Commander’s Request Mast Program updated September 2016

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SESSION 9 TITLE 5 - COMPLAINTS RP.
Advertisements

Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Issue Identification, Tracking, Escalation, and Resolution.
DCIPS Performance Evaluation Administrative Reconsideration Guidance
SITUATION RESPONSE FLOW CHART SUPERVISORS’S ACTIONS SITUATION OCCURS Direct observation, complainant reports, third party reports Document initial knowledge.
Inspector General of the Marine Corps
FLW EO Office 1 COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. FLW EO Office 2 Overview  Describe the Army’s EO Complaint Process  Define the types of Complaints  Describe.
EORC CHAPTER 5 PROCESSING& REPORTING COMPLAINTS. EORC Overview Define protected communication Explain methods to address inappropriate behavior Explain.
Learn. Perform. Succeed. Protest, Claims, Disputes and Appeals Chapter 7.
CIG Roles and Responsibilities. CIG “A&I” Primary Functions Manage CIG Hotline Program – FA 316 Report Senior Official Complaints Conduct Military Reprisal.
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Complaint Handling.
CBER Managed Review Process Sheryl A. Kochman Deputy Director, DBA, OBRR, CBER September 15, 2009.
SEXUAL HARASSMENT MIDN 1/C CURTIN. OBJECTIVES COMPREHEND SECNAV SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY AND THE DEFINITON OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT. DEMONSTRATE THE ABILITY.
Foundations of Effective Board Operation Nicole L. Mace Vermont School Boards Association.
Duties, Responsibilities and Authority of the NCO
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
Slide 1Lesson 13: Complaint Processing Complaint Processing Briefing.
EO COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. OVERVIEW  DEFINE TYPES OF COMPLAINTS  ALTERNATIVE AGENCIES  CDR/ALTERNATE AGENCY RESPONSIBILITIES  ELEMENTS OF INQUIRY/INVESTIGATION.
Grant Administration and Compliance ________________ Oklahoma Municipal League Conference Steve Traina, Program Director Institute for Building Technology.
The Military Ombudsman Bill [B9 of 2011]
Mason County School District
Commander’s request mast program
Unit Commanders Course The Complaint Process and Your Responsibility
TOPS TRAINING.
Developing a Public Presence as a District Teacher of the Year
Ken Detzner, Secretary of State
CHAPTER 5 PROCESSING & REPORTING COMPLAINTS.
REQUEST MAST.
Chapter 12 Handling Problems, Conflicts, and Mistakes
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
Whistleblower Program
NJROTC NS-4 Leadership and Ethics
Commander’s Request Mast Program Updated January 2018
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
REQUEST MAST.
REQUEST MAST.
Presented By: LTCol McCann
REQUEST MAST OVERVIEW.
Presented By: Mrs. Edwards and LtCol McCann
REQUEST MAST.
FOIA, Privacy & Records Management Conference 2009 FOIA Office and Initial Denial Authority Interaction, Roles, Duties, and Responsibilities Nathan.
REQUEST MAST.
Nonjudicial Punishment and the Rights of the Accused
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Commander’s Request Mast Program
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Legal Requirement on OHSC Complaints Management Presenter: Mr M Tlholoe Director Complaints Centre & Assessment Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
Professional Review Panel
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
Unit Commanders Course The Complaint Process and Your Responsibility
FLOW CHART 1 Foreign Reciprocating Country (FRC) Seeks Paternity Establishment Through State IV-D Agency When Noncustodial Parent (NCP) is Living on a.
GUIDE TO EFFECTIVE COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT
Academy Medical Centre
Complaints Investigation Presenter: Ms H Phetoane Senior Investigator :HealthCare Cases Prepared for OHSC Consultative Workshops.
REQUEST MAST.
DCIPS Performance Evaluation Administrative Reconsideration Guidance Overview These slides should be used in conjunction with the “Army DCIPS Performance.
Ken Woodruff Civil Rights Program Manager FHWA Indiana Division
Construction Management Services April 16, 2018
in the Child Care Food Program (CCFP)
EITI - Grievance mechanisms
Commander’s Request Mast Program Updated August 2019
Commander’s Request Mast Program Updated August 2019
Presentation transcript:

Commander’s Request Mast Program updated September 2016 Inspector General of the Marine Corps Commander’s Request Mast Program updated September 2016

Mast Overview History & Purpose of Mast Policy for Requesting Mast Procedures for Requesting Mast 2

The History of Mast Naval Tradition Commander’s Interaction with Ship’s Crew Dispense Punishment Present Awards Accept Grievances Ship’s crew had guaranteed right to speak to their Commander Solutions were not assured 3

Purpose of Mast Convey grievances directly to the Commander Should not dismiss the “Chain of Concern” Provides a personal audience with Commander* Should not replace established staff functions Expedite processing of urgent concerns Should never supplant informal discourse Should employ the entire Chain of Command * Appearance with Commander should not present a conflict of interest or affect neutrality 4

Request Mast Policy NAVMC 1700.23F (directive) NAVMC 11296 (form) According to Marine Corps Order 1700.23F, it is "the right of all Marines to directly seek assistance from, or communicate grievances to, their commanding officers." A Marine has "the opportunity to communicate not only with his or her immediate commanding officer, but also with any superior officer in the chain of command up to and including the Marine's commanding general." NAVMC 1700.23F (directive) NAVMC 11296 (form) Are there better avenues of redress? Not appropriate for Mast: Nuisance requests Matters od UCMJ or ADSEP contemplated, pending, in progress, or final Administrative Actions Performance Evaluation 5

The Chain of Command Only Officers with NJP Authority may be I&I, OIC, or Acting Up to First General Officer or designated O-6 with GCMCA Commanders may be bypassed only for cause, presented in writing All Commanders must attempt to resolve grievances Petitioner may withdraw request and accept resolution at any level CG’s Eyes Only must be explained in writing usually facilitated by CIGs Denials by designated Commander submit denial reports via Chain to CG In person explanations not required 6

Request Mast Procedure NAVMC 11296 (6-97) Filled out, signed, & dated Role of the Applicant Be truthful provider facts Cover letter if sealed request Role of the “Chain of Concern” Expedite request Do not try to resolve Role if the Chain of Command Expedite Commander Audience Try to resolve at the lowest level of command Explain disposition, delays, and denials Forward up if required Report to CG any denials If there is a denial, it must be explained to the Applicant. Personal explanations not required (especially if a conflict of interest) 7

Request Mast Procedure Personal, contact, and biographical data. What Commander is requested? What is the problem? What is the solution? Legal affidavit must be signed and dated. “Starts the Clock” 8

Request Mast Procedure How did each Commander engage? Final disposition, issue may not be resolved immediately Final Commander to engage with Applicant. Sign & date, stops the clock Applicant selects one acknowledgement. Applicant and witness sign and date. 9

Request Mast Procedure To uphold faith in the system, we get the Marine quickly before their Commander. Actually resolving the issue correctly may take time, and must be tracked. “Does the commander ensure all Request Masts petitions are expeditiously handled…” 10

Request Mast Procedure If a subordinate commander, to the commander in block 8a, resolves the issue that subordinate commander is acknowledged in Part III and the Request for Mast is NOT forwarded any higher. ONLY Commanders can be acknowledged in Part III. 11

Request Mast Procedure Used when the Marine has seen the Commander designated in 8a and understands the disposition of the complaint. 12

Request Mast Procedure LtCol. Smedley D. Butler USMC Used when a Marine sees a subordinate commander and understands the disposition and voluntarily withdraws sending the Request for Mast up to the commander originally designed in block 8a. This can never be used in a sealed “eyes only” request. 13

Request Mast Procedure Used when a Commander refuses to directly communicate with an applicant. This is not the same as a denial. 14

Request Mast Procedure Used when a Commander grants an audience with an applicant but does not inform the applicant of the disposition. This is not the same as a denial. 15

Legal Requirements Commanders Must Hold accountable anyone who interferes with the Request Mast Process. Hold accountable anyone who reprises against anyone who Requests Masts 16

Request Mast Follow-Up Commanders must have a tracking system to ensure request are handled in an expeditious manner and to assure no adverse actions befall the Applicant for requesting Mast with the Commander. 17

Questions a special place for us as Senior Leaders. 18