large DEPFET pixel modules for the Belle II Pixel Detector Felix Müller Max-Planck-Institut für Physik DPG-Frühjahrstagung der Teilchenphysik,
1 Run on 25. October. 2 Full-size DCD Price: at least 32 k€ Return: April 201  Less test possibilities Full-size chip Wire-bondable DCD Price: 6.75 k€
ASICs1 Drain Current Digitizer Chip (DCD) Status and Future Plans.
Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.
Data Handling Processor Status/Plans
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Status of DHP prototypes
Ivan Perić University of Heidelberg Germany
CTA-LST meeting February 2015
Status of the UK active pixel collaboration
DCD – Measurements and Plans
Florian Lütticke, Carlos Marinas, Norbert Wermes
Jan Soldat, Heidelberg University for the DSSC ASIC design groups
Analog Readout Chips – the Status
Readout electronics for aMini-matrix DEPFET detectors
Ivan Perić University of Heidelberg Germany
Kröhnke, 14 November 2012 FCAL Collaboration Meeting Sergej Schuwalow
The Silicon Drift Detector of the ALICE Experiment
Digital Error Correction
Sensor Layout Options Aim is to understand the implication and constrains of possible sensor design/layout on the general ID Layout. Keep both ATLAS “drum”
DIGITIAL COMMUNICATION
Lars Reuen, 7th Conference on Position Sensitive Devices, Liverpool
Created by Art Kay Presented by Peggy Liska
Sensor Performance During estbeam
Front-end Digitization for fast Imagers.
Phase Frequency Detector &
Presentation transcript:

1 DCD Gain and Pedestal Spread

2 Pedestals and dynamic range Min ADC Value Separation of Pedestals and min ADC value Pedestals spread after compression, Pedestal range Signal range Dynamic range

DCD Input stage Setting for High/Low Gain Feedback Setting

Gain on DCD Realistic full ADC width: 220 * LSB width Ideal range: 254 * LSB width ADCs show reduced range (start not at -127, but at higher values) Nonlinearities in the edges Gain spread between different ADCs Some room between lowest pedestal and minimal ADC code Dynamic range: 10.4 uA (high gain, en60) 15.8 uA (high gain, en30) 16.5 uA (low gain, en60) 25.2 uA (low gain, en30) 33.0 uA (Assumed 150nA/LSB)

Signal from the matrix Expected g q from the DEPFET Sensor: 450 pA/e - Expected Charge on Sensor: MIP 7900 e -, Slow Pion: e - (3 x MIP) Expected current for the DCD: MIP 3.55uA, Slow Pion: 10.67uA MIP corresponds to 75 LSB (high gain, en60) 49 LSB (high gain, en30) 47 LSB (low gain, en60) 31 LSB (low gain, en30) 23 LSB (Assumed 150nA LSB) Slow Pion corresponds to 224 LSB (high gain, en60) 149 LSB (high gain, en30) 142 LSB (low gain, en60) 93 LSB (low gain, en30) 71 LSB (Assumed 150nA LSB) Dynamic range: 10.4 uA (high gain, en60) 15.8 uA (high gain, en30) 16.5 uA (low gain, en60) 25.2 uA (low gain, en30) 33.0 uA (Assumed 150nA/LSB)

Range for pedestals Expected g q from the DEPFET Sensor: 450 pA/e - Expected Charge on Sensor: MIP 7900e-, slow pion: (3 x MIP) Expected current for the DCD: MIP 3.55uA, slow pion: 10.67uA Pedestal range= dynamic range – expected signal Pedestal range (assuming MIPs) 6.9 uA (high gain, en60) 12.3 uA (high gain, en30) 13.0 uA (low gain, en60) 21.7 uA (low gain, en30) 29.5 uA (Assumed 150nA LSB) Pedestal range (assuming slow pions) 0 uA (high gain, en60) 5.1 uA (high gain, en30) 5.7 uA (low gain, en60) 14.5 uA (low gain, en30) 22.3 uA (Assumed 150nA LSB) Dynamic range: 10.4 uA (high gain, en60) 15.8 uA (high gain, en30) 16.5 uA (low gain, en60) 25.2 uA (low gain, en30) 33.0 uA (Assumed 150nA/LSB)

Pedestal spread without common mode correction Static wafer level measurements of OF1_W35 (cut pixel with bad contact) Measured two or four gates for every switcher 99.5% of pedestal between 109uA and 137uA 28uA spread on Pedestals System adds some spread Offset spread between ADCs -> ~1uA Current subtraction current source can have spread (5% Spread on ISubIn of 120uA) -> ~6uA 7uA additional current spread ~35uA range for pedestals needed (not irradiated)

Pedestal spread with DCD common mode correction Static wafer level measurements of OF1_W35 (cut pixel with bad contact) Measured two or four rows for every switcher Assumed perfect CM subtraction 99.5% of pedestal between -12uA and 10uA 21uA Spread on Pedestals System adds some spread Offset spread between ADCs -> ~1uA Current subtraction current source can have spread (5% Spread on ISubIn of 120uA) -> ~6uA 7uA additional current spread ~28uA range for pedestals needed (not irradiated)

Pedestal compression +I I 0 +3I 0 Dynamic switching current sources can add current to pedestals 2 bit DAC: Add 0, I 0,2I 0, 3I 0 to pedestal I 0 can be set over DAC Ideal: Compression by factor 4 but: DAC to set I 0 has certain step size. Ideal I 0 can not be set I 0 for drain A depends on what other drains get and what drain A got one gate before -> expected values do smear out I 0 varies from drain to drain 2bit DAC not perfectly linear (2I 0 != 2*I 0 ) Realistic compression factor: 3 to 3.5. To be on the save side assume compression factor 3

Range for pedestals using pedestal compression Expected g q from the DEPFET Sensor: 450 pA/e - Expected Charge on Sensor: MIP 7900e-, slow pion: (3 x MIP) Expected current for the DCD: MIP 3.55uA, slow pion: 10.67uA Expected pedestal compression factor: 3 Max pedestal spread = (dynamic range – expected signal) x compression factor Max pedestal spread (MIPs only) 20.7 uA (high gain, en60) 36.9 uA (high gain, en30) 39.0 uA (low gain, en60) 65.1 uA (low gain, en30) 88.5 uA (Assumed 150nA LSB) Max pedestal spread (slow pions) 0 uA (high gain, en60) 15.3 uA (high gain, en30) 17.1 uA (low gain, en60) 43.5 uA (low gain, en30) 66.9 uA (Assumed 150nA LSB) ~35uA pedestal spread not irradiated no dynamic effects no power drop over DCD or module assumed no common mode correction (with CM: 28uA) Dynamic range: 10.4 uA (high gain, en60) 15.8 uA (high gain, en30) 16.5 uA (low gain, en60) 25.2 uA (low gain, en30) 33.0 uA (Assumed 150nA/LSB)

Conclusions From all the possible gain configurations, only the lowest gain is suited for the experiment (MIPs and Slow Pion rescue) but: Pedestal knowledge is limited Small headroom Irradiation and temperature will add on top Any other effects (?) A slightly lower gain setting (150nA/LSB, MIP ~ 20 LSB) could be helpful as live saver, if we suffer from high pedestal spread.

Recommendations Current high gain setting (47nA/LSB) is not usable – can be dropped Current medium gain (72nA/LSB) should become our new high gain setting Matrix characterization, small matrix operation, etc. Current lowest gain setting (115nA/LSB) should be the baseline and be optimized Detector operation One even lower gain setting (150nA/LSB) as live saver Detector operation with inhomogeneous irradiation

Pedestal Spread, full data Probably bad needle contact on steering line Probably bad needle contact on drain line

Pedestal Spread - jumps in the distribution Same colored lines are neighbors Jumps, when rows are not neighbors