New Public Management In Sri Lanka and Compare With Pakistan and New- Zealand
New Public Management
Situation Before Public Sector Reforms Why These country needed Public Sector Reform Focusses areas to Develop How to Overcome this problem(New Public Management Element) Public Sector Reform In Sri Lanka Public Sector Reform In Pakistan Public Sector Reform In New Zealand What are the Suggestion
Situation Before Public Sector Reforms – Continue….. Administration System/Norm “Welfare First and Growth later” Advanced welfare Services Foods Health Education
Situation Before Public Sector Reforms – Continue….. Political administrative system (Public Services) It is centralized for Process rather than outcome Bureaucratic Approach (Public Services) Rigid rules Security than merit for promotion
Situation Before Public Sector Reforms – Continue….. Critical Problem was Unemployment High Poverty Levels Low Growth Rate
Main Challenge of This Countries are Increasing Budget Deficit Multilateral Pressures Risk of neo-liberal market economics Address the rising cost and size of government, Relative to growth of the private sector
Focusses areas to Develop Improving Efficiency and Effectiveness of Public Sector Combat Corruptions
How to Overcome this this problem (Characteristic Of New Public Management ) – Continue….. Market Based Public Administration Entrepreneurial Government
Characteristic Of New Public Management– Continue….. Market Based Public Administration Public Entities Being Commercialized Privatized Contracted Out Down sizing the Public Sector Organization
What are the main achievement of public reform Providing High Quality Service Advocating Managerial Autonomy Demanding, Measuring and Rewording both Organizational Providing human and Technology Recourses To ensure better Government with Low cost………
1980 DDC 1978 PIDS PC DPA DDCs DMS PCP 2000 What Kind of Reform Have Been Taken Since 1970
What kind of reform have been taken in Sri Lanka DDCS – 1971 Divisional Development Councils (DDCS) to Create Local Employment and use Local Resources DPA – 1973 District Political Authority with Decentralized Budget System DMS – 1978 District Minister System DDC – 1980 District Development Councils were Establish with Act PC Provincial Council Act PCP – Presidential Committee on Privatizations PIDS – 2000 Performance and Aptitude Appraisals for Senior Civil Services.
Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. DDCS Divisional Development Councils Necessary financial & Managerial Capacity were not Available. No consistency between interest of local elite objective of decentralization.
Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. DMS – 1978 District Minister System No long term planning. DMS has very low power. Lack of Interrelationship between other Institute (Local, Central government) Political Interests are taken Priority
Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. PC – 1987 (13 th Amendment) Provincial Council Act Lack of Coordination between different levels of Government Imbalances between Political Institution and Bureaucracy High Political Influence
Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. PCP – Presidential Committee on Privatizations Inadequate institutional arrangement to enforce smooth financial transaction Minimal safety nets for retrenched workers Corruption – decline of public accountability Lack of transparency in public sector
Weakness of the Reform – Continue….. Performance and aptitude appraisals Civil Servant were not ready for development need of the country like New Zealand, UK, Canada, Malesia.
What are the Suggestion Need Managers than Administration, with Communication and Technical skills(IT). Ministers Should Work with the Bureaucrats (don't use informal channel). Structure the Local Levels Officials Establish a Proper Performance Evolution System. Enforcement of Greater Transparency. Direct to Smaller Government.
Economic Data Year Population12.4 million19 million21 million Literacy Rate80%92.6% Life Expectation 70 Years76.8 Years Per Capital income $ 800$ Low income country Middle income country