22 March The Institute of Petroleum’s “Guidelines for the Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers to Withstand the Impact of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Control calculations Heat Engines & Boilers.
Advertisements

FLOW measurements.
Nathan N. Lafferty, Martin L. deBertodano,
Using Copper Water Loop Heat Pipes to Efficiently Cool CPUs and GPUs Stephen Fried President Passive Thermal Technology, Inc.
WORKSHOP 2010 ON CONSTITUTIVE MODELING IN APPLICATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES KRAKÓW, 1-3 September, 2010 Poznan University of Technology ASSESSMENT.
BakerRisk also has the ability to utilize other software tools to complete a full flare system analysis: ChemCad® Dynamic flare header hydraulics Flare.
Experiment 8 : Minor Losses
Budget Shortfall Options Ian Wyatt - Atkins JIP on Bursting Disks for Shell & Tube Exchangers – 2 nd Stakeholders Meeting.
Lesson 25 TWO-PHASE FLUID FLOW
 A 'heat exchanger' may be defined as an equipment which transfers the energy from a hot fluid to a cold fluid. Here, the process of heating or cooling.
Basics of Pump Vigyan Ashram, Pabal.
Lecture 2 – Finite Element Method
Copyright 2001, J.E. Akin. All rights reserved. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis.
THE WASHINGTON MONUMENT (1884) The purpose of this study is to show how this structure supports its own weight and wind load, by calculating its efficiency.
Copyright © 2002J. E. Akin Rice University, MEMS Dept. CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress.
March 14, 2003 MICE Absorber/Coil Integration MICE LH2 Absorber 1.Assembly 2.Safety 3.Staging 4.Instrumentation.
The views expressed in this paper are those of the individual authors / presenters and are not intended to represent the views or position of BP on the.
STHE Overpressure Protection
Week 1 Unit Conversions Mass and Volume Flow Ideal Gas Newtonian Fluids, Reynolds No. Week 2 Pressure Loss in Pipe Flow Pressure Loss Examples Flow Measurement.
P&ID Design and Equipment Selection
CHAPTER 4 CPB 20004: Plant Utility n Maintenance
Week 1 Unit Conversions Conservation of Mass Ideal Gas Newtonian Fluids, Reynolds No. Pressure Loss in Pipe Flow Week 2 Pressure Loss Examples Flow Measurement.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS INTRODUCTION TO RELIEF
DAQ Systems and Instruments for Hx Performance Testing and Periodic Monitoring.
PHAROS UNIVERSITY ME 259 FLUID MECHANICS FOR ELECTRICAL STUDENTS Basic Equations for a Control Volume.
Pro-Science 4 th International Conference of Hydrogen Safety, September 12-14, 2011, SAN FRANCISCO, USA EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF IGNITED UNSTEADY HYDROGEN.
1 Denis Grondin / Julien Giraud – 01 December 2008 SLAB COOLING Denis Grondin Julien Giraud
Proceedings of the 18 th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE18 May , 2010, Xi’an, China Hannam University Fluid-elastic Instability.
LBE-Water interaction in LIFUS V facility under different operating conditions A. Ciampichetti, D. Bernardi - ENEA T. Cadiou - CEA N. Forgione – Università.
Helium Spill Test in LHC tunnel to define length of restricted working areas  Actual situation  Evolution  How to continue  Set-up of the spilling.
Page 1 SIMULATIONS OF HYDROGEN RELEASES FROM STORAGE TANKS: DISPERSION AND CONSEQUENCES OF IGNITION By Benjamin Angers 1, Ahmed Hourri 1 and Pierre Bénard.
Safety Requirements and Regulations 10/3/20121Safety Requirements & Regulations James Sears.
BNL E951 BEAM WINDOW EXPERIENCE Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Neutrino Working Group Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Mechanical Design of Process Equipment FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES AND EQUATIONS Principal stresses Theories of failure
ERL: G-5/e-Gun Cryogenic & Pressure Safety Committee Review ERL G-5/e-gun Beam Line Vacuum Failure Analysis April 24, 2009.
International Conference on Hydrogen Safety 2011 – San Francisco, 12 Sept 2011 Risk informed separation distances for hydrogen refuelling stations Frederic.
ATLAS TRT CO 2 cooling system project status Beaufort 12: “Hurricane” (>119 km/h) Saffir-Simpson 5: “catastrophic damage” (>250 km/h) (CO 2 distribution.
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
Week 1 Unit Conversions Conservation of Mass Ideal Gas Newtonian Fluids, Reynolds No. Pressure Loss in Pipe Flow Week 2 Pressure Loss Examples Flow Measurement.
LH2 Safety Issues for MICE 1.O2/LH2 separation 2.No Ignition sources near LH2 3.Adequate ventilation 4.Affects: Windows: absorbers and vacuum Primary and.
Convection in Flat Plate Boundary Layers P M V Subbarao Associate Professor Mechanical Engineering Department IIT Delhi A Universal Similarity Law ……
Fire Resistance of the Load Bearing Structure of High Bay and Instrument Halls Fire and Egress Safety Analysis of the Instrument Halls Björn Yndemark WSP.
P16452: Active Reciprocating Compressor Valve Assembly Week 9: Subsystem Design Review.
Aim Direct impulse measurement for DDT initiation. Calculate impulse from Ballistic pendulum Pressure traces Wave reflection analysis Numerical simulation.
ERT 322 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION. (A) Spring operated reliefs in liquid and gas service. (B)Rupture disc reliefs in liquid and gas service. (C)Vents for.
ERT 312 SAFETY & LOSS PREVENTION IN BIOPROCESS RELIEF SIZING Prepared by: Pn. Hairul Nazirah Abdul Halim.
Issues Raised by the Design of the LHC Beam Dump Entrance Window Ray Veness / CERN With thanks to B.Goddard and A.Presland.
CAD and Finite Element Analysis Most ME CAD applications require a FEA in one or more areas: –Stress Analysis –Thermal Analysis –Structural Dynamics –Computational.
PIPELINES VIJAY VADER. PROCESS PLANTS  Essentially handling liquid/gases/solids  Need to transport them from one stage to another.  Transportation.
Working group meeting 07/05/15. Agenda Overview of review and current action list Relief system – Summary of problem – Details of analysis, testing and.
CFD Simulation & Consulting Services Hi-Tech CFD | Voice: Optimizing Designs of Industrial Pipes, Ducts and.
HYDRAULIC AND PNUEMATIC ACTUATION SYSTEMS
2 K Coldbox Safety and ESH
PRESSURE CONTROL VALVES (PCVs)
CHAPTER 2 - EXPLICIT TRANSIENT DYNAMIC ANALYSYS
Fluid Power Introduction
Component Availability Effects
CAD and Finite Element Analysis
Block 4 and Cluster D - Safety
Safety Valve Suppliers inn UAE | Ali Salman Trading Company
Thermal analysis Friction brakes are required to transform large amounts of kinetic energy into heat over very short time periods and in the process they.
Fluid Power Introduction
Risk informed separation distances for hydrogen refuelling stations
Heat Exchangers Heat Exchangers.
ANALYSIS OF THE HORN UNDER THERMAL SHOCK – FIRST RESULTS
Asst. Prof. Dr. Hayder Mohammad Jaffal
Parker domnick hunter. Safety of Electrical and
26. Flow Measurement and Safety Devices
Numerical Investigation of Hydrogen Release from Varying Diameter Exit
Presentation transcript:

22 March The Institute of Petroleum’s “Guidelines for the Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers to Withstand the Impact of Tube Failure” Published in 2000 The history presented by Colin Weil

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers The problem: Compressor inter and after coolers high pressure gas at (say) 200 bar, often cooled by water at (say) 10 bar. Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers can, in rare cases, suffer catastrophic tube failure. If a tube rupture occurs rather than a pin hole leak then large volumes of high pressure gas will be expelled into the low pressure utility. The solution: Safe protection of the pressure envelope and safe release of any expelled fluids

22 March Where we were in the last century: Overpressure protection was rarely mounted on the shell being protected Relief valves were normally mounted in the piping Relief valves were mounted at a convenient location That location could be many metres from the shell supposedly being protected from an overpressure incident Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Basis of need: BE EN ISO aka API 521 says that tubes can fail catastrophically and as such the system must ensure pressure envelope integrity and safe removal of the pressurised fluid. What Happens ? 1. Pressure Waves 2. Reflections 3. Pressurised balloon of gas overcomes water momentum

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Choices: Design the LP side’s hydrostatic test pressure to be equal to the highest operating pressure of the HP fluid – ensure LP piping is also adequate or Protect the LP side against risk of tube failure by one or more bursting disks or relief valves: on the shell in the utility piping

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers What the industry was doing for extreme units: Using a one dimensional computer simulation Which was fast and cheap to run Questions: Widely used and validated for piping transient flow analysis Not validated for complex geometries ? There was no certainty on its accuracy or the sensitivity to numbers used in the calculation (e.g. speeds of response)?

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers IP managed JIP Health & Safety Laboratory and Sheffield University Experiment using real shell and tube geometry High pressure gas Tube failure within a bundle protected by a bursting disk Monitor pressures against time inside the tube bundle and in the piping Record strains in shell Compare experimental and analytical results (1-D model) Analyse results to determine actual stress and strain resulting in the pressure envelope Use a shock-tube to assist in defining shell failure criteria when subjected to short, high amplitude pressure transients

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Experimental Shell with Instrument Connections

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers ID Dimensions of Test Shell 13 mm plate (typ)

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Schematic Elevation of 6 inch Bursting Disc Line

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Strengthening work on 6 inch bursting disk line to protect against severe forces generated

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Instrumentation Aim was to record both long and short-term pressures and strains, using: 14 two-axis strain gauges up to 10 pressure transducers on shell 2 pressure transducers inside bundle near failure point 6 pressure transducers on discharge pipework using over 3000 ft cable Simultaneous logging of 50 channels

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Investigations into reproducible tube failure

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Bursting disc details 6” Graphite disc 10 bar(g) + 5 % rating Sized on assumption that air entering the shell displaces an equal volume of water Tests undertaken 1) 71 bar 2) 102 bar 3) 146 bar 4) 130 bar

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Physical processes during relief Compressible gas flow will choke at tube exit site Transient stage: –high pressure bubble of gas generated –liquid’s initial momentum must be overcome –liquid is forced from the LP side –maximum pressure in the LP side of exchanger likely to occur during the transient stage Steady-state stage: –pseudo steady-state depends on the flow resistance Sizing based on flow from two open ends of tube

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Pressure trace following tube rupture showing transient and pseudo-steady stages

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Short term pressure trace for internal transducer bar test Long term pressure trace for transducer on 6” discharge pipe bar test

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Summary of shell-side pressures with two large exit routes and little back-pressure

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Dynamic Models One dimensional Assume plug flow Liquid is compressible Uses average “friction factor” for exchanger shell Need to make assumptions about disk (or valve) rupture speed Blind comparisons were undertaken to compare the experimental data against the analytical results

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Comparison of experimental results and the model predictions for peak shell pressure

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Interesting Experimental Data Tube burst speed 0.7 ms with 90% flow by 0.23 ms (material CS) Disk rupture speeds ms Baffle movement minimal ? No secondary tubes damaged ? Piping water velocity ~ 20 m/s = force of 12 Tonne

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Illustration of forces involved

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Validation of FE Analysis

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Vessel failure criteria Work done by Sheffield University suggested that finite element modelling could be used to determine dynamic failure pressures, but modelling is specific to particular design Recommended approach to compare dynamic stresses with those allowed in vessel design code, not to specify dynamic failure pressure.

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Summary of results from the JIP Large scale experiments undertaken to provide model validation data Data supported use of 1-D fluid dynamic models Experimental data also supported use of finite element models to account for very fast transients The results were used to develop the design guideline by The Institute of Petroleum Presented to the API Pressure Relieving Sub-committee and subsequently incorporated into API (RP) 521 Following the JIP the approach was as follows:

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers When was dynamic simulation recommended? Large operating pressure differentials (say 150 bar) Long shell with baffles on tight pitch For existing units where the over pressure protection was mounted on the utility piping For existing units with high differential pressures where a relief valve was used Use One Dimensional (pipe) Model

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers The Guideline recommended for critical new heat exchangers Disks for fast reaction Mounted directly on the shell (LP Side) Use 2 disks when long or very high differential operating pressures Minimise contamination by use of NRV and ESD valves in the utility piping (Note that this has an effect on pressures generated)?

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers Findings and conclusions published by the Institute of Petroleum (now the Energy Institute: “Guidelines for the Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers to Withstand the Impact of Tube Failure”

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers

22 March Design and Safe Operation of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers