Library Visits 2016 DePaul University, Chicago North Carolina State University, Raleigh University of Maryland, College Park Johns Hopkins University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is a master plan? Creates the long-term vision for the University’s land and physical resources. Lays foundation for development plan, but is not.
Advertisements

Upgrade of Core Academic Buildings Campus Objectives Board of Trustees SEPT 24, 2010.
IT in Education. No. of Students Enrollment Rate Annual Increase Employees Schools Budget General Education 1,100,000 98,7% 6% 47, US$M.
Capital Budgeting.
Funding Strategic Initiatives in Academic Technology A Process for Identifying, Cataloging, and Categorizing IT Needs Campuswide Copyright© D. Tebbetts,
The ABCs of Facility Studies in the 21 st Century: It’s More Than Just Numbers Carol S. Cash, EdD, Clinical Associate Professor, Virginia Tech Travis W.
Using Total Cost of Ownership To Make Decisions League of Innovation Conference March 13, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services.
Changing Our Culture: From Traditional Teller to New Member Experience Advisors.
Technology Access In Post-Secondary Education Ron Stewart Managing Consultant AltFormat Solutions LLC.
Presented by: Sal Chiarelli, Director of Physical Plant Panel: Terry Robbins, Facilities Zone Manager, Davis Zone Andy Galaczy, Senior Plumber, Davis.
1 Budget Conversations Vice President of Administration and External Affairs.
From a galaxy far, far away... The Compact Process A View from 40,000 feet Laura Coffin Koch Associate Vice Provost University of Minnesota.
1 Strategic Thinking for IT Leaders View from the CFO Seminars in Academic Computing Executive Leadership Institute.
Transforming the Traditional Media Center into a Learning Resources Center Presented by Mantra Henderson Assistant Director/Head of Public Services James.
Strategic Plan Presentation to Faculty & Staff Spring 2006.
North Carolina Community College System H. Martin Lancaster, President Fifty-eight Institutions Educating and Training a World-Class.
Human Resource Management System The New DEFINE. Background Major Changes Implementation Schedule Phase II Details Training Opportunities.
DECEMBER 19, 2013 PRESENTATION TO THE TRSD SCHOOL BOARD Timberlane District Action Plans.
NAROPA UNIVERSITY Strategic Plan As Voted On By Naropa’s Board of Trustees “Deliver Distinction With Excellence” September 19, 2008.
Tuition and Fees Hearing Fall Process for Setting Tuition Tuition is set once every two years for a two year period. UT System uses a process that.
Master Plan Update February 4, 2015 Georgetown University Hoya Roundtable Student Engagement.
Agriculture and Industrial Technology Complex Capital Planning and Development Project Highlight.
Operating Budget Funding Sources State Appropriations - General Revenue Formula Funding, Special Items, Benefit Cost Sharing THECB Transfers TX Grant,
The Capital Budget Game in Utah SHEEO 2006 Professional Development Conference Kevin Walthers Assistant Commissioner Utah System of Higher Education August.
California Maritime Academy Information Technology Review Results and Recommendations August 2014.
University of Arizona Health Sciences College of Medicine Space Dashboards Presenters: Angela Souza, Senior Director, UAHS Planning and Facilities Mary.
DRAFT April 14, 2016 BOARD PRESENTATION > ORGANIZE, SHARE, + LEARN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 2016 EDUCATIONAL AND FACILITIES MASTER PLANS SAN BERNARDINO.
Accreditation - Fall Standard IB - Institutional Effectiveness The College will develop and implement a comprehensive communication plan. The College.
Administration, Finances, and Resources
Planning in the Context of Budget Reduction
Chapter 4 Assessment.
DEVELOPMENT Assessment Planning Design Reading Blueprints Funding
The Importance of Managing Space Effectively
Strategic Planning Update
CLINTON COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
What Defines a Project? The cost of work, services or purchase is $5,000 or above and falls into the following categories: Alterations to existing space.
2006 Facilities Master Plan Update Cañada College
February 13, 2017.
Creating a Collaborative Learning Classroom
University Capital Budgeting Business Practices Seminar Planning, Requesting, Funding January 10, 2007.
Building on our tradition of excellence – planning for the future.
Targeted District Review Report
Library, learning connection, CTL & Pathways
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON
HEALTH AND EXERCISE SCIENCE CLASSROOM PROPOSAL
The University of Wisconsin-Madison is a public land-grant institution established in 1848.
The Catholic University of America
Full report Faculty senate website
UNION GROVE ELEMENTARY REFERENDUM
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON
Space Utilization Advisory Committee November 14, 2017
Best Practices Creating Effectively Designed Learning Spaces
Inclusion at Higher Education: The Xavier’s Experience
Executive Summary The Vision helps Decisions (How having a clear vision helps your decision process): “As trusted stewards of Boulder County’s future,
Teaching Excellence Development Fund
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON
Using Data to Plan Library Renovations
Standard III Resources
Annie Bélanger September 2016
Engaging All Faculty in Guided Pathways
Executive Director of Planning and Construction
Westfield State University
Using Data to Plan Library Renovations
Student Housing Master Planning: How to make informed decisions in relation to deferred maintenance and master planning Presenters: Dr. Steven Hood – Associate.
Distance Learning Benchmarking
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON
What is Planning? Start at 9:15—10 minutes to do this. Finish at 9:25.
Data Governance at UMBC: Built from the Bottom Up
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Standard 10 Research(**) البحث العلمي )**(.
Presentation transcript:

Library Visits 2016 DePaul University, Chicago North Carolina State University, Raleigh University of Maryland, College Park Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore Towson University, Towson Photographs from these visits can be found here:

UMBC is undertaking an update to the Facilities Master Plan which was last updated in Facilities master plans establish a framework for orderly growth and development of capital improvements on campus. In order for UMBC’s facilities master plan to be responsive to current and future needs and accommodate changes in the strategic vision, it is updated every five years and completely redeveloped every ten years. As these are capital projects, funding needs to be secured by the state and written into the annual budget and approved by the legislature. See Process.pdfhttp://dls.state.md.us/data/bud/bud_capbud/Capital-Budget- Process.pdf

Being placed upon the master plan, or on the updates does not guarantee that anything will happen in the timeframe of the master plan, but it is a starting point. An example is the student services building proposed on the Central Green in front of the AOK Library which was on the 2009 update, but has not been funded nor constructed.

According to the fall 2013 SGAP (Facilities) report, UMBC currently has a deficit of 82,433 net assignable square feet (NASF) for study and library space and a deficit of 29,388 NASF of lounge space as compared to what is allowed for an institution of this size. The Albin O. Kuhn Library & Gallery has some maintenance issues as well. There are several areas with mechanical sound transfer between HVAC equipment and assignable spaces. Water infiltration through the exterior envelope have been partially addressed through recent projects, but water infiltration continues to be a concern. Interior finishes such as carpets are in need of replacement.

The confluence of these events and issues as well as the plan of the UMBC Strategic Plan to “consistently place the university (UMBC) among the top 150 institutions in the nation” prompted the Vice Provost, the Director of Planning and myself to make trips to institutions of like size, peer benchmarking institutions and institutions that have libraries to which we aspire to collect ideas and information for UMBC. This information will be utilized in the Facilities Master Plan 2017 – The process will be inclusive including Strategy and Focus Groups and will allow for review and input.

Ideas and take-aways from visits

Focus for students is a space that can be arranged according to student needs allowing for collaboration supported by arrange-able furniture, adequate electrical power and robust wi-fi. Any technology that is introduced needs to be supported by adequate infrastructure, including people trained in use of technology able to help others to use technology. Students, despite their aptitude at many software driven and handheld devices, still need support for many applications and for anything involving programming. UMBC is a residential school, so the library needs to be an option for students in non-traditional classroom instruction hours. Library needs to be a place students want to go, and it is incumbent upon us to make it that place.

The concept of a “new” type of library needs to be sold to campus stakeholders, including potential donors, teaching faculty and researchers, library staff and the campus administration as it is a concept that may be foreign to a traditionally grounded higher education mindset remembering a “traditional” library of years ago. Re-creating space cannot be done in a vacuum, there needs to be input from those who will use the library to accommodate their dreams and desires, not simply designed by library professionals and administrators for what they perceive that users may want. Community involvement and input is critical. Student involvement is critical to garner support and enthusiasm for change and improvement

All places visited had this in common

Reduction of the size of the collection, moving from a “just in case” collection and housing to “just in time” information delivery Spaces are being opened and converted for students to define how they want to learn and study. Furniture needs to be comfortable and movable and able to be utilized. Never enough whiteboards. Nothing is set in stone, innovation in service delivery and hours and seating are all open up. If it works – support it and improve it. If it doesn’t work, what was learned and how do we proceed; what else can be tried?

Students and staff and faculty need to have a sense of ownership, that it is “their” library and it is able to accommodate their information, research, teaching and learning needs. 24/5 and 24/7 access to all of the library building is becoming the norm and needed to accommodate the hours of non-traditional students who are becoming a larger part of the student population.