Effective Routes to Innovation 14 th October 2015 Steve Shaw Executive Director E: T: W:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electric Vehicles Industrial Cluster - NPO IKEM Corp. (Business entity of EVIC) Changing the Government Agenda of EU's poorest countries using the power.
Advertisements

Technology readiness levels in a nutshell
Professionalism in IT - the UK perspective Susie Kay BCS Director of Professionalism.
OECD/INFE High-level Principles for the evaluation of financial education programmes Adele Atkinson, PhD OECD With the support of the Russian/World Bank/OECD.
National Academic Reference Standards
Envision – Architect – Prove Scott Mauvais Technical Director Microsoft Technology Center.
ESIF Priority Areas and Detailed Design Workshop Tuesday 2 December 2014 Sheffield Hallam University The Sheffield City Region and Innovation Yasmin Knight,
Universities as actors in the (regional) innovation system
Viewpoint Consulting – Committed to your success.
EPSRC Collaboration Fund 23 June 2010 Sam Decombel Finance South East.
Nutrition 564: Marketing Objectives:  Review the history of marketing  Define terms  Describe the marketing process  Identify elements to be used in.
Advancing Government through Collaboration, Education and Action Financial Innovation and Transformation Shared Services Workshop March 17, 2015.
Employment NTO Who is Tony Green? - Chief Executive of the Employment NTO Previous job - Regional Commercial Director, Central Opencast 20 years experience.
An Enterprising University Roger Ford Chair of Innovation and Technology Strategy.
Supporting technology transfer: The role of business incubators John Gabriel Goddard Knowledge Economy Forum VII Ancona, Italy.
Political Leadership How to influence! And Current OH Issues Carol Bannister Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom.
The LOGIIC Consortium Zachary Tudor, CISSP, CISM, CCP Program Director SRI International.
Funding for supporting sustainable innovation/ SDI Business Support Program 24 th April 2012.
Open Source Grid Computing in the Finance Industry Alex Efimov STFC Kite Club Knowledge Exchange Advisor UK CERN Technology Transfer Officer
Break Dengue in a Nutshell. WHAT WE WILL DO? Joint all forces against Dengue Leverage the power of social movements Be a pilot for other NTD fighting.
Global APC Content Review Project Update February 2015.
Expert Input : Review of Days 1 & 2 1. Forum Days 1 & 2 2 Overview of Days’ 1 & 2 Themes, Sessions, and Guiding Questions.
INNOWATER Introduction to Business Proposition Toolkit July 2013.
EPOS Preparatory phase Torild van Eck (ORFEUS) Call INFRA Deadline: December 3, 2009 Funding: between 3 and 6 MEuro Duration: max 4 year.
The Brain Project – Building Research Background Part of JISC Virtual Research Environments (Phase 3) Programme Based at Coventry University with Leeds.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
© 2001 Change Function Ltd USER ACCEPTANCE TESTING Is user acceptance testing of technology and / or processes a task within the project? If ‘Yes’: Will.
SME Instrument. Eligibility Criteria At least one SME established in EU member state or associated country Projects at a TRL level.
Technology Commercialization Technology Commercialization, 2011 Sanjay Dhole, Technology Programs Coordinator Maricopa SBDC.
How it Works There is a degree of flexibility within projects, so all aspects can be discussed and tailored on an individual basis. This includes: ¤ Project.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
ICAJ/PAB - Improving Compliance with International Standards on Auditing Planning an audit of financial statements 19 July 2014.
BIMILACI 2007 THE CHALLENGE OF CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT Washington, May 11, 2007 Bayo Adeola FIDIC Executive Committee.
Engaging with End–Users of Research OCTOBER 2015 Cathy Harris MBA, MInstKT Research Engagement Manager Research & Enterprise Extn 6755,
Research and Innovation Actions Innovation Actions Coordination and Support Actions Public Procurement of Innovative Solutions Co-fund SME Instrument ERANET.
Driving Innovation V Driving Innovation V Invitation to further collaboration Dr Anne Miller Environmental Sustainability KTN.
EUROPEAN HUB EU Funds for SMEs and Startups Innovation and Investment.
Collaborative & Interpersonal Leadership
Youth Engagement & Entrepreneurship
Alternative delivery models in public services
ICT22 – 2016: Technologies for Learning and Skills ICT24 – 2016: Gaming and gamification Francesca Borrelli DG CONNECT, European Commission BRUXELLES.
NIHR Invention for Innovation (i4i)
Information, Information, Information The Review of NSS and Unistats
NATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK IN SERBIA
Innovation Supports for SMEs
NAWF Women Entrepreneurs Empowerment through Entrepreneurship & Innovation How can large corporations help integrate women entrepreneurs into their network?
Keywords: Capstone design course, business plan, interdisciplinary collaboration Integration of Real-life Engineering Design Problems into Engineering.
Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.
XS2I4MS – Final Event of the Mentoring and Coaching Programme
SAMPLE Develop a Comprehensive Competency Framework
Building the foundations for innovation
Observatory, Service catalogue, Marketplace and SME end-user club
Open Source Innovation within your Business Model Innovation
Bringing EU Cybersecurity & privacy research results closer to the market Cybersecurity.
Handout 1: Identify personal and professional development requirements
Innovation procurement
Reduce the Cost and Risk of Outsourced Technical Support
Socio economic benefits of highways maintenance
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
The Polymer Helpdesk 28th November 2016 Steve Shaw Executive Director
Youth Engagement & Entrepreneurship
Four Models to Guide AT Projects Intending Innovative Technology Development Outcomes Joseph P. Lane Center on Knowledge Translation for Technology Transfer.
STEM Ambassadors – an overview
SILICE SinnoLAB Model- Social Start-up Generator 1.2
The EU pilot programme on Environmental Technology Verification (ETV)
Growing Indonesia: A Triangular Approach
Taking the STANDARDS Seriously
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
Yelena Shevchenko Director of Strategic Planning and
Prof. Kiran Kalia, Director NIPER Ahmedabad
Presentation transcript:

Effective Routes to Innovation 14 th October 2015 Steve Shaw Executive Director E: T: W:

Contents Why listen to RAPRA? Routes to Innovation including the ‘environment’ that businesses have to work in Real or perceived challenges faced by companies on the innovation journey How to avoid, or at least minimise obstacles to achieve success in your innovation project. Effective Routes to Innovation!

Why listen to RAPRA The original remit for RAPRA as stated in our Memorandum of Association: “To promote research and other scientific, technological, information or consultative work in connection with rubbers, plastics, and allied materials and trades and industries associated therewith or allied thereto or any of them (“the said trades and industries”), and for this purpose to raise money by subscriptions levied on the members of this Association and otherwise howsoever.”

Why listen to RAPRA Formed in 1919, RAPRA is probably the oldest independent non-profit organisation in the world dedicated to helping Industry commercially exploit the latest polymer technology. Our salaries are paid by our members who are commercial companies, so we act entirely on their behalf. RAPRA can - and does - connect with the best available resources, commercial, publically funded, academic or trade based to fulfil its role. It has a seat on the Polymer Advisory Group that informs Innovate UK of the R&D funding needs of Industry.

Routes to Innovation ‘Innovation can be viewed as the application of better solutions that meet new requirements, inarticulated needs, or existing market needs.’ Maranville, S (1992), Entrepreneurship in the Business Curriculum, Journal of Education for Business Resources you’ll need on the way… Motivation – be in no doubt that even if the process goes smoothly, it will involve a lot of hard work and sleepless nights. Getting and staying motivated to complete your project can be a challenge. Minds – You and your staff are the greatest experts on your business, but it is often desirable and necessary to have the assistance of other great minds that bring new knowledge and skills. Money – Even the largest global companies are mindful of the cost of being Innovative. Smaller companies generally cannot afford to take ‘big’ risks, unless they get external financial support.

Routes to Innovation – the map TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Basic principles observed and reported Technology Concept and/or application formulated Critical function: proof of concept established Laboratory testing of prototype component or process Prototype system verified Integrated pilot system demonstrated System incorporated into commercial design System ready for full scale deployment Laboratory testing of integrated system Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) A NASA researcher, Stan Sadin, conceived the first scale in It had seven levels which were not formally defined until In the 1990s NASA adopted a scale with nine levels which gained widespread acceptance across industry and remains in use today. Industry and other government organisations, have tailored definitions for certain TRLs to suit their own needs, but their overall scales match NASA's traditional scale very closely.

Routes to Innovation – the UK environment TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Technology Assessment & ProvingPre-ProductionProduction Implementation Stakeholders: Government, Academic Institutions & (ideally No. 1) INDUSTRY Industry problems Commercially viable solutions

Real or Perceived Challenges TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Technology Assessment & ProvingPre-ProductionProduction Implementation Industry problems Commercially viable solutions Referred to as the ‘Valley of Death’ Stakeholders: Government, Academic Institutions & (ideally No. 1) INDUSTRY

Real or Perceived Challenges TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Technology Assessment & ProvingPre-ProductionProduction Implementation Primarily sponsored by Large Companies and Government organisations Industry problems Commercially viable solutions Referred to as the ‘Valley of Death’ Government bodies e.g.: Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Transition phase from ‘theory’ to ‘practice’ where it is crucial that Industry is involved Government bodies e.g.: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS), Innovate UK, Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN) Industry has to embrace and roll out the new technology or processes

Real or Perceived Challenges - Input TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Technology Assessment & ProvingPre-ProductionProduction Implementation Primarily sponsored by Large Companies and Government organisations Industry problems Commercially viable solutions Government bodies e.g.: Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Transition phase from ‘theory’ to ‘practice’ where it is crucial that Industry is involved Government bodies: Innovate UK, Knowledge transfer Network (KTN) Industry has to roll out the new technology or processes How well are Industry problems (especially those faced by SMEs) being gathered and analysed to provide the stimuli for funded research? How much do the current University research funding mechanisms encourage engagement with SME’s?

Real or Perceived Challenges - Processing TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Technology Assessment & ProvingPre-ProductionProduction Implementation Primarily sponsored by Large Companies and Government organisations Industry problems Commercially viable solutions Government bodies e.g.: Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Transition phase from ‘theory’ to ‘practice’ where it is crucial that Industry is involved Industry has to roll out the new technology or processes How well does BIS, Innovate UK and the KTN engage with Industry? Does Industry (especially SME’s) find it easy to engage with research bodies? Do SME’s feel motivated to? Government bodies e.g.: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS), Innovate UK, Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN)

Real or Perceived Challenges - Output TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Technology Assessment & ProvingPre-ProductionProduction Implementation Primarily sponsored by Large Companies and Government organisations Industry problems Commercially viable solutions Government bodies e.g.: Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), Science & Technology Facilities Council (STFC) Transition phase from ‘theory’ to ‘practice’ where it is crucial that Industry is involved Industry has to roll out the new technology or processes How often does Industry get offered new technology or processes appropriate to its needs? Government bodies e.g.: Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS), Innovate UK, Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN)

Avoiding, or minimising the obstacles TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Industry problems Commercially viable solutions Get independent help to correctly identify your ‘Industry Problems’ and get them passed into the system at the optimum stage Do your research about Routes to Innovation, or get to know someone you trust who guide you Collaborate to share the resource cost (remember earlier slide - M, M & M!)

Effective Routes to Innovation TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Industry problems Commercially viable solutions Contact RAPRA for help with any aspect of your innovative R&D

Thank you Discussion Steve Shaw Executive Director E: T: W: