Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

Argumentation.
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Classical and Toulmin, Models Junior AP English September 23, 2008.
Text Table of Contents #5 and #8: Evaluating the Argument.
Welcome to Dave Penner’s Presentation on Inductive Reasoning!
Philosophy 103 Linguistics 103 More Introductory Logic: Critical Thinking
Logic and Reasoning Panther Prep North Central High School.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
Analysis of Diagnostic Essay: The Deductive Argument English 102 Argumentation.
Deduction and Induction
For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.
LOGIC AND CRITICAL THINKING
Causality, Reasoning in Research, and Why Science is Hard
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
INDUCTION. GENUS: General principle DIFFERENTIA: which states that events in nature are REGULAR, not RANDOM ANALYTIC DEF’N // The past, while not a carbon.
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) December 23, 2005.
Responding Critically to Texts
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
Section 2-3 Deductive Reasoning. Types of Reasoning:
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
DEDUCTIVE REASONING MOVES FROM A GENERALIZATION THAT IS TRUE OR SELF-EVIDENT TO A MORE SPECIFIC CONCLUSION DEDUCTIVE REASONING.
An Introduction to Logic And Fallacious Reasoning
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
HOW TO CRITIQUE AN ARGUMENT
Theory of Knowledge Ms. Bauer
0 Validity & Invalidity (Exercises) All dogs have two heads. 2. All tigers are dogs. ___________________________________ 3. All tigers have two.
DEDUCTIVE VS. INDUCTIVE REASONING. Problem Solving Logic – The science of correct reasoning. Reasoning – The drawing of inferences or conclusions from.
BBI 3420 Critical Reading and Thinking Critical Reading Strategies: Identifying Arguments.
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
Chapter 32: How to Read an Essay. General Questions (pp ) What does the word, phrase, clause, or sentence mean? Is the claim true? Are the claims.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning
I think therefore I am - Rene Descartes. REASON (logic) It has been said that man is a rational animal. All my life I have been searching for evidence.
What is an argument? An argument is, to quote the Monty Python sketch, "a connected series of statements to establish a definite proposition." Huh? Three.
Text Table of Contents #5: Evaluating the Argument.
1 Lesson 7: Arguments SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
Part One: Assessing the Inference, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Chapter 7. Propositional and Predicate Logic
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Logic and Reasoning.
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
What is Inductive Reasoning?
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
The Reasoning Process Inductive Reasoning
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Introduction to Logic PHIL 240 Sections
Validity and Soundness
Formulating a logical argument using Inductive and Deductive Reasoning
Logic, Philosophical Tools Quiz Review…20 minutes 10/31
DEDUCTIVE vs. INDUCTIVE REASONING
Arguments.
Inductive and Deductive Logic
…or, “Stop your lippy attitude.”
Making Sense of Arguments
Logic Problems and Questions
Section 3-6 Inductive Reasoning.
Definitions: Evidence-Based Claims- 1.) the ability to take detailed
Logical Fallacies.
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Phil2303 intro to logic.
Key Terms: Deductive vs. Inductive Reasoning
Structuring and Analyzing Arguments: The Toulmin Model
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Business Research Methods William G. Zikmund
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?

 Arguments intend to convince us to accept a conclusion – i.e., a position, claim, belief, etc.  Why does the author want us to accept this conclusion?  Reasons tell us why that conclusion should be accepted.  Will Ferrell Will Ferrell

 For each sentence ask: ◦ Does this sentence support the conclusion?  Or does it make sense when you precede the sentence with: ◦ The conclusion is true because …

 Reasons + Inferences  Conclusion  The acceptability of a conclusion depends on ◦ the quality of the reasons (evidence) ◦ the validity of the inferences (logic)

 Infer  deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements (Oxford dictionary)  Inference is the “connection” between the reason and the conclusion.  Validity of inference ◦ does not refer to truth of premise or conclusion ◦ refers to the form of the inference ◦ i.e., how the inference is drawn  A word about inference - induction vs. deduction  induction – results in probable conclusion  deduction results in certain conclusion

People who forecast the weather (meteorologists) are well educated. The weather forecasts for the past 200 days have been 85% accurate. The forecasts for the past 11 days have predicted hot weather and each day the temperature was at least 88 degrees. The forecast for tomorrow is for the weather to be hot. Therefore, the weather tomorrow will probably be hot.

1. People who forecast the weather (meteorologists) are well educated. 2. The weather forecasts for the past 200 days have been 85% accurate. 3. The forecasts for the past 11 days have predicted hot weather and each day the temperature was at least 88 degrees. 4. The forecast for tomorrow is for the weather to be hot. Conclusion: Therefore the weather tomorrow will probably be hot.

UH Hilo should increase the tuition rate charged per credit. Many college scholarships never get awarded because students don’t apply for them. Also, the added funding would allow UHH to hire more faculty and offer more courses which would decrease the number of semesters for graduation for many students.

1. Many college scholarships never get awarded because students don’t apply for them. 2. Also, the added funding would allow UHH to hire more faculty and offer more courses which would decrease the number of semesters for graduation for many students. Conclusion: UH Hilo should increase the tuition rate charged per credit.

 All fruits are sweet.  A banana is a fruit.  Therefore, a banana is sweet.  For the conclusion to be necessarily true, the premises need to be true.

 Leading from true premises to a false conclusion.  All apples are fruit. (correct)  Bananas are fruit. (correct)  Therefore, bananas are apples. (incorrect)  Do you understand why this argument is invalid?

 When a valid argument is used to derive a false conclusion from false premises, the inference is valid because it follows the form of a correct inference.  A valid argument with false premises may lead to a false conclusion: ◦ All tall people are Greek. (incorrect) ◦ John Lennon was tall. (correct) ◦ Therefore, John Lennon was Greek. (incorrect)  Do you understand why this argument is valid?

 A valid argument can also be used to derive a true conclusion from false premises: ◦ All tall people are musicians (incorrect) ◦ John Lennon was tall (correct) ◦ Therefore, John Lennon was a musician (correct)  Do you understand why this argument is valid?

 Facts, examples, analogies, statistics, authorities, etc.  Observations, beliefs, principles  Later we will explore more thoroughly how to evaluate the quality of evidence