G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks1 Heterogeneous Detector Networks Sky Localization with 3G Detectors May 26, 2016 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Advertisements

September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
Microchannel Plates signals, Picosecond timing, Design’s minimum performance.
Louis J. Rubbo, Neil J. Cornish, and Olivier Poujade Support for this project was provided by the NASA EPSCoR program.
LIGO-G W Gregory Mendell, LIGO Hanford Observatory on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration StackSlide Summary LSC Meeting, August 2005.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
Gravitational-waves: Sources and detection
Parameter Estimation Using 3.5 post-Newtonian Inspiral Waveforms GWDAW, December 15-18, 2004, Annecy K. Arun, B.R. Iyer, B.S. Sathyaprakash and P. Sundarajan.
Brennan Ireland Rochester Institute of Technology Astrophysical Sciences and Technology December 5, 2013 LIGO: Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave.
Capabilities of a Gravitational Wave Network Bernard F Schutz Albert Einstein Institute (Potsdam, Germany) and School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff.
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
Cavalier Fabien on behalf LAL group Orsay GWDAW 10 December, 14 th 2005 Reconstruction of Source Location using the Virgo-LIGO network Presentation of.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
8/13/2004 Stefan Ballmer, MIT / LIGO Hanford G Directional Stochastic Search: a Gravitational Wave Radiometer Stefan Ballmer Massachusetts.
DelayRatio: A Gravitational Wave Event Physical Likelihood Estimator Based on Detection Delays and SNR Ratios Amber L. Stuver LIGO Livingston ObservatoryCalifornia.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Mock Data Production, Characteristics, and Confusion Background WG4 f2f – Nice 09/01/10 Tania Regimbau.
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
A coherent null stream consistency test for gravitational wave bursts Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G Z The AURIGA-LIGO Joint Burst Search L. Cadonati, G. Prodi, L. Baggio, S. Heng, W. Johnson, A. Mion, S. Poggi, A. Ortolan, F. Salemi, P.
1SBPI 16/06/2009 Heterodyne detection with LISA for gravitational waves parameters estimation Nicolas Douillet.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Analysis of Signals from Misaligned Interferometers M. Rakhmanov, S. Klimenko Department of Physics, University of Florida,
Solution of the Inverse Problem for Gravitational Wave Bursts Massimo Tinto JPL/CIT LIGO Seminar, October 12, 2004 Y. Gursel & M. Tinto, Phys. Rev. D,
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
S.Klimenko, August 2005, LSC, G Z Constraint likelihood analysis with a network of GW detectors S.Klimenko University of Florida, in collaboration.
Amaldi-7 meeting, Sydney, Australia, July 8-14, 2007 LIGO-G Z All-Sky Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts during the fifth LSC Science Run Igor.
8/13/101 Updates on the simulation. 8/13/102 Some news I finally have the event generator working, for which the ‘physics’ event has 5 D D 0 bar,
A fully coherent analysis can be performed when data is available from three or more non-aligned detectors Generalization of collocated Hanford detector.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
LIGO- G D Experimental Upper Limit from LIGO on the Gravitational Waves from GRB Stan Whitcomb For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Informal.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
Joint LIGO-Virgo data analysis Inspiral and Burst Summary of the first project results Overview of the future activities M.-A. Bizouard (LAL-Orsay) on.
GWDAW10, UTB, Dec , Search for inspiraling neutron star binaries using TAMA300 data Hideyuki Tagoshi on behalf of the TAMA collaboration.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
LIGO-G Z TFClusters Tuning for the LIGO-TAMA Search Patrick Sutton LIGO-Caltech.
S5 First Epoch BNS Inspiral Results Drew Keppel 1 representing the Inspiral Group 1 California Institute of Technology Nov LSC Meeting MIT, 4 November.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
LIGO-G Z Status of the LIGO-TAMA Joint Bursts Search Patrick Sutton LIGO Laboratory, Caltech, for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Working Group.
January 20, 2009 ET-WP3 Geometryy 1 ET Geometry/Topology Some possible studies January 20, 2009 B. Mours.
Elisa manoni SuperB meeting June 17, SuperB meeting, Physics + Computing session July 17, 2009 B reco studies in FastSim: status report Elisa Manoni.
By: Daniel Coelho Matthew Szydagis Robert Svoboda Improving Electron / Gamma Separation LBNE Software Fermilab, ILFebruary 1, 2013.
Search for gravitational waves from binary inspirals in S3 and S4 LIGO data. Thomas Cokelaer on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Capitalizing on GW polarization bias
Electromagnetic Follow-ups of LIGO/Virgo Triggers
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
Searching for Gravitational-Wave Bursts (GWBs) associated with Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) during the LIGO S5 run Isabel Leonor University of Oregon (for the.
Coherent detection and reconstruction
Travis Hansen, Marek Szczepanczyk, Michele Zanolin
M.-A. Bizouard, F. Cavalier
Background estimation in searches for binary inspiral
Some Illustrative Use Cases
LISA Data Analysis & Sources
Update on LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Status and Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Data Analysis
Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Joint bar-IFO observations
Presentation transcript:

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks1 Heterogeneous Detector Networks Sky Localization with 3G Detectors May 26, 2016 Daniel Sigg LIGO Hanford Observatory

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks2 Issue  Sky localization is vital  EM counter parts (maybe)  Full waveform reconstruction  Distance determination (z goes into source frame mass)  Full Sky Coverage  Advanced detectors:  Network with 4-5 detectors of similar sensitivity  Sky localization by triangulation  3G detectors:  Network probably much smaller  Sky localization by polarization?  Heterogeneous network with Advanced detectors?

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks3 Basics  Inverse problem solved: Gürsel, Tinto 1989  Requires 3 detectors: not collinear, not coplanar (can be collocated)  For example: 3 L’s randomly on Earth, or 1 Δ & 1 L, or 2 Δ’s  With similar detectors combined SNR matters (detector null fine)  Sky location by polarization and antenna pattern  Triangulation:  Need 3 facilities minimum  Base length matters & high frequency signals give better timing  Tends to be superior (on Earth approx. factor of 10 in angle)  SNR of worst detector determines resolution (detector null bad)  Monte Carlo code combines both methods

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks4 Advanced Detector Network Klimenko,Vedovat o Low SNR events dominate in plot!

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks5 Triangulation Error Time Resolution Effective Bandwidth Fairhurst

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks6 Heterogeneous Networks  1-2 3G detector facilities + advanced detectors  Cut on high SNR events in 3G detector  Solid angle reduction (SNR 3G/AD ~ 10)  Add one 3G facility: ~2  Add two 3G facilities: ~10  Three 3G facilities: ~70 (due to reduced bandwidth)  Will allow for distance measurements  Two 3G facilities on their own?

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks7 Double Trigon Configuration

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks8 Solid angle for SNR 100 events (BW 50Hz) Polarization & TimingPolarization alone

G v1Heterogeneous Detector Networks9 Open Questions  How important is accurate sky localization?  Is the sky localization of the advanced detector network good enough for 3G physics?  If not, need more than one 3G facility  How important is full sky coverage?  If you can see all binary inspiral events, you can subtract/veto them from the stochastic background!  How many facilities can we afford?  Trade off: 3 L’s vs 2 Δ’s ?  Need MC code simulations