Slide 1 Status Report. Slide 2 QCD and W+jets Background Estimation Using Fake Rate Method Norbert Neumeister, Hwidong Yoo Purdue University EXO non-hadronic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Advertisements

ESTIMATING THE FAKE LEPTON BACKGROUND IN A SEARCH FOR PAIR PRODUCED STOPS AT CMS David Kolchmeyer Advisor: Alberto Graziano.
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb -1 Chris Hays 1, Ashutosh Kotwal 2, Ye Li 3, Oliver Stelzer-Chilton 1 1 Oxford University.
1 Measurements at 8 TeV of TTbar events with additional particles in the final state Boris Mangano (ETH Zürich) on behalf of the CMS collaboration Boris.
The Matrix Method Data-driven method of estimating the W→lv and QCD multijet contributions to sample S’.
Background studies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics May 6 th, 2010.
4/23/06 Ali Hanks - APS 1 A method for directly measuring bremsstrahlung photons from jets Ali Hanks APS Conference April 23, 2006.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
1 Viktor Veszprémi (Purdue University, CDF Collaboration) SUSY 2005, Durham Search for the SM Higgs Boson at the CDF Experiment Search for the SM Higgs.
Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.
9/15/06Ali Hanks1 Measuring bremsstrahlung photons in sqrt(s)=200 GeV pp collisions Ali Hanks Hard/Photon analysis fest September 15, 2006.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
Slide 1 SMP-V: Report for Luminosity Calibration Study Jiyeon Han, Ping Tan Alexey Svyatkovskiy, Hwidong Yoo Stoyan Stoynev Ilya Kravchenko, Jamila Butt.
4/10/12 Contribution in ATLAS Collaboration 1 Talk “Multi-jet balance for high pT jet calibration” presented on ATLAS Hadronic Calibration Workshop 2011(SLAC.
Associated top Higgs search: with ttH (H  bb) Chris Collins-Tooth, 17 June 2008.
Analysis Plans for Jets + EtMiss Signatures Pierre Savard ATLAS Toronto Group Meeting January
F. Ahmadov Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Institute of Physics, ANAS, Baku, Azerbaijan 41th ITEP Winter School of Physics February.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
LHC France 2013, 3 rd April ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair production cross section in dilepton channel Frédéric Derue, LPNHE Paris Rencontres.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
QCD and Top backgrounds in W+jets and Rjets Alessandro Tricoli (CERN) on behalf of W+jets and Rjets groups 3 rd May 2013 W+jets and Rjets EB Meeting.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
1 Single top in e+jets channel Outline : - Data and MC samples - Overview of the analysis - Loose and topological cuts - MC efficiencies and expected number.
Itamar Roth, Ehud Duchovni Group meeting 19/01/15 1.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
29,30 July 2010 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai 1 Update on Z’-> τ τ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir.
Slides for EB3. Left Problems from EB2 1. Why muon triggers are not used in e  channel? 2. Add backgrounds estimation for signal search region 3. Add.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
7/20/07Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester)1 d  /dy Distribution of Drell-Yan Dielectron Pairs at CDF in Run II Jiyeon Han (University of Rochester) For.
W/Z+Jets production studies in ATLAS
28/01/101 Zvv bkg, how to get an estimate with first data ? R. Brunelière Time schedule is tight. Goal : get an estimate by may/june if we get data from.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
Top physics at startup CMS France – 1 er avril 2010 Anne-Catherine Le Bihan.
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Measuring the t-tbar Cross-Section in the Dilepton Channel at CDF* J. Incandela for C. Mills Jan. 17, 2008 DOE Site Visit UC Santa Barbara * PhD Thesis.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
Search for Pair Produced Stops Decaying to a Dileptonic Final State at CMS David Kolchmeyer.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
QCD estimate with the matrix method Alexander D. with the help of many…
Methodology and examples to determine fake rate separate signal from background Using fit on sideband. Using independent control sample.
1 Top activities in Milano. 2 Overview Study of W+jets background to semileptonic tt –I. Besana (1 st year PhD student, continuing work of diploma thesis)
Data Driven study for Same Sign Dileptons July 31 st 2009, “CMS SUSY Leptonic Meeting” 1 Sanjay Padhi.
Estimating QCD background in single muon channel Alexander D.
ATLAS results on inclusive top quark pair
Diphoton+MET: Update on Plans and Progress
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Modified HEEP ID for Z’ SUSY Search
CDS comments on supporting note
Top quark search update
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
B Tagging Efficiency and Mistag Rate Measurement in ATLAS
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Measuring fragmentation photons in p+p collisions
RAA predictions show enhancement highly sensitive to jet quenching
Getting sample and code
W Charge Asymmetry at CDF
W boson helicity measurement
Observation and measurement of HW+W-
ttbar + jets AOD analysis
Search for Narrow Resonance Decaying to Muon Pairs in 2.3 fb-1
Status of the H4l CSC Note (HG2)
The others’ latest result about SUSY search with same-sign dimuon
Presentation transcript:

Slide 1 Status Report

Slide 2 QCD and W+jets Background Estimation Using Fake Rate Method Norbert Neumeister, Hwidong Yoo Purdue University EXO non-hadronic meeting January 30, 2014

Slide 3 Outline

Slide 4 Introduction

Slide 5 QCD Background (1) Use fake rate method (data-driven method) –Estimate QCD, W+jets contributions –Event which pass loose selection criteria are reweighted to predict the distribution of events which pass full selection cuts –Use single muon spectrum –Parameterize pt and eta of muons Fake Rate = N(muons) passing tight iso / N(muons) passing loose iso –Tight iso: rel. trk iso < 0.1 –Loose iso: rel. trk iso < 0.4 Cross check all methods with no iso cut as a denominator There is large EWK contamination on the single muon spectrum –DY, ttbar, diboson etc.

Slide 6 Fake Rate Fake rate in QCD MC sample No significant different on the fake rate between single muon events and dimuon events in both isolation category Inclusive Loose iso

Slide 7 EWK Contamination: pT Single muon spectrom in 2012 data There is large contamination from EWK muons These EWK muons affect the fake rate measured in data Inclusive Loose iso Tight iso

Slide 8 EWK Contamination: Eta Single muon spectrom in 2012 data There is large contamination from EWK muons These EWK muons affect the fake rate measured in data Inclusive Loose iso Tight iso

Slide 9 QCD Background (2) Several methods are used to cross check Ratio method –Remove EWK contamination from the fake rate using the ratio of QCD to EWK events in MC –Sensitive to the accuracy of the MC simulation of QCD –Fr = Fake Rate * p(QCD|tight iso)/p(QCD|loose iso) Subtraction method –EWK contaminations are predicted from MC and subtracted from the numerator and denominator event count –This method is sensitive to the accuracy of the EWK cross section and trigger algorithms used for MC simulation –Fr = (N(muons)_tight iso – EWK_tight iso (NLO))/ (N(muons)_loose iso – EWK_loose iso (NLO)) Not much different from the technique used in DY Developing macros for two methods

Slide 10 Fake Rate: Inclusive Similar results between two methods No significant dependency on the pt distribution Fit on pol0 and use as a constant

Slide 11 Fake Rate: Loose Iso Similar results between two methods No significant dependency on the pt distribution Fit on pol0 and use as a constant

Slide 12 Fake Rate: Inclusive Large dependency is found in eta distribution Nonnegligible difference between two methods Need to apply the parameterized fake rate using the muon eta

Slide 13 Fake Rate: Loose Iso Large dependency is found in eta distribution Nonnegligible difference between two methods Need to apply the parameterized fake rate using the muon eta

Slide 14 Event Weight Event weight is determined using the fake rate Ratio method, subtraction method –Weight = p(pass tight iso)/ p(fail tight, pass loose iso) = Fr / (1 – Fr) Events in which both muons fail tight isolation cut but pass loose (or inclusive) isolation cut –Weight these events to calculate QCD background

Slide 15 QCD Background Candidate Data distribution on the candiate events Inclusive Loose iso Same Sign Opposite Sign

Slide 16 Same Sign QCD Background Use constant fake rate from pt distribution Statistical uncertainty only

Slide 17 Opposite Sign QCD Background Use constant fake rate from pt distribution Statistical uncertainty only

Slide 18 Systematic Uncertainty

Slide 19 W+Jets Background Use candidate events that one muon fails tight isolation but both muons pass loose (or inclusive) isolation Apply fake rate weight factor to the candidates events Large contamination from DY and ttbar events after the selection –Subtract the MC predictions from data to take into account the contamination Opposite Sign Loose Isolation Fake rate from ratio method Opposite Sign Loose Isolation Fake rate from subtract method

Slide 20 Same Sign W+Jets Background No significant difference between two methods Statistical uncertainty only Inclusive Loose iso

Slide 21 Opposite Sign W+Jets Background No significant difference between two methods Statistical uncertainty only Inclusive Loose iso

Slide 22 Summary