A University-Wide Approach to Inclusion: A Model Bridging Teaching, Learning and Accessibility.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE DIVERGENT BUT COMPLEMENTARY PATHS OF COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM REVIEW AND STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT A Case Study Presentation At the 2004 AAHE.
Advertisements

Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
Mental Health Advocacy and Accessibility Brandy Usick and Carolyn Christie Student Advocacy and Accessibility Student Support.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
UBC Senate: Supporting an integrated approach to enhancing the mental health and wellbeing of students in the academic environment Lindsey Kovacevic Academic.
“Framework for mainstreaming Ireland's experience" Siobhan Barron Director National Disability Authority Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin Second Annual Disability Service Symposium The Development and Implementation Plans for UCC Fitness to Practice Policy June 26 th.
Maureen Noonan Bischof Eden Inoway-Ronnie Office of the Provost Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association Annual Meeting April 22, 2007.
Inclusive Education in Montenegro Belgrade, December 2011.
“Creating A More Educated Georgia” Webinar for Consolidating Institutions Hosted by Academic Affairs & Legal Affairs Presenters: Kimberly Ballard-Washington.
Request from University Graduate Council for Revision to UFS Bylaws.
A MEMBER OF THE RUSSELL GROUP PGR PERIODIC REVIEW Sara Crowley
DIVISION OF STUDENT AFFAIRS Academic Accommodation Procedures for Graduate Students Joel Lynn, Executive Director, Student Services | Jonathan Derry, Manager,
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Write On! Your Course Outline. Pedagogy Unbound Series Facilitated by: Deborah Richards Florence Daddey.
Legal framework for student participatiing in decison making process in Serbia V. Dondur University of Belgrade-Faculty of physical chemistry CAQA, HERE.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
February, MansourahProf. Nadia Badrawi Implementation of National Academic Reference Standards Prof. Nadia Badrawi Senior Member and former chairperson.
Title of presentation umanitoba.ca. Test your Knowledge How many students attend the University of Manitoba: a) 20,000 b) 25,000 c) 30,000 d) 35,000.
Network of VET institutions Olav Aarna TAIEX expert Estonian Qualifications Authority.
Maximum Student Credit Hour Load per Semester POLICY 8.22.
Here Today Here to Stay August 17, TJC’s Mission.
HLC Criterion Four Primer Thursday, Oct. 15, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Advanced Writing Requirement Proposal
Principles of Good Governance
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDY PROGRAMS IN UNIVERSITY OF PRISHTINA/KOSOVO
Judith Brooder, Manager Student Accessibility Services
Academic Program Review
Finding balance between academic requirements and accommodations
New Program Proposal Workflow Chart
Designing Effective Accommodation Plans in Clinical Placement & Internship Settings
An Introduction to Identifying Essential Academic Requirements
New Faculty Orientation Provost’s Report August 22, 2016
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Shared Governance Territorial Act (1889): The faculty, the president, and the regents are jointly responsible for governing the university. NWCCU, Standard.
GOVERNANCE COUNCILS AND HARTNELL’S GOVERNANCE MODEL
The NEW Distance Education Guidelines
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
New Department Chair Workshop
Curriculum and Accreditation
Syllabus Guidelines and Other Instructor/Student Policies
Curriculum and Accreditation
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Strategic Planning
Disability Support Services (DSS) and CUA Faculty
The IEPI Framework: Integrated Planning and Disaggregating Data
AACRAO Tech and transfer Conference
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
Documents in the Classroom
UMKC General Education Revision - Background June 7, 2016
Shared Governance at KSU
Quality Assurance of Assessment Arrangements
Accreditation and curriculum
Organizational Consulting
Quality Assurance of Assessment Arrangements
Consideration of Core Outcomes for Strategic Plan
Step-by-Step Guide to Adopting a Classified 9+1
Extend an Existing Degree Program to a New Location
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
“From Strength to Strength”
Fort Valley State University
Articulation Manual Faculty Senate Presentation
Professor John W Sawkins, Deputy Principal (Learning and Teaching)
Core Concepts of the Standards 2019
Developing and Evaluating Processes and Practices
Working with actors in healthcare simulation
Presentation transcript:

A University-Wide Approach to Inclusion: A Model Bridging Teaching, Learning and Accessibility

Presenters Brandy Usick Director Student Advocacy and Accessibility Carolyn Christie Coordinator Student Accessibility Services Acknowledgements: The Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning

Session Objectives Context The “Cooper Commission” report Core components of the U of M process Activity Questions

The University of Manitoba Context

Student Accessibility Services Students registered, according to disability type

The Cooper Commission Recommend how to balance the University’s legal obligation to offer reasonable accommodations to students with disabilities while protecting academic standards Types of accommodations How decisions made, who must be consulted Evidence of disability Timely decisions Protect privacy

Cooper Commission Report Recommendations Education on responsibilities and procedures Revised policies Specialized decision making body, with increased faculty input Handbook Annual report to Senate Better documenting academic standards

Core Components

Changes in Policy

New Governing Documents The University of Manitoba Accessibility Policy Student Accessibility Procedures Student Accessibility Appeal Procedures

Changes in Articulating Academic Requirements

Essential Skills and Abilities For academic programs subject to external accreditation or approval: Document must be congruent with the requirements outlined by the respective registering college or approval body Senate approval required

Bona Fide Academic Requirements (BFARs) BFARs are important because they: Clearly define program expectations Ensure academic integrity of programs Increase transparency for students prior to beginning a program of study Ensure students have attained essential knowledge and skills upon graduation

BFAR Process BFARs are vetted by an interdisciplinary committee including representatives from: The Centre for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning Office of Human Rights and Conflict Management Office of Fair Practices and Legal Affairs Student Advocacy and Accessibility Senate has the final approval of all BFAR statements.

Changes to Service Provision

Accommodation Teams Accessibility Advisory Committees Student RequestFaculty Policy & Procedure Non-Standard Accommodations Not Looking at Individual Cases Frequent MeetingsTwice Yearly Meetings

Changes to Daily Work

Procedural conversations Student Accessibility Procedure: The accommodation must be reasonable. The accommodation must not create undue hardship for the University. The accommodation must not compromise a defined Bona Fide Academic Requirement. cedure_-_2015_01_01.pdf

Education

Educational Activities Campus-wide education Promotion (Marketing and Communication office) BFAR interdisciplinary committee Faculty workshops & support Student Accessibility Services resources (e.g. faculty handbook, accessible documents etc.,)

Group Activity: Looking at the four components that have guided U of M in their work in implementing the Cooper Commission recommendations: 1.Discuss how this process may look/does look at your institution 2.Who should/is included in the process 3.What steps and strategies are/were needed