Tests of Lorentz Invariance with atomic clocks and optical cavities Fundamental Physics Laws: Gravity, Lorentz Symmetry and Quantum Gravity - 2 & 3 June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kiwoon Choi PQ-invariant multi-singlet NMSSM
Advertisements

APRIL 2010 AARHUS UNIVERSITY Simulation of probed quantum many body systems.
Atomic Parity Violation in Ytterbium, K. Tsigutkin, D. Dounas-Frazer, A. Family, and D. Budker
Cutnell/Johnson Physics 7th edition
Teppei Katori, Indiana University1 PRD74(2006) Global 3 parameter Lorentz Violation model for neutrino oscillation with MiniBooNE Teppei Katori,
Rainbow Gravity and the Very Early Universe Yi Ling Center for Gravity and Relativistic Astrophysics Nanchang University, China Nov. 4, Workshop.
Fundamental Physics Research in Space International Workshop Washington DC May 2006 Probing Relativity using Space-Based Experiments Neil Russell.
Lorentz Violation and an Experimental Limit Ben Rybolt 12/10/2012.
Matt Jones Precision Tests of Fundamental Physics using Strontium Clocks.
Standard Model Requires Treatment of Particles as Fields Hamiltonian, H=E, is not Lorentz invariant. QM not a relativistic theory. Lagrangian, T-V, used.
EPPT M2 INTRODUCTION TO RELATIVITY K Young, Physics Department, CUHK  The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Macroscopic Behaviours of Palatini Modified Gravity Theories [gr-qc] and [gr-qc] Baojiu Li, David F. Mota & Douglas J. Shaw Portsmouth,
Reducing Decoherence in Quantum Sensors Charles W. Clark 1 and Marianna Safronova 2 1 Joint Quantum Institute, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
PHY 042: Electricity and Magnetism Introduction Prof. Pierre-Hugues Beauchemin.
Muon and electron g-2 A charged particle which has spin angular momentum s will have also a magnetic moment m. The ratio of the magnetic to angular moments.
Based on Phys.Rev.D84:043515,2011,arXiv: &JCAP01(2012)016 Phys.Rev.D84:043515,2011,arXiv: &JCAP01(2012)016.
An Optical Kennedy-Thorndike Experiment on the ISS (JULE) J. Nissen Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology J.A. Lipa, Stanford University.
Testing Relativity Theory With Neutrinos Brett Altschul University of South Carolina May 15, 2008.
Phys 102 – Lecture 26 The quantum numbers and spin.
Bounding the Higgs Width using Interferometry L. Dixon Bounding the Higgs widthRADCOR Lance Dixon (SLAC) with Ye Li [ ] and Stefan Höche.
Absorption and Emission of Radiation:
Tests of Lorentz and CPT violation with Neutrinos Teppei Katori Massachusetts Institute of Technology ICHEP2012, Melbourne, Australia, July 10, /10/12Teppei.
Gravitational Experiments and Lorentz Violation Jay D. Tasson V. Alan Kostelecký Indiana University TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual.
Influence of Lorentz violation on the hydrogen spectrum Manoel M. Ferreira Jr (UFMA- Federal University of Maranhão - Brazil) Colaborators: Fernando M.
Sensitivity to New Physics using Atmospheric Neutrinos and AMANDA-II John Kelley UW-Madison Penn State Collaboration Meeting State College, PA June 2006.
Search for Quantum Gravity Using Atom Interferometers Charles Wang, University of Aberdeen, UK Robert Bingham, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Tito.
Energy Scan of Hadron (  0 ) Suppression and Flow in Au+Au Collisions at PHENIX Norbert Novitzky for PHENIX collaboration University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
Contents 1. Introduction 2. Analysis 3. Results 4. Conclusion Presice measurement of the Higgs-boson electroweak couplings at Linear Collider and its physics.
PHY 520 Introduction Christopher Crawford
A. Bondarevskaya Highly charged ion beam polarization and its application to the search for the parity nonconservation effects in ions
K. Iwakuni, H. Sera, M. Abe, and H. Sasada Department of Physics, faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Japan 1 70 th. International Symposium.
Huaizhang Deng Yale University Precise measurement of (g-2)  University of Pennsylvania.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
Monday, Apr. 11, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #18 Monday, Apr. 11, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu Symmetries Local gauge symmetry Gauge fields.
E. Todesco, Milano Bicocca January-February 2016 Appendix B: A digression on divergences in electromagnetism and lengths in atomic physics Ezio Todesco.
Derek F. Jackson Kimball. Collaboration Dmitry Budker, Arne Wickenbrock, John Blanchard, Samer Afach, Nathan Leefer, Lykourgas Bougas, Dionysis Antypas.
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
Lorentz Invariance and CPT Violation Studies with MeV Blazars and GRBs 1.) Motivation and Status of Observations. 2.) Theoretical Framework (the Standard.
The Constancy of Constants. Dirac’s Large Number Hypothesis “A New Basis for Cosmology” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, A165, 199 (1938) Ratio.
Testing general relativity experimentally: Equivalence Principle Tests
– + + – Search for the μEDM using a compact storage ring A. Adelmann 1, K. Kirch 1, C.J.G. Onderwater 2, T. Schietinger 1, A. Streun 1 1 Paul Scherrer.
Measurement of direct photon emission in K+ →π+π0γ ---Spectroscopic studies for various K+ decay channels --- S. Shimizu for the KEK-PS E470 collaboration.
qBOUNCE: a quantum bouncing ball gravity spectrometer
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #23 Symmetries Why do we care about the symmetry?
Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris
Measurement Science Science et étalons
5. Wave-Particle Duality - the Principle of Complementarity
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Atomic Theory.
Precision Tests of Fundamental Physics
Observation of the DsJ(2463)Dspo & Confirmation of the DsJ(2317)Dspo
CPT Symmetry and Lorentz Symmetry Tests
Handout 9 : The Weak Interaction and V-A
Constraining the Properties of the Antiproton
Mac Keiser and Alex Silbergleit
dark matter Properties stable non-relativistic non-baryonic
General Physics (PHY 2140) Lecture 31 Modern Physics Quantum Physics
Spontaneous Lorentz-Symmetry Breaking in Gravity
Mac Keiser and Alex Silbergleit
Quantum Spacetime and Cosmic Inflation
Chapter 41 Atomic Structure
Polarized Structure Function of Nucleon and Orbital Angular Momentum
Beam-Beam Interaction in Linac-Ring Colliders
5. Wave-Particle Duality - the Principle of Complementarity
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
wan ahmad tajuddin wan abdullah jabatan fizik universiti malaya
Intro to Special Relativity
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Presentation transcript:

Tests of Lorentz Invariance with atomic clocks and optical cavities Fundamental Physics Laws: Gravity, Lorentz Symmetry and Quantum Gravity - 2 & 3 June Paris, France P. Wolf 1, F. Chapelet 1, S. Bize 1, A. Clairon 1 1 LNE-SYRTE, Observatoire de Paris

Contents Introduction The Lorentz violating Standard Model Extension (SME) - Photon sector and present limits - Matter sector Frequency shift of the Cs hyperfine transition Experimental strategy Data and analysis Systematic effects Results Outlook and Conclusion.

Introduction Lorentz Invariance (LI): invariance of physics in inertial frames under change of velocity or orientation. Founding postulate of relativity  cornerstone of all of modern physics. Unification theories (string theory, loop quantum gravity, …) hint towards LI violation.  strong motivations for experimental LI tests. Michelson-Morley, Kennedy-Thorndike, Ives-Stilwell, Hughes-Drever,…. Comprehensive framework for all tests of LI developed (Kostelecky et al.), the minimal Standard Model Extension (SME). Photon and matter sectors. Photon sector is tested by astrophysical observations (birefringence), and laboratory experiments (cavities, clocks) Search for a dependence of atomic transition frequencies on the orientation of the involved spins. We test a previously “unexplored” region of the SME parameter space: the proton quadrupole SME energy shift (related to the 7/2 nuclear spin of Cs). First measurements of 4 parameters, improvement by 11 and 12 orders of magnitude on 4 others  good probability of finding a LI violating signal. Wolf et al. (2004), Stanwix et al. (2006), Müller et al. (2007). Wolf et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, , (2006).

The Standard Model Extension (SME): photon sector Generalization of the SM Lagrangian including all Lorentz violating terms that can be formed from known fields (photons, p +, e -, n, etc..). The photon sector of the SME is equivalent to usual Maxwell equations with: Experiments generally set limits on linear combinations of the  tensors: 10 components: limited by astrophysical tests to  components: limited by resonator tests at ≈ components: limited by resonator tests at ≈ component: limited by IS exp. at ≈ 10 -7

The Standard Model Extension (SME): photon sector Spectropolarimetry of distant sources (0.1 – 2 Gpc) in IR – UV band. Search for polarization change proportional to L/. [Kostelecky and Mewes, PRL 2001] 10 components limited to  Michelson-Morley experiments with rotating optical cavities. [Herrmann et al. PRD 2009, Eisele et al. PRL 2009] 8 components limited to  and  Ives-Stilwell experiments with Li ions at 0.06c in particle accelerators [Reinhardt et al. Nature Physics 2007] 1 component limited to  10 -7

The Standard Model Extension (SME): matter sector The matter sector of the SME can be expressed as a perturbation of the standard model hamiltonian, parametrised by 44 parameters (40 at first order in v/c) for each known particle (p +, e -, n, in atomic physics). Leads to shifts of atomic energy levels as function of the atomic state. In the atom frame: -  w,  w,  w,  w, w are specific to the atom and the particular state. - the tilde coefficients are combinations of SME parameters, to be determined by experiment. They are in general time dependent due to the movement of the atom with respect to a cosmological frame. in GeV Wolf et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, , (2006).

Cs hyperfine Zeeman transitions in the SME Using the results of Bluhm et al. [PRD 68, ], the perturbation of a |F=3, m F >  |F=4, m F > transition in Cs is: SME part Classical part: Z (1) B ≈ m F 1400 Hz mFmF BpBp DpDp GpGp CpCp BeBe DeDe GeGe +3-1/6+1/22 K p -2/33 K p +1/14 K p -3/2+1/2 K e -1/2 K e -3+1/6-1/22 K p +2/33 K p +1/14 K p +3/2-1/2 K e +1/2 K e K e ≈ ; K p ≈ (Schmidt nuclear model). Direct measurement limited by first order Zeeman shift (fluctuations of B).  measure “simultaneously” 3, -3, and 0 : cancellation of first order Zeeman second order Zeeman ≈ -2 mHz

Atomic fountains: Principle of operation N at ~2  10 9 ;  r ~  mm; T ~1  K V launch ~ 4m.s -1 ; H ~1m; T ~500ms T c ~0.8-2s; B ~ 200 nT Stability (m F =0): 1.5 x Hz/√  1.5 x Hz observed Accuracy (m F =0): 6.0 x Hz transition probability B Quantization field

Experimental strategy Alternate m F = 3 and m F = -3 measurement every second (interleaved servo-loops). Measure m F = 0 clock transition every 400 s (reference). Limited by stability of magnetic field at  < 4 s. Reduce launching height to optimize stability of observable. A, C i, S i, are functions of the 8 proton components: 3 proton components ( ) are suppressed by v  /c ≈ Search for offset, sidereal and semi-sidereal signatures in the observable Transforming to sun-frame SME parameters:

21 days of data in April 2005, 14 days in September Least squares fit: in mHz

Residual First order Zeeman Shift Magnetic field gradients and non-identical trajectories of m F =+3 and m F =-3 atoms can lead to incomplete cancellation of Z (1). Confirmed by TOF difference ≈ 158  s (  623  m). Variation of B with launching height ≈ 0.02 pT/mm (at apogee).  MC simulation gives offset of only ≈ 6  Hz. Contrast as function of m F : 0.94, 0.93, 0.87, 0.75 MC simulation with only vertical B gradient cannot reproduce the contrast  horizontal B gradient of ≈ 6 pT/mm (≈ 2 pT/mm from tilt measurements). Complete MC simulation, assuming horizontal asymmetry between trajectories is same as vertical (worst case) gives offset ≈ 25 mHz. Fitting sidereal and semi-sidereal variations to the TOF difference and using the above gradients we obtain no significant effect within the statistical uncertainties (≈ 0.03 mHz at both frequencies). We take this as our upper limit of the time varying part of the residual first order Zeeman.

Results Sensitivity to c TJ reduced by a factor v  /c (≈ ). Assuming no cancellation between c TJ and others. First measurements of four components. Improvement by 11 and 13 orders of magnitude on previous limits (re-analysis of IS experiment, [Lane C., PRD 2005]). Dominated by statistical uncertainty (factor 2) except for c Q. in GeV

Outlook and Conclusion New test of LI, with first measurements of four proton parameters and large improvements on four others. Exploring a qualitatively new region of the SME. Still no evidence for Lorentz violation. Repeating the experiment over a year or more allows reduction of statistical uncertainty (gain of about a factor 2), and resolution of annual sidebands  decorrelation of c TJ parameters. Ultimate limitation will probably come from residual first order Zeeman effect (magnetic field gradient coupled to asymmetries in the  m F trajectories). Could be resolved by using simultaneously Rb as a magnetic field probe. That may also allow precise measurements of the magnetic field dependent transitions in a Rb – Cs combination  access to additional parameters. Similar experiment could be carried out onboard ACES (2009). Faster integration due to 90 min orbital period.