Quantitative morphology, recent evolution, and future activity of the Kameni Islands volcano, Santorini, Greece by David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere Volume 2(5): August 30, 2006 ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 1. General location (A) and geological map (B) of Santorini, and the intracaldera Kameni Islands, after Druitt et al. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 1. HISTORICAL ACTIVITY OF THE KAMENI ISLANDS. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 2. TYPICAL FEATURES OF THE KAMENI DACITE LAVAS. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 3. DEVELOPMENT OF EIGHTEENTH- AND NINETEENTH-CENTURY FLOW FIELDS. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 4. DEVELOPMENT OF TWENTIETH-CENTURY FLOW FIELDS. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 2. Flow lengths as a function of time for the eruptions in 1925–1926 and 1939–1941, based on field maps and observations in Kténas (1926) and Georgalas and Papastamatiou (1951, 1953). David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 3. Light detection and ranging laser radar (LiDAR) return intensity map. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 4. Hill-shaded digital map of the Kameni Islands, based on light detection and ranging laser radar (LiDAR) data. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 5. Elevation map of the Kameni Islands, shown as elevation above mean sea level. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 6. Orthorectified aerial photograph mosaic of the Kameni Islands, April David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 7. Interpreted geological map of the Kameni Islands, based on the new imagery and on previous maps compiled by Georgalas (1962), Huijsmans (1985), and Druitt et al. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 8. (A) Expanded map section showing the revised interpretation of the 1939–1941 lavas, with the inferred flow paths shown with arrows (+ symbols show the UTM grid intersections). David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 5. LEVÉE AND FLOW DIMENSIONS. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 9. Cross section showing a classical levée structure across the 1866 SW lava flow. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 6. YIELD STRENGTHS, ASSUMING BINGHAM RHEOLOGY. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 10. Surface buckling shown in a topographic section along the 1925 SE lava flow, with the underlying slope removed. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 11. Contour map of the spectral power (arbitrary scale) of the different fold wavelengths in a set of five parallel profiles, spaced 2 m apart, along the length of the 1866 SW lava flow. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 7. WAVELENGTHS OF FOLDS. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 12. Graph showing the relationship between the length of the measuring rule (x axis) against the gross length of the planform for the 1925 N flow. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 13. Comparison of fractal dimensions determined for Nea Kameni blocky a‘a flows with data from basaltic a‘a and pahoehoe flows from Hawaii and Galapagos (Bruno et al., 1992, 1994). David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 8. GROWTH OF DOMES DURING THE 1866 AND 1939 ERUPTIONS. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 14. Lava dome height (m) as a function of growth time, showing data from the 1866 and 1939 eruptions of the Kameni Islands (1866 Giorgios dome; 1939 Fouqué dome; Table 8), the Soufrière volcano of St. Vincent eruption (1979; Huppert et al., 1982), an... David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

TABLE 9. INFERRED ERUPTION LENGTHS FROM DOME HEIGHT. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 15. Graph showing the areal distribution of known vents from the Kameni Islands. David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America

Figure 16. Relationship between eruption length and intereruptive interval for the last five eruptions of the Kameni Islands (1707–1711, 1866–1870, 1925–1928, 1939–1941, 1950). David M. Pyle, and John R. Elliott Geosphere 2006;2: ©2006 by Geological Society of America