1 Lecture-06 Baryogenesis Ping He ITP.CAS.CN

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radius of Observable Universe and Expansion Rate vs time, k = 0  = 0 Radiation dominated R = 3 x cm R = 10 cm R. =10 18 c c.
Advertisements

Searching for Magnetic Monopoles
Discrete Space-Time Symmetries Xiao-Gang He USTC, Nanakai, and NTU 1. Discrete Space-Time Symmetries 2. The Down Fall of Parity P Symmetry 3. The Down.
Testing CPT with CMB 李明哲 University of Bielefeld 2008 年 4 月 28 日.
Cosmological CPT Violation, Baryo/leptogenesis and CMB Polarization Mingzhe Li Nanjing University.
Chapter 17: The Birth of the Universe
QED at Finite Temperature and Constant Magnetic Field: 1. The Standard Model of Electroweak Interaction at Finite Temperature and Strong Magnetic Field.
Baryogenesis Astrophysical Seminar 2004/2005 Ben Koch.
1 Lecture-05 Thermodynamics in the Expanding Universe Ping He ITP.CAS.CN
Particle Physics and Cosmology
Option 212: UNIT 2 Elementary Particles Department of Physics and Astronomy SCHEDULE  5-Feb pm Physics LRA Dr M Burleigh Intro lecture  9-Feb-04.
Particle Physics and Cosmology Dark Matter. What is our universe made of ? quintessence ! fire, air, water, soil !
Smashing the Standard Model: Physics at the CERN LHC
The Ideas of Unified Theories of Physics Tareq Ahmed Mokhiemer PHYS441 Student.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 15; March
Chapter 29 Exploring the Early Universe. Guiding Questions 1.Has the universe always expanded as it does today? 2.What is antimatter? How can it be created,
Italian Physical Society International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”
PHY418 PARTICLE ASTROPHYSICS Introduction: What is particle astrophysics? 1.
Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 12; May
1 Oct 8 th, 2003Gerhard Raven CP violation: The difference between matter and antimatter Gerhard Raven Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Subatomic Physics.
Inflation: why and how? Gert Jan Hoeve, December 2012.
Option 212: UNIT 2 Elementary Particles Department of Physics and Astronomy SCHEDULE 26-Jan pm LRB Intro lecture 28-Jan pm LRBProblem solving.
Temperature dependence of Standard Model CP-violation and Cold Electroweak Baryogenesis Aleksi Vuorinen Bielefeld University Aleksi Vuorinen Bielefeld.
Nov.9, 2006, SNULeptogenesis & Triplet Seesaw1 Leptogenesis and Triplet Seesaw Eung Jin Chun KIAS TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual.
Vanya Belyaev (ITEP/Moscow) Физика на LHCb The material from the lectures by Profs. T.Nakada and S.Stone is used.
Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003PHYS 5326, Spring 2003 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #24 Wednesday, Apr. 23, 2003 Dr. Jae Yu Issues with SM picture Introduction.
QED at Finite Temperature and Constant Magnetic Field: The Standard Model of Electroweak Interaction at Finite Temperature and Strong Magnetic Field Neda.
Let us allow now the second heavy RH neutrino to be close to the lightest one,. How does the overall picture change? There are two crucial points to understand:
INVASIONS IN PARTICLE PHYSICS Compton Lectures Autumn 2001 Lecture 8 Dec
Introduction to Particle Physics How to compute the Universe?
1 Electroweak baryon number violation and a “topological condensate” Steven Bass / Innsbruck July Baryon asymmetry in the Universe:
PHY th century cosmology 1920s – 1990s (from Friedmann to Freedman)  theoretical technology available, but no data  20 th century: birth of observational.
The Life of the Universe From Beginning to End.
Chapter 17 The Beginning of Time. Running the Expansion Backward Temperature of the Universe from the Big Bang to the present (10 10 years ~ 3 x
Lecture 2: The First Second Baryogenisis: origin of neutrons and protons Hot Big Bang Expanding and cooling “Pair Soup” free particle + anti-particle pairs.
H. Quarks – “the building blocks of the Universe” The number of quarks increased with discoveries of new particles and have reached 6 For unknown reasons.
1 Lecture-03 The Thermal History of the universe Ping He ITP.CAS.CN
1 The Standard Model of Particle Physics Owen Long U. C. Riverside March 1, 2014.
Common problem against B and L genesis and its possible resolution M. Yoshimura Introduction 3 conditions for B asymmetry generation Sources of B non-conservation.
IoP Masterclass The Physics of Flavour at the Large Hadron Collider Tim Gershon University of Warwick March 30 th 2011.
IoP Masterclass The Physics of Flavour at the Large Hadron Collider Tim Gershon University of Warwick April 14 th 2010.
IoP Masterclass B PHYSICS Tim Gershon University of Warwick March 18 th 2009.
Internal structure of the fundamental particles
Nuclear Physics : Origin of elements
Leptogenesis beyond the limit of hierarchical heavy neutrino masses
TeV-Scale Leptogenesis and the LHC
Colour Breaking Baryogenesis
Monopoles The Mystery.
Intro to Symmetries Gene Golowich Physics (UMass) Talk at NEPPSR-04
Searching for Magnetic Monopoles
Why We Need or Want Baryogenesis
Matter vs. Antimatter The Question of Symmetry
The Beginning of Time (Birth Of The Universe)
The Four Fundamental Forces
The symmetry of interactions
The MESSM The Minimal Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model
Beyond the standard model
Subatomic Particles and Quantum Theory
What’s the matter with antimatter?
The Thermal History of the Universe
cosmodynamics quintessence fifth force
Beyond the Higgs wan ahmad tajuddin wan abdullah
Frontiers of fundamental physics
Double beta decay and Leptogenesis
Early Universe.
Lecture 2: The First Second origin of neutrons and protons
The Four Fundamental Forces
Rome Samanta, University of Southampton
Prospect after discoveries of Higgs/SUSY
Presentation transcript:

1 Lecture-06 Baryogenesis Ping He ITP.CAS.CN

2 6.1 Overview Grand unification (Grand unified theories – GUTs): to unify the strong, weak, and electromagnetic interactions and the quarks and leptons within the framework of a gauge field theory based upon a simple or semi-simple, non-Abelian symmetry group, e.g., SU(5), SO(10), E 6. GUTs predictions: (1) new interactions violate baryon number B and lepton L conservations, -- instability of the proton  proton decay; (2) large amount of superheavy magnetic monopoles. The B-violation interactions are extremely weak today, due to the longevity of proton. Standard model:

3 Baryogenesis, based on these B-violation interactions: (1) can explain how the B-symmetry Universe can evolve into the B-asymmetry Universe; (2) can explain the present baryon-to-photon ratio; (3) can provide a mechanism to unify quarks and leptons. Predictions from baryogenesis based on GUTs conflicts with standard cosmology, that there are too much superheavy monopoles that are not observed.  inflation M: the energy scale of unification

4 6.2 Evidence for a Baryon Asymmetry Anti-matter is rare on Earth, only in accelerator or cosmic ray. Also rare in the solar system, cosmic ray coming from the galaxy indicates that the galaxy is not anti-matter. On large scales: if matter and anti-matter co-exist, then there are strong   ray emission from nucleon-antinucleon annihilation. The absence of such   ray flux indicates the asymmetry of matter and anti-matter. In a locally-baryon-symmetric Universe nucleons and antinucleons remain in chemical equilibrium down to T ~ 22 MeV, when In order to avoid the “annihilation catastrophe” a physical mechanism should operate at T > 38 MeV, so that

5 The most reasonable conclusion then is that the Universe at early times T>38MeV possessed an asymmetry between baryons and antibaryons which prevented the annihilation catastrophe. At high temperatures T>1GeV, thermal quark-antiquark pairs were present in great numbers,, so that the baryon asymmetry observed today corresponds to a tiny quark-antiquark asymmetry at early times ( ). Baryogenesis scenario provides a very attractive means by which this tiny asymmetry can arise from initially baryon symmetric Universe.

6 3). In chemical equilibrium, the chemical potentials associated with all non-conserved quantum numbers vanish, that is, 6.3 The Basic Picture Three ingredients to generate non-zero baryon number from an initially baryon symmetric state, i.e., Sakharov Criteria: (1) Violation of Baryon number (B) symmetry; (2) Violation of C and CP symmetries; (3) A departure from thermal equilibrium. 1). It’s obviously. If baryon number is conserved in all interactions, the present baryon asymmetry can only reflect asymmetric initial conditions. 2). Without C and CP violation, B-nonconserving interactions will produce baryon and antibaryon excesses at the same rate  zero net baryon number. by CPT invariance, so, hence

7 A toy model: to illustrate the mechanics of baryogenesis. Since the two final states have different baryon number,  B-nonconservation. If C and CP are violated, then. If a box containing equal numbers of bosons. symmetric initial conditions The mean net baryons produced by X is: produced by The mean net baryon number produced by a pair of X and decay is (C and CP violated)

8  can be treated as indication of the degree of C and CP violation. When, can decay, but can also produce in pair in thermal collision, then: If always in thermal equilibrium, the process that produces baryon excess balance the one that perishes baryon  The asymmetry can be roughly estimated in the following way The correct way to do so should be handled by Boltzmann equation, which may have deviations of several orders of magnitude. when out-of-equilibrium ( ), due to B, C and CP violation, 

9 6.4 Concluding Remarks (1) Sakharov Three Criteria, but notice the scenario of spontaneous baryogenesis; (2) The precise evolution of the baryon asymmetry is handled by Boltzmann Equation; (3) Lepton-genesis can be treated in a similar way; (4) The current GUTs are not successful.

10 References E.W. Kolb & M.S. Turner, The Early Universe, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1993 D. Bailin & A. Love, Cosmology in Gauge Field Theory and String Theory, IoP Publishing, 2004 俞允强,热大爆炸宇宙学,北京大学出版 社, 2001 范祖辉, Course Notes on Physical Cosmology, See this site.this site