Lecture 1.5: Proof Techniques

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Proofs
Advertisements

Lecture 1.4: Rules of Inference CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Copyright © Zeph Grunschlag,
Lecture 4.5: POSets and Hasse Diagrams CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena *Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Methods of Proof & Proof Strategies
Lecture 3.1: Mathematical Induction CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren, Zeph Grunschlag.
1 Methods of Proof CS/APMA 202 Epp, chapter 3 Aaron Bloomfield.
Methods of Proof Lecture 3: Sep 9. This Lecture Now we have learnt the basics in logic. We are going to apply the logical rules in proving mathematical.
Lecture 1.2: Equivalences, and Predicate Logic* CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena *Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren, Zeph.
Lecture 2.2: Set Theory* CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena *Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Lecture 4.3: Closures and Equivalence Relations CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2013 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Methods of Proof Dr. Yasir Ali. Proof A (logical) proof of a statement is a finite sequence of statements (called the steps of the proof) leading from.
Lecture 2.1: Sets and Set Operations CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Lecture 1.3: Predicate Logic CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2012 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Lecture 1.2: Equivalences, and Predicate Logic CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2015 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren, Zeph.
Lecture 1.4: Rules of Inference, and Proof Techniques* CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena *Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Introduction to Proofs
Section 1.7. Definitions A theorem is a statement that can be shown to be true using: definitions other theorems axioms (statements which are given as.
Lecture 1.3: Predicate Logic, and Rules of Inference* CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena *Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren.
Lecture 1.5: Proof Techniques CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2012 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren 1.
9/29/2011Lecture Strong Induction1 Lecture 3.2: Strong Induction CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena *Adopted from previous lectures.
9/27/2011 Lecture Mathematical Induction1 Lecture 3.1: Mathematical Induction* CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena *Adopted from.
Proof Techniques CS160/CS122 Rosen: 1.5, 1.6, 1.7.
Chapter 1 Logic and Proof.
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Lecture 1.2: Equivalences, and Predicate Logic
Chapter 4 (Part 1): Induction & Recursion
Lecture 1.4: Rules of Inference
Direct Proof by Contraposition Direct Proof by Contradiction
Lecture 1.5: Proof Techniques
Methods of Proof CS 202 Epp, chapter 3.
Chapter 1: The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Lecture 4.3: Closures and Equivalence Relations
Proof by Contradiction
Lecture 3.2: Induction and Strong Induction (contd.)
Discrete Math for CS CMPSC 360 LECTURE 4 Last time and recitations:
The Foundations: Logic and Proofs
Lecture 3.2: Induction, and Strong Induction
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2011 Nitesh Saxena
CS 220: Discrete Structures and their Applications
Lecture 3.2: Induction and Strong Induction (contd.)
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014
Lecture 3.2: Induction, and Strong Induction
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2015
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2015
Lecture 4.3: Closures and Equivalence Relations
Lecture 3.2: Induction, and Strong Induction
Lecture 1.6: Proof Techniques (contd)
Lecture 1.3: Predicate Logic
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2015 Nitesh Saxena
Lecture 2.1: Sets and Set Operations*
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2013
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2013
Lecture 3.1: Mathematical Induction
Lecture 4.1: Relations Basics
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014 Nitesh Saxena
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014 Nitesh Saxena
Lecture 1.6: Proof Techniques (contd)
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014 Nitesh Saxena
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Lecture 1.4: Rules of Inference
Introduction to Proofs
CSE 321 Discrete Structures
Lecture 3.1: Mathematical Induction
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2015 Nitesh Saxena
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2015 Nitesh Saxena
Introduction to Proofs
Lecture 1.3: Predicate Logic
CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2012
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 1.5: Proof Techniques CS 250, Discrete Structures, Fall 2014 Nitesh Saxena Adopted from previous lectures by Cinda Heeren

Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques Course Admin Slides from previous lectures all posted HW1 posted Due at 11am on Sep 18 Please follow all instructions Questions? 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques Outline Proof Techniques 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques Main techniques Direct proofs Proofs using contraposition Proofs using contradiction 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Direct Proofs: first example Theorem: If n is an odd natural number, then n2 is also an odd natural number. Proof: If n is odd, then n = 2k + 1 for some int k. This means that: n2 = (2k+1)(2k+1) = 4k2 + 4k + 1 = 2(2k2 + 2k) + 1 = 2j + 1 for some int j  n2 is odd 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques Direct Proofs An example: Prove that if n = 3 mod 4, then n2 = 1 mod 4. HUH? 7 = 3 mod 4 7 = 111 mod 4 37 = 1 mod 4 37 = 61 mod 4 94 = 2 mod 4 94 = 6 mod 4 16 = 0 mod 4 16 = 1024 mod 4 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques Direct Proofs Coming back to our Theorem: If n = 3 mod 4, then n2 = 1 mod 4. Proof: If n = 3 mod 4, then n = 4k + 3 for some int k. This means that: n2 = (4k + 3)(4k + 3) = 16k2 + 24k + 9 = 16k2 + 24k + 8 + 1 = 4(4k2 + 6k + 2) + 1 = 4j + 1 for some int j = 1 mod 4. 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Proofs by Contraposition Recall: Contrapositive: p  q and q  p Ex. “If it is noon, then I am hungry.” “If I am not hungry, then it is not noon.” We also know that: p  q  q  p Therefore, if establishing a direct proof (p  q) is difficult for some reason, we can instead prove its contraposition (q  p), which may be easier. 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Proofs by Contraposition: example Theorem: If 3n + 2 is an odd natural number, then n is also an odd natural number. Proof: If n is not odd, then n = 2k for some int k. This means that: 3n+2 = 3(2k) + 2 = 2(3k) + 2 = 2(3k + 1) = 2j for some int j  3n+2 is not odd 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Proofs by Contraposition: another example Theorem: If N = ab where a and b are natural numbers, then a <= sqrt(N) or b <= sqrt(N). Proof: If a > sqrt(N) AND b > sqrt(N), then by multiplying the two inequalities, we get ab > N This negates the proposition N=ab 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Proofs by Contradiction Recall: Contradiction is a proposition that is always False To prove that a proposition p is True, we try to find a contradiction q such that (p  q) is True. If (p  q) is True and q is False, it must be the case that p is True. We suppose that p is False and use this to find a contradiction of the form r  r 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Proofs by Contradiction: example Theorem: Every prime number is an odd number Proof: A: n is prime B: n is odd We need to show that A  B is true We need to find a contradiction q such that:  (A  B)  q We know:  (A  B)  (A  B)  A  B This means that we suppose (n is prime) AND (n is even) is True But, if n is even, it means n has 2 as its factor, and this means that n is not prime. This is a contradiction because (n is prime) AND (n is not prime) is True 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Proofs by Contradiction: example Theorem: If 3n + 2 is an odd natural number, then n is also an odd natural number. Proof: A: 3n + 2 is odd B: n is odd We need to show that A  B is true We need to find a contradiction q such that:  (A  B)  q We know:  (A  B)  (A  B)  A  B This means that we suppose that (3n + 2 is odd) AND (n is even) is True. But, if n is even, it means n = 2k for some int k, and this means that 3n + 2 = 6K+2 = 2(3K+1)  even. This is a contradiction: (3n + 2 is odd) AND (3n +2 is even)

Disproving something: counterexamples If we are asked to show that a proposition is False, then we just need to provide one counter-example for which the proposition is False In other words, to show that x P(x) is False, we can just show x P(x) = x P(x) to be True Example: “Every positive integer is the sum of the squares of two integers” is False. Proof: counter-examples: 3, 6,… 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques

Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques Today’s Reading Rosen 1.7 Please start solving the exercises at the end of each chapter section. They are fun. 9/13/2017 Lecture 1.5 - Proof Techniques