LCP-2-MAR Part A Marin County Land Use Plan Update

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Advertisements

Introduction to Reviewing Development Projects: Case Scenarios Thursday, June 25, 2009 Sullivan County Division of Planning and Environmental Management.
Chapter 3 Size Requirements 1. Overview of Size Requirements Initial qualifying tracts must meet a minimum size requirement Qualifying tracts may contain.
General Provisions Affordable Housing Signs Transfer of Development Rights 2009 ULDC Update September 8,
Land Subdivision and Zoning Unit: Owning Property Lesson: Land Subdivision and Zoning.
What Can Local Government Do?. Utah Agriculture Code 4-1-8(1) “the science and art of the production of plants and animals useful to man including the.
1 Williamson Act Public Information Meeting March 6, 2006.
Planned Unit Development
Island County SMP Shoreline Residential Development Workshop December 5, 2011.
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission ZOS Location Map Feet.
1 Preservation Parcels Investigation Report to the Board of County Commissioners September 19, :30 PM.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE REGULATIONS Planning Commission Workshop April 3, 2012.
Forestry-related Ordinances in Florida What are the potential influences of county and municipal ordinances on forest land retention and sustainability?
Rural Residential Zoning District & Subdivision Exemptions Southampton County Board of Supervisors Presented by Jay Randolph November 28, 2005.
Agricultural Preserves Program Uniform Rules Update Office of Long Range Planning Board of Supervisors Hearing September 25, 2007.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING February 19, 2008.
How to Protect and Preserve Your Agricultural Land.
Consistency Determination: City of Seaside Local Coastal Program FORA Board Meeting March 15, 2013 Agenda No: 8a.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District March 10, 2009 Board of County Commissioners.
Butterfly Village (PLN080209) Monterey County RMA- Planning Director July 30, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
RUTHERFORD SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CLEAN WATER MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND GRANT Travis Ringo, Rutherford SWCD.
Updates to Title 8. Anticipated Timeline… July - December 2013 Ideas Compiled Research and Drafting January 2014 Planning Commission Worksession Review.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
Annexations as a Means to Preserve Open Space October 29, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 11, 2011.
February 20, 2007 Macon County Planning Board. Structure Height Ordinance Allows construction to 4 stories or 48 feet, whichever is greater Measured from.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 9, 2009.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 23, 2009.
Shore Protection Act (O.C.G.A , et seq.) Karl BurgessApril 5, 2011 Photo of Choice.
Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon Rural Settlement Commercial Design Overlay District February 24, 2009 Board of County Commissioners Lake Avalon.
Goleta Against Drilling (GAD-NO): A group of concerned citizens in Goleta working to protect the environment from the adverse effects of the Southern California.
Coastal Coalition of Family Farmers California Coastal Commission Long Beach, CA March 12, 2014 Presentation made by Schmitz & Associates 5234 Chesebro.
Hohnloser De novo review of proposed boundary line adjustment at and South Highway One, Gualala, Mendocino County (APN ) Item F12a.
Santa Barbara County LCP Amendment 1-09-A and –B Land Use and Development Code (LUDC) & Rezone Th17 b & c.
City of Grover Beach, San Luis Obispo County 1 Grover Beach.
Redevelopment in the Resort Housing District To the Sanibel- Captiva Chamber of Commerce Nov. 29, 2011 Prepared by: Planning Department.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Public Participation Meeting June 15, 2016 Surplus Farm Dwelling Severances.
TREE ORDINANCE WORKSHOP DISCUSSION September 3, 2014.
Animal Care Facilities
OPEN SPACE/ CONSERVATION
Marin County Local Coastal Program Amendment
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Housing Production Plan: Meeting Local Needs
Butte County Board of Supervisors
Large scale development groundwater balance
Site Plan Control By-law
8/23/2016 Luis N. Serna, AICP David, Healey, FAICP
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
2017 Zoning Update New Sewickley Township.
Parks and Recreation Commission
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
Hurst New Blufftop Home Appeal Substantial Issue
Continuing Authorities Program
Meardon New Blufftop Home Appeal Substantial Issue
2016 Development Regulations Update
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Regulation Amendment AM April 3, 2018.
Butte County Board of Supervisors July 24, 2018
Planning Commission Meeting: August 3, 2016
Agri-Nature Entrepreneurship
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Board of County Commissioners
Presentation transcript:

LCP-2-MAR-13-0224-1 Part A Marin County Land Use Plan Update California Coastal Commission May 2014

Overview of Presentation County’s local process Introduction to Marin’s coastal zone Discussion of LUP submittal Existing LUP Proposed LUP Suggested modifications for Coastal Act consistency

Local Update Process Marin LCP approved 1982 Current LCP update Three parts: Unit 1 (southern Marin) LUP, Unit 2 (northern Marin) LUP, Implementation Plan Current LCP update Planning Commission: 19 public workshops and 9 public hearings between 2009-2012 Board of Supervisors: 7 public hearings County approval of updated LCP: July 2013

Marin County Coastal Zone 106 miles of coastline 128 square miles (82,168 acres) 53 square miles (33,913 acres) federal land 75 square miles (48,255 acres) County LCP jurisdiction 48 square miles (30,781 acres) Coastal Agricultural Production Zone 23 square miles (15,000 acres) nine coastal villages Dillon Beach, Tomales, East Shore/Marshall, Inverness, Point Reyes Station, Olema, Bolinas, Stinson Beach, Muir Beach

LUP Submittal: Agriculture

LUP Submittal: Agriculture Existing LUP Principally Permitted Land Uses: Agriculture (uses of land to grow and/or produce agricultural commodities for commercial purposes) One single-family dwelling Agricultural accessory structures (including barns, fences, stables, utility facilities) Bed and breakfast facilities of three or fewer guest rooms Conditional Land Uses Farm worker housing Agricultural processing and sales facilities

LUP Submittal: Agriculture Existing LUP Development standards: 60 acre density for dwellings; 1 dwelling per parcel All development subject to approval of a master plan including consistency with following requirements/findings: Development would protect and enhance continued agricultural use and contribute to agricultural viability; All development, including all land converted from agricultural use, such as roads and residences, shall be clustered on no more than 5% of the gross acreage, to the extent feasible; Permanent conservation easements over that portion of the property not used for physical development are required, with only agricultural uses allowed. Master plan requirement can be waived – County indicates it has consistently waived master plan.

LUP Submittal: Agriculture Proposed LUP Principally Permitted Land Uses: Agriculture Uses of land for livestock Production of food and fiber Raising of bees, fish, poultry, fowl Planting/producing agriculture, aquaculture, horticulture, viticulture, vermiculture, forestry, plant nurseries Similar uses Accessory structures or uses One farmhouse, one intergenerational home, agricultural worker housing, limited product processing and sales, educational tours, homestay facilities, barns, fences, stables, corrals, coops Conditional Land Uses Additional agricultural uses Non-agricultural uses including single-family residences

LUP Submittal: Agriculture Proposed LUP Development standards: Intergenerational Homes: New land use allowed for farm owner’s or operator’s immediate family Cannot be divided from agricultural lot Up to two homes allowed, in addition to a farmhouse, subject to 60 acres required for each allowed farmhouse and each intergenerational home 7,000 square foot aggregate size cap for all allowed farmhouses and intergenerational homes

LUP Submittal: Agriculture Suggested Modifications Farmhouse and Intergenerational home=Agricultural Dwelling Unit Must be owned by owner or operator who is actively and directly engaged in agricultural use of the property No more than 7,000 square feet aggregate agricultural dwelling unit size regardless of number of legal lots 27-unit intergenerational home cap throughout coastal zone

LUP Submittal: Agriculture C-AG-5 Agricultural Dwelling Units (Farmhouses, Intergenerational Housing, and Agricultural Worker Housing). Support the preservation of family farms by facilitating multi-generational operation and succession. Agricultural dwelling units may be permitted on C-APZ lands subject to the policies below, as well as any applicable requirement in C-AG-6, 7, 8, and 9, and all other applicable requirements in the LCP. Agricultural dwelling units must be owned by a farmer or operator actively and directly engaged in agricultural use of the property. No more than a combined total of 7,000 sq ft may be used as an agricultural dwelling by the farm owner or operator, whether in a single farmhouse or in a combination of a farmhouse and intergenerational homes(s). Only a single farmhouse or a combination of a farmhouse and intergenerational home(s) with the combined total of 7,000 square feet may be allowed for each farm owner or operator actively and directly engaged in agriculture, regardless of the number of legal lots each farm owner or operator owns. In addition to the farmhouse, up to two additional dwelling units per legal lot may be permitted in the C-APZ designation for members of the farm operator’s or owner’s immediate family. Such iIntergenerational family farm homes may only be occupied by persons authorized by the farm owner or operator, shall not be subdivided from the rest of the primary agricultural legal lot, and shall be consistent with the standards of LCP Policy C-AG-7and the building size limitations of Policy C-AG-9. Such intergenerational homes shall not be subject to the requirement for an Agricultural Production and Stewardship Plan (C-AG-8), or permanent agricultural conservation easement (C-AG-7), nor shall occupants be required to be actively and directly engaged in the agricultural use of the land. An equivalent density of 60 acres per unit shall be required for each home farmhouse and intergenerational house (i.e. at least 60 acres for a farmhouse, 120 acres for a farmhouse and an intergenerational house, and 180 acres required for a farmhouse and two intergenerational homes), including any existing homes. The reviewing authority shall consider all contiguous properties under the same ownership to achieve the requirements of the LCP. No Use Permit shall be required for the first intergenerational home on a qualifying lot, but a Use Permit shall be required for a second intergenerational home. No more than 27 intergenerational homes may be allowed in the County’s coastal zone. Agricultural worker housing providing accommodations consisting of no more than 36 beds in group living quarters per legal parcel or 12 units or spaces per legal parcel for agricultural workers and their households shall not be included in the calculation of density in the following zoning districts: C-ARP, C-APZ, C-RA, and C-OA. Additional agricultural worker housing above 36 beds or 12 units shall be subject to the density requirements applicable to the zoning district. An application for agricultural worker housing above 36 beds or 12 units shall include a worker housing needs assessment and plan, including evaluation of other available worker housing in the area. The amount of approved worker housing shall be commensurate with the demonstrated need. Approval of agricultural worker housing shall require recording a restrictive covenant running with the land for the benefit of the County ensuring that the agricultural worker housing will continuously be maintained as such, or, if no longer needed, for non-dwelling agricultural production related uses.

LUP Submittal: Agriculture C-AG-2… In the C-APZ zone, the principal permitted use shall be agriculture, limited to the following as follows: 1) Agricultural Production: 1.Uses of land for the breeding, raising, pasturing, and grazing of livestock; 2. The production of food and fiber; 3. The breeding and raising of bees, fish, poultry, and other fowl; 4. The planting, raising, harvesting and producing of agriculture, aquaculture, mariculture, horticulture, viticulture, vermiculture, forestry crops, and plant nurseries.; 5. Substantially similar uses of an equivalent nature and intensity; and 6. 2) Agricultural Accessory sStructures; 3) Agricultural Accessory Activities; or uses 4) One farmhouse or a combination of one farmhouse and one intergenerational home per legal lot, consistent with C-AG-5, including combined total size limits; 5) Agricultural worker housing, providing accommodations consisting of no more than 36 beds in group living quarters per legal parcel or 12 units or spaces per legal lot for agricultural workers and their households; 6) Other Agricultural Uses, if appurtenant and necessary to the operation of agricultureal uses, limited to: including one farmhouse per legal lot, one intergenerational home, agricultural worker housing, limited agricultural product sales and processing, educational tours, agricultural homestay facilities with three or fewer guest rooms, barns, fences, stables, corrals, coops and pens, and utility facilities (not including wind energy conversion systems and wind testing facilities). Agricultural product sales and processing of products grown on-site, provided that for sales, the building(s) or structure(s), or outdoor areas used for sales do not exceed an aggregate floor area of 500 square feet, and for processing, the building(s) or structure(s) used for processing activities do not exceed an aggregate floor area of 5,000 square feet; Not-for-profit educational tours.

LUP Submittal: Agriculture Proposed LUP Development standards: Existing LCP: Parcel: “All contiguous assessor’s parcels under common ownership” (Unit 2 Agriculture Policy 6b) 22.57.032(d) of the certified IP defines parcel as “all contiguous assessor’s parcels under common ownership unless legally divided” Existing LUP unit of measurement is thus the legal lot Proposed LUP: One farmhouse or combination of farmhouse/intergenerational home per legal lot and limited to aggregate of 7,000 square foot building size cap regardless of number of legal lots Proposed LUP unit of measurement is thus the legal lot

LUP Submittal: Coastal Hazards

LUP Submittal: Coastal Hazards Existing LUP Development in mapped hazardous areas shall be required to demonstrate: The area of construction is stable Will not create a hazard or diminish stability of the area Will not require the construction of protective devices Blufftop development: Set back to ensure protection from bluff retreat for 50 year economic life expectancy Shoreline development: Sited and designed so that no shoreline protective device is required for 50 year economic life

LUP Submittal: Coastal Hazards Existing LUP Shoreline Protective Device Standards: The structure is required to serve a coastal-dependent use, existing development, or public beaches No other non-structural alternative is practical or preferable The condition is site-specific and not attributable to a general erosion trend Design Standards for Shoreline Protective Devices: Make is as visually unobtrusive as possible Respect natural landforms Minimize impairment and movement of sand supply Proposed LUP Generally maintains and strengthens LUP standards (increases economic life to 100 years, prohibits bluff face development, addresses FEMA, SLR vulnerability assessment, etc.)

LUP Submittal: Coastal Hazards Suggested Modifications: Remove 100 year economic definition Insert ‘coastal redevelopment’ definition and policy Tie authorization of shoreline protective device with the structure it is protecting Require mitigation in 20 year increments Meet applicable visual/character requirements Avoid brush clearance

LUP Submittal: Biological Resources

LUP Submittal: Biological Resources Proposed LUP: ESHA Designation Allowed uses: Wetlands: 30233 uses (commercial fishing facilities, incidental public service purposes, aquaculture); agricultural uses if used for such activities prior to 4/1/1981 Wetland buffer: 100 feet, may be reduced Streams: 30236 uses (necessary water supply projects, flood control projects, fish and wildlife habitat projects) Stream buffer: 100 feet, may be reduced Terrestrial: 30240 uses (resource-dependent) ESHA buffer: 50 feet, may be reduced

LUP Submittal: Biological Resources Proposed LUP: Suggested Modifications Minimum buffer of 25 feet for terrestrial ESHA Consistent with Coastal Act Section 30240(b)

LUP Submittal: Visual Resources and Community Character

LUP Submittal: Visual Resources and Community Character Proposed LUP: Suggested Modifications Definition of significant views (“…to and along the ocean and scenic coastal areas”) Height limit exceptions for some land uses 30250(a)’s land division requirements 30610(g)’s coastal permit exemption for only destroyed structures

LUP Submittal: Public Recreational Access and Visitor Serving Uses

LUP Submittal: Public Recreational Access and Visitor Serving Uses Proposed LUP: Suggested Modifications Reductions in public parking must mitigate for potential loss of public coastal access Residential development in commercial mixed-use zones must enhance established commercial character

LUP Submittal: Public Services

LUP Submittal: Public Services Proposed LUP: Suggested Modifications Reservation of public service capacity for all Coastal Act priority uses Coordinate with Caltrans, National Park Service and other appropriate entities in refining and implementing State Route 1 Repair Guidelines Within Marin County

LUP Submittal: Appendices and Maps Proposed LUP: Suggested Modifications “The Coastal Zone Boundary depicted on this map is shown for illustrative purposes only and does not define the Coastal Zone. The delineation is representational, may be revised at any time in the future, is not binding on the Coastal Commission, and may not eliminate the need for a formal boundary determination made by the Coastal Commission.”

LUP Submittal: Appendices and Maps Commission- certified permit and appeal jurisdiction maps Proposed Map 28

Conclusion Commission and County staff, as well as stakeholders and the public, have worked closely throughout the update process Staff believes that the Land Use Plan, as modified, is in conformity with the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act