CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HYGIENE STANDARDS AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS
Advertisements

Hazardous Materials Section Five: Scene Safety, PPE and Scene Control
Eduardo J Salazar-Vega, MPH CPH Jan Koehn, MS CIH.
Trichloroethylene (TCE) Toxicity Values Update Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting March 27, 2014 C. Mark Smith Ph.D., M.S. Deputy Director Office.
Regulatory Toxicology James Swenberg, D.V.M., Ph.D.
Chemical Carcinogens – workplace risk assessment and health surveillance Tiina Santonen Paide.
Risk Assessment.
Health Hazards The overall objective for this module is that given a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS), the participant will interpret health hazard information.
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
Wien.arbeiterkammer.at Revision of the Carcinogens and Mutagens Directive – Why do we need it? Christoph Streissler Arbeiterkammer Wien (Chamber of Labour,
Annual Formaldehyde Awareness Training
CONFERENCE ON “ FOOD ADDITIVES : SAFETY IN USE AND CONSUMER CONCERNS“ JOMO KENYATTA UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY NAIROBI, 24 JUNE 2014.
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
Elizabeth L. Pullen, CIH APOSHO 26 & Australasian
Cumulative Risk Assessment for Pesticide Regulation: A Risk Characterization Challenge Mary A. Fox, PhD, MPH Linda C. Abbott, PhD USDA Office of Risk Assessment.
It Takes a Village to Raise a Child Roberta L. Grant, Ph.D. Toxicology Section - Chief Engineer’s Office Texas Commission on Environmental Quality.
NSF/ANSI STANDARD 61 FRAMEWORK FOR RISK ASSESSMENTS For use by Toxicology Sub-committee only Please do not copy or distribute.
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Exposure Assessment Thanks to Marc Rigas, PhD for an earlier version of this lecture Much of the materials is drawn from Paustenbach, DJ. (2000) The practice.
1 Issues in Harmonizing Methods for Risk Assessment Kenny S. Crump Louisiana Tech University
Risk Assessment II Dec 9, Is there a “safe” dose ? For effects other than cancer:
NORA Exposure Assessment Methods Team Whitepaper Research Needs and Priorities Beth Donovan Reh National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
The EU Scientific Committee on Occupational Exposure Limits (SCOEL) Presentation by Professor Len Levy, Cranfield University (Vice-Chair of SCOEL)
Energy Facility Contractors Group Safety Working Group Industrial Hygiene / Industrial Safety Technical Team Dina Siegel, Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Safety 5120Industrial Hygiene Threshold Limit Values (TLVs) TLV ® Definition concentrations … which it is airborne concentrations … which it is believed.
Environmental Risk Analysis
Lynn H. Pottenger, PhD, DABT The Dow Chemical Company
Occupational Exposure Limits & Other Reference Values.
Committee on Carcinogenicity (COC) Approach to Risk Assessment of Genotoxic Carcinogens David H. Phillips* COC Chairman Descriptive vs. Quantitative.
TRAINING FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR
Michael J. Sullivan, Ph.D., CIH, REA
Introduction to INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE
Health Hazards Instructional Goal
Translating HPV Information into Plain Language Characterizing Chemicals in Commerce Austin, TX December, 12-14, 2006.
Risk Assessment Nov 7, 2008 Timbrell 3 rd Edn pp Casarett & Doull 7 th Edn Chapter 7 (pp )
Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Dekant Department of Toxicology University of Würzburg Germany Risk, Hazard, and Innovation.
SCOEL and Carcinogens Group A: Non-threshold genotoxic carcinogens; for risk low-dose assessment the linear non-threshold (LNT) model appears appropriate.
Air Toxics Risk Assessment: Traditional versus New Approaches Mark Saperstein BP Product Stewardship Group.
TOXICOLOGY OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS CHEMICAL PHYSICAL ERGONOMIC PSYCHOLOGIC BIOLOGIC.
NUATRC/TCEQ Air Toxics Workshop October Air Toxics Air Toxics: What We Know, What we Don’t Know, and What We Need to Know Human Health Effects –
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
Case Study # 2  Problem Formulation  Inter-individual variability in cancer assessment (evaluate default from Silver Book)  Proposed Methods  Critical.
‘DOSE’-‘OUTCOME’ IN GENERAL Relationship between a measured outcome associated with a measured dose –‘outcome’ = level of biological response or prevalence.
Dose-Response ENVR430 Nov 09, 2009 Casarett and Doull, Chapter 2, pp (6 th Edn) Chapter 2, pp (7 th Edn) Timbrell Chapter 2, pp (3 rd.
Perspective on the current state-of-knowledge of mode of action as it relates to the dose response assessment of cancer and noncancer toxicity Jennifer.
Chemical Risk Assessment & Exposure Monitoring Quantitative Risk Assessment Revision December Information provided subject to the 'Conditions for.
Basic information OEL & PBOEL-HHC for API & IPI
HEX-Tox paper reading Tue Hye Young Choi.
Volker J. Soballa Evonik Degussa GmbH Essen, Germany
Acute Toxicity Studies Single dose - rat, mouse (5/sex/dose), dog, monkey (1/sex/dose) 14 day observation In-life observations (body wt., food consumption,
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
What are hazards in food system? Physical – Fish bones, nail, hair, etc… Chemical – Environmental pollutants Heavy metal Polymers – Pesticides – Antibiotic.
Toxicology and Chemical Exposure CEE-PUBH 5670 Hazardous Chemical Handling and Safety.
Risk Assessment Dec 4 -6, 2006.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering and Science (3rd ed.)
HYGIENE STANDARDS AND OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS
Fundamentals of Industrial Hygiene 6th Edition
Chemical Risk Assessment & Exposure Monitoring
Bi-Weekly Safety Meeting October 1, 2015
CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks.
Risk Assessment Dec 7, 2009 Timbrell 3rd Edn pp 16-21
Exposure Assessment: A Statistical Validation of Mercury Exposures in the Workplace An Analysis of Potential Workplace Exposure to Mercury from Broken.
The Consortium for Environmental Risk Management, LLC
At facilities with subsurface contamination, what other chemicals may your workers be breathing? Matt Raithel.
Case Study: Risk – Risk Comparison n-Propyl Bromide vs
Click to start.
Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
TOXICOLOGY.
Introduction to Risk Assessment
VICH GL 54, Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: General approach to establish an Acute Reference Dose (ARfD)
Presentation transcript:

CHAPTER 5 Occupational Exposure Limits and Assessment of Workplace Chemical Risks

Learning Objectives Describe how occupational exposure limits (OELs) are used in workplace risk assessment. Identify the key components of an OEL. Identify the OELs created by various organizations. Outline the process of OEL derivation. Apply available information to working conditions to assess hazardous exposure levels.

Role of OELs In Workplace Risk Assessment Hazard characterization Dose-response assessment Exposure assessment Risk characterization

Importance of OELs Provide a scientific basis to evaluate existing exposure control technologies and to identify worker health and medical surveillance needs Promote risk communication by informing workers of potentially adverse health effects of chemical exposure Provide a benchmark for exposure assessment comparisons

OEL Elements Concentration units Recommended Time Weighted Average (TWA) Additional notations

Short-Term Exposure Limit (STEL) A time-weighted average exposure limit whose averaging time is short In most organizations, a STEL is a 15-minute TWA exposure limit, although other averaging times can be specified for a given chemical.

Ceiling Limit A maximum exposure, or ceiling limit that should not be exceeded at any time during the workday

Hazard Notations Additional factors may affect the interpretation or use of OELs such as toxicity via skin absorption potential for sensitization carcinogenicity

Fundamentals of OEL Derivation 1) Define the scenario and develop the problem formulation. 2) Gather and summarize the scientific literature. 3) Select a dose point that will protect workers from the chemical’s toxic effect. 4) Perform extrapolations to increase the relevance of the point of departure: a) Adjust for route of exposure and exposure duration/patterns using default assumptions on rates of ingestion/inhalation or physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models. b) Perform animal-to-human extrapolations and human variability extrapolations c) Apply any additional uncertainty factors 5) Submit the value for external review.

No Observable Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) The highest dose that does not cause an adverse effect

Lowest Observable Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) The lowest dose that causes an adverse effect

Point of Departure (POD) The NOAEL or LOAEL that best identifies the boundary of the onset of adverse effects is selected for OEL derivation