Deductive Reasoning BOMLA LacyMath Geometry Pre-AP.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Geometry Chapter 2 Terms.

Advertisements

Sec.2-3 Deductive Reasoning

Geometry 2.3 Big Idea: Use Deductive Reasoning

Targets Use the Law of Detachment. Use the Law of Syllogism. Lesson 2-3: Deductive Reasoning TARGETS.

2. 1 Inductive Reasoning & Conjecture 2. 2 Logic 2

Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Geometry 1.0 – Students demonstrate understanding by identifying and giving examples of inductive and deductive reasoning.

Chapter 2: Geometric Reasoning

Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning. Ohio Content Standards.

Chapter 1-4: Properties Commutative Property: the order in which you add or multiply numbers does not change the sum or product Ex = * 8.

Geometry Unit 2 Power Points Montero to 2.3 Notes and Examples Patterns, Conditional Statements, and BiConditional Statements Essential Vocabulary.

Using Patterns and Inductive Reasoning Geometry Mr. Zampetti Unit 1, Day 3.

Section 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.

Introduction to Geometric Proof Logical Reasoning and Conditional Statements.

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning. Objectives Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Detachment Use the Law of Syllogism Use the Law of Syllogism.

Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:

Write the following in biconditional form. p: The sun is out. q: It is day time. The sun is out iff it is day time.

Deductive Reasoning What can you D…D….D…. DEDUCE ?

Deductive Reasoning Section 2-4. Deductive reasoning uses a rule to make a conclusion. Inductive reasoning uses examples to make a conjecture or rule.

Applying Deductive Reasoning Section 2.3. Essential Question How do you construct a logical argument?

Reasoning and Conditional Statements Advanced Geometry Deductive Reasoning Lesson 1.

Deductive Reasoning Chapter 2 Lesson 4.

 ESSENTIAL QUESTION  How can you use reasoning to solve problems?  Scholars will  Use the Law of Syllogism  Use the Law of Detachment UNIT 01 – LESSON.

Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive reasoning- uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions Law of Detachment: If p.

Properties and Numbers 1.4. Deductive Reasoning Using facts, properties or rules to reach a valid conclusion Conjecture: statement that could be true.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. What We Will Learn Use inductive reasoning Use deductive reasoning.

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning is the process of reasoning logically from given statements to a conclusion.

Ch. 2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Section 2.3: Deductive Reasoning

5-Minute Check Converse: Inverse: Contrapositive: Hypothesis: Conclusion: The measure of an angle is less than 90  The angle is acute If an angle is.

Geometry Chapter 2: Reasoning and Introduction to Proof We can do this dude!

LG 1: Logic A Closer Look at Reasoning

Using Deductive Reasoning to Verify Conjectures 2-3

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If

Section 2.3 – Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning, Postulates, and Proofs

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Chapter 1 Lessons 1-4 to 1-8.

Warm Up For this conditional statement: If a polygon has 3 sides, then it is a triangle. Write the converse, the inverse, the contrapositive, and the.

EXAMPLE 3 Use inductive and deductive reasoning

2.2 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Chapter 2 Review Geometric Reasoning.

Objective Apply the Law of Detachment and the Law of Syllogism in logical reasoning.

Deductive Reasoning Section 2-4.

2-4 Deductive Reasoning Ms. Andrejko.

Applying Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning – Reasoning that uses facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment.

Sec. 2.3: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Earlier we learned about inductive reasoning. • Look at specific examples. • Recognize patterns, which.

2.4 Deductive Reasoning.

Warmup Definition: Perpendicular Lines—

2-3 Deductive Reasoning Objectives:

Drill: Tuesday, 10/18 2. Determine if the conditional “If x is a number then |x| > 0” is true. If false, give a counterexample. OBJ: SWBAT analyze.

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of. “If

1. Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive of the conditional below and determine the truth value for each. “If the measure of an angle is less.

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment

Math Humor Q: How is a geometry classroom like the United Nations?

2.3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Premise: If it’s a school day, then I have Geometry class.

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Section 3-6 Inductive Reasoning.

Welcome to Interactive Chalkboard

2-3 Apply Deductive Reasoning

Pearson Unit 1 Topic 2: Reasoning and Proof 2-4: Deductive Reasoning Pearson Texas Geometry ©2016 Holt Geometry Texas ©2007.

To solve problems by looking for a pattern

2-4 Deductive Reasoning Deductive Reasoning: Using facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach logical conclusions. Law of Detachment: A form.

Law of Detachment Law of Syllogism

2-4 Deductive Reasoning Vocab:

EXAMPLE 1 Use the Law of Detachment

Chapter 2.3 Notes: Apply Deductive Reasoning

Presentation transcript:

Deductive Reasoning BOMLA LacyMath Geometry Pre-AP

Deductive Reasoning  The use of facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach a conclusion.

Deductive Reasoning  The use of facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach a conclusion.  How is it different from Inductive?

Deductive Reasoning  The use of facts, rules, definitions, or properties to reach a conclusion.  How is it different from Inductive?  Inductive reasoning uses examples to make a conjecture.

Deductive Reasoning  Today… We’ll determine whether conclusions are valid or invalid using deductive reasoning.

Deductive Reasoning  Determine whether the conclusion in each example is valid based on the given information.  Example 1

Deductive Reasoning  Determine whether the conclusion in each example is valid based on the given information.  Example 1 The conclusion is valid using deductive reasoning.

Deductive Reasoning  Determine whether the conclusion in each example is valid based on the given information.  Example 2

Deductive Reasoning  Determine whether the conclusion in each example is valid based on the given information.  Example 2 The conclusion is invalid. The sum of the two angles is not 180.

Deductive Reasoning  Two Special Forms of Deductive Reasoning  Law of Detachment AND  Law of Syllogism

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Detachment If p  q is true and p is true, then q is also true. (If p, then q is true and p is true, then q is also true.)

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Detachment If p  q is true and p is true, then q is also true. Example 1

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Detachment If p  q is true and p is true, then q is also true. Example 1 What can we conclude using Law of Detachment?

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Detachment If p  q is true and p is true, then q is also true. Example 1 What can we conclude using Law of Detachment? Answer: Mr. Conway is drinking coffee.

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Detachment If p  q is true and p is true, then q is also true. Example 2 If the sum of two angles is 90, then the angles are complementary. The sum of two angles is 90.

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Detachment If p  q is true and p is true, then q is also true. Example 2 If the sum of two angles is 90, then the angles are complementary. The sum of two angles is 90. What can we conclude using the Law of Detachment?

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Detachment If p  q is true and p is true, then q is also true. Example 2 If the sum of two angles is 90, then the angles are complementary. The sum of two angles is 90. What can we conclude using the Law of Detachment? Answer: The two angles are complementary.

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Syllogism If p  q is true and q  r is true, then p  r is also true. (“If p, then q” is true and “If q, then r” is true, “If p, then r” is also true.)

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Syllogism Similar to the “Transitive Property of Equality”… If A = B, and B = C, then A = C.

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Syllogism If p  q is true and q  r is true, then p  r is also true. Example 1

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Syllogism If p  q is true and q  r is true, then p  r is also true. Example 1 What can we conclude using the Law of Syllogism?

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Syllogism If p  q is true and q  r is true, then p  r is also true. Example 1 What can we conclude using the Law of Syllogism? Answer:If I win the lottery, then I will buy a fur coat.

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Syllogism If p  q is true and q  r is true, then p  r is also true. Example 2 If Chuck Norris gets mad at you, then he will roundhouse kick you in the face. If Chuck Norris roundhouse kicks you in the face, then you will explode.

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Syllogism If p  q is true and q  r is true, then p  r is also true. Example 2 If Chuck Norris gets mad at you, then he will roundhouse kick you in the face. If Chuck Norris roundhouse kicks you in the face, then you will explode. What can we conclude using the Law of Syllogism?

Deductive Reasoning  Law of Syllogism If p  q is true and q  r is true, then p  r is also true. Example 2 If Chuck Norris gets mad at you, then he will roundhouse kick you in the face. If Chuck Norris roundhouse kicks you in the face, then you will explode. What can we conclude using the Law of Syllogism? Answer: If Chuck Norris gets mad at you, then you will explode.

Deductive Reasoning  CW – Deductive Reasoning Pg. 122, #12-17 Pg. 124, #37-42