Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.
Advertisements

Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0550r0 May 2015 K. Yunoki and B. Zhao, KDDI R&D Labs.Slide 1 L-Preamble Issues for UL-OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0354r1 March 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 Bandwidth granularity on UL-OFDMA data allocation Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Uplink Multi-User MIMO Protocol Design
Submission doc.: IEEE /0567r0 May 2015 Xiaofei Wang (InterDigital)Slide 1 Multi-STA BA for SU Transmissions Date: Authors:
Submission Vida Ferdowsi, NewracomSlide 1 doc.: IEEE /0856r0July 2015 Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1096r0 Sep 2015 John Son et al., WILUSSlide 1 Recovery Procedures in Cascading Sequences Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission September 2015 doc.: IEEE /1328r0 November 2015 Yujin Noh, Newracom Slide 1 Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1265r1 November 2015 Slide 1 RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control Date: Authors: NameAffiliationAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1280r1 November 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0843r1 July 2015 Submission(ZTE) UL MU Random Access Analysis Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Yonggang.
Doc.: IEEE /1047r0 September 2015 SubmissionStéphane Baron et. al., Canon Random RU selection process upon TF-R reception Date: Slide.
Doc.: IEEE /0066r0 Submission January 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Downlink OFDMA Protocol Design Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1052r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Bandwidth for UL MU Transmission Date: Authors: September 2015.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0042r2 January 2016 Geonjung Ko, WILUSSlide 1 BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1034r0 Submission September 2015 Yongho Seok, NEWRACOM Notification of Operating Mode Changes Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0331r1 March 2016 Kome Oteri (InterDigital)Slide 1 Power Control for Multi-User Transmission in ax Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0591r1 May 2016 SubmissionPatrice NEZOU et al., Canon Issues related to OCW management Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
HE Trigger Frame Format
Submission doc.: IEEE /0674r0 May 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 EIFS excess problem of Acknowledgement for UL MU procedure Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0048r0 SubmissionSlide 1Young Hoon Kwon, Newracom Protection using MU-RTS/CTS Date: Authors: January 2016.
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
Location Measurement Protocol for Unassociated STAs
Sleep States in IEEE ax Simulation Scenarios
Virtual CS during UL MU Date: Authors: March 2017
Month Year doc.: IEEE /1081r0 September, 2015
Compressed Uplink Trigger Frame
Scheduling Information for UL OFDMA Acknowledgement
AP access procedure for UL MU operation
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Traffic priority for random Multi User Uplink OFDMA
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
MAC Calibration Results
MAC Capabilities Info. in HE Capabilities IE
Issues related to OCW management
RTS*/CTS* for UL/DL OFDMA Control
Regarding UL MU protection
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
MAC Clarifications Date: Authors: September 2016
Issue of Buffer Status reporting
Follow up on Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Duration/ID field in UL-MU
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
Data field in HE PPDU Date: Authors: September 2015
Regarding buffer status of UL-STAs in UL-OFDMA
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results
Explicit Block Ack Request in DL MU PPDU
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
UL MU Random Access Analysis
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
OFDMA performance in 11ax
BSS Color Settings for a Multiple BSSID Set
Reception Status of Frames Transmitted in Random Access RUs
May 2016 doc.: IEEE /584r1 May 2016 Need of SDU Fragmentation to Reduce Padding Ratio in UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Yu Wang.
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
NAV Update Rule Considering UL MU Operation
Location Measurement Protocol for 11ax
Regarding trigger frame in UL MU
80MHz/160MHz Protection Date: Authors: Date: September 2010
WUR with conventional power save
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue related to unused UL OFDMA RUs Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress Stéphane BARON Canon Cesson-Sevigné, France Patrice NEZOU Romain GUIGNARD Pascal VIGER

doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Introduction Slide 2 UL MU OFDMA transmission is now part of ax The TGax SFD [1] includes specifications for the UL MU OFDMA operation A-MPDU MAC padding is required [2]: –The transmission from all the STAs in an UL MU PPDU shall end at the time indicated in Trigger frame. –The A-MPDU padding per each STA follows the 11ac procedure. The TGax SFD [1] includes also specifications for the random access Trigger Frame (TF-R) A STA randomly selects any one of the assigned RUs for random access and transmits its UL PPDU in the selected RU Through simulation, ratio of unused RUs can be high (see next slides) This presentation discusses about a possible issue due to unused OFDMA RUs

doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Legacy collision issue already identified in the case of early STA TX termination Extract from [2]: ( /0876, “Duration and MAC Padding for MU PPDUs”, S. Merlin, slide 10) –Each channel/stream occupied by the UL MU PPDU should be maintained busy for the time indicated by AP –If a STA was allowed to end its transmission earlier, the unused sub-channel could be acquired by an OBSS STA, which may initiate a transmissions, potentially resulting in: Interference with the following DL BAs –Immediate BA not possible for STAs that terminated earlier Corrupted reception of the remaining UL MU PPDUs due to interference at AP In particular, the primary channel should not be left unused while other STAs are completing the UL MU PPDU transmission on secondary channels –Certain receiver algorithms may be affected by sudden termination of one stream –The virtual protection provided by trigger frame (NAV) or UL MU PPDU PHY preamble (deferral for the PPDU duration) is not fully reliable against OBSS [3] –Power save from early termination does not seem relevant Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Number of unused RUs in MU_UL OFDMA is also significant… (especially in random access) Example of simulation results for random RU allocation (TF-R): Note: some scheduled RUs may also be empty (because scheduled station still in doze state, or no data ready for tx) Slide 4 Efficiency > 33% 20% < Unused RU < 57% Efficiency > 33% 35%<Unused RU<57%

doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Issue : unused RUs modify busy detection ? A STA performs the energy-detect (ED) per single 20 MHz channel. Unused RUs can mislead (legacy or foreign OBSS) STAs, so they start transmitting. –STA thinks the 20MHz sub-channel is free (false ED) Slide 5 TF-R Quaternary channel Primary channel Secondary channel Tertiary channel TF-R ACK SIFS OFDMA UL (random allocation) Used RU Collided RU Unused RU Non-ht duplicate

doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Slide 6 Conclusion We note that the MU uplink transmission may lead to have unused RUs, and thus low-energy on corresponding 20MHz channel. We suppose that this could impact the tentatively reserved MU TXOP, by letting other (legacy/OBSS) transmission occur (same issue as the case of early termination of RU). –As the efficiency of OFDMA random access is already low (<37%), it shall not be more damaged due to amount of unused RUs. What are the possible solutions ? –Maintain the energy level of the partially used 20Mhz channels ?

doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Slide 7 References [1] 11-15/0132r15 “Tgax Specification Framework”, [2] 11-15/0876r1 “Duration and MAC Padding for MU PPDUs”, Simone Merlin (Qualcomm). [3] 11-15/0367r0 “OBSS preamble detection”, Gwen Barriac (Qualcomm)

doc.: IEEE /0333r0 March 2016 SubmissionStéphane Baron et al., Canon Slide 8 Straw Poll 1 Do you agree that some configurations of unused OFDMA RUs are potentially critical for MU OFDMA TXOP, and that a further study is required ? Y/N/A