The Collector Ring at FAIR Dmitriy Berkaev IWAPT 2015, BINP, Novosibirsk D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAIR Synchrotrons SIS100/300
Advertisements

EMMA Magnet Design Ben Shepherd Magnetics and Radiation Sources Group ASTeC STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Sergey Antipov, University of Chicago Fermilab Mentor: Sergei Nagaitsev Injection to IOTA ring.
Options for a 50Hz, 10 MW, Short Pulse Spallation Neutron Source G H Rees, ASTeC, CCLRC, RAL, UK.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnet Design Workshop: Magnet Design and Analysis Charles Spataro, NSLS-II Project NSLS-II is a new 3Gev synchrotron.
BINP for FAIR Yu.Shatunov Moscow May Research and Development Contract between GSI and BINP 1. Kickers for synchrotrons and storage rings.
March A. Chancé, J. Payet DAPNIA/SACM / Beta-beam ECFA/BENE Workshop The Decay Ring -First Design- A. Chancé, J.Payet CEA/DSM/DAPNIA/SACM.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
Vacuum Issues from the Beam Dynamics Point of View Marc Muñoz.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Magnet Design & Construction for EMMA
Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
M. Steck, RUPAC 2006, Novosibirsk Cooling of Rare Isotope Beams in the ESR Cooling by: Stochastic cooling (pre-cooling) Electron cooling (final cooling)
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
PSB H- injection concept J.Borburgh, C.Bracco, C.Carli, B.Goddard, M.Hourican, B.Mikulec, W.Weterings,
Overview of Ramp Development Giulio Stancari E-835 Collaboration Meeting Torino, May
Villars, 26 September Extra Low Energy Antiproton Ring (ELENA) for antiproton deceleration after the AD Pavel Belochitskii for the AD team On behalf.
Global Design Effort ILC Damping Rings: R&D Plan and Organisation in the Technical Design Phase Andy Wolski University of Liverpool and the Cockcroft Institute,
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Thomas Roser SPIN 2006 October 3, 2006 A Study of Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC A.U.Luccio, M.Bai, T.Roser Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton,
The power supply for magnetic elements at CR D.Senkov IWAPT 2015, BINP, Novosibirsk The power supply for magnetic elements at CR D. Senkov/
CR: status and activities at BINP I.Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk O.Dolinskyy, GSI,Darmstadt , MAC, GSI, Darmstadt.
Oleksiy Dolinskyy 23 rd October, FAIR layout of accelerators Collector Ring.
Booster Corrector Review, Oct. 10 th, 2006 E. Prebys Introduction/Specifications Eric Prebys Proton Plan Manager.
Status of CR and activity at BINP I.Koop, D.Berkaev, BINP, Novosibirsk , 6-th FAIR-GSI-BINP workshop, GSI, Darmstadt.
Optimization of the Collider rings’ optics
Beam test of slow extraction from the ESR
Oleksiy Dolinskyy 1st December, 2014
High energy beam transport.
BEAM TRANSFER CHANNELS, INJECTION AND EXTRACTION SYSTEMS
Oleksiy Dolinskyy December 1st, 2014
Schedule for the FAIR Antiproton Target
Status of HESR 18th March Gießen Dieter Prasuhn.
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
6th BINP-FAIR-GSI Workshop,
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
The Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics
General remarks about the HESR and PANDA vacuum system
ELENA Overview and Layout Start of ELENA Commissioning Next Steps
EFREMOV INSTITUTE SAINT PETERSBURG RUSSIA
Beam Collector Ring Dmitry Shwartz BINP, Novosibirsk 6th BINP-GSI-FAIR workshop
Arc magnet designs Attilio Milanese 13 Oct. 2016
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Acceleration of Polarized Protons and Deuterons at HESR/FAIR
6th BINP-GSI-FAIR workshop
Multiturn extraction for PS2
PS2 Injection/Extraction Layout
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
CEPC-SPPC Beihang Symposium
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Physics Design on Injector I
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
ILIMA Experiments in the CR
HESR for SPARC 25th November FAIR MAC Dieter Prasuhn.
CEPC Collider Magnets CHEN, Fusan November 13, 2018.
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Update on MEIC Nonlinear Dynamics Work
Fanglei Lin, Yuhong Zhang JLEIC R&D Meeting, March 10, 2016
Alternative Ion Injector Design
MEIC Alternative Design Part V
Presentation transcript:

The Collector Ring at FAIR Dmitriy Berkaev IWAPT 2015, BINP, Novosibirsk D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR1

CR Responsibility D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR2 BINP is responsible for the “general design and corresponding specifications of the CR system” (Article 4.1 of Collaboration Contract) 1.MoU between FAIR, GSI and BINP (Oct 2013) 2.Addendum to MoU (Nov 2013) 3.Collaboration Contract CC CR.HOAI (Aug 2014)

FAIR layout of accelerators D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR3 pbar-target/separator Collector Ring

Tasks of the CR* D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR4 1. Cooling of secondary beams of radioactive ion beam (RIB)   =200 mm mrad  p/p=3 % ~ 1.5 sec    0.5 mm mrad  p/p  0.05 % CR extraction RI beams to the HESR 2. Cooling of antiproton beams (P_bar)    =240 mm mrad  p/p=6 %    5 mm mrad  p/p  0.1 % extraction Pbar to the HESR ~ 10 sec CR 3. Mass spectrometer of radioactive ions RI (TOF)**    =100 mm mrad  p/p=1 % CR ~ few turns Injection RI beams from the Super-FRS E=740 MeV/u Injection from antiproton separator E=3 GeV Injection RI beams from the Super-FRS E=400 – 800 MeV/u ΔfΔf * Beam Dynamics for CR to be presented in the Dr. D. Schwartz talk ( ) ** To be presented in the Dr. S. Litvinov talk ( )

Present layout of the CR D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR5 Injection from P_bar target or SFRS Extraction to HESR RF – cavities Injection Kicker magnets Stochastic cooling Pick-Up Stochastic cooling Kickers ToF System AntiprotonsIons Perimeter, П m Rigidity, B  13 T  m Number of particles, N Kinetic energy, K3 GeV740 MeV/u Velocity, v0.971c0.830c Relativistic factor,  Betatron tunes, x, y 4.39, , 3.44 Revolution frequency,  MHz1.16 MHz RF harmonic, q1

TCR1 Line D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR6 29 GeV protons from SIS100 target station 3 GeV antiprotons From the SFRS CR 740 MeV/u RIBs TCR1 Pbar TL BINP responsibility

CR System Responsibility. Part D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR7 PSPNameResp.Resp. Persons 2.5.1System designBINPDr. I. Koop(MPL), Dr. D. Berkaev 2.5.2MagnetsBINPDr. A. Starostenko 2.5.3Power ConvertersBINPD. Senkov 2.5.4RF System*GSIDr. U. Laier 2.5.5Inj/Ext SystemBINPDr. P. Shatunov, A. Kasaev 2.5.6Beam Diagnostics**BINP/GSIYu. Rogovsky / Dr. M. Schwikert 2.5.7VacuumBINPDr. A. Krasnov, Dr, V. Anashin SC Cooling*GSIDr. C. Dimopolou Common SystemsGSIDr. Thorsten Ziglasch * To be presented in the Dr. A. Dolinskii Talk ( ) ** To be presented in the Yu. Rogovsky Talk ( )

CR Improvements D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR8 1.Optimization of the CR layout. In order to reduce the beam sizes in the Quadrupoles, Sextupoles and Dipoles approximately by 20% as compared to the initial variants of antiproton and ion optics the positions of Quadrupoles and Sextupoles in the CR arcs have been changed. This reduction was absolutely required due to the fixed parameters (apertures) of the RF cavities (PSP 2.5.4, responsibility of GSI) and Stochastic Cooling subsystem (PSP , responsibility of GSI). The result of layout optimizations is more reliable beam optics for all CR operation modes. 2.Optimization of the Quadrupole Magnets. We have come to the conclusion that to provide the required free space for other magnetic elements and beam instrumentation it is expedient to increase the number of types of the Quadrupole Magnets with a wide aperture from one to three. All these wide Quadrupole Magnets have the same production technology, very similar electric properties and properties of their Power Converters. More compact and less weighted SWQs are cheaper to manufacture. 3.Increased number of CR Narrow Quadrupole Magnets. Additional decrease in expenses is reached by means of replacement (everywhere where it is possible in CR) of weak, wide and more expensive Quadrupole Magnets with the Narrow type Quadrupole magnets. Thus, all required CR parameters are provided. Besides the advantages of the new beam optics, this replacement gives a reduction of the total CR magnet system cost. The total number of CR Quadrupole magnets is the same: 40 pcs. 4.Simplification of the steering magnets design. The presented new layout of CR allowed moving vertical orbit Steering Magnets from the Sextupole Magnets to the increased drift spaces due to the shortened Quadrupole magnets nearby the initial places. Additionally to the significant simplification of the design of the Steering Magnets, the changes provide a reduction of their aperture and power of their PoCos approximately by a factor of two. 5.Pickups have been moved from Wide Quadrupole Magnets to the closest straight section. Such the approaches led to simplify significantly the design of the both Quadrupole and Sextupole Magnets, their vacuum chambers and the design of the vertical Steering Magnets and pickups. All the improvements, performed in the close connection with the GSI experts, are aimed to the best performance of the CR and will provide more stable and long-term CR operation. The increase of antiproton and rare ion beam currents up to 25% can be expected.

CR magnets: dipole (PSP ) D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR9 Magnet typeH – type GeometryStraight yoke, sector pole Edge focusingNo CoilsRace Track IronM A Lamination thickness1 mm Number24+2 For convenience of assembling and shipment each half of the yoke is separated into three parts: 3.8 t, 17.6 t and 3.8 t, which are assembled with bolting

CR magnets: Wide Quadrupole D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR10 WQ type. 14 Quadrupole magnets in the arcs have an inscribed radius of 160 mm with an effective length of 1000 mm, G max = 4.7 T/m; SWQ type (Short Wide Quads). The rest 12 arc Quadrupole magnets have the same inscribed radius of 160 mm, but effective length is reduced to 700 mm, G max = 4.7 T/m. It can be done due to a smaller integral of quadrupole field required and the remained drift space can be used for other CR items (see 4) ; EWQ type (Extra Wide Quads). 3 Quadrupole magnets right after the injection point should have additional aperture to avoid injected beam losses. An inscribed radius of 185 mm at an effective length of 1000 mm, G max = 3.5 T/m. All these types of wide Quadrupole Magnets have the same production technology, very similar electric properties and properties of their PS.

CR magnets: Narrow Quads & Sextupoles D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR11 Increased number of CR Narrow Quadrupole Magnets (11 instead of 4 in TDR) replaces weak but Wide (and more expensive) Quadrupole Magnets at all the places of CR where it is possible while maintaining all required CR parameters. The main advantages of the reviewed CR Sextupole magnets: 1.Vertical corrector is moved from this magnet. As a consequence the aperture of the Sextupole Magnet (inscribed radius) is reduced down to 201 mm (210 in TDR). Thus, the PS requirements are reduced too: 500A, 17.3 V (580 A and 34.2 V in TDR). 2.Accurate magnetic and mechanical calculations have shown the necessity of the “return” yoke thickness increasing. Otherwise this magnet will not have enough mechanical strength (hardness). Nevertheless, total weight of the magnet is also reduced down to 1.2 t (1.4 in TDR).

Power Converters D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR12 Dipoles Current: 1400 A Voltade: 300 V Quads (three types) Current: 1500 A Voltade: 200, 100, 50 V Sextupoles Current: 500 A, Voltade: 100 V Steerers (three types) Current: 20 A (max), Voltade: 100 V

CR Vacuum D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR13 + Dr. A. Krasnov, Dr. V. Anashin, A. Semenov All chambers potentially bake- able L/s pump ports 13x2 per arc About 100p DN500 flange connections, 200 flanges in arcs 300m sealing length ! BINP decision: The only TIG welded flanges guarantee 100p DN500 fail-safe connections

Geometrical requirements for orbital TIG welding D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR14 BINP have the offer for automatic orbital TIG welding machine… …and automatic cutting machine as well. These items will be the part of the CR vacuum equipment.

CR Vacuum D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR15 Dipole 1. Decreasing number of flange connections 2. Universalization of pumping system 3. Placement of pumping ports far from Schottky resonators in all the sectors 4. The solution gives space for additional devices

Overview D. Berkaev. The Collector Ring at FAIR16 The CR is a special ring that is designed for fast cooling of RIBs and antiprotons Stochastic cooling is an essential task of the CR The optical layout of the ring is chosen to meet the requirements for most efficient stochastic cooling (incl. eta-ramping procedure) The flexibility in setting the transition energy γ tr to an optimal value is extremely important One should remember that one needs to install enough diagnostic instruments, COD corrector magnets, high order non-linear correctors