Session 2 The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation Setting the scene: the Global Partnership, what it is and how it can make a difference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented at the ECOSOC 2012 Development Cooperation Forum 1 st High-level Symposium Bamako, Mali 5-6 May 2011 by Timothy Lubanga, Assistant Commissioner.
Advertisements

Africa is still facing significant development challenges Institutional capacity to adequately improve livelihoods of Africas citizens Systematic pan-African.
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
Harmonized support to scaling up the national AIDS response Ini Huijts 7 th June 2006 ODI meeting, London.
Open Forum on CSO Development Effectiveness as a Response to Paris Declaration IDEAS Global Assembly 2009 Getting to Results: Evaluation Capacity Building.
KEMENTERIAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL/ BADAN PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN NASIONAL Overview On Knowledge Sharing And How To Foster More Efficient Ways.
Asia Pacific Consultation on Building Regional Evidence for the First High Level Meeting of the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation.
Delivering on Commitments to Gender Equality and Women’s Rights Key issues for HLF4 on aid effectiveness, Busan November 2011 Delivering on Commitments.
Partnerships for Prosperity (P4P) An overview PPD Workshop, March 2014.
Commonwealth Local Government Forum Freeport, Bahamas, May 13, 2009 Tim Kehoe Local Government and Aid Effectiveness.
Feedback Mechanisms in Malawi Key challenges and way forward Ministry of Finance and Development Planning MALAWI.
CSO’s on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals.
1 Development Cooperation Policies Trade Union Development Cooperation Network February 2009.
The Outcomes of the Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness (HLF-4) Aid Quality & Architecture Division Development Co-operation Directorate OECD.
Elaine Ireland Policy Adviser: Global Health Global Health Policy Forum 9 th September 2010 Aid Effectiveness in the Health Sector: A civil society perspective.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION IN ASIA PACIFIC: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES
July 2011: OECD-DAC Working Party on Aid Effectiveness, Paris June 2011: Joint Global Assembly of Open Forum and Better Aid Platform to prepare for HLF4.
About the CSO Partnership for Development Effectiveness
The International Framework of Aid and Development Effectiveness Karin Fällman, Sida 13 February 2014.
1 Donor coordination and effectiveness of aid to agriculture Effectiveness in Aid to Agriculture Czech action to strengthen food security Glopolis / FoRS.
Development Cooperation and Partnerships Strategy ( ) October 2014 KIM Lumang Bopata Policy Department.
Overview Outcomes from Busan HLF 4 Faye Lee, Korea NGO Council for Overseas Cooperation.
1 Collaboration and partnerships for increased impact and effectiveness Kanayo F. Nwanze Vice-President of IFAD October th Replenishment.
Lessons learned and benefits of multi-stakeholder food security and nutrition governance Deborah Fulton Secretary, CFS.
International Development on Aid Effectiveness Presenter Said Muhammed Jama Aid Coordination Expert Ministry of National Planning and Development.
WEBINAR 3 rd UN DCF Survey on Global Accountability Office for ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UNDESA.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration in 2011 Preliminary Findings Working Party on Aid Effectiveness Paris, 5-8 July 2011.
Aid Coordination Roundtable Meeting 09 July 2009 Accra Agenda of Action and The Paris Declaration.
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
1. Background to CSO Development Effectiveness 2. What is the Open Forum process 3. International Framework for CSO Development Effectiveness 5. GLOBAL.
“AID EFFECTIVENESS AND HEALTH Challenges and opportunities Marielle Hart Action for Global Health.
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
Inclusive Partnerships & Multi-stakeholder Approaches Busan Partnership Workshop Nov. 6-7, 2014 Break-out Session 4 Jacqueline Wood for the Task Team on.
Vienna, Austria March 4 th, 2014 Arab Aid Development Effectiveness Workshop GPEDC Background & Indicators.
Monitoring the Paris Declaration Emerging Findings Brenda Killen, OECD Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland 30 August.
UHC 2030 CSO engagement mechanism Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Engaging CSOs in UHC 2030 Bruno Rivalan IHP+ Northern CSO Representative IHP+ Steering committee 21 th June 2016.
Effective development cooperation principles and quality of partnerships in the post-2015 and Financing for Development context ---Bangladesh perspective.
Session 6 Introduction to the indicator clinics UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
Coordination and Partnerships of SDG4-Education 2030 Le Thu Huong Section of Partnerships, Cooperation and Research, UNESCO Paris.
stakeholder engagement and gender mainstreaming
The Global Partnership
Session 3 The monitoring framework
KNOWLEDGE SHARING CONCEPT NOTE
Auditing Sustainable Development Goals
Planning Institute of Jamaica (PIOJ) Social Good Summit UNDP
ICELANDIC DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION
Sustainable Development Goals
Session 3 The 2nd monitoring round ( )
Vincent Grimaud, Head of Unit
Nairobi Outcome Document
Effective Aid? From Paris to Accra to Doha and Beyond
Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round
IHP+ First Steering Committee Meeting 15 January 2014
Background to The Conference
Session 1: Setting the Scene
SESSION I: Governance and Organisational Issues Related to Early Warning Systems for Integrated Disaster Risk Reduction SYMPOSIUM ON MULTI-HAZARD EARLY.
Session 3 The monitoring framework
Session 3 Stock take of the first monitoring round
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results-
Session 4 Introduction to the 2nd monitoring round ( )
Co Chair, BetterAid Open Platform for Development Effectiveness
Session 6 Introduction to the indicator clinics
Busan Partnership for Climate Finance and Development Effectiveness
Marjolaine Nicod, IHP+ Core Team
The SDGs in Flanders November 27, 2018.
25-27 April 2018 Nairobi, Kenya Pan-African High-level Conference Co-convened by UNESCO and the Government of Kenya in collaboration w the African Union.
Septiembre 2017 Mexico’s Monitoring Pilot
Capacity development and Financing data for development
Presentation transcript:

Session 2 The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation Setting the scene: the Global Partnership, what it is and how it can make a difference UNDP-OECD Joint Support Team www.effectivecooperation.org

Intro: What is Effective Development Co-operation? Principles of effective development co-operation (EDC): Ownership of development priorities by developing countries Focus on results Partnerships for inclusive development Transparency and accountability These principles build on a range of international discussions and commitments: Rome Declaration on Harmonisation Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness Accra Agenda for Action Busan Partnership agreement Mexico High-Level Communiqué MDGs The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (GPEDC) brings together a wide variety of actors to improve the quality and effectiveness of development co-operation. Building on the Monterrey Consensus (2002), the Rome Declaration on Harmonisation (2003), the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness (2005), and the Accra Agenda for Action (2008) - the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan (2011) represented a new way forward in bringing together historical efforts to improve development co-operation by different partners in an inclusive manner to include non-state actors such as business, civil society, parliamentarians, international organisations and foundations as development partners alongside governments. The Busan Partnership agreement sets out principles and commitments that form the foundation of effective development co-operation: ownership by developing countries results as a focus of development efforts partnerships for inclusive development, and transparency and accountability. The GPEDC was established as a direct result of the Busan Partnership agreement. It is a forum for shared advice, shared learning and shared action to support the implementation of Busan commitments. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provide support for the effective functioning of the GPEDC through the UNDP-OECD joint support team (JST). The JST includes dedicated staff across the two organisations who provide day-to-day support to the GPEDC. SDGs 2000 2002 2003 2005 2008 2011 2014 2015 1st FFD Monterrey Consensus 2nd FFD Doha Declaration 3rd FFD Addis Ababa Action Agenda

What is the Global Partnership ? Born at the 4th High Level Forum on Aid effectiveness in Busan (2011) A multi-stakeholder platform to help sustain political focus on high- quality and inclusive development partnerships. 160 countries and territories and 47 international organisations Developing countries, “traditional” providers, South-South Cooperation providers, private sector, CSOs, parliamentarians An important contribution to implementing the Post-2015 development and Financing for Development agendas: Addis Ababa Action Agenda: “We welcome continued efforts to improve the quality, impact and effectiveness of development cooperation and other international efforts in public finance, including adherence to agreed development cooperation effectiveness principles […] We will pursue these efforts in the DCF of the ECOSOC, and […] will also take account of efforts in other relevant for a, such as the GPEDC, in a complementary manner” (para 58). The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (GPEDC) brings together a wide variety of actors to improve the quality and effectiveness of development co-operation. Building on the Monterrey Consensus (2002), the Rome Declaration on Harmonisation (2003), the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness (2005), and the Accra Agenda for Action (2008) - the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan (2011) represented a new way forward in bringing together historical efforts to improve development co-operation by different partners in an inclusive manner to include non-state actors such as business, civil society, parliamentarians, international organisations and foundations as development partners alongside governments. The Busan Partnership agreement sets out principles and commitments that form the foundation of effective development co-operation: ownership by developing countries results as a focus of development efforts partnerships for inclusive development, and transparency and accountability. The GPEDC was established as a direct result of the Busan Partnership agreement. It is a forum for shared advice, shared learning and shared action to support the implementation of Busan commitments. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provide support for the effective functioning of the GPEDC through the UNDP-OECD joint support team (JST). The JST includes dedicated staff across the two organisations who provide day-to-day support to the GPEDC.

What does it do? Provides a voluntary and dynamic platform for dialogue on policy coherence and practice, to spur action at country level Shares knowledge to boost development impact with a strong country focus Monitors the implementation of EDC commitments Brokers and cultivates multi- actor initiatives Current monitoring framework (indicators, its targets and process to monitor progress up to 2015) agreed in 2012 It focuses on implementation of the Busan principles for effective development cooperation through selective 10 indicators (10 indicators grounded in the four principles of ownership, results focus, inclusive partnerships, and transparency and accountability) - incentivize behavioral change for more effective development co-operation based on four principles, namely, country ownership, results focus, inclusive partnership, and transparency and accountability. It aims to stimulate actions on the ground on how to improve quality of partnerships. Through better partnerships, we can achieve better results. Monitoring supports dialogue at country and global level. The outcome of the process to inform political policy dialogue at HLMs at global level, but to also inform dialogue at country level. Objectives of the GPEDC monitoring framework Provides a mechanism for monitoring the implementation of commitments agreed in Busan for more effective development co-operation. The framework was proposed by the Post-Busan Interim Group (PBIG) and endorsed during the last meeting of the Working Party on Aid Effectiveness in July 2012. It builds on experience and lessons of international monitoring efforts since 2005, and responds to developing countries’ demand for a global accountability framework to support national implementation efforts. In order to track progress in the effectiveness and quality of development co-operation, the Global Partnership monitoring framework monitors behaviour change in development co-operation. Key features of the GPEDC Monitoring Framework Country-led accountability Global multi-stakeholder dialogue Supporting accountability for post-2015 implementation

Making a difference on the ground The GPEDC spurs action on the ground - Examples of concrete initiatives: Ethiopia Post-Busan Action Plan Objective: measure progress and hold providers and the government accountable Designed by the Effective Development Co-operation Taskforce Will be regularly monitored Burkina Faso Annual M&E of Busan commitments by a multi-stakeholder group Participation of the public administration, providers, CSOs, the private sector Support from UNDP Outcomes: multi-stakeholder dialogue and concrete recommendations Bénin Aid Policy Includes targets for individual providers and processes for co-M&E Participation of local authorities and other non-executive stakeholders Current monitoring framework (indicators, its targets and process to monitor progress up to 2015) agreed in 2012 It focuses on implementation of the Busan principles for effective development cooperation through selective 10 indicators (10 indicators grounded in the four principles of ownership, results focus, inclusive partnerships, and transparency and accountability) - incentivize behavioral change for more effective development co-operation based on four principles, namely, country ownership, results focus, inclusive partnership, and transparency and accountability. It aims to stimulate actions on the ground on how to improve quality of partnerships. Through better partnerships, we can achieve better results. Monitoring supports dialogue at country and global level. The outcome of the process to inform political policy dialogue at HLMs at global level, but to also inform dialogue at country level. Objectives of the GPEDC monitoring framework Provides a mechanism for monitoring the implementation of commitments agreed in Busan for more effective development co-operation. The framework was proposed by the Post-Busan Interim Group (PBIG) and endorsed during the last meeting of the Working Party on Aid Effectiveness in July 2012. It builds on experience and lessons of international monitoring efforts since 2005, and responds to developing countries’ demand for a global accountability framework to support national implementation efforts. In order to track progress in the effectiveness and quality of development co-operation, the Global Partnership monitoring framework monitors behaviour change in development co-operation. Key features of the GPEDC Monitoring Framework Country-led accountability Global multi-stakeholder dialogue Supporting accountability for post-2015 implementation

International Level Framework Country Level Framework A “global light, country-focused” approach International Level Framework Ministerial political dialogue drawn from evidence, selective indicators and targets monitoring progress on a rolling basis Regional platforms Voicing, knowledge-sharing, consultation Country Level Framework Country-level compacts Implementation action plans Country-results based accountability frameworks (incl. own indicators and targets), inclusive partnerships

Leadership Co-Chairs (left to right) Mr. Goodall Edward Gondwe, Minister of Finance, Economic Planning & Development, Malawi. Lilianne Ploumen, Minister for Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation, Netherlands Claudia Ruiz Massieu, Secretary of Foreign Affairs, MEXICOSecretary of Foreign Affairs, Mexico Global monitoring of commitments on aid effectiveness began in 2005, building on references to quality of aid in the Monterrey Consensus. At the Busan High Level Forum in 2011, developing countries called for the continuation of a global monitoring framework to uphold accountability and support implementation efforts for effective development co-operation in individual countries. The Global Partnership monitoring framework provides an existing methodology, and mechanism for monitoring the quality of development partnerships grounded in the principles of effective development co-operation. Monitoring efforts are country-led, founded on developing country leadership and built on countries’ own accountability mechanisms and information systems. Its approach to mutual learning between governments from the north and south, multilateral and regional organisations, private sector, foundations, NGOs and others offers an inclusive international platform to reinforce mutual learning and knowledge sharing, linking national, regional and global levels. Quality and results of development financing (ODA, SSC, FDI, etc.) represent important elements of the Financing for Development process and the post-2015 means of implementation. Development finance becomes effective when complemented by impact-oriented cooperation; effective partnerships that yield concrete results will help the international community to deliver on its goals. Through its existing methodology and inclusive country-led process, the GPEDC provides a complementary, ready-made niche product to support UN-led accountability efforts for post-2015.

Structure Ministerial-level meetings Steering Committee Countries. IOs. CSOs, Private Sector, Parliamentarians Meet every 18-24 months to: Review progress Ensure political accountability Address key issues 3 Co-Chairs + 21 members Meets every 6-12 months, focus on: Steering Ministerial-level work Identifying priorities / actions to support progress and political dialogue Global monitoring of commitments on aid effectiveness began in 2005, building on references to quality of aid in the Monterrey Consensus. At the Busan High Level Forum in 2011, developing countries called for the continuation of a global monitoring framework to uphold accountability and support implementation efforts for effective development co-operation in individual countries. The Global Partnership monitoring framework provides an existing methodology, and mechanism for monitoring the quality of development partnerships grounded in the principles of effective development co-operation. Monitoring efforts are country-led, founded on developing country leadership and built on countries’ own accountability mechanisms and information systems. Its approach to mutual learning between governments from the north and south, multilateral and regional organisations, private sector, foundations, NGOs and others offers an inclusive international platform to reinforce mutual learning and knowledge sharing, linking national, regional and global levels. Quality and results of development financing (ODA, SSC, FDI, etc.) represent important elements of the Financing for Development process and the post-2015 means of implementation. Development finance becomes effective when complemented by impact-oriented cooperation; effective partnerships that yield concrete results will help the international community to deliver on its goals. Through its existing methodology and inclusive country-led process, the GPEDC provides a complementary, ready-made niche product to support UN-led accountability efforts for post-2015. Joint Support Team (JST) OECD and UNDP Delivers light global “secretariat”, including: Conducting global monitoring, With the guidance of a Monitoring Advisory Group Producing analytical work Organising meetings

To be updated GPEDC in the 2030 Agenda An extraordinary time in history To be updated The Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation (GPEDC) brings together a wide variety of actors to improve the quality and effectiveness of development co-operation. Building on the Monterrey Consensus (2002), the Rome Declaration on Harmonisation (2003), the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness (2005), and the Accra Agenda for Action (2008) - the Fourth High-Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness in Busan (2011) represented a new way forward in bringing together historical efforts to improve development co-operation by different partners in an inclusive manner to include non-state actors such as business, civil society, parliamentarians, international organisations and foundations as development partners alongside governments. The Busan Partnership agreement sets out principles and commitments that form the foundation of effective development co-operation: ownership by developing countries results as a focus of development efforts partnerships for inclusive development, and transparency and accountability. The GPEDC was established as a direct result of the Busan Partnership agreement. It is a forum for shared advice, shared learning and shared action to support the implementation of Busan commitments. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) provide support for the effective functioning of the GPEDC through the UNDP-OECD joint support team (JST). The JST includes dedicated staff across the two organisations who provide day-to-day support to the GPEDC.

How to engage? Countries and organisations can engage by: Shaping the Global Partnership’s agenda and helping prepare for the High-Level Meeting through Steering Committee. Next HLM: Nairobi, Nov 2016 Sharing experiences, challenges and best practices. Communicating progress in your own implementation of the EDC commitments Participating in monitoring efforts at the country level.

Get involved! Visit the website www.effectivecooperation.org Share knowledge on the community space – email: community@effectivecooperation.org Subscribe to our newsletter – email: info@effectivecooperation.org @DevCooperation#GPEDC#DevCoop Facebook.com/DevCooperation Youtube.com/user/TheGlobalPartnership

তোমাকে ধন্যবাদ Gracias Thank you Dankjewel Hvala Merci Asante مننه ありがとう Gracias Thank you Dankjewel Hvala Merci Asante مننه شكرا Obrigado Salamat