2014 Mobility Fee Update Study Adoption Reading 1 October 21, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Advertisements

Cost Behavior and Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis
Regional Water Service Development Cost Charges Update October 2014 Bryan Shoji, P.Eng. General Manager, Infrastructure Services.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
Washington County Economic Development Council Utah Alliance for Economic Development RICHFIELD MEETING Friday, 13 July 2012.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
Multi-Modal Concurrency PSRC TRAC-UW Depart of Urban Design and Planning Evans School.
Alachua County Mobility Plan Southwest Alachua County Transportation Improvement District Jonathan B. Paul, AICP, MA 2 Jeffrey L. Hays Chris Dawson, AICP.
The Effects of Different Land Uses in Missouri on Local Fiscal Conditions – Cost of Community Services Project Update – 4/12/02.
Alachua County Mobility Plan Transportation Improvement District Overview Jonathan B. Paul, AICP, MA 2 Jeffery L. Hays.
Law Enforcement Impact Fee Study Update Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing January 15, 2013.
1 Impact Fees in Virginia Virginia Municipal League Annual Conference October 15, 2007 Jeffrey S. Gore Hefty & Wiley, P.C.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDS vs DEVELOPMENT CHARGES.
Bae Economic Impact of San Francisco’s Cruise Industry June 8, 2007.
Economic Incentive Plan and Impact Fee Update Board of County Commissioners Work Session February 7, 2012.
MOBILITY FEES, SMART GROWTH AND FUNDING July 11, 2012.
Sunshine Coast Regional District Development Cost Charges July 3, 2014 Infrastructure Services Committee Bob Twerdoff.
2030 Mobility Plan City of Jacksonville Planning and Development Department January 2011.
The Alachua County Mobility Plan:
1. New Starts Program Debate Preserving the American Dream Conference Washington, DC October 27, 2013 Art Guzzetti Vice President – Policy American Public.
Economics of Congestion Jagadish Guria Presentation to the the 8th Annual New Zealand Transport Summit 25 February 2008.
Alachua County Mobility Plan Springhills Transportation Improvement District and Santa Fe Village Developer’s Agreement October 28, 2014.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Pool Sales Tax Study Group Perspectives. Pool Study Group Black Jack Clarkson Valley Greendale Florissant St. Louis County University City Webster Groves.
January 20, 2016 Dave Kubik, Dubuque County Assessor and Rick Engelken, Dubuque City Assessor.
But-For Determination Report & Cost-Benefit Analysis October 14, 2015 Tom Denaway – Assistant Vice President Springsted Incorporated 9229 Ward Parkway,
Revenue Projections Fiscal Year 2012 Hampton City Council February 23, 2011 Revenue Projections 2012.
Fiscal Impact Analysis – City of Norwalk, Connecticut October 5, 2006 Prepared by:RKG Associates, Inc. Economic, Planning and Real Estate Consultants 277.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
4701 Sangamore Road S240 | Bethesda, MD | (800) Ext
1 Transportation Impact Fees and Street Maintenance Fees Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department January 21, 2010.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
Island County Comprehensive Plan 2016 Review and Update Buildable Lands Analysis Results 1.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
1 Pasco County Strategic Plan and Budget Overview.
1 Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2011 May 10, 2010.
2014 Mobility Fee Update Study Stakeholder Kick-off Meeting March 20, 2014.
Taxes and Government 5.3. HOW DOES IT WORK?  Government receives funds from taxes and borrowing (i.e. bonds issued)  LARGEST part of funds comes from.
MCSD 5-YEAR FORECAST PRESENTED MAY 19, 2016 BY RANDY BERTRAM, TREASURER BOARD APPROVAL MAY 23, 2016.
June 14, Where does the money come from? Total Revenues Collected $363,449.
Transportation Impact Fee BCC Public Hearing
Presentation to NORA 2016 Annual Summit Creative Financing Strategies
Sources of Government Revenue Ch. 9
Induced Travel: Definition, Forecasting Process, and A Case Study in the Metropolitan Washington Region A Briefing Paper for the National Capital Region.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Two Rivers: Small City Perspective on State-Local Finance
Proposed Budget for Adoption
RPS Modeling Results Second Round
City of Madras System Development Charges
March 8, 2011 County of San Diego Economic Update
Transportation Impact Fee Study
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
Summit County – Canyons Employee Housing
Mobility Fee Model Process Standardization
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Transportation System Development Charge Working Group
Alternative Road Impact Fee Methodologies
Transportation Impact Fees and Funding
Presentation and Discussion of the Draft Transportation Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan Report (Impact Fee Report) Town Council.
System Development Charge (SDC) Basics
Capital Improvement Plans
Schedule of Taxes, Fees, and Charges Annual Update Fiscal Year 2015
Davidson County FY County Manager’s Proposed Budget
Funding the Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP): A Discussion of Cash Flows Town Council Meeting February 15, 2017.
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
First Interim Financial Report
Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan
Sustainable Agricultural Lands Conservation Program
Public Workshop September 26, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

2014 Mobility Fee Update Study Adoption Reading 1 October 21, 2014

Presentation Outline Summarize Need for Mobility Fee Principles of its Calculation Update Process Changes from 2011 Fee Recommended Fee Schedule 2

What is a Mobility Fee? One-time charge on travel-generating development to help fund needed transportation system capacity. Developed consistent with adopted comprehensive/transportation plan (LRTP). 3

Why do we need one? Efficient, safe, and predictable transportation system fosters economic growth Contributes to quality of life (less travel time required for daily activities) Diversifies revenue sources Mobility fee $$ can leverage other $$ 4

Why do we need one? Rate of growth outpaces rate of system expansion Consider: In 2010, roads in Pasco carried about 9M vehicle- miles of travel (vmt) If 2.3%/yr growth, by 2040, we’ll add 8M vmt At $447/vmc, that costs $3.6B (at a 1:1 ratio) In-place State, County tax revenues generate ~$2.0B – so, we need (at least) another $1.6B or more. 5

How is the fee calculated? Fee = Travel Generated x Cost of Capacity – Credits – Incentives Where: Travel Generated: [# Trips x Trip Length x % New Trips / 2] Cost of Capacity: Multi-modal, per LRTP, QoS Credits: Self-generated $$ for capacity (e.g. gas tax, P4P) Incentives: Gov’t pays for portion of fee for incentivized uses using taxes from non-growth sources. 6

How is the fee calculated? CAR=0.8 CAR=1.25 CAR=1.33 CAR= “Capacity Addition Ratio” 7

How is the fee calculated? Incentives for location of development (Urban, Suburban, Rural, Harbors Re-Development Area) Incentives for form of development (MUTRM, TND, TOD) Incentives for job-creation/tourism (Office, Industrial, and Lodging) 8

Changes from 2011 Fee Overall goal to keep fees the same, expand incentives Added incentives for “West/Harbors” market area and MUTRM land use. Increased Suburban and Rural Office, Industrial and Lodging incentives to 100% at an additional cost of $14M. 9

Changes from 2011 Fee Suburban MUTRM and TND fee matches Urban MUTRM and TND fees. Reduced incentives for TOD from 100% to 75% Added “Mining” land use Re-classified Mini-Warehouse from Industrial to Retail 10

Changes from 2011 Fee Incorporated adoption of 5-cent 2 nd LOGT Continues reliance on Penny for Pasco sales tax and tax increment revenue commitment to transportation $420.9 million incentive “budget” 11

Allocation of Incentive Budget 12

Extent of Incentives 13 “% Incentivized” means the percentage by which the non-incentivized fee is reduced. Therefore, a 100% incentive means the fee is zero. The numbers indicated are the average by class of use

Changes from 2011 Fee 839 specific fees (76 Land Uses x 11 Areas + 3) 307 new categories or uses (MUTRM, Harbors/ West Redevelopment Area, mining) 267 higher due to reduced incentives or re- classification (TND, TOD, mini-warehouse) 40 lower due to increased employment/ tourism incentives 16 lower due to revised travel characteristics 225 of 228 original “standard” fees are lower or remain unchanged 14

Growth vs. “Base” Funding Relationship Mobility Fees make up about 42 percent of estimated capital revenues, vs about 33 percent in the 2011 study. “Growth” generates about 63 percent of estimated capital revenues, vs about 54 percent in the 2011 plan. Proportions are affected by rate of growth. 15

Nearby County Transportation Impact Fee Rates 16

Church Fee Mobility fee based on weekday trip generation. Architectural standards indicate 12 to 20 s.f. per seat for sanctuary only. Example: 300-seat sanctuary (3,600 to 6,000 s.f.) 17 Breakeven s.f.

Church Fee Other “non-church” significant weekday activities (e.g. pre-school or schools) are assessed separately. Since weekday activities usually occur in non- sanctuary space, per/1,000 s.f., and churches with less resources and less s.f. will pay smaller fee for more modest facilities, staff recommends staying with /1,000 s.f. method. 18

End of Presentation 19

How is the fee calculated? 20

How Do We Compare? Pasco in 2010 Pasco in 2035, per 2035 LRTP Orange Co. Pinellas Co. Hillsborough Co. 21

Fee Benefit Districts 22