NIH Update Maria Skinner, OSP Manager (NIH Lead) Laura Johnston, OSP Asst. Director January 7, /7/2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of Sponsored Programs VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY The Office of Sponsored Programs has upgraded COEUS to accommodate the new Grants.gov C-Forms About.
Advertisements

VA Update – Sarah Jackson New Budget Worksheet NIH Notices and Other Updates Uniform Guidance and Reminders.
November 13, 2009 NIH PROPOSAL SUBMISSIONS: 2010 REVISONS.
Use and Care of Vertebrate Animals: What Researchers Need to Know Brian Greene IACUC Chair and Associate Professor of Biology Missouri State University.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
SPA Updates 1 st Quarter 2015 February 19, :30 – 4:00 pm SOP N103.
Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions Navigating the Changes to the NIH Application Instructions EFFECTIVE JANUARY 25, 2010.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) The IACUC provides internal oversight of animal: - husbandry - facilities - use in teaching & research.
The Use of Animals in Research Is a Privilege We Wish to Retain Animal Welfare Versus Animal Rights How are Animal Welfare Concerns Reported?
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW Changes to Application Forms and Instructions October 6, 2009.
We have reviewed this material in accordance with U.S. Copyright Law and have tried to maximize your ability to use, share, and adapt it. The citation.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
IES Statistical and Research Methodology in Education Grant Program (84.305D) 2010 Program Meeting.
Animals in Research: Navigating the Animal Protocol Approval Process Summer Seminar Series Susan Warren IACUC Chair.
1 Preparing an NIH Institutional Training Grant Application Rod Ulane, Ph.D. NIH Research Training Officer Office of Extramural Research, NIH.
JEFF WARNER CONTRACT AND GRANT OFFICER FEDERAL UPDATE.
National Institutes of Health Ask The Experts: SBIR/STTR Grant Application Submissions Webinar November 25, 2008.
1 Judy Hewitt, PhD On Detail to Office of Extramural Research National Institutes of Health May 18, 2015 Center for Scientific Review Advisory Council.
Rigor & Reproducibility: Back to Basics
Research Administration Forum Changes to NSF & NIH Proposal Submission and Award Documents December 8, 2015.
Quarterly Grant Managers Meeting 06/17/15. Agenda Data Security Policy: Information Technology Security Office Update Richard Biever and Cara Bonnett.
ENHANCING PEER REVIEW: GUIDE FOR REVIEW OF RESTRUCTURED GRANT APPLICATIONS.
Upcoming NIH Proposal Preparation Changes NOT-OD (Summary of All Changes) NOT-OD
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
Dhanonjoy C. Saha, DVM, PhD Director, Office of Grant Support (OGS) December 16 and 17, 2015.
NIH CHANGES TO POLICIES, INSTRUCTIONS AND FORMS Presented by the Office of Sponsored Programs.
Roundtable November 12, 2015 Auditorium C, DHMC.  The continuing Resolution is good until December 11, 2015….stay tuned.  Non-competing awards are issued.
NIH Fellowships – Tips and Tricks for the Forms and Application Process Jenny Dahlberg, School of Veterinary Medicine
Office of Sponsored Projects Federal Updates/Reminders ROUNDTABLE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 CAMPUS.
Sponsored Programs Administration (SPA).  Coeus is now updated with the SF424 D-Forms for all NIH submissions due May 25, 2016 and after.  For proposals.
A CLOSER LOOK AT RECENT NIH APPLICATION CHANGES…. Revised May 5, 2016.
Peer Review and Grant Mechanisms at NIH What is Changing? May 2016 Richard Nakamura, Ph.D., Director Center for Scientific Review.
Kaplan University LS 516 Unit Six Town Hall Welcome! Are there any questions? Tonight our subject concerns two basic questions: 1.When sponsoring faculty.
Rigor and Transparency in Research
Office of Extramural Programs RIGOR AND REPRODUCIBILITY: BACK TO BASICS MAY 13, 2016 PATRICIA VALDEZ, Ph.D. NIH EXTRAMURAL RESEARCH INTEGRITY OFFICER.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
NOTICE OF POLICY CHANGES FOR NIH GRANTS
Rigor and reproducibility: back to basics
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
A-State IACUC Guidelines
NIH Fellowships Overview
“SPEAR” Workshop May 18, 2017 Julie Wammack
Upcoming NIH Proposal Preparation Changes
The NIH perspective on rigor and reproducibility
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Office of Sponsored Projects
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
NIH GRANT PREPARATION WORKSHOP: A workshop for new investigators about putting together administrative portions of a grant and the NIH review panel. Tuesday,
WHAT IS NEW AT NIH & OTHER UPDATES
Project Grant: Fall 2016 Competition
Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS): Proposal Development
Grant Writing Information Session
Exceptional Children Division Special Programs and Data Section
Being an effective consumer of preclinical research
Director of Training, Workforce Development and Diversity
HOW TO WRITE A SYSTEMATIC/NARRATIVE REVIEW
Writing that First Research Grant
New NIH Human Subjects & Clinical Trials Information
Just In Time Concepts & Review
VUMC Core Managers Meeting
NIH Grant Proposal Preparation:
AURA Meeting May 25, 2016.
Approach Section: The “Meat” of the Proposal
Informed Consent (SBER)
Renewal Animal Training
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
K R Investigator Research Question
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

NIH Update Maria Skinner, OSP Manager (NIH Lead) Laura Johnston, OSP Asst. Director January 7, /7/2016

Overview Two phases of changes: Phase 1: For due dates on or after January 25, Rigor and Reproducibility (excluding training and fellowships) - Vertebrate animals (excluding training and fellowships) - Definition of a child - Training grant applications - Genomic data sharing policy Phase 2: For due dates on or after May 25, Updated forms for all applications, FORMS-D A full description of the changes can be found in NIH notice NOT-OD NOT-OD /7/20162

Rigor and Reproducibility NIH has revised their application instructions and review criteria to enhance the reproducibility of research findings through increased scientific rigor and transparency. Focus will be placed on the following four areas: 1/7/ Scientific Premise of Proposed Research2. Rigorous Experimental Design3. Consideration of Sex and Other Relevant Biological Variables4. Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources

Rigor and Reproducibility 1/7/ Scientific Premise of Proposed Research In the Research Strategy, Significance section: Describe the scientific premise for the proposed project, including the general strengths and weaknesses of the prior research being cited as crucial to support the application. This could include attention to the rigor of the previous experimental designs, as well as the incorporation of relevant biological variables and authentication of key resources.

Rigor and Reproducibility 1/7/ Rigorous Experimental Design In the Research Strategy, Approach section: Describe how you will achieve robust and unbiased results when describing the experimental design and proposed methods. Robust results are obtained using methods designed to avoid bias and can be reproduced under well- controlled and reported experimental conditions. RPPR’s submitted January 25, 2016 or later will be expected to emphasize rigorous approaches taken to ensure robust and unbiased results.

Rigor and Reproducibility 1/7/20166 In the Research Strategy, Approach section: Sex: NIH expects that sex as a biological variable will be factored into research design, analysis and reporting in vertebrate animal and human studies. Strong justification must be provided for applications proposing to study only one sex. 3. Consideration of Sex and Other Relevant Biological Variables

Rigor and Reproducibility 1/7/20167 In the Research Strategy, Approach section (Continued): Other Relevant Biological Variables: Should also consider other biological variables, as appropriate, in the design and analyses of proposed studies. Research plans and findings should indicate which biological variables are tested or controlled. Justify exclusion of variables that may be relevant but are not considered in the research plan. The Women and Minorities and Inclusion of Children sections may be used to expand your discussion on inclusion and provide additional justification 3. Consideration of Sex and Other Relevant Biological Variables

Rigor and Reproducibility 1/7/20168 Authentication of Key Resources Plan New Attachment! This is a new attachment required on the SF 424 (R&R) Other Project Information Form, in the Other Attachments field. Briefly describe methods to ensure the identity and validity of key biological and/or chemical resources used in the proposed studies. 4. Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources *Caution - information in this attachment must focus only on authentication and/or validation of key resources to be used in the study; all other methods and preliminary data must be included within the page limits of the research strategy. Applications identified as non-compliant with this limitation will be withdrawn from the review process.

Rigor and Reproducibility 1/7/20169 Authentication of Key Resources Plan (Continued) New Attachment! Key biological and/or chemical resources may or may not be generated with NIH funds and: 1)may differ from laboratory to laboratory or over time; 2)may have qualities and/or qualifications that could influence the research data; and 3)are integral to the proposed research. These include, but are not limited to, cell lines, specialty chemicals, antibodies, and other biologics. 4. Authentication of Key Biological and/or Chemical Resources

Vertebrate Animals 1/7/ Summary of Changes: A description of veterinary care is no longer required Justification for the number of animals has been eliminated A description of the method of euthanasia is required only if the method is not consistent with AVMA guidelines.

Vertebrate Animals 1/7/ Description of Procedures Provide a concise description of the proposed procedures to be used that involve vertebrate animals in the work outlined in the “Research Strategy” section. Identify the species, strains, ages, sex, and total numbers of animals by species, to be used in the proposed work. If dogs or cats are proposed provide the source of the animals. Justifications Provide justification that the species are appropriate for the proposed research. Explain why the research goals cannot be accomplished using an alternative model Minimization of Pain and Distress Describe the interventions including analgesia, anesthesia, sedation, palliative care and humane endpoints to minimize discomfort, distress, pain, and injury Euthanasia State whether the method of euthanasia is consistent with the recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals. If not, describe the method and provide a scientific justification What to include:

Definition of a Child 1/7/ The age of a child will now be defined as individuals under 18 years old rather than 21 years old.

Training Grant Applications 1/7/ There are also significant changes to the training grant application instructions. If you are aware of a training grant application being submitted, please make sure to review the new application instructions and contact your Proposal Team if you have any questions.Proposal Team

Genomic Data Sharing Policy 1/7/ Applications proposing to generate large-scale human and/or non-human genomic data are expected to include a genomic data sharing plan. A cover letter should also be attached stating the proposal is expected to generate large-scale genomic data. Applicants who want to use the NIH-designated repository for human genomic data to achieve the specific aims of their proposal, in the Research Plan of the application should: 1.Address plans to request access to the data, and 2.State their intention to abide by the NIH Genomic Data User Code of Conduct

Resources 1/7/ NIH Rigor and Reproducibility website:

Resources 1/7/ NIH Rigor and Reproducibility FAQ’s: Office of Sponsored Programs, NIH updates website: NIH explanation of Phase I and II changes: NOT-OD NOT-OD Notice related to Rigor and Reproducibility: NOT-OD NOT-OD Notice related to Vertebrate Animals Section: NOT-OD NOT-OD Notice related to Training Grant changes: NOT-OD NOT-OD New Application instructions:

Communications Presentations: Educational session for faculty - 1/7/16, 1:30-2:30 in room 1420 of the BPS Building ERA Hot Topics elective - 12/8/2015 Presented to CORD – 11/19/2015 & 1/7/2016 & Website Updates: OSP/SPA/CGA Listserv announcement - 12/21/2015 sent to MSU NIH faculty - 12/21/2015 & 1/5/2016 Included News item on the SPA website – 1/6/2016 1/7/201617