Supplemental Figure 1. The association of maternal hCG with birth weight and SGA in the whole study population Birthweight (SD) -0.1 hCG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association between feeding style and weight gain in infants aged 2-7 months Mihrshahi S* 1,2, Daniels L A 1,2, Jansen E 1,2, Battistutta D 2, Wilson JL.
Advertisements

Risk Factors for Recurrent Shoulder Dystocia, Washington State Hillary Moore, MD University of Washington School of Public Health and Community.
2005 NORTH DAKOTA Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
HUMAN BIRTH WEIGHT 1.Variation in birth weight 2.Sources of variation in birth weight 3.Implications of variation in birth wieght.
Jul-15H.S.1 Short overview of statistical methods Hein Stigum Presentation, data and programs at: courses.
A Longitudinal Study of Maternal Smoking During Pregnancy and Child Height Author 1 Author 2 Author 3.
2006 NORTH CAROLINA Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
Associations between gestational weight gain and child BMI at age 5 Author 1 Author 2 December 5, 2007 PH 251.
Is Maternal Menstrual Cycle Length Associated with Twinning? Author 1 Author 2.
Mortality rates Ashry Gad Mohamed Prof. Ashry Gad Mohamed.
2008 NORTH DAKOTA Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
2010 WISCONSIN Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ADOLESCENT/YOUNG ADULT BMI AND SUBSEQUENT NON- PROBLEM AND PROBLEM ALCOHOL USE Alexis E. Duncan, Kathleen Keenan Bucholz, Pamela.
Racial Disparity in Correlates of Late Preterm Births: A Population-Based Study Shailja Jakhar, Christine Williams, Louis Flick, Jen Jen Chang, Qian Min,
Birth Weight and Childhood Cancer and Leukemia Update from the I4C Environmental Working Group on Birth Weight and Childhood Cancer Ora Paltiel, Hadassah-Hebrew.
MATERIAL & METHODS SECTION PREPARATION (IN THE HEALTH RESEARCH PROPOSAL) DR. HAYFAA A. WAHBI ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, CHAIR OF EBHC & KT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE.
2010 NORTH CAROLINA Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
Nutrition: A Lifespan Approach, by Simon Langley-Evans. © 2009 Simon Langley-Evans. 1 Learning objectives.
2011 NATIONAL Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
Bayesian Multivariate Logistic Regression by Sean O’Brien and David Dunson (Biometrics, 2004 ) Presented by Lihan He ECE, Duke University May 16, 2008.
Supplemental Table A. Baseline proteinuria predicting renal outcome in multivariable Cox-Hazard model PredictorsHR95% CIp value Baseline UPE, g/day
Birthweight (gms) BPDNProp Total BPD (Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia) by birth weight Proportion.
HUMAN BIRTH WEIGHT 1.Variation in birth weight 2.Sources of variation in birth weight 3.Implications of variation in birth weight.
The Association between Diet During Pregnancy and Infant Birth Weight in white Europeans and South Asians CHILD, FAMILY, and START cohorts and FFQs, and.
Factors associated with maternal smoking during early pregnancy: relationship to low-birth-weight infants and maternal attitude toward their pregnancy.
National Center for Fetal Medicine Dept. Ob–Gyn Trondheim Norway Pregnancy dating.
Preeclampsia and Retinopathy of prematurity in Very-Low-Birth-Weight-Infants − A population base study Hsin-Chung Huang 1, Hwai-I Yang 2, Wu-Shiun Hsieh.
National data bases and classification of death in Sweden Sven Cnattingius, MD, PhD.
UOG Journal Club: August 2017
Maternal Depressive Symptoms During and After Pregnancy and Psychiatric Problems in Children  Marius Lahti, PhD, Katri Savolainen, MA, Soile Tuovinen,
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Examining the Relationship Between Two Variables
Copyright © 2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Birth by the Numbers Gene Declercq March, 2016
Introduction Materials and Methods Results Conclusions
Fetal growth restriction
Square-root TSH (μIU/mL) Presence vs. Absence TPO Abᵈ
2006 NORTH CAROLINA Children Aged <5 Years Pediatric Nutrition
Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts
NORTH CAROLINA 2008 Pregnancy Nutrition Surveillance System.
UOG Journal Club: October 2018
Odds Ratio Interpretation Confounder  Diabetes
Figure cases 24 cases: neonatal or infant death
Alison L. Park, MSc, Marcelo L. Urquia, PhD, Joel G. Ray, MD, MSc 
Screening for fetal growth restriction using ultrasound and the sFLT1/PlGF ratio in nulliparous women: a prospective cohort study  Francesca Gaccioli,
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2018)
Joshua A. Bell et al. JACC 2018;72:
Joshua A. Bell et al. JACC 2018;72:
Examining the Relationship Between Two Variables
Pregnancy-related complications and perinatal outcomes resulting from transfer of cryopreserved versus fresh embryos in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis 
Mother-Newborn Pairs (Jan Dec 2014) N=7431 SGA AGA
Customized Charts and Their Role in Identifying Pregnancies at Risk Because of Fetal Growth Restriction  Jason Gardosi, MD, FRCOG  Journal of Obstetrics.
Male and female alcohol consumption and live birth after assisted reproductive technology treatment: a nationwide register-based cohort study  Ida Vittrup,
Predicting the Spontaneous Onset of Labour in Post-Date Pregnancies: A Population- Based Retrospective Cohort Study  Gerald P. Marquette, MD, FRCSC, Jennifer.
Volume 72, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Logistic Regression.
Exercise 1: Gestational age and birthweight
Forest plot of adjusted odds ratios (with 95% confidence intervals) from multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis (table 4), by number of.
Risk Factors for Adverse Birth Outcomes
Comparison of women carrying a male fetus and those carrying a female fetus, with respect to mean adjusted blood glucose levels during the OGTT (A), mean.
Stratified analysis of the association between GDM and abdominal circumference (AC) >90th percentile at 28 wkGA. Stratified analysis of the association.
Urinary paraben concentrations and in vitro fertilization outcomes among women from a fertility clinic  Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón, Ph.D., Yu-Han Chiu, M.D.,
Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals for differences in PSA trajectories of the 200 μg/d selenium (circle) and 800 μg/d (square) selenium treatment.
Exercise 1: Gestational age and birthweight
Glycemic profile at time of recruitment of women with ICP (n = 19) and uncomplicated pregnancy (n = 23) using a CGMS (Medtronic iPro2) over 3 days. Glycemic.
Effect of male and female body mass index on pregnancy and live birth success after in vitro fertilization  Karen C. Schliep, Ph.D., M.S.P.H., Sunni L.
Multifetal pregnancy in older women and perinatal outcomes
Chantal Nelson BORN Annual Conference April 25, 2017
Relative risk by median risk exposure for 40-year-old men.
Jacob J.E. Koopman, MD, PhD  American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
Presentation transcript:

Supplemental Figure 1. The association of maternal hCG with birth weight and SGA in the whole study population Birthweight (SD) -0.1 hCG (SD) Risk of SGA (p) P=0.009 P=0.028 hCG (SD) Plots show the linear and logistic regression models for total hCG (standardized to gestational age; SD) and birthweight (standardized to gestational age at birth; SD) as predicted mean with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain and fetal sex.

hCG cut-offOR(95%CI)P-value <51.24( )0.22 < ( )0.61 < ( )0.14 > ( )0.52 > ( )0.69 >951.18( )0.34 Supplemental Table 1. The association of maternal hCG cut-offs with SGA. Table shows the association between different cut-off levels for total hCG (standardized to gestational age; SD) and small for gestational age (defined as birthweight below 10 th percentile for gestational age) as odds ratio with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain and fetal sex.

Supplemental Figure 2. The association of maternal hCG with birth weight stratified by gestational age at hCG measurement Gestational age weeks Gestational age 12 – 13.5 weeks Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) Plots show the linear regression model for the relationship between total maternal hCG (standardized to gestational age at measurement; SD) and birthweight (standardized to gestational age at birth; SD) as predicted mean with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain and fetal sex. 0.2 Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) P= Birthweight (SD) Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) Gestational age 13.5 – 15.5 weeks hCG (SD) Gestational age 15.5 – 19.5 weeks Gestational age 19.5 – 39 weeks P=0.73 P=0.77 P=0.84 P=0.005 Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD)

Supplemental Figure 3. The association of hCG measured in the 11th or 12th week with birth weight and SGA. Plots show the linear and logistic regression models for total hCG (standardized to gestational age at measurement; SD) and birthweight (standardized to gestational age at birth; SD) as predicted mean with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain and fetal sex Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) P< hCG (SD) Risk of SGA (p) P=0.02

Supplemental Table 2. The association of maternal hCG measured in the 11th or 12th week cut- offs with small for gestational age. hCG cut-offOR(95%CI)P-value <52.21( )0.04 < ( )0.03 < ( )0.03 > ( )0.57 > ( )0.96 >951.52( )0.40 Table shows the association between different cut-off levels for total hCG (standardized to gestational age; SD) and small for gestational age (defined as birthweight below 10 th percentile for gestational age) as odds ratio with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain and fetal sex.

Values are regression coefficients (95% confidence intervals) from the linear regression models for total hCG (standardized according to gestational age at measurement; SD) and birthweight (standardized according to gestational age at birth; SD). Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity, gestational weight gain and fetal sex. Non- linear associations are presented with the two estimates for hCG (sd) and the cut-off was based on the shape of the association. * P<0.05 ** P<0.001

Supplemental Figure 4. The association of maternal hCG with crown-rump length within the subgroup of women with a reliable cycle and known last menstrual periode (N=1526) CRL (SD) hCG (SD) Plot shows the linear regression model for total hCG (SD) and crown-rump length (adjusted according to week of gestation; available in n=1526;SD) as predicted mean with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, education level, ethnicity, gestational weight gain and fetal sex P=0.13

Amongst male fetuses P<0.05 P=0.04 P=0.08 Supplemental Figure 5. The association of maternal hCG per week of measurement with birth weight stratified by fetal sex. 11th week12th week13th week Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) P=0.1 hCG (SD) Plots show the logistic and linear regression models for total hCG (standardized according to gestational age at measurement; SD) and birthweight (standardized according to gestational age at birth; SD) or small for gestational age (defined as birthweight below 10 th percentile for gestational age) as predicted mean with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity and gestational weight gain. (N=120)(N=400)(N=720) P= Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) 14th week Birthweight (SD) P= Birthweight (SD) P= Birthweight (SD) P= Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) (N=134) (N=383)(N=692) (N=514) (N=546) Amongst female fetuses 11th week12th week13th week 14th week

Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) P=0.005 Supplemental Figure 6. The association of maternal hCG measured in the 11th or 12th week with birth weight stratified by fetal sex hCG (SD) Risk of SGA (p) P= Birthweight (SD) hCG (SD) P=0.005 hCG (SD) Risk of SGA (p) P=0.27 Amongst female fetuses Amongst male fetuses Plots show the linear and logistic regression models for total hCG (standardized to gestational age; SD) and birthweight (standardized to gestational age at birth; SD) or small for gestational age (defined as <10 th percentile of gestational age specific birth weight) as predicted mean with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity, gestational age at birth and gestational weight gain.

Supplemental Table 4. The association of maternal hCG measured in the 11th or 12th week and SGA stratified by fetal sex. Amongst female fetuses hCG cut-offOR(95%CI)P-value <52.08( )0.17 < ( )0.01 < ( )0.009 > ( )0.07 > ( )0.32 >950.53( )0.58 hCG cut-offOR(95%CI)P-value <52.39( )0.16 < ( )0.73 < ( )0.76 > ( )0.71 > ( )0.78 >951.88( )0.28 Amongst male fetuses Table shows the association between different cut-off levels for total hCG (standardized to gestational age; SD) and small for gestational age (defined as birthweight below 10 th percentile for gestational age) as odds ratio with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, placental weight at birth, education level, ethnicity, gestational age at birth, gestational weight gain and fetal sex.

Week of hCG measurement Fetal sexBeta ±SE P-value 95% Confidence interval All weeksmale 0.012± (-0.000, 0.003) 11 th and 12 th week onlymale0.003 ± (-0.002, 0.007) All weeksfemale0.002 ± (0.001, 0.004) 11 th and 12 th week only female0.006± (0.002, 0.010) Supplemental Table 5. The association of maternal hCG with fetal growth throughout gestation stratified by fetal sex. Table shows the repeated measurement model for the association of total hCG (SD), fetal weight (measured twice during pregnancy) and birthweight, as predicted mean with 95 percent confidence interval. Analyses were performed after exclusion of women with IVF treatment (N=38), twin pregnancy (N=90) and were adjusted for maternal age, smoking, BMI, parity, education level, ethnicity, gestational weight gain and placental weight at birth.