Potential Air Impacts of Demand Response in New England Geoff Keith Synapse Energy Economics, Inc

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
Advertisements

Demand Response in New York State Northwest Power and Conservation Council DR workshop February 24, 2006.
RGGI Leakage Workshop Presentation June 15, 2006 Stephen J. Rourke Vice President, System Planning ISO New England.
The Benefits of Dynamic Pricing of Default Electricity Service Bernie Neenan UtiliPoint International Prepared for Assessing the Potential for Demand Response.
Valuing Load Reduction in Restructured Markets Supply Cost Curve Regressions Market Price vs. Value of Load Reduction Photovoltaic Case Study William B.
Toward a Sustainable Future Name of Conference, Event, or Audience Date Presenter’s Name | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All.
Study Case Report PC 10 High Carbon Price PC 11 Low Carbon Price W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Economic Update Brian Horii and Snuller Price Energy & Environmental Economics,
WGG Coal Retirement Case Transmission Repurposed for Renewables.
Economic Analyses of FPL’s New Nuclear Projects: An Overview Dr. Steven Sim Senior Manager, Resource Assessment & Planning Florida Power & Light Company.
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
ERCOT PUBLIC 6/17/ LTSA Scenario Results June, 2014.
LMP Electricity Markets: Market Operations, Market Power, and Value for Consumers EMRI Symposium American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 Presented.
Highlights of AESC 2011 Report Vermont Presentation August 22, | ©2011 Synapse Energy Economics Inc. All rights reserved.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
The Risks of Participating in the AMPGS Coal Plant: February 14, 2008 David Schlissel.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
2003 Hot Spots Annual Report Program Overview Program Overview  Four Basics: Quantify, Assess, Notify and Reduce Significant Risk Sources – Success! Significant.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Talking About Air Toxics John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
RGGI Workshop on Electricity Markets, Reliability and Planning Topic Session 3: RGGI Design, Markets and Reliability – Issues Relating to System Operations.
Generation Technologies in a Carbon-constrained World Steve Specker President & CEO October 2005.
David J. Shaw Director, NYSDEC Division of Air Resources Presented To: NACAA Spring Meeting Sacramento, CA May 17 – 19, 2010 Air Quality Management Plan.
PJM©2008 Potential Effects of Proposed Climate Change Policies on PJM’s Energy Market Paul M. Sotkiewicz, Ph.D. Senior Economist PJM Interconnection Organization.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Long Term Study Scenarios and Generation Expansion Update October 12, 2012.
ISO New England State of the Markets Report May April 2002 Robert Ethier, Ph.D. Manager, Market Monitoring and Mitigation ISO New England June 26,
OPSI Annual Meeting October 13, Session 6 Reliability Pricing Model: Are Further Changes Necessary? Reluctantly…yes But States should also be.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency March 2, 2011 John Seltz.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
Long Term Study Task Force Update Modeling Emerging Resources Through 2030 January 13, 2012 LTSTF.
PC21 Coal Retirement Study TAS/TEPPC – Nov W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL WECC System Adequacy Planning.
Project Introduction and Overview Brock Bernstein OPC Meeting June 25, 2010.
ISO Confidential Overview of California’s Current Drought and its Effects on the Energy System Dede Subakti, P. E. Director, Operations Engineering Services.
Diesel Exhaust – Air Quality Issues ITEP Air Quality Training Kodiak 2015 Bob Morgan Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
Shaping Up The Duck Chart Independent Energy Producers Association Annual Meeting Mark Rothleder Vice President, Market Quality and Renewable Integration.
California Independent System Operator 1 Department of Market Analysis California Independent System Operator California ISO Creation Time: July,
Power Supply Adequacy for the 2021 Operating Year Resource Adequacy Advisory Committee Steering Committee Webinar June 8, 2016.
World Energy and Environmental Outlook to 2030
Accommodate or Achieve
Estimating the resource adequacy value of demand response in the German electricity market Hamid Aghaie Research Scientist in Energy Economics, AIT Austrian.
Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study (PCWIS) Prepared by: GE Energy Consulting, Vaisala , EnerNex, Electranix, Knight Piésold Olga Kucherenko.
Contents Introduction Focus area Wind scenarios
2018 LTSA Workshop August 2017 RPG Meeting Welcome to.
First in Service First in Value
GENESYS Redevelopment Strawman Proposal
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Restructuring Roundtable March 24, 2017 Boston, MA
California Low Emission Vehicle (LEV II) Program in the Northeast
2017 Integrated Resource Plan
2018 VELCO IRP Forecast Preliminary results
MRES Resource Operations in SPP
Zonal Electricity Supply Curve Estimation with Fuzzy Fuel Switching Thresholds North American power grid is “the largest and most complex machine in the.
CSP Grid Value of Energy Storage and LCOE Implications 26 August 2013
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
MIT tour of the California ISO Control Center March 31, 2015
Key Findings and Resource Strategy
Additional clarifications on economic and adequacy running hours
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
New England Resource Adequacy
Division of Energy Resources
Energy Efficiency in New England: Resource Opportunities
Market Design in New England
New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable September 18, 2009
Forecasting and Operations CAISO Case
2021 Adequacy Assessment Status Report
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Joshua Linn (MIT and Resources for the Future)
Presentation transcript:

Potential Air Impacts of Demand Response in New England Geoff Keith Synapse Energy Economics, Inc

DR Emissions Modeling for NEDRI Hourly dispatch modeling with PROSYM Modeled a hypothetical near-term year with a system reserve margin of 20% 500-MW DR resource in New England 60% of DR capacity modeled as load response and 40% generation Modeled economic (day-ahead bidding) demand response – not emergency programs DR bid at five bid points: $ per MWh Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.

Overview (cont.) Examined emissions of NOx, SO 2, CO 2, PM 2.5, PM and seven air toxics Explored different assumptions about: –Level of participation by diesel- vs. gas-fired IC generators –Amount of loads shifted to off-peak periods –Whether the DR resource could be used to meet operating reserve requirements Also modeled energy efficiency programs for comparison Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.

DR Operation DR operated in approximately 90 summer hours. It provided 3,360 MWhs of load relief (over three times as much as ISO NE’s 2002 economic demand response program). The vast majority of the load relief was in southwest CT. Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.

When DR Is Used for Reserves The result is more efficient unit commitment, reduced operation of oil- and gas-fired steam units and overall emission reductions. The emission reductions are primarily due to the use of DR capacity to meet reserve requirements. Increasing the level of diesel participation in the DR program reduces overall emission reductions for NO x, SO 2, CO 2, PM 2.5 and PM. Reductions of NO x are compromised most. Some toxics increase, some decrease Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.

When DR Is Not Used for Reserves Emissions impacts are much smaller than when DR is used for reserves. The net impact on NO x could be positive or negative depending on the amount of DR provided by diesel-fired units. While overall emission impacts are small, they could pose health risks in specific locations. The most serious of these risks are probably diesel fine particulates and PAHs. DR emissions are likely to come from units without tall stacks located in populated areas. On one day in the modeled summer, total DR emissions in southwest CT are in the range of: 3.5 tons NOx. Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.

Summer Emission Changes from New England DR (when DR is used for reserves) NO x (tons) SO 2 (tons) CO 2 (tons) PM 2.5 (tons) PM (tons) Hg (lbs) All Gas , Half Diesel , All Diesel , ,3 But. (lbs) Acetaldehyde (lbs) Acrolein (lbs) Benzene (lbs) Formaldehyde (lbs) PAH (lbs) All Gas % Diesel All Diesel Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. Range of uncertainty ±10%

Summer Percentage Changes from DR (when DR is used for reserves) NO x (tons) SO 2 (tons) CO 2 (tons) PM 2.5 (tons) PM (tons) Hg (lbs) All Gas -0.18%-0.30%-0.13%-0.37%-0.32%-0.07% 50% Diesel -0.14%-0.30%-0.12%-0.37%-0.32%-0.07% All Diesel -0.10%-0.30%-0.12%-0.36%-0.31%-0.07% 1,3 But. (lbs) Acetaldhyd. (lbs) Acrolein (lbs) Benzene (lbs) Formaldehyde (lbs) PAH (lbs) All Gas 4.33%0.29%0.04%0.01%0.23%0.54% 50% Diesel 2.49%0.16%0.02%0.01%0.11%0.86% All Diesel 0.64%0.02%0.00%0.01%-0.01%1.10% Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.

Summer Emission Changes from DR (when DR is not used for reserves) Synapse Energy Economics, Inc. NO x (tons) SO 2 (tons) CO 2 (tons) PM 2.5 (tons) PM (tons) Hg (lbs) All Gas % Diesel All Diesel ,3 But. (lbs) Acetaldehyde (lbs) Acrolein (lbs) Benzene (lbs) Formaldehyde (lbs) PAH (lbs) All Gas % Diesel All Diesel Range of uncertainty ±10%

Impacts of Efficiency vs. DR Two efficiency programs we modeled, an energy-targeted and a peak-targeted program. The energy-targeted program reduced annual energy use the most, followed by the peak-targeted program and the DR program. Focusing on annual emissions, the peak-targeted program reduced NO x and SO 2 most, but the energy-targeted program reduced CO 2 most. Focusing on summer emissions, the energy-targeted program reduced NO x, SO 2 and CO 2 most. For DR, these results are from the scenario in which DR is used to meet reserve requirements. Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.

Summer Impacts of Efficiency vs. DR For DR, these results are from the scenario in which DR is used to meet reserve requirements. Demand Response Energy-Targeted EE Peak-Targeted EE Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.

Annual Impacts of Efficiency vs. DR For DR, these results are from the scenario in which DR is used to meet reserve requirements. Demand Response Energy-Targeted EE Peak-Targeted EE Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.