A MID SEMESTER REVIEW PRESENTATION ON An enhanced congestion control with cross layer approach using OLSR on MANET 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) algorithm is simple and best suited for high mobility nodes in wireless ad hoc networks. Due to high mobility in ad-hoc network,
Advertisements

Design and Implementation of the OLSR Protocol in an Ad Hoc Framework Juan Gutiérrez Plaza Supervisor: Raimo Kantola Instructor: José Costa Requena Networking.
Improving TCP Performance over Mobile Ad Hoc Networks by Exploiting Cross- Layer Information Awareness Xin Yu Department Of Computer Science New York University,
Sogang University ICC Lab Using Game Theory to Analyze Wireless Ad Hoc networks.
6/3/ Improving TCP Performance over Mobile Ad Hoc Networks by Exploiting Cross-Layer Information Awareness CS495 – Spring 2005 Northwestern University.
Multicasting in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks (MANET)
Beneficial Caching in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Bin Tang, Samir Das, Himanshu Gupta Computer Science Department Stony Brook University.
MANETs A Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a self-configuring network of mobile nodes connected by wireless links. Characteristics include: no fixed infrastructure.
The Impact of Multihop Wireless Channel on TCP Throughput and Loss Zhenghua Fu, Petros Zerfos, Haiyun Luo, Songwu Lu, Lixia Zhang, Mario Gerla INFOCOM2003,
Performance Enhancement of TFRC in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Mingzhe Li, Choong-Soo Lee, Emmanuel Agu, Mark Claypool and Bob Kinicki Computer Science Department.
Component-Based Routing for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Chunyue Liu, Tarek Saadawi & Myung Lee CUNY, City College.
1 Expected Data Rate (EDR): An Accurate High-Throughput Path Metric For Multi- Hop Wireless Routing Jun Cheol Park Sneha Kumar Kasera.
High Throughput Route Selection in Multi-Rate Ad Hoc Wireless Networks Dr. Baruch Awerbuch, David Holmer, and Herbert Rubens Johns Hopkins University Department.
Roadmap-Based End-to-End Traffic Engineering for Multi-hop Wireless Networks Mustafa O. Kilavuz Ahmet Soran Murat Yuksel University of Nevada Reno.
ENHANCING AND EVALUATION OF AD-HOC ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN VANET.
Itrat Rasool Quadri ST ID COE-543 Wireless and Mobile Networks
Qian Zhang Department of Computer Science HKUST Advanced Topics in Next- Generation Wireless Networks Transport Protocols in Ad hoc Networks.
A Simple and Effective Cross Layer Networking System for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Wing Ho Yuen, Heung-no Lee and Timothy Andersen.
10/1/2015 9:14 PM1 TCP in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks ─ Split TCP CSE 6590.
CSE 6590 Fall 2010 Routing Metrics for Wireless Mesh Networks 1 4 October, 2015.
A Study of Live Video Streaming over Highway Vehicular Ad hoc Networks Meenakshi Mittal ©2010 International Journal of Computer Applications ( )Volume.
Improving QoS Support in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Agenda Motivations Proposed Framework Packet-level FEC Multipath Routing Simulation Results Conclusions.
ROUTING ALGORITHMS IN AD HOC NETWORKS
Enhancing Link Duration and Path Stability of Routing Protocols in VANETs Presented by: Sanjay Kumar, Haresh Kumar and Zahid Yousuf Supervised by: Dr.
1 Mobile ad hoc networking with a view of 4G wireless: Imperatives and challenges Myungchul Kim Tel:
Dilshad Haleem CST593 summer 2007 Routing In Wireless Mesh Networks CST593 Final Project by Dilshad Haleem Division of Computing Studies, ASU Polytechnic.
CSE 6590 Fall 2009 Routing Metrics for Wireless Mesh Networks 1 12 November, 2015.
S Master’s thesis seminar 8th August 2006 QUALITY OF SERVICE AWARE ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS Thesis Author: Shan Gong Supervisor:Sven-Gustav.
TCP with Variance Control for Multihop IEEE Wireless Networks Jiwei Chen, Mario Gerla, Yeng-zhong Lee.
KAIS T High-throughput multicast routing metrics in wireless mesh networks Sabyasachi Roy, Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, Saumitra Das, and Y. Charlie Hu ICDCS.
Robust MANET Design John P. Mullen, Ph.D. Timothy I. Matis, Ph.D. Smriti Rangan Karl Adams Center for Stochastic Modeling New Mexico State University May.
Project Proposal Team 8,9 손영주이경섭장성운정은호. Table of Contents Motivation Motivation Goals and Scope Goals and Scope Technical Problem Description Technical.
TCP OVER ADHOC NETWORK. TCP Basics TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) was designed to provide reliable end-to-end delivery of data over unreliable networks.
November 4, 2003Applied Research Laboratory, Washington University in St. Louis APOC 2003 Wuhan, China Cost Efficient Routing in Ad Hoc Mobile Wireless.
Energy-Efficient Protocol for Cooperative Networks.
Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols Presented by Venkata Suresh Tamminiedi Computer Science Department Georgia State University.
1 Ad-hoc Transport Layer Protocol (ATCP) EECS 4215.
An Efficient Routing Protocol for Green Communications in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks Jamal Toutouh, Enritue Alba GECCO’ 11, July Presented by 劉美妙.
Mobile Ad Hoc Networking By Shaena Price. What is it? Autonomous system of routers and hosts connected by wireless links Can work flawlessly in a standalone.
HoWL: An Efficient Route Discovery Scheme Using Routing History in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Faculty of Environmental Information Mika Minematsu
Routing Metrics for Wireless Mesh Networks
Author:Zarei.M.;Faez.K. ;Nya.J.M.
TAODV: A Trusted AODV Routing Protocol for MANET
Confluent vs. Splittable Flows
Analysis the performance of vehicles ad hoc network simulation based
Routing Metrics for Wireless Mesh Networks
Architecture and Algorithms for an IEEE 802
Overview of Wireless Networks:
AODV-OLSR Scalable Ad hoc Routing
Lecture 28 Mobile Ad hoc Network Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Mobicom ‘99 Per Johansson, Tony Larsson, Nicklas Hedman
Ad-hoc Transport Layer Protocol (ATCP)
Sensor Network Routing
CSE 4340/5349 Mobile Systems Engineering
任課教授:陳朝鈞 教授 學生:王志嘉、馬敏修
Ad hoc Routing Protocols
Routing Metrics for Wireless Mesh Networks
A New Multipath Routing Protocol for Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
High Throughput Route Selection in Multi-Rate Ad Hoc Wireless Networks
TCP in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
A High-Throughput Path Metric for Multi-Hop Wireless Routing
TCP in Wireless Ad-hoc Networks
The Impact of Multihop Wireless Channel on TCP Performance
Privacy Preservation and Protection Scheme over ALARM on Geographical routing B. Muthusenthil, S. Murugavalli Results The PPS is geographical routing protocol,
Wireless & Mobile Networking CS 752/852 - Spring 2011
Hemant Kr Rath1, Anirudha Sahoo2, Abhay Karandikar1
Study of performance of regular TCP in MANETs (using simulator).
Xiuzhen Cheng Csci332 MAS Networks – Challenges and State-of-the-Art Research – Wireless Mesh Networks Xiuzhen Cheng
Motion-Aware Routing in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks
Routing in Mobile Ad-hoc Networks
Presentation transcript:

A MID SEMESTER REVIEW PRESENTATION ON An enhanced congestion control with cross layer approach using OLSR on MANET 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION1 Present By: Guided By: Katariya Pinali N.Dhaval M Nimavat Assistant Professor, ATMIYA INST OF TECH & SCI 003,RAJKOT

Outline INTRODUCTION LITERATURE REVIEW PROBLEM DEFINITION RELATED WORK COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS PROPOSED WORK IMPLEMENTATION WORK CONCLUSION PAPER PUBLICATION DP-1 COMMENTS SOLUTION REFERENCES 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION2

Introduction to MANET MANETs are wireless networks consisting of dynamic nodes that are self-configurable and infrastructure-less[1]. Ad-hoc networks are basically peer-to-peer multi-hop mobile wireless networks where information packets are transmitted in a “store-and- forward” manner from a source to destination, via intermediate nodes. The routing protocols in MANETs can be classified into two main types: Proactive and Reactive. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION3 Fig.1 mobile ad-hoc network

Introduction to MANET MANET challenges:  Restricted wireless transmission range  Time-varying wireless link characteristics  Broadcast nature of the wireless medium  Packet losses due to transmission errors  Mobility-induced route changes  Mobility-induced packet losses  Battery constraints  Potentially frequent network partitions  Routing  Quality of Service & Security 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION4

Introduction to cross layer approach “Cross layer design is a concept to modern protocol that communicate in network virtually between layers and their boundaries”[7]. It is use for better network efficiency and performance. Cross layer design having six different types, depend on its efforts to improvement[6]. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION5

Comparison of OSI layer and cross layer design 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION6 Fig.2 OSI architecture[1] Fig.3 cross layer architecture[1]

Literature Review Paper 1 (base) “An Efficient Congestion Control Scheme Using Cross-Layered Approach and Comparison of TCP Variants for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs)” AuthorSneha V. Sangolli, Jayavignesh Thyagarajan Publication & Year IEEE 2014 Summary  In this paper, they used TCP-Tahoe, TCP-New Reno and TCP-Vegas, run over AODV routing protocol for congestion control.  It is discussed that every packet loss is considered as a sign of congestion and unnecessary retransmissions and slowing down the sending rate results in poor performance.  None of the TCP variants able to work proactively to avoid packet loss, so here cross layer approach is applied to identify correct network event.  In this paper suggest exponential averaging and employ an energy efficient routing protocol in window based exponential averaging scheme. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION7

Literature Review Paper 2 (base) “Performance of OLSR in MANETs with Cross-Layer Metrics and TCP/UDP flows” AuthorM. Colizza, M. Pratesi, F. Santucci, S. Pollio, G. Rigazzi Publication & Year IEEE 2012 Summary  Here in this paper they have focused on investigate traffic related performance for TCP/UDP-based traffic flows in a MANET by OLSR with various routing metrics.  Here they have worked on PER based metrics and also used cross layer approach to improve robustness against changes in network mobility to evaluate performance in the traffic condition.  As a future work, this PER metrics is also used to select high throughput(more efficient) paths for TCP based services, simultaneously using low delay paths for real time services. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION8

Literature Review Paper 3“Performance Comparison of TCP variants over AODV, DSDV, DSR, OLSR in NS-2” AuthorMd. Monzur Morshed, Meft ah Ur Rahman, Md. Habibur Rahman, Md. Rafiqul Islam Publication & Year IEEE 2012 Summary  In this paper, analysis of TCP variation such as Reno, New-Reno, Vegas, and Tahoe under routing protocol AODV, DSDV, DSR, OLSR discussed.  They have used QoS metrics such as drop, throughput, delay, and jitter for performance compression.  Simulation result shows TCP-Vegas out of all TCP variants gives best output and among network layer protocol OLSR and AODV performs better. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION9

Literature Review Paper 4“A Cross Layer Routing Matric for Gateway Aware Routing in Wireless Mesh Network” AuthorNarayan D. G., Kumar Sugnani, Abhishek Raichur, Uma M Publication & Year IEEE 2013 Summary  In this paper they have focused on network gateway for optimization operation.  They have proposed a new metric for gateway routing by using cross layer approach and OLSR routing protocol.  It gives better throughput and average end-to-end delay compare to load aware expected transmission time(LAETT). The performance differential analyzed for both static and dynamic scenarios. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION10

Literature Review Paper 5“A Cross-Layer Design Approach in OLSR MANET using BER and Weighted Connectivity Index” AuthorTeerapat Sanguankotchakorn, Sanika K. Wijayasekara, Nobuhiko Sugino Publication & Year IEEE 2013 Summary  In this paper they have proposed the heuristic approach based on cross layer design to enhanced performance of OLSR by using BER derived from physical layer together with network layer parameter weighted connectivity index(CI).  They have used throughput, PDR, average end-to-end delay as a performance metric.  They have concluded that cross layer framework enhances OLSR protocol by considering link quality in terms of BER from physical layer and CI from network layer. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION11

Research gap From the literature survey it has been observed that packet loss is considered a reason for congestion. None of the TCP variants and network layer protocol works proactively to avoid packet loss. We also observed that cross layer approach along with routing protocol OLSR can be used to optimize performance in packet loss situation. Earlier research never used OLSR along with cross layer approach to avoid congestion. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION12

Related work Disconnection, link layer contention, buffer over – flow are one of the reason for packet loss results in congestion. For resolve this various TCP variants and routing protocols are used but none of the gives satisfactorily output. As an alternative to communicate directly between layers, cross layer approach is useful. Similarly OLSR used at many places as its proactive nature. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION13

Proposed work An analysis the cross layer approach with OLSR routing protocol over TCP variants. Using these three calculate high throughput and low delay(end-to-end delay) for packet transmission. The simulation environment developed using ns-2. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION14

Conclusion and Further work Here we use transport layer and network layer collaborating with data link layer. OLSR routing protocol with cross layer approach using TCP variants by using high throughput and low delay(end to end delay) for congestion control in packet transmission environment. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION15

References [1] Sneha V. Sangolli, Jayavignesh Thyagarajan “An Efficient Congestion Control Scheme Using Cross- Layered Approach and Comparison of TCP Variants for Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs)” 2014 IEEE. [2] M. Colizza, M. Pratesi, F. Santucci, S. Pollio, G. Rigazzi “Performance of OLSR in MANETs with Cross-Layer Metrics and TCP/UDP flows” 2012 IEEE. [3] Md. Monzur Morshed, Meft ah Ur Rahman, Md. Habibur Rahman, Md. Rafiqul Islam “Performance Comparison of TCP variants over AODV, DSDV, DSR, OLSR in NS-2 ” 2012 IEEE. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION16

References [4] Narayan D. G., Kumar Sugnani, Abhishek Raichur, Uma M “A Cross Layer Routing Metric for Gateway Aware Routing in Wireless Mesh Network ” 2013 IEEE. [5] Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, Sanika K. Wijayasekara, Nobuhiko Sugino “A Cross-Layer Design Approach in OLSR MANET using BER and Weighted Connectivity Index” 2013 IEEE. [6] John A. Stine Member “Cross-Layer Design of MANETs: The Only Option ” IEEE. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION17

References [7] Anshu Chaturvedi, D.N. Goswami, Shivjay Singh “Energy Aware Route Selection Algorithm for Cross Layer Design over MANET” 2015 IEEE. 3/6/2017ME SEM-3 DP-1 PRESENTATION18